We all want liberty. We all want to be free as individuals, but in a state of war, liberty and freedom cannot be the highest values. In a state of war, what matters most is survival and victory, which are best ensured by teamwork, organization, loyalty, and trust. Those who invoke liberty & freedom to betray their own side or desert to the other side deserve our contempt. It doesn't matter if they betrayed or deserted in the name of freedom or liberty. The fact remains they are traitors and/or deserters who turned against their own kind. This is why libertarianism is worthless in a state of war.
The white race is currently in a state of war. It is in a state of war with Jewish globalists who infect and colonize white minds with 'white guilt' and 'diversity'. It is in a state of war with Third World masses who invade and appropriate white lands to leech off white wealth and achievement. It is in a state of war with blacks who beat up white males and colonize white wombs of white women whose minds are infected with the Virus of Jungle Fever disseminated by Jewish-control-of-media.
In this WWWW or War of Words, Worlds, and Wombs, any white person who collaborates with Jewish globalists is a traitor. Any white person who welcomes mass non-white invasion is a cuck-collaborator. Any white woman who offers her womb to Negroes is a sexual deserter. She has deserted her bio-cultural obligation as creator of future white children and instead uses her womb to make black babies for blacks, the enemy of the white race. White women who choose ACOWW, or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, are enemies of the white race. It's no wonder that Jews, who are hellbent on destruction of white power, are going all out to turn every white woman into a mudshark, a race-traitor and sexual-deserter.
And it doesn't matter if these traitors and deserters did what they did in the name of individual freedom or liberty. The fact remains that, in a state of war, they sided with the enemy and worked against their own race, culture, heritage, and homeland.
After all, the military and intelligence services do not forgive traitors and deserters because the transgression took place in the name of individual liberty and freedom.
Only when white people can ensure survival & enjoy security, only then the issue of individual liberty & freedom can be of primary importance to the white race.
When a people, culture, and land are threatened and in a state of war, Survival and Victory take precedence over all other considerations and principles, even over liberty and freedom.
After all, George Washington hanged traitors. He knew that traitors and deserters could invoke individual freedom to do as Benedict Arnold did.
This is why Jews promote libertarianism as the favored ideology among white 'conservatives'. It leads to atomization, dissension, self-absorption, decadence, and greed, none of which fosters or encourages teamwork and cooperation among white people.
Now, am I arguing for 'my country right or wrong' or 'my people, right or wrong'? No, that would be imperialism.
What I'm arguing for is nationalism for all peoples that ensures survival and victory of each people in their own realm in accordance to the particularities of identity, history, and territory.
Individual freedom and liberty are wonderful things but only in a State of Peace and Security. In a State of War, they must take a backseat to group unity, organization, loyalty, solidarity, and trust in order to roll back or defeat the existential enemy of one's own people, land, and culture.
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
Friday, May 26, 2017
Problem of Trust Culture & Education. Problem of Power Core in America.
There are lots of advantages of being part of a Trust Culture. But one of the downsides is the tendency to earnestly trust the Prevailing Authority and its Official Dogma.
Blind trust is a hindrance not to learning but to realizing that there may be an unspoken agenda behind the stated intentions of the Authority. Official Propaganda becomes all the more tricky when the Power is shrouded in the sanctimony of 'Social Justice'. The Power often does this by directing the righteous rage of the indoctrinated toward something other than the ruling power. In the West, the globalists have the real power, but they avoid scrutiny by directing the righteous rage at nationalism and the bogeyman of 'white supremacism'.
Culture of Trust is good for cohesion and cooperation, but when Authority if unworthy of Trust, we need a Culture of Inquiry. We need to question what we are being taught and why. When students trust the Authority, they can be good students of what they are taught. But they will never learn to realize the agenda behind the education. They will not awaken to the fact that education is often indoctrination to serve the interests of a certain group.
For most of American history, Wasps constituted the ruling elites. And then, the ruling elites have been Jewish. If Jews fall from power, Wasps won't be able to gain dominant power again. Will the result be come colorblind elite based on meritocracy? No way, as identity politics and groups interests will heat up. Without a ruling racial or ethnic group to hold it all together, can there even be a union? Without Turkish domination, the Ottoman Empire wasn't possible. Without the Russian Core, the USSR would have lacked gravitation forc.
The power core of US used to be Wasps, and this made good sense because Wasps founded America and comprised a huge segment of US population, even as other groups grew in number and power.
Then the power core shifted to Jews. This is problematic since Jews have shallower roots in the US and constitute only 2%. Also, if Wasp power was premised on positive Pride of founding and building America, Jewish power has been premised on negative shaming white gentiles for their historical sins, which can be expatiated ONLY BY the non-whitening of America, or so PC says. (But if the great sin of White America had been to Indians and blacks, how are those groups well-served by massive invasion of the US by Asians, Hispanics, Hindus, Muslims, Africans, etc?)
Still, even if Jewish power core is problematic, it is still something around which everything else revolves. It is a nucleus of power. But if Jews lose that centrality, can there be any operative power core in the US?
Blind trust is a hindrance not to learning but to realizing that there may be an unspoken agenda behind the stated intentions of the Authority. Official Propaganda becomes all the more tricky when the Power is shrouded in the sanctimony of 'Social Justice'. The Power often does this by directing the righteous rage of the indoctrinated toward something other than the ruling power. In the West, the globalists have the real power, but they avoid scrutiny by directing the righteous rage at nationalism and the bogeyman of 'white supremacism'.
Culture of Trust is good for cohesion and cooperation, but when Authority if unworthy of Trust, we need a Culture of Inquiry. We need to question what we are being taught and why. When students trust the Authority, they can be good students of what they are taught. But they will never learn to realize the agenda behind the education. They will not awaken to the fact that education is often indoctrination to serve the interests of a certain group.
For most of American history, Wasps constituted the ruling elites. And then, the ruling elites have been Jewish. If Jews fall from power, Wasps won't be able to gain dominant power again. Will the result be come colorblind elite based on meritocracy? No way, as identity politics and groups interests will heat up. Without a ruling racial or ethnic group to hold it all together, can there even be a union? Without Turkish domination, the Ottoman Empire wasn't possible. Without the Russian Core, the USSR would have lacked gravitation forc.
The power core of US used to be Wasps, and this made good sense because Wasps founded America and comprised a huge segment of US population, even as other groups grew in number and power.
Then the power core shifted to Jews. This is problematic since Jews have shallower roots in the US and constitute only 2%. Also, if Wasp power was premised on positive Pride of founding and building America, Jewish power has been premised on negative shaming white gentiles for their historical sins, which can be expatiated ONLY BY the non-whitening of America, or so PC says. (But if the great sin of White America had been to Indians and blacks, how are those groups well-served by massive invasion of the US by Asians, Hispanics, Hindus, Muslims, Africans, etc?)
Still, even if Jewish power core is problematic, it is still something around which everything else revolves. It is a nucleus of power. But if Jews lose that centrality, can there be any operative power core in the US?
Saturday, May 13, 2017
Mass Immigration is Intro-Colonization, and it is just as bad as Imperialism, or Extro-Colonization
How is Intro-Colonization better than Extro-Colonization in the long run?
Extro-Colonization conquers and takes other people’s lands, like what Alexander the Great did. Or like what the Persian Imperialists did.
Intro-Colonization allows one’s own civilization, kingdom, or nation to be colonized and conquered by others.
Both lead to the demise and replacement of one people and culture(in their own homeland) by another or many others.
What happened to Palestinians as the result of mass Jewish immigration, which was both intro-colonization and extro-colonization? The ruling elites in Palestine allowed it, but these ruling elites were really foreigners, namely the British Imperialists.
Of course, Palestinians didn’t choose that path for themselves. It was chosen for them by the British elites who ruled that part of the world. British rule in Palestine allowed massive Intro-Colonization of Zionist Extro-colonists. The result was tragedy for Palestinians.
Extro-colonization or Intro-Colonization, it is a form of replacism and displacism. In our globalizing world where all nations are threatened with mass-conquest by others with ZERO respect for national borders, identities, and cultures, all people should be against demographic imperialism. Especially Jewish globalists have NO respect for any nation and its identity and culture. They seek to weaken and exploit any nation that possesses an ounce of sovereignty and autonomy with ‘multi-culturalism’, ‘diversity’, homomania, and minority-elite-supremacism.
And in the Golden Age of Universal Nationalism following the end of WWII, all peoples agreed on the ideal and necessity of National Sovereignty. European colonists in the Third World had to return home and mind their own business and preserve their own nations. And newly independent Third World nations guarded their own autonomy and sought to develop their own economies. All nations tried to respect one another even as they expanded world trade and exchange of ideas and expressions.
So, what destroyed this balance?
The process of massive Intro-Colonization pursued by Western elites, especially with the encouragement and pressure of Jewish elites. For the Western elites, Intro-Colonization meant cheaper labor and more consumers. For Jewish elites, it meant Diversity and divide-and-rule over the goyim. And for non-whites in the Third World whose main theme has been nationalism and autonomy following WWII, the siren call of abandoning their own nations, moving to the West, and enjoying better material lives was too much to resist. They betrayed the ideal of national autonomy by favoring narrow self-interest over the national good. In seeking entry into the West, they join with Jewish globalists to undermine the national sovereignty of Western nations. But this will boomerang on their own nations. If they argue that the West must ‘put out’ to the world as a moral imperative, then the same logic will apply to their own nations. Thus, globalism doesn’t merely undermine and destroy Western nations. It promotion the Western Rejection of National Autonomy as the New Ideal for all nations… with the exception of Israel.
So, globalism brought about the New Age of Mass Colonization. Elites sermonize about ‘principles’ to push this madness, but I’ll take their principles more seriously when they make the same demands for Israel as for Poland and Hungary.
-----------------
It’s not ‘supremacism’ if you defend your turf. It is ‘supremacism’ when you invade others and rule over them.
Japanese were not supremacist when they were only defending Japan. They became supremacist when they invaded China and tried to rule over Chinese.
Greeks keeping Hellas for Greeks was not the problem. The problem was Greek imperialism over others. But Kennedy is less bothered by imperialism than immigration, which can lead to reverse-imperialism or demographic imperialism by foreigners.
Btw, most slaves in Greece were white and fellow Europeans. It’s like virtually all slaves in past Japan were Japanese. So, how is that a form of ‘racial supremacism’? If Greeks were biased, it was about culture. Greeks thought barbarians had inferior culture.
But then, Kennedy’s argument is oddly western-supremacist too. By arguing that Western Civilization belongs to everyone and not just to whites, she is saying all the world should be ‘westernized’.
Now, given that the West did most to create the modern world, the world had indeed become ‘westernized’. But this IDEA-aspect of Westernization doesn’t need massive transference of peoples. Ideas travel through the minds. Japan, Turkey, and Germany don’t need Hollywood in their own nations to learn to make their own movies. You don’t have to invite an Italian into your house to make pizza. Just learn the recipe from a book.
----------------
We are told ‘cultural appropriation’ is bad. But non-whites must now appropriate Western Classical culture? What’s wrong with keeping and preserving their own culture? Why must they adopt Hellenic cultural identity?
Also, should the West be appropriating peoples from other parts of the world and turning them ‘western’, thus cutting them off from their own cultural roots? Sharing Western Culture with non-Westerners may sound generous and ‘inclusive’, but it cuts non-whites off from their own cultures and encourages them to pretend that they are Greek. It’s like converting heathens to Christianity. It may seem ‘inclusive’ and ‘nice’, but the missionaries are cutting non-Christian natives from their own roots, cultures, and spiritual belief systems.
