Diversity Demands Sensitivity. Open Borders mean Shut Mouths. Globalism says Identity has value only as Minority.

Immigration-Invasion by other races is like guests arriving but never leaving your house. It’s like kids of other families coming over to play but never leaving and, if anything, demanding to be clothed and fed.

Diversity is like always having strangers in and about your house.
Diversity demands Sensitivity, which means you can’t say or express anything that might ‘offend’ strangers and invaders who won’t leave.
Just like you can’t relax in your home with strangers around, you can’t be open and free in your nation with Diversity.

Open Borders mean Shut Mouths. Diversity demands Sensitivity, and a Culture of Sensitivity means Censorship of Real Feelings and Closing of Honest Minds.
Your nation, in which you once could express yourself freely, has become a place where you have to look over your shoulders and watch what you say, and for what and why? To serve Diversity and facilitate takeover by foreigners as ‘new nationals’.

That is globalism and current state of the world.

This is why Jews spread homomania all over. The Spread of homomania means every nation must be Sensitive to the elite-minority vanity of homos. It means the silencing of the great normal sane decent majority to appease and flatter a deviant minority. Once this mentality takes root in a nation, its mind-infected populace is more likely to surrender to foreign invasion and appease the nasty sensitivities of minorities-as-new-nationals.

Under the law of globalism, you have more pride, rights, dignity, and honor as a minority than as a majority. So, if you’re a Japanese in Japan, you suck. But if you’re a Japanese minority in Australia or the US, you are special and to be 'celebrated'. If you’re a Hindu in India, you ain't nothing special. But if you’re a Hindu in Canada, you are such a darling. If you’re a Muslim in the Muslim world, you and your kind deserve to be bombed back to the stone age by globalism’s Wars for Israel. But if you’re a Muslim minority in the West, you are the most wonderful kind of person who must be shielded from 'Islamophobia'.

Globalism says “You suck in your own homeland where you are the majority, and your ethnic pride in your nation is ‘far right’ and evil’”… however, “If you leave your homeland and become a minority in another country, you are so wonderful and your ethnic identity, along with homomania(which attaches itself to everything like germs) must be celebrated.”

So, in your own nation where your ethnicity and culture have the best chance of survival, such have no honor & value and must bow down to the foreign ethnic groups and cultures of the world.

But in foreign nations where your ethnicity and culture have very low chance of survival, such have great value and honor(especially as tools of globalists to undermine the majority ethnicity and culture of that nation).

What a wacky set of rules. But that’s how globalism works.
It's like saying rabbits have no value on land and should only be prized underwater(where they will drown and disappear).
It's like saying fish have no value in water and should only be prized on land(where they will die). Yeah, by the butchers of globalism who would turn all of us into fusion sushi.

Globalist Rule: Your identity is evil and ugly where your the majority, but it's noble and beautiful where you're a minority.
So, in your nation where your kind is the majority, you must invite more diversity to make your identity less-majoritarian-dominant, therefore less 'evil'.
And if you want to be praised and admired for your identity, you must move to another nation and make a big fuss about your new minority status. But as a minority, what chance does your kind have of retaining ethnic identity for long?

Now, what is to be the common bond among all peoples in the end where all cultures are diluted and degraded by globalism?
Homomania. By praising homos-as-elite-minorities above all, the entire world will be pro-elite-minoritarian, and that is wonderful for Jews, the most powerful elite-minority in the world. Worshiping homos is gateway to worshiping Jews as homos are elite-minority-proxies of Jews as elite-minority-masters of the world.

A People without Patriotism is like Organisms without Defensive Mechanisms. Globalism is Secular Rapture.

All organisms have defensive mechanism.

Organisms can only survive by assessing threat and acting upon them. As humans are organisms, they are no different. In order for race-culture to survive on a territory, it must defend and preserve itself from outsiders and invaders. While it's true that every nation has history of invasions and incursions, they only became stable civilizations when there was sufficient political, military, and legal power to protect the nation from further invasions. Without such security and stability, national order isn't possible. This is why stuff like 'UK is a nation of immigrants' is retarded. UK was constantly invaded BEFORE it was a nation. The invaders came at will on warships and laid waste to native populations. (Also, the invaders of the past were fellow white Europeans, so they could eventually meld with the existing populations.) Once Britain gained security, order, and power, it defended itself from further foreign invasions. If foreigners did arrive(and settle), it was with the permission of the state in consideration of national interest.
A nation that cannot stop or control the inflow of outsiders is the victim of military imperialism, demographic imperialism, and/or financial-ideological imperialism(that colonizes native souls with the mental virus that 'diversity' is good when it spells doom for native identity and culture).

Look at nature. All animals must sense and assess degrees of threat level. When humans encroach on wolf territory, the wolves growl. Hippos don't like Negroes coming closer with spears. Bears fight other bears to maintain territory for food, mating, and security. Birds guard their nest and attack threatening species. Without such defensive mechanisms, no complex organism could survive. Bees don't just allow any bunch of organisms to come and eat the honey. Bees work like crazy to collect the honey to feed their own community. (Some say modern societies cannot produce enough life and that's why they need immigration to get new workers. But if modern societies have given up on life, it means they are soul-sick and culturally misguided, and THAT DISEASE should be diagnosed and treated. If someone won't eat, don't give his food to another person. Convince him to eat again.)

Globalism has infected Western minds with the notion that their natural defensive mechanism is 'evil', 'racist', and 'xenophobic'. It dilutes hormonal instincts and weakens carnivorous instincts, turning whites into human herbivores. Brits have been turned from lions(without a powerful pride of territory) to rabbits(who just wander around aimlessly in their own nation without claiming it).

Globalism is like quasi-spiritual cult of rapture. It’s the Promise of Deliverance, a hopeful ecstasy of departing from the ‘sinful’ nationalist flesh and becoming one with the transcendent globalist spirit. It's secular cult of being 'saved'.
Since all histories are associated with cultures/nations and since all cultures/nations are stained ‘sinful’ deeds, globalism offers deliverance from 'tribal' sins via collective union o all peoples in Glob Heaven. This rapture is experienced through PC kumbayah and Pop Culture orgiastics. Take leave of roots, senses, and obligations. Just scream, feel orgasmic, and let one’s soul lift from national earth to globo-heaven.

So, even though UK is being remade by massive invasion, Brits have no defensive mechanism left. If Brits still have any aggressive drives left, it is against their own will for self-preservation. (Jewish ideological control infected British minds with the sanctimonious notion that white Britons must serve the interests of the holy Jewish minority before their own. This elevation of minority-as-sacred-group led to white Britons placing every non-white minority above whites on the national pedestal. In time, white Britons even came to worship homos. That this is a globalist-imperialist phenomenon is made clear by what is happening in Ireland. Even though the Irish have defined their own narrative against Great Britain, its current national agenda is identical to that of the British because both nations are under globalist Sorosian control. Both nations worship non-white minorities and homos above native whites and real-sexuals who are to be attacked and denounced if they resist massive immigration-invasion and homomania. This is why Ireland has a Hindu-Homo prime minister and why London has a Pakistani-Muslim mayor. The two peoples who never agreed on much are now totally agreed on national self-destruction and white self-loathing as the highest virtue. Other than the ideological infection of Jewish-controlled globalism, there is the factor of Afromania and Jungle Fever that have whites all over the world worshiping Negroes as MLK-Mandela Magic Negro race and 'cool-badass' race whom whites must admire, praise, and emulate 24/7.)

It used to be Brits were most aggressive against would-be invaders, such as Spanish or Germans. Now, they are most aggressive against would-be-patriots-and-defenders. Brits get most passionate about attacking and destroying patriots and offering UK to the Sorosian god of globalism. UK is no longer seen as a nation among nations but a part of a globo-rapture-empire of Jew-worship, homomania, Afromania, and Diversity. UK must serve that higher god by surrendering national identity, borders, and sovereignty. UK is now to the world what Puerto Rico is to the US.
And the elites of UK, instead of standing up for national defense and preservation, lead the nation in surrendering to globalism and mammon. Also, elites have used the media and academia to infect the younger generation with the idea that UK has always been a 'nation of immigrants', a defenseless domain that welcomes invasions than fends them off.

What UK really needs is AUSTERITY AGAINST DIVERSITY, 'diversity' being just euphemism for invasion.

Now, some organisms are compatible. Even in the wild, lions coexist with gophers, turtles, vultures, and etc. The biggest threat to lions are other lions.
Likewise, people of any nation can co-exist with birds, squirrels, pond turtles, seagulls, chipmunks, rabbits, raccoon, opossums, and etc. People need to fear other peoples the most, just like lions need to fear other prides of lions the most. White Australians have nothing to fear from kangaroos, koala bears, or wombats. Not even from crocodiles as long as one doesn't get too near them and prod them with sticks. They have far more to fear from massive immigration of Asians, Arabs, and Africans.

Different groups of humans have competing identities, interests, narratives, and appetites.
Palestinians weren't done in by pigeons, fish, or jackals. They were done in by other humans: the British imperialists, Zionists, Soviets, and Americans.
Tibetans and Uighurs are not being done in by sheep, eagles, toads, or snakes. They are being done in by other humans, the Han Chinese. The biggest threat to any organism is, more often than not, others of its own kind. Because they have similar objectives, they compete and fight for the same thing. It's like a man who wants a certain woman need not compete with male pigs, wolves, moose, hippos, wombats, and etc for her. Those other species are not interested in the woman. He must compete with other men. A horse, bison, bear, hamster, python, or cougar will not take a white woman from a white man. It is the Negro who will.

Nation is the same way. To own it, a people must compete with other peoples. Lose the defensive mechanism(under whatever fancy pants 'progressive' idealism), and it's only a matter of time before you lose your nation, narrative, and culture.

