Race Denial Is No Long Tenable - Ideology Is Downstream from Iconography

Following WWII and the demise of Nazism(and revelations of its horrors) and prior to the explosion of race problems in America(and now in Europe as well), one could forgive the sincere belief among intellectuals, social scientists, and politicians that race is essentially a ‘social construct’ and, once equality was assured under the law, all races could achieve more or less the same. If intellectuals were wrong about race reality and racial differences back then, it was more out of naivete or idealism than dogma, cowardice, or some pernicious agenda.

But after several decades of social experimentation, it should be clear to any honest person that racial differences are all-too-real and account for the persistent problems of race, especially pertaining to blacks. But because of the pervasiveness of PC as status symbol(as political incorrectness will invariably lead to blacklisting or demotion in the choicest careers), iconography of holy relics(as Jews, Negroes, and Homos are now objects of mandatory reverence), and radical violence as forms of intimidation(as heretics & dissidents face real danger of being physically assaulted by Antifa thugs, BLM lunatics, or screeching campus fanatics), most academics and media people are FORCED to be dishonest, FORCED to ‘not know’ what they, in the heart of hearts, know.

We can forgive a white liberal in the 1940s, 1950s, and even in the 1960s for believing that black conditions would be vastly improved with new laws and federal programs because, after all, blacks(along with other non-white races) had been denied equal opportunity in America. But after several decades of undeniable proof of black advantage in muscle power, black impulsiveness, black aggressiveness, and black psychopathy that tends toward obsessive egotism & narcissism, one has to be willfully disingenuous or just plain delusional to insist that the racial problems in this country owe to the legacy of slavery and ‘Jim Crow’.

It’s no longer about Jim Crow but ‘Radio Raheem’(the obnoxious thug of Spike Lee’s worthless DO THE RIGHT THING), the kind of moron who is all too common in black communities across America. The problem is too many Negroes who act like ‘nogs’ and carry this ‘groid’ gene that makes them tougher, more aggressive, more impulsive, and more psychopathic. After decades of black rampage against other races(and among themselves), this fact should be plain as day, but the tyranny of political correctness prohibits honest discussion of race that locates the black problem as rooted in genetics. As a result, we are left with praising everything black(as if even Problem Blacks are really just misguided and misunderstood victims of the System)and blaming anything white as explanation for the failures of the black community.

PC is an excuse-making machine that blames external white forces for all that stinks in the black community. (This is all the more disingenuous because it is the problematic nature of blacks that is hyped and sensationalized as ‘cool’ and ‘badass’. So, the very white progs who insist something must be done about black gangsta culture of mayhem and murder also promote it as ‘authentic’ and something worthy of emulation.) The idiot critic Andrew O’Hehir at Salon surmised(or pontificated) that Detroit’s decline owed to envious white racism’s punishment of Motown. Apparently, white folks decided Detroit must go down because Smokey Robinson wrote too many groovy songs.

To be sure, conservatives are hardly better on the Race Issue; they also play by the PC songbook in their own way. So, we are told that Detroit was ruined by Liberalism, socialism, and the Democratic Party. Apparently, it had nothing to do with race, specifically the naturally destructive tendency among blacks. If so, why are some white-majority cities under Democratic rule among the richest in America? Why is San Francisco and Manhattan, two very Liberal cities, overflowing with wealth and privilege despite their ‘big government’ policies?

Or consider how Ann Coulter blames lowly black behavior on the Democratic Party, as if blacks would have acted better under Republicans. So, how are blacks acting in Republican Alabama or Texas? Or channeling Thomas Sowell, Ann Coulter muses that blacks learned how to be violent from Scotch-Irish hillbillies, a notion that would imply that Black Africa was an Edenic paradise of peace and harmony when, in fact, it was inhabited by spear-chucking savages from time immemorial. Why is there so much nonsense about blacks?