Also, Kennedy seems not to understand what Steve King really meant. There is a difference between Western Ideas and Western Folks.
It’s true that Western Civilization’s achievements don’t belong only to the West. They belong to anyone who will draw inspiration from them and use them. So, even though cinema is an American(and French) invention, other peoples can use the technology and make Arab movies, Asian movies, and African movies. The gun belongs to anyone who learns how to make them and use them even if the modern firearm is a Western invention.
Also, anyone can enjoy Beethoven or Mozart, just like anyone can appreciate Chinese architecture or Hindu temples or the Taj Mahal.
But there is more to a people than their arts, ideas, science, and technology. There is a thing called ethnos, a sense of national family, and this is deeper than any set of abstract ideas or technological advances. And it is this sense that the West has lost.
This sense of people-hood is more important than high achievements. After all, there are many peoples and nations that didn’t produce anything great. If Azerbaijanis had never existed, it wouldn’t have mattered much to the world. Unlike Jews, Greeks, Chinese, Arabs(with Islam), and Asian-Indians, Azerbaijanis didn’t do anything that fundamentally changed the world.
Still, at least for Azerbaijanis, their history, culture, and sense of lineage/heritage surely mean something simply because they are unique & distinct and imbue Azerbaijanis with a sense of who they are, where they’ve settled as homeland, and how they remember their folklore & history. So, even if Azerbaijanis don’t matter much to the world in terms of ideas and science, their culture means everything to them because it defines what they are in terms of blood, soil, and story. It’s like Jews became a people and culture first before they gained greatness.
And this is why there is something deeper than this thing called ‘Western Civilization’. While it’s true that it did more than any other civilization to reshape the world — and therefore became the template for modern world civilization —, the fact remains that European peoples and cultures would still exist and still have value even without the high achievement. Suppose Germans had never produced people like Kant, Goethe, Beethoven, Heisenberg, and etc. German civilization would have meant far less to the world, but German sense of folk, memory, and culture would still have been of priceless value to Germans. Before greatness is possible, there must be a people and culture. When a people attain greatness, they’ve created something of world significance. If they fail to achieve such, they cannot change the world… BUT their culture, even if not great, has immense value as something that defines a people, guides them, and lends them a sense of where they came from. Consider the Greeks during the Dark Ages. This was before Greeks created a Great Civilization, the ideas of which would come to eventually change the world. But even in the Dark Ages, there was a folk who struggled to defend their land and told stories to keep the legends and memory alive. This is the Core of a People. Greatness is the fruits that grow and hang abundantly from a tree, but such growth of fruits is possibly only if there is tree with trunk and roots. Too often, people regard Western Civilization as the fruits without any regard to the trunk and roots of ethnos, narrative and mythos, and territory.
So, for people like King, the achievements of the West are of secondary importance to the existence and survival of Western peoples and their sense of who they are in terms of ethnos, memory, and territory. And this core sense of blood, soil, and story is one thing that great peoples and ungreat peoples can have in common. However great or however ungreat, there is more to a people than its achievements. It’s like West Germany achieved far more than East Germany when it came to science, technology, and economy, but East Germans were no less German in the sense of blood, soil, and story that goes back for centuries and even millenniums if we count the world of Germanic barbarians.
All peoples, great or ungreat, should have the right to preserve and defend the core of blood, soil, and story in their designated homelands. Whether it’s Great Britain or un-great Bulgaria, it should have the right to preserve its core ethnos, history, and territory.
Also, even though Western Civilization can be appreciated by any people and can inspire any individual around the globe, there is a racial basis to its rise and achievement. In the most basic sense, Western literature conveys European temperament and personality. Western music conveys European emotions and passions. Western arts depict European forms and expressions. If Greeks looked and felt like Africans or Chinese, their arts and expressions would have been different.
Even when a people borrow culture from another people, their genetics work on the material and make it their own. It’s like Christianity, originated by Near Eastern Jews, was expressed differently among Arabs, Europeans, and blacks. Black people took much of Western music and created ‘black music’, and whites too black music and made it into ‘white rock’.
Extro-Colonization conquers and takes other people’s lands, like what Alexander the Great did. Or like what the Persian Imperialists did.
Intro-Colonization allows one’s own civilization, kingdom, or nation to be colonized and conquered by others.
Both lead to the demise and replacement of one people and culture(in their own homeland) by another or many others.
What happened to Palestinians as the result of mass Jewish immigration, which was both intro-colonization and extro-colonization? The ruling elites in Palestine allowed it, but these ruling elites were really foreigners, namely the British Imperialists.
Of course, Palestinians didn’t choose that path for themselves. It was chosen for them by the British elites who ruled that part of the world. British rule in Palestine allowed massive Intro-Colonization of Zionist Extro-colonists. The result was tragedy for Palestinians.
Extro-colonization or Intro-Colonization, it is a form of replacism and displacism. In our globalizing world where all nations are threatened with mass-conquest by others with ZERO respect for national borders, identities, and cultures, all people should be against demographic imperialism. Especially Jewish globalists have NO respect for any nation and its identity and culture. They seek to weaken and exploit any nation that possesses an ounce of sovereignty and autonomy with ‘multi-culturalism’, ‘diversity’, homomania, and minority-elite-supremacism.
And in the Golden Age of Universal Nationalism following the end of WWII, all peoples agreed on the ideal and necessity of National Sovereignty. European colonists in the Third World had to return home and mind their own business and preserve their own nations. And newly independent Third World nations guarded their own autonomy and sought to develop their own economies. All nations tried to respect one another even as they expanded world trade and exchange of ideas and expressions.
So, what destroyed this balance?
The process of massive Intro-Colonization pursued by Western elites, especially with the encouragement and pressure of Jewish elites. For the Western elites, Intro-Colonization meant cheaper labor and more consumers. For Jewish elites, it meant Diversity and divide-and-rule over the goyim. And for non-whites in the Third World whose main theme has been nationalism and autonomy following WWII, the siren call of abandoning their own nations, moving to the West, and enjoying better material lives was too much to resist. They betrayed the ideal of national autonomy by favoring narrow self-interest over the national good. In seeking entry into the West, they join with Jewish globalists to undermine the national sovereignty of Western nations. But this will boomerang on their own nations. If they argue that the West must ‘put out’ to the world as a moral imperative, then the same logic will apply to their own nations. Thus, globalism doesn’t merely undermine and destroy Western nations. It promotion the Western Rejection of National Autonomy as the New Ideal for all nations… with the exception of Israel.
So, globalism brought about the New Age of Mass Colonization. Elites sermonize about ‘principles’ to push this madness, but I’ll take their principles more seriously when they make the same demands for Israel as for Poland and Hungary.
-----------------
It’s not ‘supremacism’ if you defend your turf. It is ‘supremacism’ when you invade others and rule over them.
Japanese were not supremacist when they were only defending Japan. They became supremacist when they invaded China and tried to rule over Chinese.
Greeks keeping Hellas for Greeks was not the problem. The problem was Greek imperialism over others. But Kennedy is less bothered by imperialism than immigration, which can lead to reverse-imperialism or demographic imperialism by foreigners.
Btw, most slaves in Greece were white and fellow Europeans. It’s like virtually all slaves in past Japan were Japanese. So, how is that a form of ‘racial supremacism’? If Greeks were biased, it was about culture. Greeks thought barbarians had inferior culture.
But then, Kennedy’s argument is oddly western-supremacist too. By arguing that Western Civilization belongs to everyone and not just to whites, she is saying all the world should be ‘westernized’.
Now, given that the West did most to create the modern world, the world had indeed become ‘westernized’. But this IDEA-aspect of Westernization doesn’t need massive transference of peoples. Ideas travel through the minds. Japan, Turkey, and Germany don’t need Hollywood in their own nations to learn to make their own movies. You don’t have to invite an Italian into your house to make pizza. Just learn the recipe from a book.
----------------
We are told ‘cultural appropriation’ is bad. But non-whites must now appropriate Western Classical culture? What’s wrong with keeping and preserving their own culture? Why must they adopt Hellenic cultural identity?
Also, should the West be appropriating peoples from other parts of the world and turning them ‘western’, thus cutting them off from their own cultural roots? Sharing Western Culture with non-Westerners may sound generous and ‘inclusive’, but it cuts non-whites off from their own cultures and encourages them to pretend that they are Greek. It’s like converting heathens to Christianity. It may seem ‘inclusive’ and ‘nice’, but the missionaries are cutting non-Christian natives from their own roots, cultures, and spiritual belief systems.
Also, Kennedy seems not to understand what Steve King really meant. There is a difference between Western Ideas and Western Folks.
It’s true that Western Civilization’s achievements don’t belong only to the West. They belong to anyone who will draw inspiration from them and use them. So, even though cinema is an American(and French) invention, other peoples can use the technology and make Arab movies, Asian movies, and African movies. The gun belongs to anyone who learns how to make them and use them even if the modern firearm is a Western invention.
Also, anyone can enjoy Beethoven or Mozart, just like anyone can appreciate Chinese architecture or Hindu temples or the Taj Mahal.
But there is more to a people than their arts, ideas, science, and technology. There is a thing called ethnos, a sense of national family, and this is deeper than any set of abstract ideas or technological advances. And it is this sense that the West has lost.
This sense of people-hood is more important than high achievements. After all, there are many peoples and nations that didn’t produce anything great. If Azerbaijanis had never existed, it wouldn’t have mattered much to the world. Unlike Jews, Greeks, Chinese, Arabs(with Islam), and Asian-Indians, Azerbaijanis didn’t do anything that fundamentally changed the world.
Still, at least for Azerbaijanis, their history, culture, and sense of lineage/heritage surely mean something simply because they are unique & distinct and imbue Azerbaijanis with a sense of who they are, where they’ve settled as homeland, and how they remember their folklore & history. So, even if Azerbaijanis don’t matter much to the world in terms of ideas and science, their culture means everything to them because it defines what they are in terms of blood, soil, and story. It’s like Jews became a people and culture first before they gained greatness.
And this is why there is something deeper than this thing called ‘Western Civilization’. While it’s true that it did more than any other civilization to reshape the world — and therefore became the template for modern world civilization —, the fact remains that European peoples and cultures would still exist and still have value even without the high achievement. Suppose Germans had never produced people like Kant, Goethe, Beethoven, Heisenberg, and etc. German civilization would have meant far less to the world, but German sense of folk, memory, and culture would still have been of priceless value to Germans. Before greatness is possible, there must be a people and culture. When a people attain greatness, they’ve created something of world significance. If they fail to achieve such, they cannot change the world… BUT their culture, even if not great, has immense value as something that defines a people, guides them, and lends them a sense of where they came from. Consider the Greeks during the Dark Ages. This was before Greeks created a Great Civilization, the ideas of which would come to eventually change the world. But even in the Dark Ages, there was a folk who struggled to defend their land and told stories to keep the legends and memory alive. This is the Core of a People. Greatness is the fruits that grow and hang abundantly from a tree, but such growth of fruits is possibly only if there is tree with trunk and roots. Too often, people regard Western Civilization as the fruits without any regard to the trunk and roots of ethnos, narrative and mythos, and territory.
So, for people like King, the achievements of the West are of secondary importance to the existence and survival of Western peoples and their sense of who they are in terms of ethnos, memory, and territory. And this core sense of blood, soil, and story is one thing that great peoples and ungreat peoples can have in common. However great or however ungreat, there is more to a people than its achievements. It’s like West Germany achieved far more than East Germany when it came to science, technology, and economy, but East Germans were no less German in the sense of blood, soil, and story that goes back for centuries and even millenniums if we count the world of Germanic barbarians.