Universalism is not about adherence to Universal Principles but about the Power to Force an Agenda Universally

Universalism as a political tool is not about peoples around the world agreeing to what constitutes universal values but about the preeminent power imposing its ideas and interests as 'universals' on all other peoples.

This was true of religion.
Catholics were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned Catholic.
Muslims were universal in the sense that the whole would should be turned Islamic.
It was about Universal Imposition or Universal Coercion than Universal Consensus.

This was also true of ideology.
Communists were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned communist.

Today, Globalism is a Universal Imposition(the new inquisition) that pressures the entire world to conform to the favored ideas and interests of the Rulers of the US. Since Jews are the ruling elites, Homos are their main proxies & agents, and blacks are sacro-negroes by PC narrative & Pop Culture, the dominant form of Universalism is about Holocaust Worship, Homomania, and Afromania.
After all, if the globalist-universalism is really about 'anti-racist egalitarianism', it should be just as sensitive to the interests of Palestinians as to those of Zionists. But it isn't so. All those politicians in Congress say they support 'universal values', but they totally ignore the tragic history and plight Palestinians caused by Jewish influence on US politics. At the UN, when Iran raised the question of why Palestinians were punished for the crimes of Europeans during WWII, the European delegation all walked out despite their professed commitment to universalism.

So, univeralism as political phenomenon isn't about what the world sincerely, rationally, and morally agrees upon as the shared values that transcend all cultures. It is not about all nations, great and small, submitting to the same principles but really about the Great Power forcing its agenda and biases on the universal scale on all other nations. Using the analogy of nature, it's not about all species of animals agreeing on shared animal-hood but about one dominant species pressuring all other species to 'universally' bow down before it.

Take 'gay rights'. This is promoted as 'universal values'. But who said so? Now, if 'gay rights' means that all peoples should acknowledge, based on scientific evidence, that some people are born homosexual, that it's not homosexuals' fault that they are homo, and that homosexuals should be allowed to pursue professions based on ability, that is a workable and sound principle. It is factual, rational, and humane; it can be held up as a universal principle in the name of reason, tolerance, and meritocracy(as some homos are skilled and talented.)
But what currently goes by the name of 'gay rights' in the West is homomania, a mindless worship of homosexuality as something holy and the cult of homo narcissism & vanity as next to godliness. It is sick, perverse, and degenerate. So, it's not about 'gay rights' but 'gay worship'. It is a fruit-sade, the new crusade. Homomania says even churches should be converted to homo-worship. Sacred texts should be re-written or reinterpreted to spread the 'gayspel' that God, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammad would have been for something like 'gay marriage'.

'Progressives' deride the Inquisition of Old, but they aren't averse to using their vast globalist power to push the Imposition of their sick agenda on all the world. It is often done through bribery of foreign regimes(candies and prizes if they put on 'gay pride' parades), spread of decadent Pop Culture as narcotic & opiate, and promotion of PC that suppresses free speech ironically in the name of 'liberal values'. PC limits the range of inquiry, constricts the Narrative spectrum, and insists on a loaded terminology as dishonest as loaded dice. A term like 'homophobia' favors homomaniac since it implies that those who oppose the homo agenda are clinically sick in the head. And 'racism', as currently defined, is a loaded term since it presumes that anyone who believes in the reality of races is also a racial supremacist.

Anyway, universalism as political force is more about the power to impose one's agenda universally than about the adherence to universal principles applying equally to all nations and cultures.

Why do Jews hate Gentile Nationalism? Same reason a man with a sword hates your sword.

Even though Jews love Israel and Jewish nationalism(aka Zionism), Jewish power really resides in gentile nations, especially the US and nations of EU. Since the survival and viability of Israel depend to a large extent on the support of Western nations, Jews feel they must ensure the loyalty of gentile nations to the Jews and Israel. In other words, white gentiles must favor Jews over themselves.

So, when Jews say nationalism is a bad thing, what they really mean is that the rise of gentile nationalism poses a challenge to Jewish nationalism. If nationalism means one's preference of one's own people over others, it means gentile nationalism will lead to gentiles favoring themselves over Jews. And that may pose a threat to Jewish nationalism and supremacism. China is nationalist and favors Chinese interests over any other. Iran is nationalist and favors Iranian interests over any other. Even though China and Iran may not be overly anti-Jewish, they will not place Jewish interests above their own. So, Jews cannot control those nations to serve the Jews. But Jews have persuaded white gentiles that nationalism --- at least in white nations --- is evil, a kind of 'Nazism'. (In truth, it was Polish nationalism, French nationalism, Russian nationalism, Chinese nationalism, and American nationalism that rolled back the tide of Axis Imperialism.) White gentiles, baited with Holocaust Guilt and in awe of Jewish power in media & finance, have become mentally colonized or psycolonized by Jews.
However, when Jews demean nationalism, it is not ALL nationalisms. Paradoxically, Jews attack white gentile nationalism to shore up and boost their own nationalism. Jews don't say ALL peoples, Jews included, must abandon nationalism. If anything, Jews justify their own nationalism among themselves on the basis that gentiles are innately evil and wicked. 

At any rate, Jewish fear of gentile nationalism is rational. If nationalism means the favoring of one's own people to others, then every gentile nationalism will favor the gentile majority to the Jewish minority. This doesn't necessarily mean 'antisemitism' or anti-Jewish discrimination. After all, Russia allows all sorts of freedoms and opportunities to Jews to get rich and pursue happiness & success. But gentile nationalism does mean Jews are not allowed to gain supremacist power in gentile nations, and this denial is no longer tolerable to Western Jews who now feel entitled to supremacist control over goyim. Jews no longer struggle for equality or fairness. They are addicted to maintaining their supremacist control over gentiles, especially whites. They want whites to spiritually worship Jews, financially serve Jews, culturally follow Jews, sexually surrender to Jews, etc. Jews accuse white gentile nationalists of being 'Nazi', but if 'Nazism' is a form of supremacism, then no people are as Nazi-like as the Jews are in today's world. Ironically, Jews fear gentile nationalism because gentiles will act like Jews: Favor their own kind over others. Since gentiles greatly outnumber Jews in gentile nations, this can be a real challenge to Jewish power and supremacism if gentiles were to have their own kind of gentile 'zionism'. 

Nationalism is a political weapon. It is a shield with which to defend one's own people from others. It is a sword with which to fight the enemies. A swordsman uses his own sword & shield in his fight against other swordsmen with their swords & shields. In battle, a swordsman wields his weapon to disarm his opponents of their weapons. A swordsman prizes his own sword & shield but fears, even loathes, the swords & shields of his rivals. So, it is only logical that Jews, in love with their own tribalist sword & shield, seek to destroy the swords & shields of gentiles. Jews want to be the only ones with the sword & shield of nationalism lording over all others who kneel before the Jewish king and kiss his one and only true sword. 

If we recognize nationalism as a powerful weapon, we can understand why Jews would fear the gentile nationalism of other peoples. If Jews had a nice big nation of their own, they might be content with what they have and tolerate other peoples' ownership of their own nations. But Jews are a majority in only one nation, the tiny state of Israel. So, unlike Russians, Chinese, Indians, or Iranians, Jewish power isn't much if located only in Israel. Jews must derive their power and wealth from gentile nations in which they are minorities, and therefore, Jews are keen on suppressing the nationalism of gentile peoples who've come under their thumb. Also, no people are as ambitious and arrogant as the Jews. If most peoples are content with control over their own nations and respect other peoples' control over theirs, Jews like George Soros feel this insatiable desire to remake the entire world in their radical image. Jews are tireless like rats in gnawing away at the national defenses of other peoples. Jews bitch about anti-Jewish hatred or 'antisemitism', but they ignore the fact that anti-Jewish hatred has often been defensive against Jewish aggression that gnaws itself into every region on earth to subvert and undermine gentile identity and interests. Even when Jews gain mastery over other peoples, they don't stand tall and upright as the new masters --- which would at least be honest and honorable --- but shrug their shoulders and underplay the Jewish nature of their agenda to fool the goyim. They want to be invisible masters, and this is why they rely so heavily on shabbos goyim to serve as Fronts. 

From a purely strategic viewpoint, Jewish hostility to gentile nationalism makes total sense. If Jews want to ensure that gentiles in US and EU will primarily serve Jewish interests, Jewish nationalism, and Jewish supremacism(or Jewish 'Nazism'), then gentiles must be persuaded and/or pressured to forgo their own ethno-nationalist identities and interests that, if left to grow of their own accord, could turn into obstacles to gentile subservience to Jewish identity and interests. 

History has proven time and again that the MOST POTENT force against imperialism has been nationalism. All anti-imperialist struggles were nationalist. Without the rise of nationalist consciousness, the subject peoples failed to unite to fight to overthrow the foreign rulers. It was with the spread of nationalist consciousness that the peoples of world began to regain independence and drive out the imperialists in places like Algeria, Cuba, and Vietnam. Creation of America has been portrayed as a birth of liberty, but it was more the birth of new nationalism against the overweening imperialism of the British. So, even imperialism births nationalism among the colonizers who rebel against it.

It was the rise of nationalism that finally brought an end to European imperialist domination. In some cases, the Third World nationalism was organic. For example, there really was a Vietnamese civilization going back over  a thousands years. In other cases, the nationalism was newly constructed, as in Indonesia and even India, places that gained a sense of common destiny under the imperialism. The narrative of shared tragedy under imperialism forged a political bond. Rise of nationalism made imperialism no longer viable in the Third World. 