Political Correctness isn’t just about ideas & issues but also about idols & icons. In a way, the power of idolatry & iconography is more crucial to the sway of PC. After all, even as the ‘right’ and the ‘left’ differ in their explanations & proposals of the Black Problem, both sides are agreed that blacks, along with Jews and even homos, must be treated as a preternaturally noble and holy people, a Magic People. Despite differences in ideology, the American ‘right’ and American ‘left’ are agreed on the icons. It’s like the conflict between Catholics and Protestants or between Sunnis and Shias. Despite doctrinal differences, they worship the same gods or icons. So, ‘iconology’ > ideology. While ideology offers explanations, ‘iconology’ determines what or whom should be worshiped. There is a reason why Jews, homos, and Negroes have special iconic power in the US. Part of the reason is obvious: Jews control the media and decide which people should get favorable attention and adoration. But it’s also because Jews, homos, and blacks have special talents. Jews are especially good with intellectualism, science, business, and humor. So, they are admired as people of superior skills whose achievements continue to do wonders for all humanity. Jews also promoted the Cult of Shoah. As for homos, they are naturally fanciful, flamboyant, & narcissistic, and in our Age of Vanity & Hedonism, those qualities count for a lot. As for Negroes, they dominate sports, pop music, and sexual symbolism. For many whites, nothing is worthier of worship than the black ‘twerking’ booty and the black dong. Andrew Breitbart once said "Politics is downstream from culture." Sometimes, ideology is downstream from iconography. People are captivated by something first on the sensory level and then seek rational or ideological explanations to justify their fixation. It’s like the John Hurt’s closeted homo character in LOVE AND DEATH IN LONG ISLAND who is so enthralled by the iconic sexuality of some second-rate actor that his mind follows his heart and balls.

Globalists promote Homomania to Young People to Sever their Connection to People, Culture, and History

Globalists promote the homo stuff because, when young people are made to primarily identify with or admire/praise homos, they lose connection to their own race, culture, and history.

Every people have its deep ethnic roots. Irish have deep Irish roots, Poles have deep Polish roots, and Japanese have deep Japanese roots. So, if kids are raised to primarily identify with and admire their own family, people, and culture, they feel a deep meaningful connection to their ancestors, lore, and roots.

Imagine there's a Greek kid who is raised to identify most with family, kin, nationality, and Greek culture. His main loyalty will be to Greekness. Also, Real Sexuality is about procreation and continuity since all human lives are the product of sex between men and women. Real Sexuality reminds us of our biological roots, the value of families, and our duty to life.

In contrast, homosexuality cannot produce and has never produced life. So, when young people are made to identify with or praise homos, they reject the very source and process of life.
As a result, Life becomes a game of vanity, theatrics, frivolity, and narcissism. Also, homos come in all colors. There are homos in every nation and of every race. And homomania is a global phenomenon than a national one. It's about the united supremacism of homos all over the world in spreading 'rainbow' degeneracy into every nation as the main theme of love, morality, and spirituality.

Since homos cannot produce life, they indulge in 'creativity over creation'. Homo acts, such as fecal penetration and vaginal grinding, can never ever produce life, not a single one. As substitute for life, homos create a cartoon-fantasy land that favors hair dyes, tattoos, and piercings. And these forms of degeneracy are spread throughout the culture. This is great for globalism since its agenda is to sever people from cradle to their sense of roots, origins, race, and history.

This is why globalists push homomania on your nation. Notice that people who come under homo-influence almost invariably lose their sense of roots and connection to the rich tangibles of race, culture, and history. Their main identity is one of vapid celebrity narcissism and pop culture fantasies controlled by Jewish globalists and Homo decadents.

Mixed-Race People are proof that Race is Real

Some people say the existence of mixed-race people proves that race is not real. Actually, it proves the opposite: Race is real. After all, there has to be white people and black people in order to create mulattoes. Without the existence of real whites and real blacks, you cannot have mulattoes. You can't make a mulatto by having blacks breed with blacks or by having whites breed with whites. For there to be the mulatto, there has to be white people and black people. Also, only mixing whites and blacks will produce mulattoes. You can't create a mulatto by mixing whites and Asians. Likewise, you can only create a Eurasian by mixing white and Asian. You can't get a Eurasian by mixing black and Arab.

