Race Denial Is No Long Tenable - Ideology Is Downstream from Iconography

Following WWII and the demise of Nazism(and revelations of its horrors) and prior to the explosion of race problems in America(and now in Europe as well), one could forgive the sincere belief among intellectuals, social scientists, and politicians that race is essentially a ‘social construct’ and, once equality was assured under the law, all races could achieve more or less the same. If intellectuals were wrong about race reality and racial differences back then, it was more out of naivete or idealism than dogma, cowardice, or some pernicious agenda.

But after several decades of social experimentation, it should be clear to any honest person that racial differences are all-too-real and account for the persistent problems of race, especially pertaining to blacks. But because of the pervasiveness of PC as status symbol(as political incorrectness will invariably lead to blacklisting or demotion in the choicest careers), iconography of holy relics(as Jews, Negroes, and Homos are now objects of mandatory reverence), and radical violence as forms of intimidation(as heretics & dissidents face real danger of being physically assaulted by Antifa thugs, BLM lunatics, or screeching campus fanatics), most academics and media people are FORCED to be dishonest, FORCED to ‘not know’ what they, in the heart of hearts, know.

We can forgive a white liberal in the 1940s, 1950s, and even in the 1960s for believing that black conditions would be vastly improved with new laws and federal programs because, after all, blacks(along with other non-white races) had been denied equal opportunity in America. But after several decades of undeniable proof of black advantage in muscle power, black impulsiveness, black aggressiveness, and black psychopathy that tends toward obsessive egotism & narcissism, one has to be willfully disingenuous or just plain delusional to insist that the racial problems in this country owe to the legacy of slavery and ‘Jim Crow’.

It’s no longer about Jim Crow but ‘Radio Raheem’(the obnoxious thug of Spike Lee’s worthless DO THE RIGHT THING), the kind of moron who is all too common in black communities across America. The problem is too many Negroes who act like ‘nogs’ and carry this ‘groid’ gene that makes them tougher, more aggressive, more impulsive, and more psychopathic. After decades of black rampage against other races(and among themselves), this fact should be plain as day, but the tyranny of political correctness prohibits honest discussion of race that locates the black problem as rooted in genetics. As a result, we are left with praising everything black(as if even Problem Blacks are really just misguided and misunderstood victims of the System)and blaming anything white as explanation for the failures of the black community.

PC is an excuse-making machine that blames external white forces for all that stinks in the black community. (This is all the more disingenuous because it is the problematic nature of blacks that is hyped and sensationalized as ‘cool’ and ‘badass’. So, the very white progs who insist something must be done about black gangsta culture of mayhem and murder also promote it as ‘authentic’ and something worthy of emulation.) The idiot critic Andrew O’Hehir at Salon surmised(or pontificated) that Detroit’s decline owed to envious white racism’s punishment of Motown. Apparently, white folks decided Detroit must go down because Smokey Robinson wrote too many groovy songs.

To be sure, conservatives are hardly better on the Race Issue; they also play by the PC songbook in their own way. So, we are told that Detroit was ruined by Liberalism, socialism, and the Democratic Party. Apparently, it had nothing to do with race, specifically the naturally destructive tendency among blacks. If so, why are some white-majority cities under Democratic rule among the richest in America? Why is San Francisco and Manhattan, two very Liberal cities, overflowing with wealth and privilege despite their ‘big government’ policies?

Or consider how Ann Coulter blames lowly black behavior on the Democratic Party, as if blacks would have acted better under Republicans. So, how are blacks acting in Republican Alabama or Texas? Or channeling Thomas Sowell, Ann Coulter muses that blacks learned how to be violent from Scotch-Irish hillbillies, a notion that would imply that Black Africa was an Edenic paradise of peace and harmony when, in fact, it was inhabited by spear-chucking savages from time immemorial. Why is there so much nonsense about blacks?