Today, it is the West that is under imperialist rule. It is called globalism, and it is essentially Worldwide Jewish Imperialism. All whites are under the globalist imperialist domination of Jewish supremacists. Globalism spares only one nationalism, that of Zionists. Israel gets Passover treatment while all other nationalisms are eventually to be extinguished by Jewish-globalist power. Because gentile nationalism seeks to shutter the window against this poison gas of the Jews --- Zio-Klon G -- , Jews want to shatter the glass of every gentile window so that the globo-gas will enter every nation(but Israel) and destroy national identity and pride. 

Nationalism has a populist element in obligating the elites of a nation to represent, serve, and defend the people of the nation. According to nationalism, Hungarian elites should represent, serve, and defend Hungarian identity and interests. Japanese elites should represent, serve, and defend Japanese identity and interests. German elites should represent, serve, and defend German identity and interests. This is precisely what Jews fear. Jews want the best-and-the-brightest among the gentiles to serve Jewish identity and interests. Jews want gentile elites to collaborate with Jewish globalist imperialists than to represent and serve their own peoples. It's like the British imperialists wanted Indian elites to collaborate with the British than represent the aspirations of the Indian masses. And French imperialists wanted Vietnamese elites to collaborate with the French than fight for Vietnamese independence.
Now that Jews rule the West, Jews want Western gentile elites to serve their Jewish masters than lead and guide their own peoples. (But then, even the white gentile masses have been turned onto rejecting their own identity/interests and to serving Jewish globalism under the barrage of 'white guilt' indoctrination, 'jungle fever' in sports & rap, decadent faddishness of homomania, and the Cult of Diversity. So many white people have been reduced to virtue-signaling idiots who think themselves righteous because they champion their own demographic demise via mass immigration, race-mixing, and degenerate behavior.) 

When Jews say white gentiles must forgo their national identity and interests, they don't mean it applies to Jews as well. They mean whites must put down their swords & shields to submit to the sword & shield of the Jew. If ten people have guns and if the Jewish guy happens to be anti-gun, it doesn't mean everyone INCLUDING THE JEW should surrender his gun. It means everyone EXCEPT THE JEW should give up his gun. That way, the Jew is the ONLY ONE with the gun, and he has the power over the others.

Indeed, Jewish attitude on gun rights is no different from their attitude on nationalism: It is For-Jews-Only. 

Why do Jews want to take away gun rights in America? Jews have no problem with every Jewish family owning automatic rifles in Israel because Jews are the majority there. Gun ownership in Israel means Jewish power over Arabs. But in the US, Jews are only 2% of the population; therefore, a well-armed nation means many more gentiles with guns than Jews with guns. But then, Jews control the government and elite institutions that control the military and the police. So, if only the government has the power of firearms, it means ONLY JEWS have the power of firearms since nearly all politicians are owned by Jews and nearly all of the judiciary is under Jewish control. 

Whether it's guns or nationalism, Jews want to monopolize it all. Know your Jew. 

Is it part of the American DNA to dominate, transform, and convert the entire world with missionary zeal?

Is it part of the American DNA to dominate, transform, and convert the entire world with missionary zeal?

The Founding Fathers warned against US involvement in overseas affairs. To be sure, Americans were too occupied with settling a vast wilderness to dream of overseas empire.

Still, the political philosophy of America was not about an ‘exceptional’ right to go all over the world and flex its muscles.

In many ways, American political philosophy was ‘isolationist’, not least because US is so vast. It is like a world unto itself. Even without the rest of the world, Americans have a huge world of their own to themselves.

Americans were not keen on getting involved in WWI. And after the war, America drastically cut military spending and downsized the military: One of the reasons why Japan thought it could take on America. And the great majority of Americans didn’t want to get involved in WWII. It was only Japanese attack that roused Americans for entry.

And Americans were confused about Asian policy. Should America save China after WWII? Or just let it fall to communists? Should US involve itself in Korea? Or just move out? Initially, US decided to leave Korea and let the North have the South. But then, it changed its mind.

Also, the Cold War was mostly defensive. While US did prop up allies around the world, it was not the case that Americanism was aggressively knocking on every door. Maybe with Coca Cola and Pop Culture. But politically, US lived in fear of spread of communism, not least because so many Third World nations had been former colonies of Europeans and took inspiration from Soviets, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, and later Castro and Che.

While not all national liberation struggles were communist, many looked to Soviets for inspiration or support. Some turned to China. If Africa and Asia had been European colonies, things were trickier in Latin America, a US backyard along the Monroe Doctrine. Yet, Latin America was a most strange case because it had double layer of Western imperialism: Latin Imperialism over natives and mestizos(and blacks in some parts), and Gringo Imperialism over Latin imperialism over natives and mestizos. This meant native/mestizo resentment toward white Latin elites. But it also meant Latin white resentment at the Yanqui or Gringo.

Some Latin whites collaborated with Yanqui who favored right-wing Latin elites over mestizos and natives who might rise up like the colonized in Africa, Asia, and Middle East. But some Latin whites decided to lead the natives and mestizos against both Latin elites and Yanquis. Pinochet or Che.

Because of post-colonial themes, US didn’t fight the Cold War aggressively but defensively. The question was not turning communist nations into capitalist ones but defending as many nations(esp non-white ones) as possible from turning communist or pro-Soviet.

So, even as the Cold War led to huge American expenditures, its theme was not about American Exceptionalism and spreading the American Way to other nations.

In both Korea and Vietnam, US struggled to prop up its client states against determined enemies who sought to unify the nations. And US failed with Bay of Pigs in Cuba and didn’t try again. And US shat bricks about Marxism spreading like wildfire all over Latin America. And US was upset that India, though not communist, was allied with the USSR.

Periods of American ‘exceptionalist’ jingoist-crusade had been rather limited. It only took off with the end of the Cold War.

The first round of US globalist imperialism was when Americans had finished the settling of the American West and looked elsewhere for spoils. And they saw an easy target in the rotting corpse of Spanish Empire. Taking Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Philippines was a cinch since the Spain was the dying man of Europe. As for the Monroe Doctrine that’s been around, it wasn’t about American messianism in Latin America. America more or less accepted Latin America for what it was after it had gained liberation from Spain under Simon Bolivar. America was content merely to have military superiority and some economic stakes. US had no designs to transform it.

Such missionary zeal was aimed really at Hawaii and Philippines. But they were pushovers and small potatoes, though Filipinos put up some resistance that led to bloodbath.

At any rate, near the turn of the century, US wasn’t looking to conquer the world, control the world, and etc. US took it for granted that European powers would rule much of the world: the Brits and French mostly but there were also Germans, Dutch, and others. US would go for easy picking like Hawaii, Philippines, and Cuba. And it would go for accommodation in China which would be cut like a cake among the various big powers, Japan included.

So, the US wasn’t looking for too much. It had reasons to be content because its own nation, along with Alaska, was so huge. What need to control the world when US itself is a world unto itself?

US messianism really came into being AFTER the Cold War. And to understand this, we need to understand the nature of Jewish Political Psychology(along with that of homos).

When US emerged as the top power after WWI, it could have played for supreme power in the world or at least a model beacon to the world. And to be sure, Wilson did try to propose the American Way to the world. But did Wilson really mean it? No. He was really talking about democratizing parts of Europe. He didn’t much care for the non-whites whom he saw as backward and inferior.

Also, the fact that US soon lost interest in Europe and turned inward goes to show that the American DNA was not infected with messianism and ‘exceptionalist’ world domination. If anything, many Americans began to feel that US involvement in WWI was a big mistake. US cut down its military and lost interest in much of the world. It didn’t care what was happening elsewhere. And Americans had to be dragged into WWII via Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

One could say FDR was the first truly globe-shifting American. He wasn’t content to defeat Germany and Japan in WWII but pressured Europeans to let go of their empires after WWII. He didn’t like Churchill’s jokes about the Hindu darkies. But was FDR being idealistic or was he imbued with global ambition in which America would become the new hegemon along with the USSR, for which he had a soft spot.

Did he want Europeans to drop the empire so US could pick them up? Or did he just want non-white peoples to develop their own nations and have good relations with US whose intentions would NOT be imperialist and exploitative? I dunno. At any rate, it appears FDR wasn’t interested in dominating the world or have US be the sole superpower.

And then, the Cold War mostly had US shitting bricks playing a defensive role. The problem wasn’t only containing communism but preventing the alliance of non-communist non-white nations(rich with natural resources and populations) with the USSR, as happened with India and Egypt(before Sadat switched alliances).

Anyway, the kind of ‘exceptionalism’ that became the globo-neo-imperialism really only took hold after the Cold War. And we have to consider the Jewish Factor in this. Indeed, Jews were the great exceptionalists even during the Cold War.

American Policy during the Cold War was to accommodate the non-white peoples(even supporting them against former European colonizers) so that they would lean toward the US than to the USSR. And US could have done this in the Middle East and North Africa. As US had more to offer in terms of aid, all those nations should have leaned to the US than to the USSR. But why did some key Arab nations turn to USSR? Because of Israel. From the viewpoint of foreign policy, US support of Israel made no sense.

Why sacrifice alliance with key major Arab nations by supporting a small state of Israel that was NO strategic importance to the US? It was because Jews had great power in the US and were in the process of turning the Holocaust into a religion that had to be worshiped. The real McCarthyism of American Politics has been the witch-hunt for anyone who is not 100% committed to Israel and Holocaust as religion.

Jewish interests became an exceptionalist factor in America no matter how irrational they were.