All peoples, great or ungreat, should have the right to preserve and defend the core of blood, soil, and story in their designated homelands. Whether it’s Great Britain or un-great Bulgaria, it should have the right to preserve its core ethnos, history, and territory.
Also, even though Western Civilization can be appreciated by any people and can inspire any individual around the globe, there is a racial basis to its rise and achievement. In the most basic sense, Western literature conveys European temperament and personality. Western music conveys European emotions and passions. Western arts depict European forms and expressions. If Greeks looked and felt like Africans or Chinese, their arts and expressions would have been different.
Even when a people borrow culture from another people, their genetics work on the material and make it their own. It’s like Christianity, originated by Near Eastern Jews, was expressed differently among Arabs, Europeans, and blacks. Black people took much of Western music and created ‘black music’, and whites too black music and made it into ‘white rock’.
Most Important Fact of US-led Globalism is that Jews won the Invisible War
There are military wars. US won most of them. Even when US lost, the other side suffered far more damage than the US. It’s been said US lost the Vietnam War, but compare what happened to US with what happened to Vietnam. It’s like George Kennedy’s loss to Paul Newman in COOL HAND LUKE.
Some might say US lost in Iraq too, but US was untouched by the war. Iraq is a total mess.
But there is a war more crucial than military wars or Cold Wars. There is the Invisible War. The power within the US has been determined by the Invisible War. And it was this War, more than the Cold War, that shaped the future of the world. USSR was once a world power, but it failed to win the hearts and minds or the loins and groins of the masses of the world. So, once the USSR collapsed, the question was which group in America would get to determine America’s lone-superpower agenda for the entire world?
This Invisible War mattered a great deal because US is ethnically diverse.
All nations have Invisible Wars among various groups contending for dominance, but in a homogeneous nation, the dominant race-and-culture of that nation is in charge regardless of which side wins. Suppose there are various factions vying for power in China. Whichever wins, China is controlled by Chinese.
And it used to be like that in the US. For awhile, the only major groups vying for power were all white Protestants, or Wasps. But then, waves of immigration added new groups to the contest of power.
And something fundamentally changed since the 60s.
The Invisible War came down to Wasps and Jews. This was fought in the realm of media, academia, arts, culture, finance, ideas, and various industries. But it wasn’t a simple ‘war’ between two ethnic groups in the way that Italian gangs might fight Irish gangs.
Invisible War happens in the realm of ideas, so the other side could be turned to serve your side. Their minds could be colonized by the ideas of your side.
So, over time, more and more Wasps came to be won over to the Jewish side. Most Liberal Wasps came under domination of Jewish politics. And in time, most Wasp conservative figures came to be mentally-colonized by Neocon thought. Jews won not only by conflict but by conversion.
So, Jews won the Invisible War in America, and their agenda has been turning the world upside down with Wars for Israel, Open Borders, anti-nativitism, pro-invasivism, Homomania, crazy feminism, and Afromania.
It’s a strange agenda. At its core, it is tribal and ethno-supremacist, but it is promoted as ‘western values’, ‘human rights’, or ‘universal principles’, all vague notions manipulated and distorted in meaning to serve an agenda that aligns with Jewish supremacist machinations.
So, this ‘universal values’ requires the US to make life hell for Muslims over there but hug them like long-lost brothers over here. It’s seems crazy and illogical, but once you understand the Power it really serves, what seems like contradictions on the surface make perfect sense at the core.
Friday, May 12, 2017
Politics of Empathy: Empathy is Secondary to "What You Empathize With?" and "Who Controls What You Empathize with?"
The problem is the Politics of Empathy in relation to graven or craven images put forth by the media.
Empathy is a useful mental process. It is about trying to see things from the viewpoint and feelings of other persons(or even animals). Empathy doesn't necessarily mean agreement or sympathy. It means that other people have their own egos, experiences, problems, justifications, biases, and rationalizations. A novelist has to empathize with all his characters. An artist must 'read' minds. So, even though Oliver Stone was no fan of Nixon and loathed Bush II, he tried to enter their heads in his movies.
Everyone should develop one's own capacity for empathy, but he or she must also ask, "What am I empathizing with?" With Reality, ideality, or fantasy?
In reality, we come across real people, and over time, we come to see them for what they are. If we must learn to empathize with others(by looking into their thoughts, feelings, personal agendas and angst), it must on grounds of understanding their true motives and emotions. So, empathizing with reality is the most important thing and bring us closer to to the truth.
But outside our close circles of family members, friends, acquaintances, and co-workers, we have to rely on the media, education, arts, and pop culture to get a glimpse of what other people are like and what makes them tick. After all, we have no direct contact with them. They come to us filtered, altered, and/or spun by the media or academia. This reality outside our inner circle of people we actually know is almost never presented as raw reality or neutral truth by the controllers of knowledge. It is manipulated and shaped into an idealized version of the reality. So, if one has no direct contact with the real mafia and has never read a serious & honest account of them AND if one only knows about the mafia from Hollywood gangster movies, one's empathy will be with the ideality or fantasy than with reality of the mafia.
This is obvious enough, and the elite intellectuals should know this themselves and should be reminding us to be skeptical of how reality is manipulated by the media. Instead, elites are addicted to their own PC crack and incapable of rising above their biases. They fear the Cold Turkey of truth. Also, as they control media and academia, they prefer to use them as instruments of power and control than free thought. After all, a thinking people might disagree with the elites and draw different conclusions based on contrasting sets of facts.
So, the elites prefer the current condition where books, fiction, and movies are used as effective(especially when images are used with music) conveyors of ideality and fantasy as more-real-than-real. People's view of reality are shaped more by stereotypes and archetypes presented by media and academia than by what's really out there.
The result is the perversion of empathy. Empathy has value only when one tries to access and assess the thoughts & feelings of real people in the real world. It is a fool's game when we are empathizing with false graven/craven images conjured by the media.
Surely, if one doesn't the know the real Hitler or Stalin but only knows him by pro-Hitler propaganda or pro-Stalin movies, one will be 'empathizing' with a heroic & sympathetic portrait of the man. Thus, empathy can only become a mindless worship.
Or, if a certain figure or person is presented in the most despicable or villainous manner, the reader or viewer doesn't have much leeway to think otherwise of him.
Such rigging undermines the true worth of empathy. The reader or viewer can only go along with the pre-cooked 'empathy' served by the writer or film-maker. Now, a true artist may present complex characters in complex situations and invite the reader or viewer to participate in the exploration. But most books and movies dispense with complexity. For one thing, it's usually commercial poison as people prefer cops and robbers. Also, the powers-that-be despise the masses as dummies who should be controlled and manipulated, not provoked to think.
More importantly, the globalist-masters fear the rise of complexity & ambiguity among the educated elites because truly curious, skeptical, and rational scholars and journalists are likely to raise inconvenient and 'dangerous' questions about the true nature of power in the world and who has it. This is why the masters of the world want elite colleges and big media to be so PC, closed-minded, judgmental(without judiciousness), and smugly bigoted as 'more evolved' people by the virtue of spouting the tiresome mantras of 'racism', 'homophobia', and 'antisemitism'. Better to have intelligent educated elites fume mostly about 'trailer trash' rednecks and Evangelicals than ask questions about which group has the Real Power and uses it to spread misery around the world.
The masters of the world fear free-thinking elites more than free-thinking masses. After all, most people don't care about anything even if they had the freedom to think and ask questions. They are too incurious and none-too-bright. It is the educated elites who read books, ponder theories, and think new thoughts. So, if the paradigm is to shift, it usually begins with the elites. After all, it was Anglo elites, not Anglo workers, who shaped the political and ideological culture of the West. It was educated Jewish elites, intellectuals, and artists who changed culture and ideology. Jewish plumbers, accountants, and used car dealers had no use for that. So, in order for the Masters of the World to keep the power, they must control the educated elites that do the most thinking and raising of questions. Free-thinking elites are the most dangerous force against the Status Quo of Power. Then, we can understand why the Power Elites prefer PC hysteria in elite colleges. It is a way of preventing the culture of free thought.
For this very reason, there needs to be a major shift in the way that ideas are discussed. Since colleges only allow PC, there needs to be an online virtual campus where all voices can be heard. I'm not talking of online courses that many colleges now offer. I mean a Virtual Center of Free Thought and Discourse that is totally safe from PC. There are many independent voices on the internet and youtube, but they are too scattered and disorganized. Also,they are too fixated on a single issue or ideology to be part of a larger intellectual community committed to free discussion of ideas.
Anyway, many progs consider themselves very 'empathetic'. But they don't ask the crucial question of whom or what they are empathizing with. After all, there is a huge difference between the real Jesse James and the movie Jesse James(often featured heroically). Empathizing with the real Jesse James(for those who knew the real man) and empathizing with the Hollywood Jesse James are entirely different things. Empathizing with figures of ideality is to fall into a trap of a rigged system. Since the figure or character has been idealized, you can only see him as a hero, saint, or martyr. Empathizing with fantasy is even worse. In our celebrity culture, much of the cult of personality of various figures is closer to outright fantasy, going way beyond trimming and airbrushing less reputable details of their lives.
Too many pampered whites who grew up in protective environments don't knew the reality or actual conditions. Their idea of reality comes from books, movies, TV shows, and music videos. So, they are more likely to come across Magic Negroes than real blacks. Also, even black thugs who cause lots of harm in real life has been made 'fun' and 'cool' by the media, especially via the cult of rap. So, even the worst pathology of blacks is featured as something positive, and gullible and naive whites end up empathizing with the black gangsta some kind of 'hero' or 'legend'.
We often hear that Liberals are more empathetic by nature, but true or not, the more important question is "Are they empathizing with reality or with fantasy?" Those who empathize with fantasy mistake it for reality, and then, the whole point of empathy has been rendered moot.
Empathy is a useful mental process. It is about trying to see things from the viewpoint and feelings of other persons(or even animals). Empathy doesn't necessarily mean agreement or sympathy. It means that other people have their own egos, experiences, problems, justifications, biases, and rationalizations. A novelist has to empathize with all his characters. An artist must 'read' minds. So, even though Oliver Stone was no fan of Nixon and loathed Bush II, he tried to enter their heads in his movies.
Everyone should develop one's own capacity for empathy, but he or she must also ask, "What am I empathizing with?" With Reality, ideality, or fantasy?
In reality, we come across real people, and over time, we come to see them for what they are. If we must learn to empathize with others(by looking into their thoughts, feelings, personal agendas and angst), it must on grounds of understanding their true motives and emotions. So, empathizing with reality is the most important thing and bring us closer to to the truth.
But outside our close circles of family members, friends, acquaintances, and co-workers, we have to rely on the media, education, arts, and pop culture to get a glimpse of what other people are like and what makes them tick. After all, we have no direct contact with them. They come to us filtered, altered, and/or spun by the media or academia. This reality outside our inner circle of people we actually know is almost never presented as raw reality or neutral truth by the controllers of knowledge. It is manipulated and shaped into an idealized version of the reality. So, if one has no direct contact with the real mafia and has never read a serious & honest account of them AND if one only knows about the mafia from Hollywood gangster movies, one's empathy will be with the ideality or fantasy than with reality of the mafia.
This is obvious enough, and the elite intellectuals should know this themselves and should be reminding us to be skeptical of how reality is manipulated by the media. Instead, elites are addicted to their own PC crack and incapable of rising above their biases. They fear the Cold Turkey of truth. Also, as they control media and academia, they prefer to use them as instruments of power and control than free thought. After all, a thinking people might disagree with the elites and draw different conclusions based on contrasting sets of facts.