Political Correctness isn’t just about ideas & issues but also about idols & icons. In a way, the power of idolatry & iconography is more crucial to the sway of PC. After all, even as the ‘right’ and the ‘left’ differ in their explanations & proposals of the Black Problem, both sides are agreed that blacks, along with Jews and even homos, must be treated as a preternaturally noble and holy people, a Magic People. Despite differences in ideology, the American ‘right’ and American ‘left’ are agreed on the icons. It’s like the conflict between Catholics and Protestants or between Sunnis and Shias. Despite doctrinal differences, they worship the same gods or icons. So, ‘iconology’ > ideology. While ideology offers explanations, ‘iconology’ determines what or whom should be worshiped. There is a reason why Jews, homos, and Negroes have special iconic power in the US. Part of the reason is obvious: Jews control the media and decide which people should get favorable attention and adoration. But it’s also because Jews, homos, and blacks have special talents. Jews are especially good with intellectualism, science, business, and humor. So, they are admired as people of superior skills whose achievements continue to do wonders for all humanity. Jews also promoted the Cult of Shoah. As for homos, they are naturally fanciful, flamboyant, & narcissistic, and in our Age of Vanity & Hedonism, those qualities count for a lot. As for Negroes, they dominate sports, pop music, and sexual symbolism. For many whites, nothing is worthier of worship than the black ‘twerking’ booty and the black dong. Andrew Breitbart once said "Politics is downstream from culture." Sometimes, ideology is downstream from iconography. People are captivated by something first on the sensory level and then seek rational or ideological explanations to justify their fixation. It’s like the John Hurt’s closeted homo character in LOVE AND DEATH IN LONG ISLAND who is so enthralled by the iconic sexuality of some second-rate actor that his mind follows his heart and balls.

The Uneasy Dynamics of Rancor, Religion, and Rationality

Religion stands in the way of reason, but intellect or higher mental activity is impossible without restraint of savage nature, the animal rancor in the heart of every man. Savage nature is beastly & brutish and prefers breeding & fighting over reading and writing. It has no use for learning, reflection, or cultivation of heart & soul. It is about the law of the jungle.

Religion suppresses & restrains animal rancor and steadies & prepares the mind for reflection & contemplation. Thus, religiosity/spirituality cultivates the life of the mind even as scriptures place strictures on what can be thought and said.

Rationality had to break out of the taboos of religiosity, but then, reason could arise only after spiritual authority had forced chaotic animal rancor inside the cage and tamed it.

Reason is the bird that flew out of the cage of religion, without which the wild cat of animal nature would have devoured the bird while still inside the egg. For there to be higher freedom of the mind, the lower freedom of savage instinct must be tamed. And religion played a key role in restraining lower freedoms so that higher freedom could finally arise, though, to be sure, they had to break out of the confines of religious taboos.

As most people weren't sufficiently smart or privileged for higher thought, the only viable option for them were spiritually guided moral life of restraints OR animal-driven beastly existence of excesses. If most people were moral, a stable community was possible and could sustain institutions for higher learning. But if most people were barbaric, social chaos ensued and even smart people had to scramble just to survive. (There are smart people in Africa, but they can't cultivate the life of the mind because most Africans indulge in animal nature of jungle boogie. Same is true in most black-majority communities in the the West.)

With the fading of religious authority and the weakening of constraints on animal nature, we are now witnessing the degradation and destruction of Western civilization by the savagery of black thuggery, harlotry of slut pride, and decadence of homo vanity. Blacks are especially dangerous because their animal nature is more aggressive, wild, destructive, and beastly than those of other races.