American attitude after WWI goes to show that Americans were generally content to operate within the national model. And Americans might have done the same thing after WWII. It was the Cold War that forced Americans to become involved all over the world. Actually, not just the Cold War but the collapse of the European Colonial Order. IF the only two nations left in the world after WWII were US and USSR, US might have just ignored the commie USSR and went about its way. But the fall of the colonial order meant the possibility of the Third World lurching to the commie side. Unless US stepped into the fray of the Cold War, much of Asia, Africa, and Middle East could turn communist. And then the majority mestizos and natives of Latin America might rise too, either led by Latin leaders or by native/mestizos. And of course, US had to defend Western Europe too.

Anyway, when US saw China fall to the communists in no time, it began to shit. Just how did that happen? Maybe FDR invited Soviets cuz he wanted the commies to win. I dunno. Or maybe he underestimated the full implication of his Asian policy. It’s hard to discern what he really wanted cuz he was a devious man yet not without genuine ideals. Whatever the case, US fought the Cold War in the mode of Damage Control and to stop the bleeding, not to spread American domination all over the world. The main theme was “Don’t join the Soviets” than “Be sure to Join us” or "Be just like us."

But one thing for sure, after the Cold War, there really was no reason for US to get overly involved with the world. It could just trade with other nations, and that was it. Communism was dead. Even Latin American guerrillas pretty much gave it up.

North Vietnam may have won the war, but US won the peace, as Asian nations allied with the US made the real achievement in economy, politics, and health.

Russia ended the communist party and was ready to do business. The fall of the Berlin Wall earlier was epic. Soviets were willing to let its former subject nations go. Amazingly, the Russians went further and dismantled even the USSR itself. Russia gave up huge swaths of territory, especially Kazakstan and even Ukraine, culturally so close to Russia. And with no more Soviet support, Third World Marxist insurgencies were totally dead.

So, why didn’t America do what it did after WWI? Just mind its own business?

When WWII ended, the Cold War loomed. But when the Cold War ended, the global war was really over. There was no more need for more mega-conflicts. Francis Fuku was right on this. Even if the American/Western ideology won the great battle of ideas, most Western Europeans and Americans had no desire to transform the world.

But what Fuku failed to understand is that civilizations are not only ideological. They can be ethnological. If patriotic Anglo-Americans had firm control of the US after the Cold War, maybe things might have been different. But the so-called End of History also brought about the End of Anglo rule and rise of Jewish rule. And that changed everything.

When WWI ended, Anglo-Americans and other white Americans could just turn inward and be happy as Americans. They could accept the national model.

But Jews have always been uneasy with the gentile national model. It could mean gentile majority against Jewish minority. So, Jews feel safer playing with the globalist model. It weakens the national identity and loyalty within gentile nations. It turns white elites away from white masses(the coming apart) and makes them identify with the World as ‘global citizens’ and the source of masses of new immigrants. Globalism could undermine gentile unity in every nation. This is why Jews hate Viktor Orban in Hungary and the angry patriotic Poles. And of course, they hate Russian’s neo-nationalism that united Putin and other Russian elites with Russian masses. This has thwarted the Jewish takeover of Russia. Russia is friendly to Jews, but that isn’t enough. Jews feel that unless majority gentile power is totally destroyed, they won’t be safe as supremacist overlords. Jews have strange dreams of naked Trumps and Putins coming after them with Nazi armbands and SS dildos to shove up their arses. (Indeed, American Exceptionalism is as much about the American gentile masses surrendering to the world as the world surrendering to American power. Invite/Invade. And American Values are to be decided by Jews and homos rather than by gentile straights who make up the great majority, whose fate is to be rendered into just another minority by mass immigration. American Exceptionalism is not about the world being transformed by the values/culture of the white Christian majority. It is about both the world and white American Christian majority surrendering to the power of Jews, homos, and gangster rappers. If anything, even as American Exceptionalism imbues Americans with special pride and power, it also fills white Americans with guilt, shame, and inferiority for not working hard enough to transform America faster into a multi-culti state like Brazil. This 'exceptionalism' is as much about White America being demographically conquered by the world as about American Power conquering the world via finance, bombs,and trash culture. American Exceptionalism is a crazy game where white Americans are told that they are winning by losing.)

So, after the Cold War, Jews pushed US into a globalist mode. They cooked up this notion of ‘proposition nation’ and ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation that must involve itself with the rest of the world(usually for the sake of Zionist interests, which is why most of US wars have been in the Middle East and North Africa and other Muslim nations than elsewhere). What has happened to the US as the result of Jewish takeover since the end of the Cold War is sickening. So much of US aggression and justification thereof around the world are fantastic, gratuitous, surreal, ludicrous, and etc. Since Jews cannot say they are steering US policy for their own tribal interest, they cook up all sorts of crazy stuff. Jews especially use homos as their proxy. I mean the idea of a ‘new cold war’ with Russia because homos are not allowed to prance around on Red Square. I mean who would have thought such a day would have been possible during the real Cold War? Even Mad Magazine would have passed it over as loony even for humor.

What is so exasperating about Jews is they mask their supremacism with hysteria about ‘white supremacism’. Take the Jewish hostility against Donald Trump. Trump isn’t anti-Jewish or anti-Israel. He is calling for civic nationalism. Too many Americans haven fallen behind, and American workers need something too after globalists and upper crust have been devouring most of the economic pie. Also, too much money has been spent on overseas wars and too many American soldiers have come back wounded or worse. So, let’s intervene less, let’s have good relations with Russia, and let’s offer something for the American Worker and blacks too(who also must compete with immigrants, though, to be sure, maybe some blacks want immigrants to work, pay taxes, and support the government that supports them).

Trump’s ‘America First’ means America should go into national mode and take care of its own citizens first. There is nothing supremacist about it. Also, Trump’s policies would be better for Muslims and Arabs since fewer US wars will lead to fewer destruction of Arab/Muslim nations.

But Trump is seen as Hitler by so many Jews. Of course, Jews know he is NOT Hitler. So, why are Jews so upset? It’s because Trump’s civic nationalism gets in the way of Jewish Hitlerism or Jewish supremacism. Fewer wars in the Middle East means less chance for Zionists to destroy Arab/Muslim nations for the sake of Israel.

And if Americans go into national mode and try to do things that are good for American people as a whole, there might be more scrutiny into Wall Street and other such institutions. Rich Jews would have to be more mindful of doing things that are good for all Americans instead of just themselves. America that thinks nationally than globally will pay more attention to all the social and political ills IN America, and that means the rulimg elites will be made more accountable.

End of mass immigration(at current levels) means American elites, Jews or otherwise, must be more responsive and accountable to American citizens. In contrast, more immigration means they can renege on such duty. How? They can exploit the immigrant labor willing work like slaves from gratitude of having been allowed entry. Also, as the elites praise the immigrants as the ‘true Americans’, native-born majority Americans will have to take the backseat. If native-born Americans complain, the elites can show off their ‘moral credentials’ as the champions of ‘diversity’ and the ‘huddled masses’, especially against ‘ugly’ nativism and ‘xenophobia’. This way, Jewish supremacism is protected.

Also, globalism means the US keeps finding new enemies around the world. Thus, by directing American rage at Russia or Iran or whatever, dumb Americans pay less far less attention to their real problems at home created by their rotten ruling elites.

America in National Mode means most Americans will pay attention to domestic affairs and call out on elite abuse or corruption. But America in global mode means the elites can divert American attention from domestic abuse and corruption to Evil Foreigners. It is surreal that Jews who accuse patriots of ‘xenophobia’ have no qualms about fanning hatred against certain other nations. So, never mind what the Wikileaks say about the massive amount of domestic corruption and collusion. Just remember that Russia and Putin are behind it, and Trump is their ‘puppet’. Jewish supremacist oligarchs are behind Hillary, and they push globalism to expand Jewish ethnic power, but they hire lunatics like Anne Killer of Forward to bitch and whine about how naked Trump is Hitler whose policy of banning Muslim immigration is Holocaust for Mexicans who apparently make good interfaith daughters for Jewish lesbians.

The world is a dangerous place because of Jewish Dominationism. It is the only Dominationism left standing even though Jews keep projecting it onto other groups, especially Russians and Iranians(though at times at Chinese too).

Dominationism used to define much of the world until the end of WWII, though vestiges lasted until the end of the Cold War.

Several nations, mostly European, once sought domination over the world. They didn’t necessarily want to rule the whole world but they either wanted to be #1 or one of the very great powers. The British were into dominationism, especially after they eclipsed the Spanish in naval domination. The French were full of dominationism, especially under Napoleon who sought to control all of Europe and even invaded Russia.

Dominationism is about more than being dominant in one’s own nation or domain. It is a ambition to gain disproportionate control over a domain much larger than one’s homeland. Romans were dominationist.
Japanese ruling over Japan was not dominationist, but Japanese designs on rest of Asia was dominationist.
In contrast, even though the Chinese practiced middle kingdom arrogance and regional dominance, they weren’t truly dominationist because they were content with control over their core domain.

In contrast, Spain was dominationist and so was Portugal. They tried to become the dominant powers in the world through navigation, trade, and colonization. But Brits and French overtook them, and they too went into dominationist mode. And they fought many wars, often with one another. And then later, Germans caught the same bug. They too wanted to build a huge navy and grab imperial loot. And Russia began to conquer and dominate non-Russian lands in Central Asia and Eastern Europe and even Scandinavia. These contentions led to Napoleonic Wars and finally World War I. And Japan caught the dominantionist bug in Asia, first taking small pieces but then targeting China and Southeast Asia.

No nation that would be a ‘great power’ was content with its own nation and borders. It had to control other territories, other nations, other kingdoms, other regions, the seas and skies. Japan wasn’t content with Japan. Germany wasn’t content with Germany. Italy wasn’t content with Italy. It too wanted to be great, a neo-roman empire with African territories. Brits and French ruled over vast empires. Germans and Japanese, both latecomers, wanted their piece of the pie. Japan invaded China, Germany invaded Russia in WWII. In WWI, the great powers and would-be-great-powers beat the crap out of each other. The Ottomans, a once great power, clung to its fading empire by latching onto the Germans.