You can mix orange juice and apple juice to produce an orange-apple blend.
So, does the existence of the mixture prove that orange juice and apple juice are not real? Does it prove that orange juice and apple juice are mere social constructs? No, the mixture is possible only if apple juice and orange juice really exist in the first place. The mixture can only result from the blending of distinct juices.

Just like the blend of apple juice and orange juice isn't possible unless apple juice and orange juice really exist, mixed-race people cannot coming into being without the existence of distinct and separate races.

Individual Differences are Real. What about Group Differences?

Progs have no problem with the reality of individual differences but have a big trouble with the concept of group differences. They admit some individuals are smarter than others, but they are reluctant to believe a group can be smarter than another group.

So, if someone says Mike Tyson and Justin Bieber are different in many respects as individuals, even Progs would agree. Tyson and Bieber are different individuals and different as individuals.

Now, suppose some mad scientist clones Mike Tyson and makes a thousand copies of him. Suppose this scientist also clones Justin Bieber into a thousand copies..

Didn't we go from validity of individual differences to validity of group differences?
Surely, the clone-tribe of Tysons are different as a group from the clone-tribe of Biebers.

Of course, people of a race are not clones of one another. There are too many genetic variations. Still, they are kind of like rough-clones of an 'extended family' because they share the DNA that evolved in isolation to make them distinct from other groups.

So, if we grab a bunch of average whites and a bunch of average blacks, whites will have more in common with one another than with blacks, and blacks will have more in common with one another than with whites. Even though there may be more genetic differences between a white giant and a whited dwarf than between an average white man and an average black man, most people don't have extreme-traits --- like Down's Syndrome or some rare genetic condition --- and belong to the racial mean.  Among people of this mean, they have more in common with members of their own race(or subspecies) than with members of another race.

Anyway, the Tyson-Bieber Experiment proves that group differences can exist. Just multiply the traits of an individual to form a larger group. Such a group will surely differ from another group with different DNA basis.

Why do the Elitists want to ban the Truth about Race from the Masses?

Even though Political Correctness enforces rigid dogma on Racial matters --- "race is just a social construct", "there are no significant racial differences", etc --- , in truth many individuals in the academia & think-tanks are well-aware that there is a genetic basis to race and racial differences. And these people freely discuss this matter among themselves. So, their main concern is not the discussion of race and racial differences but the 'danger' of this knowledge leaking out to the masses. To these elitists, many of whom are Jewish or white collaborators(cucks or shabbos goyim), the rise of mass consciousness on the Reality of Race is a threat to their own power and privilege since the entire edifice of Political Correctness is built on 'White Guilt' of 'racism' that supposedly constructed wholly artificial racial hierarchies when, all things being equal, every race is capable of achieving as much as any other. Thus, Political Correctness blames 'white racism' for all the social inequalities and problems in the West. This is useful for the Jewish elites because their elite-minority-power rests on suppressing white pride, power, and unity. And nothing has been as effective as 'white guilt', especially since Western Morality is founded on Christian Culture of Conscience.

But in fact, many Jewish elites know that race is real among themselves. They know that blacks tend to make a mess of things because blacks are more aggressive and less intelligent. Also, genetics made blacks more muscular and stronger, which accounts for interracial violence being overwhelmingly black on non-black. Jews and white shabbos goyim know this in their inner circles. But if such knowledge were to become widely disseminated among the white masses, the cult of 'white guilt' would dissipate. White people would realize that it's not their fault that other races have the problem that they do. Thus freed of 'white guilt', white people will think, organize, and operate on basis of white pride, power, and unity. This will threaten Jewish elite-minority-power-and-privilege, especially since Jews have been so hostile toward whites. And since white shabbos goyim(cuck collaborators) depend on Jewish largess, threat to Jewish power is threat to their power(just like threat to Nazi power in France also threatened French collaborators in Vichy). Is it any wonder that not only Jews but Conservatism Inc. is freaked out about the Alt Right that is willing to directly address the issues of race and the Jewish Question?