If there is a kind of 'religion' in the current West, it is Political Correctness, the official dogma of Jewish-controlled Globalism, that enforces taboos on honest minds that notice that the Emperor has no clothes. Honest people see the reality of racial differences and its dire implications. They also perceive the threat to the West(or any sane civilization) posed by black savagery, homo degeneracy, Jewish supremacism(via globalism), and feminist insipidity, but inquisitional PC imposes the politics of silence, shunning, or witch-burning on any brave soul who refuses to cower before the court of globalist dogma.
Actually, shallow & stupid PC is worse than real religions, which, at the very least and despite their repressive dimensions, were grounded in genuine contemplation, profundity of vision, and reflection of higher truths. PC is just a disingenuous tool of Jewish supremacists to bait and milk 'white guilt' so that there won't be a viable challenge to Jewish Power.

Multiculturalism is Not about Tolerance of Minorities. It is a Cancer that Demands Endless Demographic Imperialism until the Native Majority is Reduced to a Minority.

Multiculturalism is like a cancer that keeps on metastasizing. It never stops. It grows bigger and bigger and demands more and more Diversity until the native host population is consumed and devoured by it.

PC or Political Correctness is the mental virus that fools a people into seeing Multiculturalism as a magic cure than as the cancer that it really is.

Those who ignore cancer because it begins as a small tumor doesn't understand its true nature. Unlike a birthmark or mole that remains fixed in size, cancer cells tirelessly grow and spread, eventually to sicken and kill the person.
Likewise, those who ignore multiculturalism as just some small thing fail to realize that it is a radical ideology designed to keep increasing foreign populations until the native folks are reduced to cowered and powerless minority.

It is natural for a society to have minorities. That is not the problem. Every society has some minorities.
However, multi-culturalism isn't about humane tolerance of existing minorities. It is a radical ideology insisting that MORE minorities and foreigners must be added UNTIL the native majority is reduced to a minority and shamed and intimidated into obeisance.

It is about immigration-invasion and destruction of native folks and culture.

There is no negotiating with multi-culturalists. They will not accept any limits on the percentage of minorities. If a nation is 99% white and willing to accept multiculturalism until the nation is 90% white, multiculturalists will only insist on more diversity. If the white majority settles for a 80% white nation, that won't be acceptable either. Indeed, the more you try to negotiate or compromise with multi-culturalists, the bolder and nastier they get. So, if you seek compromise for a nation that is to remain 60% white, the multi-culturalists will again say NO!
Then 50%? 40%? 30%? No, the multi-culti process is radical & ravenous and continue with zeal even when whites become 10% or less of the original population.

THAT is multiculturalism. It is a cancerous mechanism that never compromises and insatiably presses fore more conquest and concessions.

Guardians of Political Correctness DUCK honest engagement with Those with the Courage and Honesty to Speak the Truth on Race, History, and Identity

Long ago, white boxers -- and even black boxers like Jack Johnson and Joe Louis -- 'ducked' fights with black boxers who might beat them.

Today, PC-pushers duck engagements with those who speak candidly about race, culture, history, and identity because they fear getting KO'ed.

On race, the facts point to racial differences. Races are different, and these differences have profound impact on society in terms of income, crime, sex, sports, culture, and power.

On culture, it's irrefutable that Western Culture is now decadent & degenerate and non-Western Cultures have problem with modernity.

On history, facts say all peoples have been violent and invasive. Whites weren't the only conquerors and colonizers. Also, white expansionists did a lot of good as well as bad.

On identity, it's a fact that people crave some form of group identity and that an identity rooted in ethnicity, history, and territory is the most sound and stable. After all, why did Jews seek a land of their own where they can be Jews with a sense of history?

With PC ducking honest debate and discourse, Alt Right and HBD community have become like the Negro Leagues.

Why do the Elitists want to ban the Truth about Race from the Masses?