WWI dealt a huge blow to dominationism, but it didn’t die. France and Brits lost a lot of people and the war was costly, but they managed to hold onto their empires and still qualify as great powers. Japan expanded its position in Asia. Italy got to feeling big about itself, and Mussolini came to power. Germany and Russia seemed like the two big losers, but communism armed Russia with new expansionism, and Germany turned to the most extreme form of dominationism with the rise of Nazism.

Back then, there were several dominationist contenders: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Russia. The Turks were out as they wisely made peace with the loss of the Ottoman Empire, and they went about minding national issues.

But it wasn’t long before WWII cured all those nations of dominationism. Both winners and losers lost taste for it. Germany got defeated horribly, many times worse than in WWI. Japan got demolished. France was humiliated in defeat at hands of Germans and had to be saved by detested Brits and Americans. Italy was exposed as a paper tiger. Russia prevailed and even took over Eastern Europe, but the war was so costly and destructive that Russians were mostly involved with rebuilding. And its military was designed more for defense than offense contrary to US fears that USSR might swallow all of Europe. And the prospect of nuclear war tempered both US and USSR.

Europeans decided that the sane thing is to live with one another instead of seeking domination over one another. So many horrible wars had been fought among Europeans over domination, empire, territory, revenge, and hatred. Some of these wars were near-genocidal, like the Thirty Years War. But just as Catholics and Protestants had earlier decided to just respect one another and stop butchering one another, modern European peoples finally decided to bury the hatchet after WWII. No more hard feelings and vengeance. It’s like, at some point, Christendom and the Muslim world had also decided to just leave each other alone and stop bashing one another. (The Zionist destruction of the Muslim World, broken borders, and mass migration of Muslims/Africans into Europe may lead to new 'clashes of civilizations' in the West: National Whites vs Cuck Whites vs Jews vs Muslims vs Africans.)

Europeans were able to overcome dominationism because of the horrifying lessons of the war. Also, as Jerry Muller wrote in Foreign Affairs, it was because the borderlines and population transfers after WWII produced homogeneous nation-states. With each nation being made up mostly of its own kinfolk, there was less need for tension and conflict. (In contrast, Soviet Occupation of Eastern Bloc nations led to East German rebellions, Polish riots, Hungarian uprising, and Czech uprisings; and the diverse crazy quilt of Yugoslavia led to the wars in the 90s.) The miracle of post WWII was that Europeans discovered they could live with one another in mutual peace and forgiveness as long as each people relinquished dominationism.
Europeans began to care more about goodness than greatness, cooperation than domination.
Even in the Soviet-occupied Eastern Bloc, there was relative peace since Soviets allowed each Warsaw Pact nation to mind its own affairs within its borders. It was empire by indirect rule. For so very long, Europeans had thought such peace was impossible. Each nation once had so many narratives and legends of their great heroes fighting the evil nasty bad guys of other kingdoms or nations. Each side felt so justified, even to the point of bloodlust toward other peoples.

And Europeans once harbored such feelings toward Jews. The Jewish Question was asked over and over whether Christian folks can live with Jews. But after WWII, Europeans decided Jews are okay too. Everyone could get along as long as they all relinquished dominationism. After all, dominationism had led to so many wars over the centuries that sometimes led to near-genocidal wars. So many people got ‘genocided’ in WWII. Not only Jews in holocaust but millions of dead Poles, Germans, Russians, etc. Who needed more of this? Even though WWII was more destructive than WWI, there was less bad blood after it ended than following the previous war. Paradoxically, the total-shit-facing of just about every nation taught it a most valuable lesson. Supremacism and chauvinism lead to mayhem and disaster for all. Therefore, much of the hatred that once seemed ineradicable among nations and ethnic groups melted away. Also, France and UK soon lost their empires and returned home. They made peace with the outcome, even though there were some hard-fought wars, especially in Vietnam and Algeria. Europeans learned to get along and do business with non-whites without dominationist empires.

And in the East, Japan lost its entire empire, renounced war, and decided to be a good nation and trading partner with the world. No more banzai imperial rising sun crap.

Americans could have been filled with dominationism as they were the undisputed great power after WWII, not least because its homeland was untouched by destruction. But America didn’t go into dominationist mode. Though it totally crushed Japan, it generously aided its rebuilding and even felt a bit sorry for having dropped the two big ones. And instead of gloating as the dominant power, it came up with Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe and was ultimately magnanimous with Germany that soon rebuilt itself into the main economy of Europe.

And in the Cold War, US mostly played a defensive role to contain communism and spread of ‘world liberation movements’ allied with Soviets(who themselves didn’t know what to make of these movements). Even in Vietnam, US wasn’t trying to take north Vietnam but only trying to save the South from communism up north.

And US took weak measures against Castro’s Cuba. Maybe American elites felt some degree of guilt of having treated Cuba like a sleazy whore for too long. They could see that Castro and revolutionaries were inspired and popular whereas the most prominent Cuban exiles were gangsters, oligarchs, playboys, sharks, or stooges of the CIA.

Anyway, the 80s showed that Wasps, Russians, and Chinese were not into dominationism either. China under Deng wanted to change and just develop economically. Russians had enough of the Cold War. They wanted peace and were even willing to give up Eastern Bloc on promise that US would not seek dominationism by exploiting Russian weakness. And Reagan, upon sensing good will in Gorbachev, was eager to end the Cold War as soon as possible. With the end of the Cold War, it could really have been the end of dominationism all over the world.

But, there was one group that was not willing to give it up. The Jews.

This is rather odd. While it’s true that Jews did have problems with Europeans and Christians for a long time — just like French, Germans, Russians, Poles, Brits, Turks, Greeks, and etc had problems with one another, sometimes leading to horrible wars and retaliations — , Europeans and Christians really buried the hatchet with Jews after WWII, especially in Western Europe(though things got a bit hostile in Eastern Europe once Zionist Israel allied with the US). As the Germans, French, Brits, Italians, and etc were all getting along with another — and despite the Iron Curtain, the relations between Western Europeans and Eastern Europeans were cordial on a personal/social basis — , Jews could have joined in like everyone else. After WWII and Holocaust, most Europeans lost the stomach for antisemitism, especially the overt kind, and new generation of kids were raised to tolerate and accept Jews, even love Jews. It was much the same in the US. So, Jews and whites could have gotten along famously after WWII. There was no more need for bad blood.

But Jews felt otherwise. Why?

Did Jews have dominationism on their minds from the outset? Or did they become addicted to power as they came into vast wealth, power, and influence? It seems much of Jewish vitriol against Trump and Putin has nothing to do with prospect of New Nazism. There is zero chance of gentiles rounding up Jews and doing horrible things. What Jews fear is the loss of their supremacist status, their dominationist control over others. At one time, immediately following WWII, it is possible that Jews mainly had survival and well-being on their minds. But as they rapidly gained in power, privilege, and influence, they got accustomed to an existence that has value and meaning ONLY IF Jews are at the very top and bossing everyone around, even to the point of telling them not to use the word ‘bossy’.

Consider Putin and Jews. There are lots of rich Jews in Russia. Putin goes out of his way to accommodate the Jewish community. But that isn’t enough for Jews because Russian nationalism stands in the way of Jewish supremacist domination of the kind that defined Russia in the 90s. Jews prefer a Russia where most Russians are defeated & humiliated while Jews rule supreme than a Russia where things are good for both Jews and Russians.

And there is nothing in Trump’s platform that would do any harm to Jews. There are no anti-Jewish laws or anything of the kind. The only difference would be that a new civic nationalism would require Jews to be mindful of what is good for ALL Americans. Jews simply cannot abide by this. It’s either their way or.. it’s the Holocaust!! Anything other than Jewish dominationism and Jewish supremacism is the ‘Holocaust’ as Jews see it.

And this mindset is so deeply embedded in the sicko American political landscape(shaped by Jewish power) that we get strange statements about Israel and Palestinians. So, if anyone makes the slightest suggestion that Palestinians be given some consideration in the West Bank, we have shrill hysteria(from both Democrats and Republicans, even from Trump) that this is ‘throwing Israel under the bus’, it is ‘new holocaust’, and etc. I mean Zionists have total domination over Palestinians who still live under Occupation. Yet, even a modest proposal for some justice for Palestinians is seen as ‘new holocaust’ on the horizon for Jews. The most supremacist people bitch incessantly about how they are about to be destroyed by antisemitic supremacism when most critics of Zionism are only calling for a fair resolution to the West Bank crisis.

Jewish supremacists sound so much like the Nazis. Nazis sought supremacist control over other peoples, but they constantly bitched about how the poor poor Germans were being oppressed and done wrong by other peoples. In a way, even Nazi German complaint had more validity than the current Jewish hysteria. After all, Germans were treated badly in Sudetenland; and Stalin’s fate for Baltic Germans were pretty grim. But Jews are doing fine in America, EU, and Israel, even in Russia. Jewsare well-protected even in Iran. If some Jews are periodically attacked in EU, it’s because of massive immigration of Muslims(with full support of Jewish globalists). And if there is some Palestinian violence against Israelis, well, the Occupation is still going on, and Israelis keep building more settlements.

Holocaust Cult has blinded Jews to the idea that they themselves could become evil and supremacist. They are so used to seeing themselves as victims of Nazi racial supremacism that they are blind to their own abuse of power and overly sensitive to any criticism of Jewish power.