This is why the Jews want to keep the Realities of Race a SECRET KNOWLEDGE that can only be discussed among the Jewish elitists and their closest allies. As for the white masses, they must be kept in the dark and fed a steady diet of 'race is just a social construct' and 'white guilt'. Some Jewish academics have said that EVEN IF there is scientific truth about racial differences, it must be censored & suppressed for the Social Good. Of course, what these Jews really want is to protect their own power and privilege that is premised on Everlasting 'White Guilt' that paralyzes White Pride & Power.

But such attitude is nothing new in history. The Hindu Brahmins also had their secret knowledge. Their sacred texts could only be read by them for certain peoples. If someone of the wrong caste heard even a bit of this knowledge, the punishment was molten lead poured down their ears.
And in totalitarian-communist nations, the knowledge of the outside world, especially of the capitalist West, was restricted to the elites. The communist elites knew that life was more bountiful in the capitalist West. They themselves enjoyed the goods and entertainment of the the Enemy. But they kept this knowledge within the inner circle while feeding the Official Dogma to the masses since their power and privilege were premised on the 'scientific-materialism' of Marxist-Leninist Doctrine. If the masses were to know the difference between the Capitalist West and Communist East, they could rise up to overthrow the power of communist elites(like what happened in Romania).
So, the communist elites kept the facts about the capitalist West a Secret Knowledge. They themselves wanted to access and enjoy Western luxuries, but they had to censor the truth from the masses who, if enlightened, might demand end to communist rule in favor of market economy.

Jewish elites, Brahmins, and Communist rulers, as keepers of the Secret Knowledge, all invoked the INTERESTS OF THE PEOPLE or NEEDS OF A SACRED ORDER, but their main concern was preserving their own power and privilege. If the masses were to know, they might tell the rulers to go. What the rulers decried as corrupting of the masses was really disruptive to their own power.
And this is why Political Correctness is used to keep certain facts and ideas taboo for everyone but for the elites who believe they and only they should be guardians of the Secret Knowledge.
Insider Trading may be illegal on Wall Street(even though the real insiders do it all the time by 'other means'), but Insider-trading-of-secret-knowledge is the norm in elite circles.

When the Jewish elites attacked Charles Murray, it wasn't primarily because of his views on race and racial differences. If anything, such views had long been aired in elite circles. The problem was he wrote a book for the public, thus playing a Promethean role. Gods didn't punish Prometheus for having the knowledge of fire. They punished him because he took the knowledge of fire to the mortals. Thus, fire was no longer the sole magic power of the gods.

Ethnology trumps Economics. Material Wealth is not Cultural Wealth.

Mass immigration must be opposed EVEN IF all the newcomers are intelligent, hardworking, and do wonders for the economy.

A nation is, first and foremost, about the shared treasury of race, culture, heritage, history, and territory.
Economy serves the material needs of a nation. It is NOT the heart and soul of a nation. After all, even a poor nation has value and meaning based on its race, culture, and heritage.

West Germany was rich, East Germany was relatively poor. So, economically or materially, one was better than the other. But East Germany was no less racially and culturally rich as West Germany. Both nations, despite ideological and economic differences, were German in the deepest historical and cultural sense.

Same with South Korea and North Korea. South is immeasurably richer than the North, but it is not richer in identity, heritage, and culture. After all, the North, despite its tyranny & poverty, is just as Korean as South Korea. In identity, North is just as rich as the South. Indeed, it may be richer because South is a willing whore of US-dominated globalism that is racial-and-cultural war on all gentile nations.

It's like even a poor Jew is just as Jewish(in the racial and cultural sense) as a rich Jew.

Cultural wealth is different from material wealth.