Even though Political Correctness enforces rigid dogma on Racial matters --- "race is just a social construct", "there are no significant racial differences", etc --- , in truth many individuals in the academia & think-tanks are well-aware that there is a genetic basis to race and racial differences. And these people freely discuss this matter among themselves. So, their main concern is not the discussion of race and racial differences but the 'danger' of this knowledge leaking out to the masses. To these elitists, many of whom are Jewish or white collaborators(cucks or shabbos goyim), the rise of mass consciousness on the Reality of Race is a threat to their own power and privilege since the entire edifice of Political Correctness is built on 'White Guilt' of 'racism' that supposedly constructed wholly artificial racial hierarchies when, all things being equal, every race is capable of achieving as much as any other. Thus, Political Correctness blames 'white racism' for all the social inequalities and problems in the West. This is useful for the Jewish elites because their elite-minority-power rests on suppressing white pride, power, and unity. And nothing has been as effective as 'white guilt', especially since Western Morality is founded on Christian Culture of Conscience.

But in fact, many Jewish elites know that race is real among themselves. They know that blacks tend to make a mess of things because blacks are more aggressive and less intelligent. Also, genetics made blacks more muscular and stronger, which accounts for interracial violence being overwhelmingly black on non-black. Jews and white shabbos goyim know this in their inner circles. But if such knowledge were to become widely disseminated among the white masses, the cult of 'white guilt' would dissipate. White people would realize that it's not their fault that other races have the problem that they do. Thus freed of 'white guilt', white people will think, organize, and operate on basis of white pride, power, and unity. This will threaten Jewish elite-minority-power-and-privilege, especially since Jews have been so hostile toward whites. And since white shabbos goyim(cuck collaborators) depend on Jewish largess, threat to Jewish power is threat to their power(just like threat to Nazi power in France also threatened French collaborators in Vichy). Is it any wonder that not only Jews but Conservatism Inc. is freaked out about the Alt Right that is willing to directly address the issues of race and the Jewish Question?

This is why the Jews want to keep the Realities of Race a SECRET KNOWLEDGE that can only be discussed among the Jewish elitists and their closest allies. As for the white masses, they must be kept in the dark and fed a steady diet of 'race is just a social construct' and 'white guilt'. Some Jewish academics have said that EVEN IF there is scientific truth about racial differences, it must be censored & suppressed for the Social Good. Of course, what these Jews really want is to protect their own power and privilege that is premised on Everlasting 'White Guilt' that paralyzes White Pride & Power.

But such attitude is nothing new in history. The Hindu Brahmins also had their secret knowledge. Their sacred texts could only be read by them for certain peoples. If someone of the wrong caste heard even a bit of this knowledge, the punishment was molten lead poured down their ears.
And in totalitarian-communist nations, the knowledge of the outside world, especially of the capitalist West, was restricted to the elites. The communist elites knew that life was more bountiful in the capitalist West. They themselves enjoyed the goods and entertainment of the the Enemy. But they kept this knowledge within the inner circle while feeding the Official Dogma to the masses since their power and privilege were premised on the 'scientific-materialism' of Marxist-Leninist Doctrine. If the masses were to know the difference between the Capitalist West and Communist East, they could rise up to overthrow the power of communist elites(like what happened in Romania).
So, the communist elites kept the facts about the capitalist West a Secret Knowledge. They themselves wanted to access and enjoy Western luxuries, but they had to censor the truth from the masses who, if enlightened, might demand end to communist rule in favor of market economy.

Jewish elites, Brahmins, and Communist rulers, as keepers of the Secret Knowledge, all invoked the INTERESTS OF THE PEOPLE or NEEDS OF A SACRED ORDER, but their main concern was preserving their own power and privilege. If the masses were to know, they might tell the rulers to go. What the rulers decried as corrupting of the masses was really disruptive to their own power.
And this is why Political Correctness is used to keep certain facts and ideas taboo for everyone but for the elites who believe they and only they should be guardians of the Secret Knowledge.
Insider Trading may be illegal on Wall Street(even though the real insiders do it all the time by 'other means'), but Insider-trading-of-secret-knowledge is the norm in elite circles.

When the Jewish elites attacked Charles Murray, it wasn't primarily because of his views on race and racial differences. If anything, such views had long been aired in elite circles. The problem was he wrote a book for the public, thus playing a Promethean role. Gods didn't punish Prometheus for having the knowledge of fire. They punished him because he took the knowledge of fire to the mortals. Thus, fire was no longer the sole magic power of the gods.