And spectacular Jewish success in so many fields have accustomed Jews to the mindset that they are entitled to lead super-privileged lives with complete obedience from the gentile population. Jews have become so spoiled in the US and EU — where Holocaust Cult is a religion — that they expect the same kind of treatment all over the world and get awful angry when they don’t get it. So, they use the might of US and NATO to smash any gentile nation they don’t like, mostly in Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe as Russia is in the crosshairs.

The tragedy of WWII led to one great moral triumph for most peoples: the abandonment of dominationism and willingness to respect other nations and get along in peace and mutual respect. Just a decade after WWII, it was amazing how the Europeans were getting along and cooperating. One might think the greatest war in history never happened. They were willing to bury the hatchet,and this goodwill was extended to Jews as well.

But Jews, due to Holocaust neurosis, radical personality, new-found arrogance of great success, or whatever, decided to work in bad faith and serve their own dominationism. And American Jews dragged Anglo-cucks into this madness, and we have whores like Hillary and John McCain barking at Russia and arming Jihadis in Syria to take down secular modernizer Assad.
We have a useless ‘new cold war’ that makes no sense apart from Jewish ethno-supremacism. We have these horrible wars in the Middle East and North Africa that were concocted by Zionist-globalists. And with the massive migration of ‘refugees’ and migrants from Africa and Muslim world to Europe, national borders are in tatters.

The great achievement of end of WWII was the clear demarcation of national borders and the creation of stable national populations. But Jews have this crazy idea that the gentile national model means new rise of Nazism, and so, Jews support open borders and diversity so that gentiles will be forever in conflict with other gentiles.

And so, the world is going to pot once again. The golden opportunity was lost.
And who knows? If things get so horribly bad in Europe, maybe there will be the rise of new extreme antisemitism once again.

Why are Jews filled with such anti-white vitriol?

An organism is driven by fear & anxiety and seeks to secure its survival... or better yet, its dominance.

Jews are the dominant organism in the Global System and American hierarchy.

The Jewish Organism understands that other ethno-organisms or ethnorganisms tend to envy, resent, and target the organism that has the most power and privilege. It is the political logic of the King of the Hill. Those at the bottom of the hill go after those on top of the hill. The Jewish Organism or Zio-Organism(or Ziorganism) is the King of the Hill and visible as such to any honest & clear-eyed person.

So, the Ziorganism, as the King of the Hill, uses various tactics to shield itself from attacks by other ethnorganisms.

By spraying the narco-toxin of moral outrage over 'white privilege' and 'white supremacism', Jews seek to paralyze or divert the anti-Ziorganic feelings of gentile ethnorganisms.

The narco-toxin that vilifies 'white privilege' has a paralyzing effect on the White Ethnorganism. Injected and infected with 'white guilt', the White Ethnorganism loses the prideful will and determination to challenge the Dominant Power of the Ziorganism. Thus, the Ziorganism maintains supremacy over the White Ethnorganism that remains in servile mode before its Jewish Master Organism. Morality is a tool of power among organisms, and it is the powerful that tweaks the politics of morality to suit its own interests.

At any rate, this narco-toxin is also effective in controlling the potentially anti-Jewish rage of non-white ethnorganisms. Ziorganism is nervous about Afrorganism, Islamorganism, Latinorganism, Mongorganism, and etc. because they, as 'people of color', aren't contaminated with 'white guilt' and 'Holocaust Guilt'. If anything, Jewish Media/Academia Narrative have instilled non-whites with moral pride as victims of Western Imperialism and White Racism. Thus, non-whites have the pride of victim-hood. Since they see themselves as noble victims, they naturally feel hostile to the ruling power of the West. Since Ziorganism rules the West, Jews are the natural target of non-white ethnorganisms.

This is why the narco-toxin of the moral outrage about 'white privilege' and 'white supremacism' is useful to Jews. By screaming 'Nazi' and 'KKK' 24/7, the Ziorganism creates the illusion among non-white ethnorganisms that 'white people' still have and control everything. Thus, non-white hostility is diverted away from Jewish elites and directed toward whites(in America and even abroad in Russia, even though Russian whites have been among the greatest victims of Jewish venom either in the form of radical communism, finance capitalism, or Zio-Globalist warmongering).

Jews promote anti-white hatred for a reason. It is not about morality or justice. It is really the survival strategy of the Zio-Organism to maintain its dominance over other ethno-organisms.

Jews are the most patriotic and nationalist people... but for their own kind of course

In one way, Jews are the most patriotic people in America... except not to America but to Israel and Jewish Diaspora Empire, or Diaspire.
Jewish Globalists are different from white globalists. White globalists really want to surrender their identity, sovereignty, & heritage and just join the globo-club of cosmo-privilege. In contrast, Jewish elites use globalism to strengthen and consolidate Jewish Power and Control over the world. For Jews, globalism(like liberalism) is a tool for what are essentially ethnic identity and interests. After all, white globalists don't demand that all Americans praise and worship White America, but Jewish Globalists require all gentiles to attend AIPAC Nuremberkowicz Rallies and hail Israel and Jewish People sky high.

In a way, the Jewish way makes sense from their own perspective. Jews didn't come to America as humble immigrants to assimilate with the white gentile majority. Indeed, what set Jews apart from other peoples through the ages has been their powerful Will to cling to identity & history and resist total assimilation.
Jews chose accommodation over assimilation. They had to seek accommodation with gentile surroundings to do business and work up the social ladder. But they despised gentiles as dumb, naive, earnest, brutish, and less civilized. Jewish attitude toward gentiles can be found in Polack Jokes. Jews hated gentiles who noticed & exposed Jewish power-lust. But Jews also despised gentiles-who-trusted-Jews as dupes and useful idiots.

So, even though many Jews did come to America as poor folks, their ultimate Will to Power was to rule over white masses. They had an imperialist mindset. Their attitude towards white gentiles was akin to British attitudes towards Asian Indians, Spanish attitude towards native Meso-Americans, Japanese imperialist attitude towards Manchurians, Prussian elites attitude towards Poles(in Polish areas under Prussian occupation), and Anglo-Afrikaner attitude towards the black majority in South Africa. Afrikaner nationalism couldn't represent black South African nationalism since the two mindsets and narratives were so very different.
Likewise, despite white gentile fantasies of 'Judeo-Christian' America, Jews never saw themselves as part of any 'Christian' civilization. They equated Christianity mainly with the antisemitic resistance to the Jewish Will to Power seeking domination over gentiles. But since Jews didn't gain dominance by power of gunboats and bombs(except in Israel) but through power of money and media, their imperialism has been invisible. Jews are the Invisible Imperialists.

Even though Jews are indeed globalist, they are also deeply nationalist and patriotic. The problem is that their patriotism isn't the patriotism of gentiles. Why should Jews be patriotic to white Christian/gentile America? If patriotism means love of one's own people and culture, then Jews should be all about Jewish identity and power. Since Jews don't have the power of numbers in gentile-majority nations, they cannot use Jewish nationalism to defeat and dominate over white gentiles. They can use blatant nationalism to their advantage ONLY IN Israel where they are the solid majority.
But in non-Jewish nations, promoting nationalism would be counter-productive since gentiles will get the idea that their own nationalism is a good thing(and such nationalism will resist the hostile power of the Jews with different identity and interests). So, Jews in the West attack and suppress nationalism while surreptitiously serving their own Jewish nationalism behind the rubric of globalism. Esoteric nationalism or eso-nationalism.

Jewish attitude in the US is similar to British policy across their once mighty empire. Brits feared the rise of Asian Indian nationalism, so it was suppressed, and Asian Indians were encouraged to identify with the glory and might of the British globo-empire and the Queen, the AIPAC of its day. Don't serve your Hindu identity and nationhood; instead, serve the empire(that brings light of civilization to all peoples) and the Queen.

Even so, the Brits were very proud to be British, and this show of nationalism got their subject peoples to wondering.. "If nationalism is good for the Brits, why is it bad for us?" So, the British empire began to fall apart when various peoples became nationalistic in their own manner.
Jews fear gentile nationalism for the same reason. Jewish globalist empire will be shaken if various peoples feel more national pride and work toward national sovereignty to free themselves from the likes of George Soros, Google Jews, and Bloomberg.

Just like Hindus wondered, "If nationalism is good for Anglos, why is it bad for us?", we need to ask, "If nationalism is good for Zionists and Jews, why is it bad for us?" And from that question, white folks may finally wake up from the Great Hoodwinking by the globo-Jewish-supremacists.

Is the West really ruled by Liberal Democracy... or by the Fascist-Democracy of Zionist-Globalists?

It's been said Liberal Democracy has ruled the West.

If so, why does US take orders from Israel, a fascist-democracy?

Israel is democratic ethno-state. American Jews support Israel via AIPAC & Zionist-controlled media that favors Shabbos Goyim shills like Bush family, John McCain, Hillary, and etc.

Oddly enough, a 'liberal Democracy' takes orders from a fascist-democracy. Americans are ruled by ethnocentric Jews. In principle, the US may be a 'liberal democracy' but, in practice, takes orders from ethno-conscious rule of Jewish racialists.

If US, as a liberal democracy, takes orders from Jews & Israel who are committed to ethno-democracy, then fascism(that of Jews who are nationalist in Israel and globalist in goy nations) must be the most powerful force in the world. After all, the most powerful 'liberal democracy' submits to the will of a 'fascist-democracy'. If fascist-democratic Israel dictates orders to liberal-democratic US, then it means Jewish fascism is the reigning champion of World Power.

If liberal democracy is indeed dominant(as Western pundits always remind us), then Liberal Jews should insist on Israel dumping its fascist-democracy and becoming like the cucked EU. But the US as a 'liberal democracy' obeys Israel as a 'fascist-democracy', and Jews everywhere(US, UK, France, etc) want to keep it that way.