So, the elites prefer the current condition where books, fiction, and movies are used as effective(especially when images are used with music) conveyors of ideality and fantasy as more-real-than-real. People's view of reality are shaped more by stereotypes and archetypes presented by media and academia than by what's really out there.
The result is the perversion of empathy. Empathy has value only when one tries to access and assess the thoughts & feelings of real people in the real world. It is a fool's game when we are empathizing with false graven/craven images conjured by the media.
Surely, if one doesn't the know the real Hitler or Stalin but only knows him by pro-Hitler propaganda or pro-Stalin movies, one will be 'empathizing' with a heroic & sympathetic portrait of the man. Thus, empathy can only become a mindless worship.
Or, if a certain figure or person is presented in the most despicable or villainous manner, the reader or viewer doesn't have much leeway to think otherwise of him.
Such rigging undermines the true worth of empathy. The reader or viewer can only go along with the pre-cooked 'empathy' served by the writer or film-maker. Now, a true artist may present complex characters in complex situations and invite the reader or viewer to participate in the exploration. But most books and movies dispense with complexity. For one thing, it's usually commercial poison as people prefer cops and robbers. Also, the powers-that-be despise the masses as dummies who should be controlled and manipulated, not provoked to think.
More importantly, the globalist-masters fear the rise of complexity & ambiguity among the educated elites because truly curious, skeptical, and rational scholars and journalists are likely to raise inconvenient and 'dangerous' questions about the true nature of power in the world and who has it. This is why the masters of the world want elite colleges and big media to be so PC, closed-minded, judgmental(without judiciousness), and smugly bigoted as 'more evolved' people by the virtue of spouting the tiresome mantras of 'racism', 'homophobia', and 'antisemitism'. Better to have intelligent educated elites fume mostly about 'trailer trash' rednecks and Evangelicals than ask questions about which group has the Real Power and uses it to spread misery around the world.
The masters of the world fear free-thinking elites more than free-thinking masses. After all, most people don't care about anything even if they had the freedom to think and ask questions. They are too incurious and none-too-bright. It is the educated elites who read books, ponder theories, and think new thoughts. So, if the paradigm is to shift, it usually begins with the elites. After all, it was Anglo elites, not Anglo workers, who shaped the political and ideological culture of the West. It was educated Jewish elites, intellectuals, and artists who changed culture and ideology. Jewish plumbers, accountants, and used car dealers had no use for that. So, in order for the Masters of the World to keep the power, they must control the educated elites that do the most thinking and raising of questions. Free-thinking elites are the most dangerous force against the Status Quo of Power. Then, we can understand why the Power Elites prefer PC hysteria in elite colleges. It is a way of preventing the culture of free thought.
For this very reason, there needs to be a major shift in the way that ideas are discussed. Since colleges only allow PC, there needs to be an online virtual campus where all voices can be heard. I'm not talking of online courses that many colleges now offer. I mean a Virtual Center of Free Thought and Discourse that is totally safe from PC. There are many independent voices on the internet and youtube, but they are too scattered and disorganized. Also,they are too fixated on a single issue or ideology to be part of a larger intellectual community committed to free discussion of ideas.
Anyway, many progs consider themselves very 'empathetic'. But they don't ask the crucial question of whom or what they are empathizing with. After all, there is a huge difference between the real Jesse James and the movie Jesse James(often featured heroically). Empathizing with the real Jesse James(for those who knew the real man) and empathizing with the Hollywood Jesse James are entirely different things. Empathizing with figures of ideality is to fall into a trap of a rigged system. Since the figure or character has been idealized, you can only see him as a hero, saint, or martyr. Empathizing with fantasy is even worse. In our celebrity culture, much of the cult of personality of various figures is closer to outright fantasy, going way beyond trimming and airbrushing less reputable details of their lives.
Too many pampered whites who grew up in protective environments don't knew the reality or actual conditions. Their idea of reality comes from books, movies, TV shows, and music videos. So, they are more likely to come across Magic Negroes than real blacks. Also, even black thugs who cause lots of harm in real life has been made 'fun' and 'cool' by the media, especially via the cult of rap. So, even the worst pathology of blacks is featured as something positive, and gullible and naive whites end up empathizing with the black gangsta some kind of 'hero' or 'legend'.
We often hear that Liberals are more empathetic by nature, but true or not, the more important question is "Are they empathizing with reality or with fantasy?" Those who empathize with fantasy mistake it for reality, and then, the whole point of empathy has been rendered moot.
Thursday, May 11, 2017
Universalism is not about adherence to Universal Principles but about the Power to Force an Agenda Universally
Universalism as a political tool is not about peoples around the world agreeing to what constitutes universal values but about the preeminent power imposing its ideas and interests as 'universals' on all other peoples.
This was true of religion.
Catholics were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned Catholic.
Muslims were universal in the sense that the whole would should be turned Islamic.
It was about Universal Imposition or Universal Coercion than Universal Consensus.
This was also true of ideology.
Communists were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned communist.
Today, Globalism is a Universal Imposition(the new inquisition) that pressures the entire world to conform to the favored ideas and interests of the Rulers of the US. Since Jews are the ruling elites, Homos are their main proxies & agents, and blacks are sacro-negroes by PC narrative & Pop Culture, the dominant form of Universalism is about Holocaust Worship, Homomania, and Afromania.
After all, if the globalist-universalism is really about 'anti-racist egalitarianism', it should be just as sensitive to the interests of Palestinians as to those of Zionists. But it isn't so. All those politicians in Congress say they support 'universal values', but they totally ignore the tragic history and plight Palestinians caused by Jewish influence on US politics. At the UN, when Iran raised the question of why Palestinians were punished for the crimes of Europeans during WWII, the European delegation all walked out despite their professed commitment to universalism.
So, univeralism as political phenomenon isn't about what the world sincerely, rationally, and morally agrees upon as the shared values that transcend all cultures. It is not about all nations, great and small, submitting to the same principles but really about the Great Power forcing its agenda and biases on the universal scale on all other nations. Using the analogy of nature, it's not about all species of animals agreeing on shared animal-hood but about one dominant species pressuring all other species to 'universally' bow down before it.
Take 'gay rights'. This is promoted as 'universal values'. But who said so? Now, if 'gay rights' means that all peoples should acknowledge, based on scientific evidence, that some people are born homosexual, that it's not homosexuals' fault that they are homo, and that homosexuals should be allowed to pursue professions based on ability, that is a workable and sound principle. It is factual, rational, and humane; it can be held up as a universal principle in the name of reason, tolerance, and meritocracy(as some homos are skilled and talented.)
But what currently goes by the name of 'gay rights' in the West is homomania, a mindless worship of homosexuality as something holy and the cult of homo narcissism & vanity as next to godliness. It is sick, perverse, and degenerate. So, it's not about 'gay rights' but 'gay worship'. It is a fruit-sade, the new crusade. Homomania says even churches should be converted to homo-worship. Sacred texts should be re-written or reinterpreted to spread the 'gayspel' that God, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammad would have been for something like 'gay marriage'.
'Progressives' deride the Inquisition of Old, but they aren't averse to using their vast globalist power to push the Imposition of their sick agenda on all the world. It is often done through bribery of foreign regimes(candies and prizes if they put on 'gay pride' parades), spread of decadent Pop Culture as narcotic & opiate, and promotion of PC that suppresses free speech ironically in the name of 'liberal values'. PC limits the range of inquiry, constricts the Narrative spectrum, and insists on a loaded terminology as dishonest as loaded dice. A term like 'homophobia' favors homomaniac since it implies that those who oppose the homo agenda are clinically sick in the head. And 'racism', as currently defined, is a loaded term since it presumes that anyone who believes in the reality of races is also a racial supremacist.
Anyway, universalism as political force is more about the power to impose one's agenda universally than about the adherence to universal principles applying equally to all nations and cultures.
This was true of religion.
Catholics were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned Catholic.
Muslims were universal in the sense that the whole would should be turned Islamic.
It was about Universal Imposition or Universal Coercion than Universal Consensus.
This was also true of ideology.
Communists were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned communist.
Today, Globalism is a Universal Imposition(the new inquisition) that pressures the entire world to conform to the favored ideas and interests of the Rulers of the US. Since Jews are the ruling elites, Homos are their main proxies & agents, and blacks are sacro-negroes by PC narrative & Pop Culture, the dominant form of Universalism is about Holocaust Worship, Homomania, and Afromania.
After all, if the globalist-universalism is really about 'anti-racist egalitarianism', it should be just as sensitive to the interests of Palestinians as to those of Zionists. But it isn't so. All those politicians in Congress say they support 'universal values', but they totally ignore the tragic history and plight Palestinians caused by Jewish influence on US politics. At the UN, when Iran raised the question of why Palestinians were punished for the crimes of Europeans during WWII, the European delegation all walked out despite their professed commitment to universalism.
So, univeralism as political phenomenon isn't about what the world sincerely, rationally, and morally agrees upon as the shared values that transcend all cultures. It is not about all nations, great and small, submitting to the same principles but really about the Great Power forcing its agenda and biases on the universal scale on all other nations. Using the analogy of nature, it's not about all species of animals agreeing on shared animal-hood but about one dominant species pressuring all other species to 'universally' bow down before it.
Take 'gay rights'. This is promoted as 'universal values'. But who said so? Now, if 'gay rights' means that all peoples should acknowledge, based on scientific evidence, that some people are born homosexual, that it's not homosexuals' fault that they are homo, and that homosexuals should be allowed to pursue professions based on ability, that is a workable and sound principle. It is factual, rational, and humane; it can be held up as a universal principle in the name of reason, tolerance, and meritocracy(as some homos are skilled and talented.)
But what currently goes by the name of 'gay rights' in the West is homomania, a mindless worship of homosexuality as something holy and the cult of homo narcissism & vanity as next to godliness. It is sick, perverse, and degenerate. So, it's not about 'gay rights' but 'gay worship'. It is a fruit-sade, the new crusade. Homomania says even churches should be converted to homo-worship. Sacred texts should be re-written or reinterpreted to spread the 'gayspel' that God, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammad would have been for something like 'gay marriage'.
'Progressives' deride the Inquisition of Old, but they aren't averse to using their vast globalist power to push the Imposition of their sick agenda on all the world. It is often done through bribery of foreign regimes(candies and prizes if they put on 'gay pride' parades), spread of decadent Pop Culture as narcotic & opiate, and promotion of PC that suppresses free speech ironically in the name of 'liberal values'. PC limits the range of inquiry, constricts the Narrative spectrum, and insists on a loaded terminology as dishonest as loaded dice. A term like 'homophobia' favors homomaniac since it implies that those who oppose the homo agenda are clinically sick in the head. And 'racism', as currently defined, is a loaded term since it presumes that anyone who believes in the reality of races is also a racial supremacist.
Anyway, universalism as political force is more about the power to impose one's agenda universally than about the adherence to universal principles applying equally to all nations and cultures.
Friday, May 5, 2017
Mixed-Race People are proof that Race is Real
Some people say the existence of mixed-race people proves that race is not real. Actually, it proves the opposite: Race is real. After all, there has to be white people and black people in order to create mulattoes. Without the existence of real whites and real blacks, you cannot have mulattoes. You can't make a mulatto by having blacks breed with blacks or by having whites breed with whites. For there to be the mulatto, there has to be white people and black people. Also, only mixing whites and blacks will produce mulattoes. You can't create a mulatto by mixing whites and Asians. Likewise, you can only create a Eurasian by mixing white and Asian. You can't get a Eurasian by mixing black and Arab.