Natural Prejudice/Preference versus Ideological Prejudice/Preference

AR or Alt Right is closer to Natural Prejudices and Preferences, whereas Political Correctness or PC is closer to Ideological Prejudices and Preferences.

Natural prejudices don't have to be taught. Most people are born with them. Having negative feelings about homosexuals is a natural prejudice. For most people, the idea of men sticking their penises into other men's bungholes is gross. The sight of a guy who acts girly and talks funny is also off-putting. As for a man who wears women's dress and wants to have his penis and testicles removed to get a fake vagina... that sounds crazy from the perspective of natural prejudice.

It is also a natural preference for most white people to want to live with fellow whites and apart from TMB(too many blacks) because blacks look & sound different, are stronger, and more aggressive(therefore, more prone to crime and other disruptive behavior). White people don't have to be taught such preferences that come naturally to them based on how brains wired and on observations of blacks.

Alt Right feels there is nothing wrong with such natural prejudices and preferences. Of course, in a diverse nation like the US -- but then, who made it so diverse? -- , people do need to get along and therefore should check their overt natural prejudices. That said, it is only normal and healthy to be in tune with one's natural prejudices and preferences on the personal level.
For the sake of social order and peace, Alt Right understands that it's not nice to call homosexuals 'faggots'. It understands that Rule of Law means that homosexuals should not be discriminated in professions just because they have weird 'sexual' fixations. The thing is to feel what comes naturally but also to check those feelings in certain areas of life for the sake of social peace and cooperation.

Alt Right's real problem is with Ideological Prejudices and Preferences. These aren't natural and are often directed against nature.
When it comes to homosexuality, PC has an ideological prejudice against 'homophobes', a bogus term devised to demean and dehumanize anyone who exhibits natural prejudices about homos. 'Phobia' is not an objective term that simply means 'fear' or 'strong dislike'. It is a judgmental term that implies that the person with the said 'phobia' is mentally ill or pathological. If 'phobia' were a neutral term, then Liberals who dislike or fear Conservatives should be called 'conservaphobes'. Of course, Liberals would never assent to such terminology. When Liberals attach 'phobia' to any attitude or sentiment, they mean it is sick or pathological to hold such views.

There is no natural prejudice against people who feel uneasy about homosexuality. Indeed, just about anyone who is straight would feel those feelings if allowed to.
PC condemns such natural prejudices and, in their stead, insists on its own ideological prejudices, especially on the impressionable young. PC works tirelessly to purge natural prejudices and to replace them with ideological prejudices that encourage people to hate, revile, and condemn 'homophobes' who harbor naturally negative feelings about homosexuality. So, ideological prejudice dupes people into believing that there is nothing wrong with fecal penetration among men or with men who remove their sex organs to get fake vaginas. And it drums up powerful passion of ideological prejudice against people who won't get with the PC program of homomania.

PC must work tirelessly to push ideological prejudices because they don't come naturally. Natural prejudices are the default facts of life. They are inborn traits.
In contrast, ideological prejudices can only come into existence through social engineering and indoctrination. This is why PC is so hysterical and tireless. Like the tale of the shark that sinks if it stops swimming, PC cannot last unless it's in hysterical mode. It's like Maoism didn't have a future except as non-stop hysteria. Its tenets went too much against the natural prejudices of humanity. PC has to constantly plug up the dam because the flood of nature threatens to break through the artificial barrier.

Or take a ideological preference like the interracism of white women going with black men. The natural preference for white men is the manly pride that derives from white women having their children. So, the natural preference of white men is to have white women have children with white men. Indeed, nothing can be more natural than that.