A fascist-democracy has elections & rule of law, but its core constitution is explicitly & thematically rooted in identity-heritage-territory. Israel is such a nation. A racial-cultural-national democracy.

Israel is a fascist-democracy like Turkey. US Jews push liberal democracy on whites but embrace ethno-democracy for themselves.

If US Jews are truly committed to the ideal of liberal democracy, they should apply the same pressure on Israel that they do on Poland and Hungary. But there is no Jewish pressure on Israel to accept refugees(or to give back Golan Heights back to Syria). Jewish 'liberals' pressure the smallest European nation to abandon its racial-national-territorial integrity and open up its legs to take in tons of Muslim and African invaders. But Jews, even 'liberal' ones in the West, fully support Israel's 'right to exist' as a racial-cultural-historical-territorial entity. When white gentile nations practice what Israel does, the Jewish-run press condemns them as 'fascist' and 'far right'. But when Jews do it, Jews expect(and demand) every US congressmen to pledge even more aid to Israel and uphold Israel's right to exist as a 'Jewish State'.

Well, by rules of logical consistency, if a certain policy is 'fascist' in Hungary or Poland, it must be 'fascist' in Israel as well. (Of course, Jews control the media and academia, thereby the Narrative and Political Logic. If Jews do what others do, it never reflects badly on Jews even if others are condemned for doing it. If Jews were to exterminate Palestinians like Nazis did with Jews, it would not be called a 'holocaust' by current Political Logic since Jews are judged differently from rest of mankind. Jews are above conventional morality. Also, if others were to do what Jews do, they could well be condemned for their 'extreme' and 'far right' tendencies. Israeli Jews can be nationalist, but if any white nation emulates such outlook, they will be condemned while, perversely enough, simultaneously being pressured to praise Israel's like-minded policy. Gentiles must say, "We condemn our own identity, territory, & history" while admiring Jews for upholding their identity, territory, & history. What a crazy world. It's the pretzel logic of Jews.)

Anyway, since American Jews and Israeli Jews are agreed on the need for Jewish identity, Jewish consciousness, and Jewish nationhood, they must be fascists. Since they rule America and the West, gentiles are not living under liberal democracy but under Jewish fascist democracy(because American liberal-democracy must defer to Jewish fascist-democracy).
Now, Jewish fascist-democracy is fine as long as Jews practice it for themselves in their own nation. But it is wrong, even evil, when Jews practice fascism over non-Jews. Each nation should have a fascist-democracy of its own. Hungary for Hungarians, Poland for Poles, just like Israel for Jews. But Jews not only want domination in Israel but in gentile nations. Jews know that fascist-democracy is a great formula for national unity, and so, they love it for Jewish Power and Israel. But they hate it for gentile nations because it implies Polish unity against Jewish control or Hungarian unity against the venal likes of George Soros. So, Jews push 'liberal democracy' on goyim while maintaining fascist-democracy for themselves.

Jewish War on Russia isn't about liberalism vs autocracy. It is Jewish ethno-centrism vs Russia nationalism. Jews are seething with hateful venom because Putin partly reversed what was done to Russia in the 90s: Jews raped & plundered the country and turned it into their whore. But Putin came along and wrested back some of the plunder and political control, and Jewish finance-imperialists hate him for that.

Jews fear that what Putin did for Russia may spread to other white nations. This is why Jews hate Trump. Even though Trump, like Putin, isn't anti-Jewish, his themes of Americanism vs globalism infuriates Jews since Jews use anti-nationalist globalism to weaken every gentile nation. (Of course, Jews support fascism and nationalism in Israel. Jews also subvert and empty Syria -- via refugee crisis -- to make room for Palestinians yet to be expelled from West Bank that shall ultimately be claimed entirely by Jews. Because nationalism and fascism are particularist, they are fine as long as they are confined within national borders. The problem is when it violates other national borders. Mixing particularism and universalism is like mixing oil and water. So-called globalist-liberal-democracy creates chaos and evil because its universalism is perverted by a particularist tribe that controls and manipulates the New World Order. So-called universal globalist-imperialism is really defined and controlled by particularist-fascist-Zionists who reserve a separate set of rules for themselves. Tragically, Jewish nationalist-fascism of Zionism is violating other borders. Jews control the US and use American money and military might to smash all Arab/Muslim nations hated by Israel. But Jews are so sneaky. Even though their wars have created the refugee crisis, they pretend to be 'humanitarians' by aiding the refugees get to the West.)

White Nationalists have most problem with globalist Jews, but their political ideal is closest to Israel, a fascist-ethno-democracy beloved by Jews.

Jews have hard fascist-democracy for themselves but push flaccid liberal-democracy on whites. Whites want fascist-democracy too in their own homelands.

Alex Jones is NOT Alt-Right, and the Real Reason why Hillary's Masters(the globalist Jews) loathe the Alt Right is because it does NOT peddle in conspiracy theories

According to Hillary, the Alt Right is all about paranoia and conspiracy-theorizing. Among the villains she mentioned was Alex Jones.

Alex Jones is a conspiracy-theorist, sometimes right, often wrong. He has connections to the Alt Right, but he is not of the Alt Right. Indeed, most Alt Right people see him as amusing at best.

The problem with Jones and others like him is they rely on elaborate conspiracy theories because they are afraid to speak the plain truth. Conspiracy theorizing allows them to go around sacred taboos, the violation of which can jeopardize their careers.

So, instead of Naming the Jew, Alex Jones will talk about the 'Illuminati'. Or, he will pretend that the Saudis run Hollywood. Or, he will invoke 'false flag' operations whenever a crisis hits.

And people like him will yammer endlessly about silly subjects like GMO's or vaccination.

Alex Jones peddles in sensationalism, and his brand of conspiracy-theorizing may entertain on the level THE BOURNE TRILOGY or V FOR VENDETTA.

But, we don't need fantasies and exaggerations to know what's really going on. And this is where Alt Right can make a real difference. Alt Right is Zzzzzzzzzz about most conspiracy theories. Alt Right sees them as diversions from the plain truth of what is really happening and what needs to be said. Alt Right is committed to tackling the obvious truths suppressed by the Narrative than to concocting outlandish theories in the hope of bypassing PC no-go zones. Illuminati? The Masons? Please!

Alt Right also knows there are limits to ideology. While excesses of socialism can undermine society, the failure of Detroit and other black-dominated cities cannot be explained with ideology alone. After all, even communist Poland, as bad as it was, wasn't as bad as Detroit or black areas of Baltimore.
If libertarians, ever fearful of being called 'racist', attribute black failure to public education(and lack of charter schools), Alt Right says it like it is. Blacks fail more because they are stronger(therefore hold other races in contempt), more aggressive(therefore less cooperative), and less intelligent. Alt Right doesn't care about the taboos against speaking such obvious truths. It notices and says what it sees. Alt Right has no use for Rand Paul the 'Detroit Republican'. Alt Right has no use for NYT 'progressive' hacks who cook up ever more outlandish theories to explain black domination in sports and failure in education. Alt Right knows Weasel Words when it hears them.

THIS is why the Establishment is afraid of the Alt Right. People like Alex Jones(who are not of the Alt Right) can easily be dismissed for obsessing over chemicals in morning cereals and umpteenth theory of Building 7 on 9/11. They can be mocked as cranks, clowns, or lunatics.

But Alt Right doesn't truck in such diversions. It takes a cold hard look at who has the real power in America. Alt Rightists notice the Jews. And they notice that the Jewish-globalist agenda is hostile to gentile populations everywhere. The Zio-globalist policy of Invade-Invite has led to the mass destruction of the Arab/Muslim World and the mass-invasion of the West by uprooted Third World hordes. Alt Right takes notice of this and says it like it is.

Alt Right also takes notice of the real source of racial problems in the US. It is due to blacks being more muscular/stronger, more aggressive, and less intelligent than other races. Alt Right is about Occam's Razor or, better yet, Occam's Laser. It has no use for bogus explanations cooked up by disingenuous 'progressives' and craven 'libertarians' who either blame 'system racism' or 'socialism' for the problems stemming from the black community.

An example of how the Alt Right operates:
The Alt Right community played a key role in exposing and debunking the UVA fraternity rape hoax. It didn't have to cook up wild conspiracy theories to do this. It only had to look at the hard facts.
If anything, it was the 'progressive' Sabrina Rubin Erdely and Rolling Stone magazine that had concocted an elaborate hoax about blonde 'Aryan' rape gang terrorizing college girls. (I think Hillary topped the Haven Monahan Hoax with Putin-as-grand-poobah-of-Alt-Right. And they said Joe McCarthy was deluded.)
To this day, NYT has yet to admit that the whole UVA scandal was a wild hoax pulled off by a venomous Jewess. Jew denounce 'tribalism' among white gentiles, but Jews sure watch out for each other's backs.

The Establishment fears the Alt Right because the Alt Right refuses to tiptoe around sacred PC taboos. Alt Right picks up the drill and bores right through the taboos. Also, Alt Right doesn't fritter away its energy on ridiculous conspiracy theories because it prefers to speak the honest and simple truth about Jewish Power and Black Thuggery.

Also, Alt Right has no use for mindless brainwashing slogans like "Diversity Is Our Strength", "Marriage Equality", "Inclusion", or "Gay Pride" -- 'pride' about homo fecal penetration or de-sausaging of the penis to form a fake vagina? Those slogans are weasel Words. After all, if 'progressives' really believe in 'marriage equality', why don't they push 'incest marriage' or polygamy? Why did Homos get special treatment? Alt Right knows without being told because the facts are so obvious: Jews are the Ruling Minority Elites in the US, and they funded and pushed the Homo Agenda to NORMALIZE minority-supremacist-domination because many homos are successful and well-connected in elite fields. The homo agenda is not about justice or tolerance(though it may have been that in the past). It is about power and domination.