You can mix orange juice and apple juice to produce an orange-apple blend.
So, does the existence of the mixture prove that orange juice and apple juice are not real? Does it prove that orange juice and apple juice are mere social constructs? No, the mixture is possible only if apple juice and orange juice really exist in the first place. The mixture can only result from the blending of distinct juices.
Just like the blend of apple juice and orange juice isn't possible unless apple juice and orange juice really exist, mixed-race people cannot coming into being without the existence of distinct and separate races.
You can mix orange juice and apple juice to produce an orange-apple blend.
So, does the existence of the mixture prove that orange juice and apple juice are not real? Does it prove that orange juice and apple juice are mere social constructs? No, the mixture is possible only if apple juice and orange juice really exist in the first place. The mixture can only result from the blending of distinct juices.
Just like the blend of apple juice and orange juice isn't possible unless apple juice and orange juice really exist, mixed-race people cannot coming into being without the existence of distinct and separate races.
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
What Black Lives Matter(BLM) and American Globo-Imperialism have in common
In a way, BLM or Black Lives Matter is as American as apple pie or fried chicken.
BLM throw fits when people say All Lives Matter. "No!!!", blacks holler. They say black lives have extra value and deserves special recognition and attention. So, it’s as though black lives are ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ in ways that other lives are not.
But, BLM is a great big lie because blacks are the most aggressive, murderous, and violent people in America. They cause the most trouble for themselves and attack-rob-rape-murder other races. Blacks cry victim and blame others, but they themselves are the main problem of America.
Well, Globo-Americanism is now like American Power Matters. America and America alone is declared ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’. If someone were to say every nation is ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ in its own way, American Power arrogantly fumes and throw fits. "No!!!", American power shouts. American Power says America has special value and deserves special respect and reverence around the world in ways that other nations do not.
But,APM is a great big lie because the US is the most aggressive, murderous, imperialist, warmongering, and violent nation on Earth. It causes the most problems for itself — like financial meltdown, PC, and decadence — and invades & destroys or bullies & intimidates other nations. American Power cries victim and blame others(esp Russia and Iran), but it is the main instigator of horrors around the world.
So, the disingenuous bullshit of BLM and the mendacious bully-pulpit of APM are really joined at the hip.
BLM throw fits when people say All Lives Matter. "No!!!", blacks holler. They say black lives have extra value and deserves special recognition and attention. So, it’s as though black lives are ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ in ways that other lives are not.
But, BLM is a great big lie because blacks are the most aggressive, murderous, and violent people in America. They cause the most trouble for themselves and attack-rob-rape-murder other races. Blacks cry victim and blame others, but they themselves are the main problem of America.
Well, Globo-Americanism is now like American Power Matters. America and America alone is declared ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’. If someone were to say every nation is ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ in its own way, American Power arrogantly fumes and throw fits. "No!!!", American power shouts. American Power says America has special value and deserves special respect and reverence around the world in ways that other nations do not.
But,APM is a great big lie because the US is the most aggressive, murderous, imperialist, warmongering, and violent nation on Earth. It causes the most problems for itself — like financial meltdown, PC, and decadence — and invades & destroys or bullies & intimidates other nations. American Power cries victim and blame others(esp Russia and Iran), but it is the main instigator of horrors around the world.
So, the disingenuous bullshit of BLM and the mendacious bully-pulpit of APM are really joined at the hip.
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
The Ugliness of Three Narcissisms & the Necessity of Tribal-Universalism
Narcissism is UGLY.
There is physical narcissism of those who are totally into how they look. This is promoted by celebrity culture, especially as controlled by vain homos.
There is talent narcissism of those who think they are so great because of high intelligence and ability. Ability and intelligence are good things, but they don't mean goodness of heart and character or soundness of mind. A person can be talented and smart and a total louse, like Mark Zuckerberg and Carlos Slim.
Libertarianism is the pathological narcissism of talent and success. The prog version of talent narcissism is the conceit of the 'creative class'. The fancy hipster urban elites deserve all the privileges because they are sooooooo 'creative'. The 'creative class' notion is also associated with vain homos, as spelled out by social critic Florida.
There is ideological narcissism of those love to self-hug themselves and pat themselves on the back for their goody-goodness. Ideological narcissism is appealing to most because ANYONE can partake of it. Physical narcissism only applies to those who really look good even though uglies do pretend to be hotter than they really are. And Talent narcissism is limited to those with real talent, and such people are relatively rare -- the kind who make it in Silicon Valley or some business venture. Most libertarians suck at most things and vicariously live through the talent narcissism of others with their Ayn-Randian worship of any rich or successful person.
But anyone can become an ideological narcissist, which explains something like antifa that is mostly made up of bottomfeeders of society. Even in elite colleges, most graduates will not become very successful, esp if they majored in something like humanities or social sciences. So, they are going to feel inferior to those with claims to physical narcissism or talent narcissism(in Wall Street, high-tech, or some business venture). So, what is left for these types to feel better than others? Ideological narcissism, a kind of secular-spiritual narcissism.
Emmanuel Macron is the favorite of physical narcissists, talent narcissists, and ideological narcissists. He is all about the look, the style over substance. Those with talent but without looks want to be associated with whatever is fashionable. Those with looks but no brains or knowledge want to be associated with whatever is officially approved, and of course 'nationalism' is condemned as a 'far right' vice. Can't have that. As for ideological narcissists, they want to feel superior about something, and PC tells them that white people are so much goody-gooder for white-knighting 'diversity'.
In the end, it's not about tribalism vs universalism.
A meaningful tribal-universalism is possible, and it's the best way. We need to take cue from the Jews whose religion is a tribal-universalism. Jews believe in the universal God, the one Truth for all. However, they have a special tribal Covenant with the universal God. So, even though God is God over all mankind, Jews have their special relation and destiny in relation to God. It's like Eskimos and Africans share the same Sun but in their own special way in different parts of the world. There is no need to make the Sun shine the same all over. The earth is round and revolving, not flat and constant. So different peoples and places get the Sun differently.
Tribalism is too limiting, but universalism is too confusing and generic. So, the Goldilocks middle is tribal-universalism.
And this should apply to secular realm as well. The notion of universal human rights is good and useful. There are certain basic ideas and values that are applicable to all mankind. And it'd be good for all peoples to adopt them. However, each people must shape and mold them according to their own history, experiences, demographics, heritage, culture, sacraments, taboos, and etc. So, these universal values will play out differently in Turkey, Iran, Uganda, Japan, Mexico, Kenya, India, Israel, etc. Also, different nations have different icons and narratives to buttress these universal values. Due to slavery and racial problems, human rights issues in the US have been represented by Lincoln and MLK, the Civil War and Civil Rights. Other nations and peoples have different experiences and different icons and different lessons they drew from history.
Same goes for free markets. It is a useful universal idea, but that doesn't mean the whole world should be part of one single market. Different nations need to have their own policies to make free markets work on the national level. And the main purpose of a nation is to serve the people of the nation than to make the nation useful to the globalist empire.
Same goes for democracy or system of republican government. When used properly, it works better than most other political systems. But that doesn't mean we should have world government of single democracy for all. Each nation needs its own national form of democracy where nationals vote for national interest.
The problem is globalists have taken control of too many key nations. And these globalists' main loyalty is not to any nation but to other globalist elites around the world. So, their main priority is to make all nations submit to the agenda of globalist elites than to have national elites represent, defend, and serve the interests of the nation.
Nationalism is the best kind of tribal-universalism. It acknowledges that other peoples should have nations of their own and their own national sovereignty. All peoples deserve their own nations as a universal human right. This mutual understanding among nations and peoples is the best recipe for peace. Also, it is on the national level/scale that universal human rights are best implemented. A nation can effectively ensure the humane functions of its national system for its own people. But a nation cannot save the world. And national identity and interests will be undermined with mass immigration-invasion.
Sweden used to practice more effective implementation of universal human rights when it was a homogeneous nation. Swedes embraced Diversity in the name of universalism, but it only led to rising tribalism and fracturing in Sweden. The result is less universalism for all those in Sweden and more contentious tribalism or cuck behavior among whites that is just downright sickening and humiliating.
Nationalism is also humble in admitting that a nation can only do so much. It is a form of hubris to play the role of savior of the world or all humanity. It's like a man claiming to be able to eat an entire horse. Hubris leads to both national degradation and imperialism, and we are seeing both in the Americanism of the 21st century. The notion that US is a limitless magnet of immigrants(the poor huddled masses) is turning entire parts of the US into the Third World. There is less unity and more enmity. America used to feel more universal when it was less diverse.
Also, the US elites now neglect the problems of Already Americans as they are too busy shopping for 'New Americans' as either cheap labor or virtue-signal-voodoo-dolls, or virdoo dolls.
And the megalomania of US as the 'indispensable' and 'exceptional' nation, the superhero savior of the world, has led to endless wars that has only destroyed countless lives. It has also compromised its allies and vassals as accomplices in these globalist war crimes by either going along or remaining silent in deference to the US. What is EU but a partner-in-crime of all the US foulness(in the name of 'humanitarian intervention') in the Middle East?
There is physical narcissism of those who are totally into how they look. This is promoted by celebrity culture, especially as controlled by vain homos.
There is talent narcissism of those who think they are so great because of high intelligence and ability. Ability and intelligence are good things, but they don't mean goodness of heart and character or soundness of mind. A person can be talented and smart and a total louse, like Mark Zuckerberg and Carlos Slim.
Libertarianism is the pathological narcissism of talent and success. The prog version of talent narcissism is the conceit of the 'creative class'. The fancy hipster urban elites deserve all the privileges because they are sooooooo 'creative'. The 'creative class' notion is also associated with vain homos, as spelled out by social critic Florida.
There is ideological narcissism of those love to self-hug themselves and pat themselves on the back for their goody-goodness. Ideological narcissism is appealing to most because ANYONE can partake of it. Physical narcissism only applies to those who really look good even though uglies do pretend to be hotter than they really are. And Talent narcissism is limited to those with real talent, and such people are relatively rare -- the kind who make it in Silicon Valley or some business venture. Most libertarians suck at most things and vicariously live through the talent narcissism of others with their Ayn-Randian worship of any rich or successful person.
But anyone can become an ideological narcissist, which explains something like antifa that is mostly made up of bottomfeeders of society. Even in elite colleges, most graduates will not become very successful, esp if they majored in something like humanities or social sciences. So, they are going to feel inferior to those with claims to physical narcissism or talent narcissism(in Wall Street, high-tech, or some business venture). So, what is left for these types to feel better than others? Ideological narcissism, a kind of secular-spiritual narcissism.
Emmanuel Macron is the favorite of physical narcissists, talent narcissists, and ideological narcissists. He is all about the look, the style over substance. Those with talent but without looks want to be associated with whatever is fashionable. Those with looks but no brains or knowledge want to be associated with whatever is officially approved, and of course 'nationalism' is condemned as a 'far right' vice. Can't have that. As for ideological narcissists, they want to feel superior about something, and PC tells them that white people are so much goody-gooder for white-knighting 'diversity'.
In the end, it's not about tribalism vs universalism.
A meaningful tribal-universalism is possible, and it's the best way. We need to take cue from the Jews whose religion is a tribal-universalism. Jews believe in the universal God, the one Truth for all. However, they have a special tribal Covenant with the universal God. So, even though God is God over all mankind, Jews have their special relation and destiny in relation to God. It's like Eskimos and Africans share the same Sun but in their own special way in different parts of the world. There is no need to make the Sun shine the same all over. The earth is round and revolving, not flat and constant. So different peoples and places get the Sun differently.