But PC, an instrument of anti-white Jews, want as many white women as possible to reject white men and have children with men of other races, especially blacks. Hostile Jews know it is most humiliating and demoralizing for white men when white women sexually defect to black men because black men are stronger and can beat up white men.
Surely, a white guy will feel more dejected and demoralized if the white woman of his dreams goes off with a NFL Negro than with Guillermo of Jimmy Kimmel.

There is no natural reason for white men to be happy about the sexual defection of white women, especially to black men. If anything, their natural reaction should be one of rage and anger. But then, Jews know all too well that such a passion could very well light the fire of white revolution because sexuality, along with territoriality, is one of the most powerful natural emotions of organisms. And then, the white revolution may come after Jews who've done most to push interracism to demoralize and cuck the white race.

So, Jews use PC to replace white men's natural preference for white female loyalty with an ideological preference of interracism that leads to sexual defection. This ideological preference makes white men cheer on the sexual betrayal of white women. These ideologically brainwashed 'white boys' cheer on the use of white wombs to hatch mulatto babies and the use of white breasts to nourish black-mulatto children than white children(who will never be born from her womb). PC instills white minds with the notion that 'racism' is the worst sin. PC says wicked white souls can only be redeemed by revering and serving blackness, and that means cucking out.

So, this ideological preference has white boys saying that it's a wonderful thing for America to have a mulatto like Obama -- the product of a white woman rejecting white men to have a child with a black African -- as president.

Wonderful how? This is what happens when natural prejudices/preferences are replaced with ideological ones.

University of Chicago is disingenuous in not offering 'safe spaces' and 'trigger warnings' to incoming students

While I fully support University of Chicago's stance against Political Correctness in defense of free speech and discourse, the only reason why U of C can function as an oasis of civil and learned discourse is because the community of Hyde Park is an artificial Safe Space sustained by a heavy-duty double-layering of police force that discourages blacks in the surrounding area(crime-ridden Chicago South Side) from entering and making trouble.

Do search the Internet for: “A Wall Around Hyde Park”: The History and the Future of the UCPD

Furthermore, is the University of Chicago really a haven for free speech and exchange of ideas? According to Jonathan Haidt, there is a concerted effort in every university, elite and otherwise, to discourage and squeeze out conservative and contrarian voices that challenge the prevailing PC orthodoxy. Robert Putnam, the author of BOWLING ALONE, even sat on his own data for years because he didn't like what it implied.

Also, if students are hysterical about 'micro-aggressions', 'triggers', and the like, it is only because they picked up these tics from the educational system.

It wasn't the students who drove Lawrence Summers(of Harvard) from his position when he ventured to speculate that males may be advantaged over females at the tail ends of IQ. It was the professorial class itself that threw fits and tantrums.

Would things be any different at University of Chicago? I don't think so.

Institutions like the University of Chicago were just fine and dandy with PC hysterics as long as it was directed at 'conservatives' and 'reactionaries'. But now that the 'red guards' of PC-revolution are beginning to devour their own parents, U of C makes faux-principled noises about defending free speech against PC. I guess Zionists at U of C are afraid that BDS folks might come to town to shut down any pro-Israeli voice.

Alt Right Is the Only Un-PC Zone in American Politics

Alt Right is the ONLY anti-PC zone.

Conservatism Inc or Cuckservatism will not touch on issues pertaining to race and Jewish power because they serve the donor class and want approval from the cocktail party crowd.

Liberalism Inc or Globalism is now the Ruling Elite, and it cares most about holding power. It fears any truth that undermines their Narrative. It is totally Jewish-dominated and promotes MLK cult and Homomania as quasi-religions.

The Left is ideologically dead. At one time, the radical left did play an provocative and effective role of challenging the status quo and critiquing power.
But, PC came from the Left, and it stifles debate, controversy, and free exchange of ideas. Because the Left is so hampered by PC, it has muffled itself. And since the Left is funded by the likes of George Soros, it has essentially become Left Inc.

So, there is only the Alt Right that is bold and brazen enough to say it like it is.