A poor Jew who maintains his identity, history, and heritage is culturally richer than a rich Jew who, despite wealth and privilege, abandons his identity and heritage to be come crass & vain consumer. Such a Jew may be materially rich, but he is culturally famished and impoverished. (Because white people have been starved of rich nutrients of racial and cultural identity, they serve their hunger for cultural roots by feeding on the racial and cultural identities of others. As cucks forbidden to consume & digest their own racial and cultural identity/heritage, they gorge on AIPAC chicken-feed that makes them cluck for Israel, Israel, and Israel. They are cornfed cucks. Or they become like Rachel Dolezal & Shaun King and feed on the identity of blacks. Such whites over-gorge on other identities since feeding on other identities never feels fully satiating and satisfying. Humans have a natural longing to belong to something, and when they are denied the right to belong to their own kind, they direct their famished attentions to some other identity. It's like Uncle Tom Blacks, denied the chance of black pride, found meaning in shucking and jiving for white massuh.)

Throughout their history, Jews were sometimes rich, sometimes poor, sometimes powerful, sometimes powerless. But if there was one powerfully connective link throughout those 3,500 yrs, it was the sense of shared identity, history, and heritage.. and the collective dream of returning to the Promised Land, the homeland. Even when Jews were at their material-poorest in the leanest years, their racial-cultural value remained priceless, no less precious than in the fat years.

Now, suppose Finland could become materially richer by having 5 million Hindus or Chinese come and become 'New Finns'. Suppose every one of those newcomers is a law-abiding and hard-working and decent person. Suppose these newcomers do wonders for the economy.

So, is it worth it to allow them in? Only if your idea of nation is purely materialistic and not racial, cultural. or historical. According to soulless materialism, the soil of Finland is chemically no different from soil in Russia, China, and India. According to materialism, Finnishness = GDP numbers and Finn = worker or consumer or voter.

But if your idea of nation is racial, cultural, and historical, the land of the Finns is where your ancestors and heroes are buried. And Finnishness has meaning and value beyond the latest data of economic output. It is about national kinship and shared historical memory.

Of course, Jews know this, which is why they carefully guard the racial, cultural, historical, and territorial integrity of Israel. But Jews seek to weaken gentile nations by economizing their identity, culture, territory, and destiny.

DO AS THE JEWS DO.
DISOBEY WHAT THE JEWS SAY.

Inclusion leads to Exclusion

'Inclusiveness' has replaced 'Diversity' as the buzzword of the Progs.

In truth, Inclusion is exclusion.

For example...

If you allow blacks into your community, your school team will exclude white players in favor of faster & tougher black players. It leads to exclusion of white athletes.
Also, inclusion of blacks into white communities leads to exclusion of white seeds in white wombs that, instead, welcome black seeds as superior. Such is the way of interracist Jungle Fever. Even some white males welcome this because they have cuckishly idealized their beta-status as atonement for 'racism'. Also, as sports-and-rap addicts, white boys grow up idolizing black males as 'heroes'.

The inclusion of blacks into Europe has led to exclusion of white athletes from many events.

The inclusion of men in women's sports would lead to exclusion of women who simply cannot compete with men.
The inclusion of heavy-weight boxers in welter-weight division will exclude welter-weights from any victory since heavy-weights will totally dominate over the smaller boxers.

Inclusion of Asians into the US has led to Asian female exclusion of inferior Asian males because Asian wombs will only accept white or black seeds.

Inclusion of Jews and Asians into the US has led to exclusion of many white gentiles from elite colleges.

So, Inclusion always leads to some form of Exclusion.

Inclusion of Neocons into the GOP led to the exclusion/expulsion of Paleo-cons and Eurocentrist-cons.

Inclusion of your enemies, rivals, and hostile competitors leads to the purging & exclusion of your own kind.

When Roman Empire 'included' the Christians, it led to the purging and exclusion of the paganists.

Inclusion of rats and pigs into Galapagos island led to exclusion of various species in the game of evolutionary survival.

Beware of what you INCLUDE. It could lead to the EXCLUSION, even extinction, of your own kind.

ALT RIGHT is...

ALT RIGHT is...