Tribalism is too limiting, but universalism is too confusing and generic. So, the Goldilocks middle is tribal-universalism.
And this should apply to secular realm as well. The notion of universal human rights is good and useful. There are certain basic ideas and values that are applicable to all mankind. And it'd be good for all peoples to adopt them. However, each people must shape and mold them according to their own history, experiences, demographics, heritage, culture, sacraments, taboos, and etc. So, these universal values will play out differently in Turkey, Iran, Uganda, Japan, Mexico, Kenya, India, Israel, etc. Also, different nations have different icons and narratives to buttress these universal values. Due to slavery and racial problems, human rights issues in the US have been represented by Lincoln and MLK, the Civil War and Civil Rights. Other nations and peoples have different experiences and different icons and different lessons they drew from history.
Same goes for free markets. It is a useful universal idea, but that doesn't mean the whole world should be part of one single market. Different nations need to have their own policies to make free markets work on the national level. And the main purpose of a nation is to serve the people of the nation than to make the nation useful to the globalist empire.
Same goes for democracy or system of republican government. When used properly, it works better than most other political systems. But that doesn't mean we should have world government of single democracy for all. Each nation needs its own national form of democracy where nationals vote for national interest.
The problem is globalists have taken control of too many key nations. And these globalists' main loyalty is not to any nation but to other globalist elites around the world. So, their main priority is to make all nations submit to the agenda of globalist elites than to have national elites represent, defend, and serve the interests of the nation.
Nationalism is the best kind of tribal-universalism. It acknowledges that other peoples should have nations of their own and their own national sovereignty. All peoples deserve their own nations as a universal human right. This mutual understanding among nations and peoples is the best recipe for peace. Also, it is on the national level/scale that universal human rights are best implemented. A nation can effectively ensure the humane functions of its national system for its own people. But a nation cannot save the world. And national identity and interests will be undermined with mass immigration-invasion.
Sweden used to practice more effective implementation of universal human rights when it was a homogeneous nation. Swedes embraced Diversity in the name of universalism, but it only led to rising tribalism and fracturing in Sweden. The result is less universalism for all those in Sweden and more contentious tribalism or cuck behavior among whites that is just downright sickening and humiliating.
Nationalism is also humble in admitting that a nation can only do so much. It is a form of hubris to play the role of savior of the world or all humanity. It's like a man claiming to be able to eat an entire horse. Hubris leads to both national degradation and imperialism, and we are seeing both in the Americanism of the 21st century. The notion that US is a limitless magnet of immigrants(the poor huddled masses) is turning entire parts of the US into the Third World. There is less unity and more enmity. America used to feel more universal when it was less diverse.
Also, the US elites now neglect the problems of Already Americans as they are too busy shopping for 'New Americans' as either cheap labor or virtue-signal-voodoo-dolls, or virdoo dolls.
And the megalomania of US as the 'indispensable' and 'exceptional' nation, the superhero savior of the world, has led to endless wars that has only destroyed countless lives. It has also compromised its allies and vassals as accomplices in these globalist war crimes by either going along or remaining silent in deference to the US. What is EU but a partner-in-crime of all the US foulness(in the name of 'humanitarian intervention') in the Middle East?
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
Virtue-Vanity is the Main Identity for Many in the West. Virtue Vanites reject Tangibles for Intangibles.
The main identity of many people in rich nations is none other than Virtue-Vanity as shaped by PC, which of course is controlled by the GLOB(globalist elites).
So, if the GLOB says homos are sacred, the V-V's(virtue-vanites) make a big show of their special 'virtue'. Also, Virtue Vanity is less something to practice personally than display fashionably. It's like a hat or high-heel shoes. It's a form of pseudo-ethical exhibitionism, and Virtue-Vanites get their jollies and virtugasms by making a spectacle of themselves. Indeed, the mindset of V-V partly stems from celebrity culture. Recall how Rock Stars held concerts to party and boogie about some cause or other to highlight their vanity not only as rich famous pigs but oh-so-caring saints. Morality for charlatans. Have the cake and eat it too. Celebrate and throw a party AND win plaudits as the new jesuses.
People are naturally 'spiritual'(and crave 'emotional uplift'), but since God has been banished from the culture, people thirst for new issues and themes to feel rapturous about. And PC offers the latest fix of Fashion Faith for the quasi-spiritual junkies.
So, if the latest neoligious(neo-religious) craze is 'trannies in the toilet', that's Virtue Vanitism's snakeoil-of-the-hour... until something new is hyped by the PC machine.
This explains why the political culture is so often 'vanitized' than merely sanitized. It is sanitized of inconvenient truths but also 'vanitized' to make people feel self-righteous and holier-than-thou. Thus, the matter goes from a social event or political issue to a new crusade or chest-beating sermon.
For many white people in the West, the vanity of virtue is the ONLY identity they have left since they are not allowed to connect or reconnect with their racial roots, cultural core, and historical bonds. Because those rich, deep, and healthy drives have been condemned and expurgated as 'racist' and 'evil', white people hunger for something to provide them with compass, meaning, and direction.
And the ONLY hope offered by PC is for whites to feel to good about themselves by putting down other whites. The 'bad whites' are those who choose to defend things that are tangible and real: race as biology, nations as homeland and territory, actual history as memory, collective & shared property of the white race.
According to PC, whites must forgo all bonds with anything that is real, substantial, or tangible. Instead, whites must strive to be 'good whites' denouncing and attacking 'bad whites', those who still hold onto the real and tangible. 'Good whites' are kindled to chase after intangibles such as 'universalism', 'social justice', 'equality', or fantasy of limitless genders. Because intangibles tend to be vague and uncertain, 'good whites' must be animated with blind faith and fanaticism. So, virtue-vanites are most hard-headed about things that can least be hand-held. Virtue Vanity is a fire that burns on PC fumes. But once the fumes vanish, so does the fire because there is no tangible wood or coal to keep the fire going independent of artificial feel-good fumes supplied by PC.
So, if the GLOB says homos are sacred, the V-V's(virtue-vanites) make a big show of their special 'virtue'. Also, Virtue Vanity is less something to practice personally than display fashionably. It's like a hat or high-heel shoes. It's a form of pseudo-ethical exhibitionism, and Virtue-Vanites get their jollies and virtugasms by making a spectacle of themselves. Indeed, the mindset of V-V partly stems from celebrity culture. Recall how Rock Stars held concerts to party and boogie about some cause or other to highlight their vanity not only as rich famous pigs but oh-so-caring saints. Morality for charlatans. Have the cake and eat it too. Celebrate and throw a party AND win plaudits as the new jesuses.
People are naturally 'spiritual'(and crave 'emotional uplift'), but since God has been banished from the culture, people thirst for new issues and themes to feel rapturous about. And PC offers the latest fix of Fashion Faith for the quasi-spiritual junkies.
So, if the latest neoligious(neo-religious) craze is 'trannies in the toilet', that's Virtue Vanitism's snakeoil-of-the-hour... until something new is hyped by the PC machine.
This explains why the political culture is so often 'vanitized' than merely sanitized. It is sanitized of inconvenient truths but also 'vanitized' to make people feel self-righteous and holier-than-thou. Thus, the matter goes from a social event or political issue to a new crusade or chest-beating sermon.
For many white people in the West, the vanity of virtue is the ONLY identity they have left since they are not allowed to connect or reconnect with their racial roots, cultural core, and historical bonds. Because those rich, deep, and healthy drives have been condemned and expurgated as 'racist' and 'evil', white people hunger for something to provide them with compass, meaning, and direction.
And the ONLY hope offered by PC is for whites to feel to good about themselves by putting down other whites. The 'bad whites' are those who choose to defend things that are tangible and real: race as biology, nations as homeland and territory, actual history as memory, collective & shared property of the white race.
According to PC, whites must forgo all bonds with anything that is real, substantial, or tangible. Instead, whites must strive to be 'good whites' denouncing and attacking 'bad whites', those who still hold onto the real and tangible. 'Good whites' are kindled to chase after intangibles such as 'universalism', 'social justice', 'equality', or fantasy of limitless genders. Because intangibles tend to be vague and uncertain, 'good whites' must be animated with blind faith and fanaticism. So, virtue-vanites are most hard-headed about things that can least be hand-held. Virtue Vanity is a fire that burns on PC fumes. But once the fumes vanish, so does the fire because there is no tangible wood or coal to keep the fire going independent of artificial feel-good fumes supplied by PC.
Saturday, April 8, 2017
Identity is the Foundation of Power
Identity is the foundation of power. After all, without self-knowledge, you'll be clueless as to your being and course of action. Without knowing which race, culture, or people you belong to, you won't know what it is you must defend and whom it is you must fight/resist. Suppose amnesia wipes out your memory, and you've no sense of personal history and ethnic identity. If you don't know whence you came, you won't know where you're headed. If you don't know who your people are, you have no sense of obligation to a community.
Imagine you're an athlete on the field and you suffer a concussion. Suppose you are rendered amnesiac and no longer know who you are, why you're on the field, and which team you belong to. You would stand there feeling clueless. As such, you would be at the mercy of OTHERS who tell you who/what you are. Since you have no idea yourself, you'll have no choice but to just go along. Others will mold your narrative, like neocons have done for George W. Bush, whose brains were turned to mush by too much drugs and self-indulgence.
Imagine that you belong to a Tribe A at war with Tribe B. But suppose you come down with amnesia, and you don't know you're part of Tribe A anymore. Also, you've forgotten that Tribe B has attacked your community and killed your loved ones.
Because you're confused and disoriented from lack of autonomous memory, the Tribe B can fool you into thinking that you belong to it and that you should fight against Tribe A. Without autonomy of identity, you are at the mercy of those who impose an identity on you. It's like the Turks conscripted Greek boys at a young age and brainwashed them of their original identities(as Hellenic Christians) and instilled their minds with Turkic-Islamic identities. Thus, identity is crucial to power, and it is the agenda of your enemy to either wipe out or weaken your identity.
If the enemy cannot wipe your identity to be replaced with something else, it will try to associate your identity with wickedness so at to demoralize you. Burdened with guilt and shame, you'll feel obligated to serve another identity(deemed to be sacrosanct by the official narrative), even if its members are hostile toward your tribe.
Jews have done exactly this with white identity. By associating the white race with 'racism', 'antisemitism', 'white supremacism', and a host of 'historical crimes' --- as if such 'evil' acts were unique to the white race --- , Jews have associated whiteness with sin-that-must-be-cleansed-forever. Thus, whites have been made to atone for whiteness by sucking up to Jews, fighting Wars for Israel, worshiping the Holocaust as new god, encouraging white women to use white wombs to hatch black babies, and all but ignore the plight of whites who've fallen on hard times due to the degradation of black thuggery, homosexual decadence, Jewish financial robbery, and anti-culture of hedonism.
In some ways, Negative Identity can be more potent than Amnesia as an instrument of psycho-political warfare. Those afflicted with Amnesia may be confused and disoriented, thus at the mercy of those who manipulate them, but they are, nevertheless, without shame or guilt. In contrast, those infected with Negative Identity feel infested with shame and guilt for which they must seek cure and redemption forever. In effect, they become emotional dogs to their masters.
Jews use both means, amnesia and negative identity, to push through their globalist agenda. Via the insidious impact of Afro-Homo Pop Culture(that promote mindless animalism and phantasm of narcissism), Jews seek to weaken a sense of history, heritage, and roots from the minds of all gentiles. The result is mass amnesia.