Alt Right is sober and doesn't need escapist conspiracy theories to explain or understand the world. Its only tools are honesty, courage, and integrity, which are qualities sorely lacking in all of establishment media and academia totally dominated by PC enforced by Jewish Power.

Can anyone prove that Jews are NOT the ruling elites of the Western World? Follow the money. Look at Jewish representation in elite institutions and industries. Look at the powerful people around Obama, Hillary, and even Donald Trump. Alt Right is simply the boy who has the guts(seen as 'gall' by the Establishment) to say the Emperor has no clothes.

With the Alt Right, the Gun-Laying against the Main Enemy is clicking ever closer into gear.

Artillery wins or loses in battle according to Gun Laying skills. Gun Laying is defined by Wikipedia as: "the process of aiming an artillery piece, such as a gun, howitzer or mortar on land, or at sea, against surface or air targets."
If you don't lay the gun properly, you will never hit the target, and all the barrage will have been for naught. You can shoot off a thousand rounds and hit nothing if you can't identify the target. But just one volley with proper gun-laying can decimate the key enemy position. A marksman with one bullet is more lethally effective than a drunken blind-man with a machine gun with 1000 rounds.

With each passing year, it is becoming ever more sobering and evident to White People in Europe and America that those who are most invested in the destruction of the West are the Jews. Jews are the main enemy. They control Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Las Vegas, Ivy Leagues, State Department, Intelligence Services, top Law Firms, and Big Media. They've even taken over Christian Churches with their homomaniacal infiltrators and subversives.

Because of the Cult of Holocaustianity, generations of white people since the end of WWII have been raised to sympathize with Jews as a wise and tragic people. But it is becoming ever more apparent, year by year, month by month, and day by day that Jews have become the most arrogant, devious, parasitic, murderous, ruthless, and hypocritical power in the world. Whether it's Neocons inventing lies to destroy Iraq, Jewish Supremacists crushing Palestinians who still live under Occupation, Shills of Zion(like George W. Bush, Obama, and Hillary) utterly wrecking Libya & Syria, Robber-barons of Wall Street exploiting dubious financial schemes to fleece the world(and then gorging on 'bailouts' to get even richer on top of their ill-gotten plunder), and Jewish globalists pushing open borders & mass migration to reduce white populations into minorities in their own homelands, it is becoming ever clearer that the main enemy of white people are the Jews.
As for non-whites, they side with Jews who've kicked open the Western gates for the entire world to barge across for better material life. 'Gold Star Family' Khan didn't mind that his Muslim son was used by Zio-Globalists to kill other Muslims(and be killed by them) in the Middle East because he made his fortune in the US.
But one only needs to look at Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to realize that the Jewish design for the non-West is just as sinister and destructive as it is for the West. Invade/Invite Strategy is double-edged sword that destroys both the Third World and the West while Jewish Globalists gain advantages from both. Jews hold the hilt, so they don't get cut. Others do the bleeding while Jews suck on the blood. One look at George Soros, and you know he is an insatiable bloodsucker. But the likes of him bankroll and control what goes by the name of 'progressivism'. It ought to be called Sorosism.

White people have been aiming their artillery in the wrong direction at the wrong targets for so many years. The idea of Sharia Law taking over America? Come on! Western Artillery needs to readjust its gun-laying toward Jewria that is the REAL power of the West.

Shooting is not enough. You have to learn how to aim.

Cult of Ethnicity and Cult of Ideology are just as damaging as Cult of Personality

Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, and Mao wrapped themselves in the Cult of Personality. They became all-knowing demi-gods to their minions who were willing to follow their Great Leader to the gates of hell. We know how that ended up. Same dynamics with the Jim Jones Cult in Guyana.

But even without the Cult of Personality, there is the problem of the Cult of Ethnicity and Cult of Ideology.

In the West, the Holocaust has become a religion -- it might as well be called 'Holocaustianity' -- , and we are supposed to respect, worship, and obey Jews as the Perfect Race, one that can do no wrong.
So, Jewish Power, the dominant force in the West, never goes questioned, criticized, and challenged. It grows more ethno-megalomaniacal, corrupt, hateful, and aggressive by the day. Jewish-influenced foreign policy has destroyed the Arab/Muslim World and now heightens tensions with Russia because Putinism has said NO to total Jewish control(by the likes of Soros and Khodorovsky).

If it is stupid to worship the Great Man as infallible, it is even dumber to worship the Great Race as godlike. We need to talk about Jewish power.

There is also the problem of Cult of Ideology. Zio-America of the 21st century is filled with neo-imperialist jingoism, chauvinism, and militarism. It declares itself above international law because the US is presumably an 'exceptional' and 'indispensable' nation. It is a new form of supremacism. Ugly and dangerous. But because of the Cult of Ideology -- the 'American' way of doing things is best and only correct one -- so many dumb Americans support the crazy globalist agenda, not unlike how the bread-and-circus-addled Romans hailed the conquering Caesars.

The notion of End of History -- The West won and is right about everything -- may well bring about the End of the World.

Just think... so many Americans are willing to vote for Hillary, the War Criminal who destroyed Libya and supports the rebranded Alqaeda in Syria to topple Syria.

The crazy hag(who belongs in the human rights court at the Hague) also wants a 'new cold war' with Russia, a nation with no ill-will toward Americans.

This is what happens to a nation when it becomes beholden to the Cult of Ethnicity and Cult of Ideology, both manipulated by Zio-globalists.

Alt-Right Can Play the Role of the Frankfurt School

When Jews didn't hold the commanding heights of power, they were penetrating critics of WASP power and Christian culture. And some of the most committed and interesting critics and intellectuals of power and privilege in America belonged to the 'Cultural Marxist' Frankfurt School.

The lesson to be drawn from this is that even those who vehemently rejected the Frankfurt School's program had something to learn from their thoughtful critique of power, privilege, control, and manipulation.
And even those who have no use for Noam Chomsky's socialist-anarchism can learn from his sharp criticism of US foreign policy and oligarchic control of media.

Now that the Western Left has become totally beholden to Political Correctness and/or oligarchic funding(of George Soros and gang), this presents a golden opportunity for the Alt Right to play a leading role in the Critique of Power, namely that of Jewish Globalists.
Because of PC and Jewish funding, nearly everyone from the Radical Left to Conservatism Inc dares not mention the J-Factor(except to occasionally condemn excesses of the Likud Party against Palestinians).
Because Alt Right has no hangups about naming the Jew in the globalist system(dominated by Jewish finance and media/academic control), Alt Right can be most honest voice on the true nature of power in the West. It can own honesty, courage, and integrity in the critique of power.

The question is, will the Alt Right take on this opportunity intelligently or will it allow dumb 14/88 provocateurs(who are likely shills of SPLC or very disturbed individuals) to drown out the debate with Pepe the Frog as Der Fuhrer.

If the Alt Right plays it right, even those opposed to the Alt Right agenda will find value in its critique of power and privilege as rigged by the globalist system.

That is a start.

Heather Mac Donald's Blind Spot on Jewish Power

Heather MacDonald said there is a 'race war' raging in America where only one side(blacks) does the fighting.

That may be so, she overlooks another ethnic conflict where only side does the fighting. Jews attack whites, but not only do whites not fight back and defend themselves but they praise they very people who are doing them most harm.

White are willfully blind to the fact that Jews are the 'Barzini' in the equation. In THE GODFATHER Don Vito Corleone eventually figured it all out. "It was Barzini all along." That's when the Corleone's shifted their aim from the Tataglia to Barzini as the arch-enemy. Vito's son Michael understood the game, which is why he understood that the Rosato Brothers only took orders from a higher power: Hyman Roth in THE GODFATHER PART 2.

Without identifying the enemy, you cannot win. Those in the game must know the Barzini Factor.

Alt Right Aims for the Correct Target. Aim and Game.

One area in which Alt Right is ahead of everyone, even Trump, is that it accurately, honestly, and correctly identifies Jewish Power as the MAIN FORCE behind the dehumanization and dispossession of white people.

This is where even Trump fails. All this "We must hate on Muslims to protect Jews and homos" totally misses the point.

Unless we aim for the main enemy target, the white race cannot make real change and save itself.

Imagine in a war where all your firepower is aimed at everything BUT the main enemy hilltop with the biggest cannons.

It doesn't matter how much firepower you have if your aim is off and not hitting the spot that is lobbing lethal volleys at you.

Suppose your enemy has a pistol with one bullet while you have a machine gun with a 1000 rounds. Suppose he aims the pistol at your head while you aim your gun at everything but him. You can shoot all you want, but it won't make any difference. In contrast, he needs to pull the trigger only once to kill you.

It's like in boxing. The boxer beats the brawler because the boxer knows the sweet science of hitting the opponent right on the button. Brawler just flails, missing most of the punches while tiring.

It's the politics of aim. If you don't have the aim, you can't play the game.

Jews aim for white power. In contrast, whites have been aiming at everything but Jewish power that has been most instrumental in the destruction of the white race. All those conservatives who worry about Sharia in America, Russia(in 'new cold war'), or Iran... what a bunch of dummies. Maybe they think they can appease Jews by hating on nations and peoples that Jews hate, but Jews are insatiable and never reciprocate in kind.

Alt Right is in the vanguard because it identifies the proper target. Jewish Power. Alt Right doesn't hate Jews as a people. But it knows that Jewish Power is out to destroy the white race. Too many powerful Jews are like George Soros.