1. Speaking truth to Globalist oligarchical power.

2. Noticing that Jewish elites rule America and saying so.

3. Being honest about the role of race and racial differences in American society.

4. Calling out on the hypocrisy of Conservatism Inc and Liberalism Inc. Both SAY one thing but DO another. Hillary claims to love blacks and Muslims, but the new Democratic Party since Bill Clinton locked up record numbers of black males(to drastically reduce crime) and accelerated gentrification -- code word for driving blacks out of urban areas. It also pushed Wars for Israel that killed over a million Arabs and Muslims since the end of the Cold War. Establishment and its minions are experts at Weasel Words.

5. Not being afraid of Political Correctness that forbids free exchange of ideas in media and academia. PC sucks all the air out of the room wherever people pursue serious and free discussion. Alt Right is glasnost from PC. Alt Right knows the truth shall slay the Great Deception. Even a one-dollar truth has more value than a million-dollar lie.
Alt Right with no money speaks more truth than governments, establishment media, and institutions with many billions.

6. Calling out all American politicians as whores of the donor class, especially that of Zion.

7. Opposing neo-imperialist Zio-American Globalism that arrogantly declares America to be an 'exceptional' and 'indispensable' nation beyond International Law. Alt Right has no use for such jingoism, chauvinism, and supremacism masked masked with neo-missionary zeal.

8. Condemning the 'new cold war' with Russia concocted by Jewish oligarchs who remain sore at Putin's nationalism that foiled the Jewish takeover of Russia.

9. Refusing to kneel at the altar of Homomania -- a cult-worship of homos and trannies as holy angels -- pushed by Wall Street, Hollywood, Ivy League, Las Vegas, and rest of the oligarchic class. Also refusing to worship Holocaust as a religion and MLK as god. Alt Right knows only too well that so-called 'secular liberalism' has its own gods, relics, and taboos. Alt Right understands PC to be a quasi-religion despite its conceit of rationalism and objectivity.

10. Believing in the right of free speech and right to own guns to protect oneself from crime and the tyrannical state.

11. Supporting nationalism for all peoples to ensure sovereignty and independence for every country.
Alt Right does not rely on 2-PC's -- Pop Culture(controlled by Jews and homos) and Political Correctness -- for core values and principles to guide life and morals. It leaves that stuff for soulless globalists like Bill Clinton and Lena Dunham. Alt Right believes in heredity, heritage, and the rich myths of a people.

12. The realization that Diversity is the strength for globalist elites(especially Jews) who use divide-and-rule among the various racial and ethnic groups to prevent a unified challenge to elite rule. For most people, Diversity means more division, more inequality, more distrust. It is exactly what the ruling elites ordered as they want the rabble confused and divided.

13. Rejection of finance-capitalism as the core economy.

14. Consciousness of European identity and ancestry; the Will to preserve heritage and territory. In this sense, Alt Right is Zionism for white people. If Jews deserve Israel as their sacred homeland, each European nationality deserves its own nation as its homeland.

15. Seeing race-traitors like Hillary and Jeb Bush for what they are: comprador-collaborators of the globo-Zionist elites.

16. The realization that WE ARE ALL 'PALESTINIANS' under Jewish domination and manipulation. Just as Jews dispossessed the Palestinians(who live in defeat and humiliation), they are now engineering the dissolution of blood and soil of Europeans and European-Americans.

17. Choosing conviction and principles over careerism and self-interest unlike the cuckservatives and cuckerals who will sell their mothers down the river for thirty pieces of silver.

18. Being tough and courageous than being 'triggered' by everything and demanding 'safe spaces' from reality.

19. Having the guts to say the main reason why blacks cause so many problems is because they are naturally stronger, more aggressive, and less intelligent. Evolution is real, and it matters.

20. Having the guts to say the reason why Jews rule America is due to their higher IQ, tribal networking, cynical exploitation of the Holocaust(to suppress any criticism of Jewish power), and lack of scruples.
Alt Right knows all too well that Jews push 'universalism', 'diversity', and 'inclusion' to expand their tribal power. If Jews are about rejection of race and identity for a globalized humanity, why do they pressure all US politicians to attend the Jewish Nuremberg rally called the AIPAC Conference?