But then, Jews also employ the germ warfare of PC, mainly against white gentiles, to infect hearts and minds with the virus of chronic shame and guilt, for which the infected feel they must atone forever, especially at the feet of Jews(and their allies, mainly homos and Negroes).
Because identity is a source of power, it is the primary target of the enemy. The British tried to weaken Irish identity. White slave-owners tried to cut blacks from their African roots. Christian gentiles sought to associate Jewish identity with pain and humiliation to pressure Jews to convert to Christianity. Likewise, Muslims associated 'infidel' identity with inferiority, hardship, pain, or even death to pressure non-Muslims convert to Islam.
The story of Moses is about the politics of identity. Moses was a Hebrew who'd been raised as an Egyptian, but his life changed upon regaining his true identity as the son of his real parents, as a member of the Tribe. His was a story of Becoming-Who-You-Are. He embarked on and completed the spiritual journey to his ethnic origins. Likewise, those who seek autonomy-and-independence must trek up the river of identity to find the true source of their being. One's identity is dependent on one's own people, and one's own people must be independent of other peoples, especially those with hostile or parasitic intent.
There are two ways of power. One is remaining true to one's original identity, as Jews have done for thousands of years. No matter where Jews happened to be in exile, they clung to their historic roots, ethnic identity, and their bio-spiritual Covenant with God. This was a great source of their power, enabling them to survive as a race and culture across the millenniums.
But another way of power is to forge ahead with a new or variant collective identity, as Anglo-Americans did. As colonials, there had been part of the British Empire. As members of the Anglo race and empire, they had shared in a great identity and power. However, there came a time when they wanted independence from the empire to set up their own Republic, and this called for a new identity which was both a cultural extension of Anglo civilization and a political break from it.
In time, the various Spanish colonists in Latin America also broke away from their motherland of Spain. Thus, the Hispanic colonists became Mexican nationals, Bolivian nationals, Peruvian nationals, and etc.
Anyway, identity is the foundation of power. In order to have control over yourself and your own people, YOU must define and shape your own personal identity(of family, values, and life experiences) and YOUR PEOPLE must decide on their group identity(of race, nation, and history). If you lose sight and control of your identity, you will be at the mercy of others who know the value of identity and will try to manipulate your identity to serve their interests.
And always beware of those who would associate your identity with negativity. Resist and forge a Positive Identity. And associate your enemy with negative identity. After all, there are tons of skeletons in the histories of Jews, blacks, Asians, Muslims, and etc.
THE BLACK BOOK OF COMMUNISM was written to shame the Left. What white patriots ought to do is write THE BLACK BOOK OF JEWS, BLACK BOOK OF ASIANS, BLACK BOOK OF MUSLIMS, BLACK BOOK OF MEXICANS, BLACK BOOK OF HINDUS, and BLACK BOOK OF BLACKS.
Friday, April 7, 2017
Why is Capitalism so closely tied with 'Progressivism'?
Why are capitalism, privilege, and success so closely tied with 'progressivism'? Are capitalism, wealth, privilege, and success inherently proggy? Perhaps in the sense that both capitalism and proggism are invested in change, transformation, and reinvention. Capitalism seeks new products, new technologies, new everything. Proggism feeds on the conceit of new frontiers in the struggle for justice. Both are at war with tradition, roots,and established norms. In economics, this makes sense since improved/advanced technology is objectively better than earlier ones. Surely, a new computer is better than one 5 yrs ago, let alone 10 yrs ago. Technology can demonstrate superiority. Also, Pop Culture must promote changes in fashions to hook new generations to new trends and the 'hottest thing'.
But can same rules be applied to arts, culture, morality, justice, and emotions? Is modern art necessarily more 'advanced' than classical art, and is post-modern art necessarily more advanced than modern art? Is today's concept of family really 'more evolved' than the concept fifty years ago? Is hipster sensibility superior to the sentiments of an earlier era?
To be sure, the more a society becomes productive and plentiful, the more various peoples(with full stomachs) tend to seek their own fetishized niche of ‘justice’ concocted to cater to his or her personal whims. Also, when even the personal is politicized or filtered through ideology, even trivialities or frivolities are mistaken as 'rights' deserving of moral recognition and benediction by all of society.
In a hungry society, the main priority is providing enough food for the masses. If Michael Jackson had been born into a sharecropper family in 1900, he would have worked in the fields and focused on food & basic needs. But he made lots of money in a rich nation and could indulge his fantasies. Eventually, the flight into fantasy became a new ‘right’, and so, we are witnessing the Michael-Jacksonization of society. Michael was effectively transsexual, transracial, and transage. He was a perpetual Peter-Pan-kid. At least he kept it to himself. Today, every freak is no longer content to indulge in his/her whims but demands all of society to recognize and celebrate what he/she is. Once homos went from a group-to-be-tolerated-and-left-alone to a group-that-must-be-praised-and-worshiped-by-all-of-society, freaks of all stripes began to take their cues from the homo movement and make similar demands.
Anyway, capitalism has lots of tendencies that aren't necessarily proggy. So, how did it end up being so proggy? Three possible explanations.
1. Most business and science/technology types don’t have much time or interest in ideas or culture. They are into money, success, ambition, and geek stuff. So, most of them don’t form their own ideas on society, politics, humanity, and history. Bill Gates is a very smart guy, but his main focus for most of his life was on geek stuff and making money. So, where do people like him get their ideas? From social sciences and media controlled by other sorts of people. So, if academia and media people lean proggy and globby(globalist), even apolitical people-of-success will gravitate in that direction. It could be that simple.
2. Mafia-type extortion. Businesses naturally want to be left alone to make money. Because Conservatives tend to be pro-business, they leave businesses alone. So, businesses have NOTHING to fear from Conservatives who kiss the butts of the business class. Why pay for something you can have for free? Conservative don’t run extortion schemes on businesses. Even when conservatives hope for donations from rich people and big business, they go pleading, not demanding and certainly not threatening.
But proggies and blacks do make demands. (And Jews make demands on gentile businesses to fork over money to Jewish causes and be mindful not to fund anything deemed 'antisemitic' or 'racist'. This means anti-white Jewish organizations & cause receive tons of donations, whereas any group even mildly associated with white interests get no funding from big business.) Jesse Jackson made an art of this and reaped a fortune by going from company to company, sniffing for ‘racism’, and extorting funds for his own coffers. (Jackson's extortion scheme ended only under Clinton & Co. that forged a deal with Big Business that progs would drop their knee-jerk anti-corporatism IF big business poured the bulk of their donations to Democrats, homos, and progs. Clintons even created a foundation to do just that on a global scale.)
Proggies, via power of media and NGO agitation/subversion, have devised an effective way to extort money and support from big companies. So, even if businesses are apolitical or conservative-leaning, they fear threats and attacks from progs who are funded and organized by the likes of George Soros. Businesses feel they have no choice but to pander to them. Progs act like a bunch of Don Fanucci’s. Just like the mafia gained control of labor unions and caused 'union trouble' for companies that didn't play ball, the Proglob(prog-globalists) operate the same way.
In contrast, since businesses have the unconditional support of Conservatives, there's no compelling reason to fund or support Conservatism. Businesses fear threats more than they appreciate support. After all, Conservative support for business is just that. It’s like a woman's devotion to a man no matter what he does. He can take her loyalty for granted. But proggy threats can get nasty, especially since proggies have close ties to media, academia, courts, deep state(with secret intelligence on everyone), and groups like SPLC & ADL and especially since Proggies can destroy careers and reputations with accusations of ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’.
Also, to appease proggies even further, corporations have hired progsters to manage the publicity departments and to devise office policy, which means everyone has to attend endless meetings on PC this or that. Also, advertising has been taken over by the Proglob and is used mostly as a vehicle for homo, interracial, anti-white, hedonist, and nihilist propaganda.
And with the vulgarization of Gramsci’s notion of ‘cultural hegemony’, many progs and even creative types now believe that anything related to culture — even TV comedies, comic books, advertising, and manuals — must be used as vehicles of ideological indoctrination. Nothing is objective or apolitical anymore. Every image or sentiment is used to promote Jew-worship, homo-worship, mass-invasion & diversity, and idea that white wombs exist to produce black babies.
This is why Conservatives need to understand the paradoxical nature of power. If cons want businesses to be more pro-conservative, conservatives must be more anti-business. Only by threatening businesses with boycotts and lost revenue will corporations pay heed to interests of conservatives or, at the very least, not cave to proggy demands so much. For too long, businesses took Conservatives for granted since the Right has been so pro-business no matter what. The rebellion of middle America by voting for Trump’s anti-globalism and the hits taken by Target(over tranny stuff) & Starbucks(over refugee stuff) illustrates that the ONLY way to make big business respect your side's values and positions is by threatening it with dire consequences. Patriotic Americans need to formulate systems and organizations that enable massive boycotts of companies that go anti-white or anti-conservative.
3. Hipster factor. This is a conceit, especially among the young. Young people like to see themselves as forever young, cool, hip, and edgy. And the center of hip culture is in downtown areas of big cities with the glitter, fashion, buzz, dazzle, and the fun. It’s La Dolce Vita, and people want IN on this culture, like those revelers in LAST DAYS OF DISCO eager to be let into the hottest night club. Such a world is appealing for its permissiveness, experimentalism, individualism, ‘creativity’, and anything-goes-ism.
Despite the repressive aspects of PC, cultural freedom is still mostly associated with bohemian areas of NY, SF, Chicago, Austin, and the like. And the political culture of this community is proggy by default — even if most denizens of this world aren't hardcore leftists — because bohemianism is inherently anti-square and un-conservative. The whole spirit of experimentalism and alternative-lifestyle-ism, as carryovers from modernism, is a rejection of traditionalism and conservatism seen as stuffy, dull, outdated, and boring. Now, most people who hang around such communities are not so strange or ‘different’ themselves. They are mostly 9-to-5 working stiffs themselves. It’s like yuppies filled up Soho and other creative parts in NY in 80s. But they want to be around the vibes of latest trends. It’s like Charlie Sheen character in WALL STREET dates some decorator with connections with ‘creative’ types.
How come libertarians don’t fit well into this culture even though they are individualistic and pro-freedom? Because they come in two colors: (1) opportunists who will whore out to the rich and powerful for any price. They seem crass in their obsession with wealth and power, and those who can't gain success for themselves toady up to the powerful, like the contemptible Poe character in PAT GARRETT AND BILLY THE KID (2) cold-hearted ruthless greed of someone like Gordon Gekko or Jordan Belfort.
Bohemian types are for unfettered freedom, but they also want to feel justified as people concerned with 'justice' and 'meaning'. They want be cool, not cold. They want feel warm and fuzzy on social/moral issues, not hard and bullying like libertarians for whom individual liberty and self-interest trump all other considerations. Even though libertarianism is about freedom, it strikes those who want a more relaxed cultural atmosphere as too hard-hitting and hyper. Libertarianism is more about will to power than will to party. It’s like someone who is for freedom to exercise to build muscle. It’s calisthenics than aesthetics of freedom.
But can same rules be applied to arts, culture, morality, justice, and emotions? Is modern art necessarily more 'advanced' than classical art, and is post-modern art necessarily more advanced than modern art? Is today's concept of family really 'more evolved' than the concept fifty years ago? Is hipster sensibility superior to the sentiments of an earlier era?
To be sure, the more a society becomes productive and plentiful, the more various peoples(with full stomachs) tend to seek their own fetishized niche of ‘justice’ concocted to cater to his or her personal whims. Also, when even the personal is politicized or filtered through ideology, even trivialities or frivolities are mistaken as 'rights' deserving of moral recognition and benediction by all of society.
In a hungry society, the main priority is providing enough food for the masses. If Michael Jackson had been born into a sharecropper family in 1900, he would have worked in the fields and focused on food & basic needs. But he made lots of money in a rich nation and could indulge his fantasies. Eventually, the flight into fantasy became a new ‘right’, and so, we are witnessing the Michael-Jacksonization of society. Michael was effectively transsexual, transracial, and transage. He was a perpetual Peter-Pan-kid. At least he kept it to himself. Today, every freak is no longer content to indulge in his/her whims but demands all of society to recognize and celebrate what he/she is. Once homos went from a group-to-be-tolerated-and-left-alone to a group-that-must-be-praised-and-worshiped-by-all-of-society, freaks of all stripes began to take their cues from the homo movement and make similar demands.
Anyway, capitalism has lots of tendencies that aren't necessarily proggy. So, how did it end up being so proggy? Three possible explanations.
1. Most business and science/technology types don’t have much time or interest in ideas or culture. They are into money, success, ambition, and geek stuff. So, most of them don’t form their own ideas on society, politics, humanity, and history. Bill Gates is a very smart guy, but his main focus for most of his life was on geek stuff and making money. So, where do people like him get their ideas? From social sciences and media controlled by other sorts of people. So, if academia and media people lean proggy and globby(globalist), even apolitical people-of-success will gravitate in that direction. It could be that simple.
2. Mafia-type extortion. Businesses naturally want to be left alone to make money. Because Conservatives tend to be pro-business, they leave businesses alone. So, businesses have NOTHING to fear from Conservatives who kiss the butts of the business class. Why pay for something you can have for free? Conservative don’t run extortion schemes on businesses. Even when conservatives hope for donations from rich people and big business, they go pleading, not demanding and certainly not threatening.
But proggies and blacks do make demands. (And Jews make demands on gentile businesses to fork over money to Jewish causes and be mindful not to fund anything deemed 'antisemitic' or 'racist'. This means anti-white Jewish organizations & cause receive tons of donations, whereas any group even mildly associated with white interests get no funding from big business.) Jesse Jackson made an art of this and reaped a fortune by going from company to company, sniffing for ‘racism’, and extorting funds for his own coffers. (Jackson's extortion scheme ended only under Clinton & Co. that forged a deal with Big Business that progs would drop their knee-jerk anti-corporatism IF big business poured the bulk of their donations to Democrats, homos, and progs. Clintons even created a foundation to do just that on a global scale.)
Proggies, via power of media and NGO agitation/subversion, have devised an effective way to extort money and support from big companies. So, even if businesses are apolitical or conservative-leaning, they fear threats and attacks from progs who are funded and organized by the likes of George Soros. Businesses feel they have no choice but to pander to them. Progs act like a bunch of Don Fanucci’s. Just like the mafia gained control of labor unions and caused 'union trouble' for companies that didn't play ball, the Proglob(prog-globalists) operate the same way.
In contrast, since businesses have the unconditional support of Conservatives, there's no compelling reason to fund or support Conservatism. Businesses fear threats more than they appreciate support. After all, Conservative support for business is just that. It’s like a woman's devotion to a man no matter what he does. He can take her loyalty for granted. But proggy threats can get nasty, especially since proggies have close ties to media, academia, courts, deep state(with secret intelligence on everyone), and groups like SPLC & ADL and especially since Proggies can destroy careers and reputations with accusations of ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’.
Also, to appease proggies even further, corporations have hired progsters to manage the publicity departments and to devise office policy, which means everyone has to attend endless meetings on PC this or that. Also, advertising has been taken over by the Proglob and is used mostly as a vehicle for homo, interracial, anti-white, hedonist, and nihilist propaganda.
And with the vulgarization of Gramsci’s notion of ‘cultural hegemony’, many progs and even creative types now believe that anything related to culture — even TV comedies, comic books, advertising, and manuals — must be used as vehicles of ideological indoctrination. Nothing is objective or apolitical anymore. Every image or sentiment is used to promote Jew-worship, homo-worship, mass-invasion & diversity, and idea that white wombs exist to produce black babies.
This is why Conservatives need to understand the paradoxical nature of power. If cons want businesses to be more pro-conservative, conservatives must be more anti-business. Only by threatening businesses with boycotts and lost revenue will corporations pay heed to interests of conservatives or, at the very least, not cave to proggy demands so much. For too long, businesses took Conservatives for granted since the Right has been so pro-business no matter what. The rebellion of middle America by voting for Trump’s anti-globalism and the hits taken by Target(over tranny stuff) & Starbucks(over refugee stuff) illustrates that the ONLY way to make big business respect your side's values and positions is by threatening it with dire consequences. Patriotic Americans need to formulate systems and organizations that enable massive boycotts of companies that go anti-white or anti-conservative.
3. Hipster factor. This is a conceit, especially among the young. Young people like to see themselves as forever young, cool, hip, and edgy. And the center of hip culture is in downtown areas of big cities with the glitter, fashion, buzz, dazzle, and the fun. It’s La Dolce Vita, and people want IN on this culture, like those revelers in LAST DAYS OF DISCO eager to be let into the hottest night club. Such a world is appealing for its permissiveness, experimentalism, individualism, ‘creativity’, and anything-goes-ism.
Despite the repressive aspects of PC, cultural freedom is still mostly associated with bohemian areas of NY, SF, Chicago, Austin, and the like. And the political culture of this community is proggy by default — even if most denizens of this world aren't hardcore leftists — because bohemianism is inherently anti-square and un-conservative. The whole spirit of experimentalism and alternative-lifestyle-ism, as carryovers from modernism, is a rejection of traditionalism and conservatism seen as stuffy, dull, outdated, and boring. Now, most people who hang around such communities are not so strange or ‘different’ themselves. They are mostly 9-to-5 working stiffs themselves. It’s like yuppies filled up Soho and other creative parts in NY in 80s. But they want to be around the vibes of latest trends. It’s like Charlie Sheen character in WALL STREET dates some decorator with connections with ‘creative’ types.
How come libertarians don’t fit well into this culture even though they are individualistic and pro-freedom? Because they come in two colors: (1) opportunists who will whore out to the rich and powerful for any price. They seem crass in their obsession with wealth and power, and those who can't gain success for themselves toady up to the powerful, like the contemptible Poe character in PAT GARRETT AND BILLY THE KID (2) cold-hearted ruthless greed of someone like Gordon Gekko or Jordan Belfort.
Bohemian types are for unfettered freedom, but they also want to feel justified as people concerned with 'justice' and 'meaning'. They want be cool, not cold. They want feel warm and fuzzy on social/moral issues, not hard and bullying like libertarians for whom individual liberty and self-interest trump all other considerations. Even though libertarianism is about freedom, it strikes those who want a more relaxed cultural atmosphere as too hard-hitting and hyper. Libertarianism is more about will to power than will to party. It’s like someone who is for freedom to exercise to build muscle. It’s calisthenics than aesthetics of freedom.
Main Problem with the World: the US is the Lone Superpower, and it is ruled by a Lone Superpower Ethnic Group, the Jews
First problem: the US is the lone superpower.
That, in and of itself, isn’t necessarily bad since majority of Americans are decent people.
It’s the Second problem in combination with first problem that makes the world so toxic.
Among various groups in the US, there is only on superpower group. Jewish Ethnics.
In the past, the lone superpower group within the US was Anglo-American or Wasp.
And then, esp after WWII, the racial/ethnic dynamics became more balanced among Wasps, Catholics, Irish, various other Ethnics, blacks, Jews.
Also, there used to be the generational divide that pit Experience vs Youth. But over time, Youth Culture took over everything, and even old people still listen to youth music and rock. In the 60s, the culture of maturity stood against culture of excitement. But the boomers never really grew up. As such, they co-opted the young of successive generations or caved to infantile demands. Cult of Youth became dominant, even though most things young people enthuse over have been planted in their minds by older people -- boomers and X-ers -- who control the academia and media. When we hear, "Young people demand this", they've made to demand it by older people who planted those ideas and images in naive immature minds. And if boomer in their counterculture heyday rebelled against elders, today’s youths take all their cues from teachers and Pop culture controlled by boomer/ X gen elders. So, there is no longer any balance of power between youth and experience. There is just the Cult of Youth that defines everything. There is no respect for age, and if anything, older people are pressured to cave to demands of young people whose minds have been corrupted by PC and Pop Culture. Look how Hillary sucked up to Lena Dunham.
Wasp power declined precipitously beginning in the 1960s. Ethnic power also faded as various ethnics — Italians, Irish, Polish, etc — just became generic Americans, hardly an identity to rally around. Blacks got stuck in rage politics and self-destruction. Religious identity faded and Catholics grew weak. Evangelicals and Southerners got numerical power but not much brains.
Meanwhile Jewish power rose and rose. In time, Jews became a superpower group in America. Eventually the ONLY ONE. There had been a time when Anglos were the lone superpower group. And then, there was balance among various major groups since end of WWII. But in the end, the only group that was perpetually on the rise were Jews who gained preeminence as the Lone Superpower Group in America.
There has been massive arrivals of non-white immigrants, but most Mexicans and other 'Hispanics' have been lackluster in gaining elite power. As for Asians, they do better in schools and make decent money, but they lack spark and unity among themselves. Whereas all Jews tend to become ONE in the US regardless of national origin(Hungary, Poland, Russia, Germany etc), the various Asians groups don’t see eye to eye on anything. Chinese and Hindus as one people? Fat chance. Also, especially among East Asians, there is too much interracial marriage to maintain a strong sense of identity and interests. The prevailing attitude among Asians is that they must be the 'feminine' partner in relation to whites, Jews, or blacks. Since Asians generally follow and suck up to power, they generally do whatever is necessary to garner favor from Jewish elites.
Muslims haven’t amounted to much either.
So, we have a dangerous situation. US is the only superpower in the world AND the US is ruled by one ethnicity as the lone superpower group. This group is only 2% of the US population but has tremendous control over brain and nerve centers of law, economy, government, judiciary, and etc. If it weren't for the First Amendment, Jewish Power would be even greater as American Jews, like their counterparts in Europe, would have made it illegal to criticize any aspects of Jewish dominance.
If Jews were the lone superpower group in America in a multi-polar world, it wouldn’t be so dangerous. In that scenario, even if Jews dominated the US, the US would not dominate the world that is multi-polar and balanced among various great powers. So, there would be a sense of geo-political equilibrium, and the US, even if Jewish-dominated, would have to respect that balance.
But, as things currently stand, the US is the lone power and controls the world. So, WHO controls the US is has huge repercussions to all the world. If there was balance of powers among various racial/ethnic groups within the US, it wouldn’t be so bad since different groups would balance each other’s interests, agendas, and avarice.
It’s like various political parties balance each other out in a democracy. One-party system can lead to autocracy and corruption of power. In the current US, we have a one-ethnic-group system despite there being many larger groups in America and despite the lone superpower group being only 2% of the population. There is Red State vs Blue State divide in the US, but the ONE ISSUE on which both sides are completely in agreement about is Israel, Israel, Israel, Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust, and Jews, Jews, Jews. Jews are so holy and wonderful and need to be worshiped and etc.
Suppose Palestinian Americans, Russian-gentile-Americans, and Iranian-Americans also wielded considerable power in the US. Then, US foreign policy wouldn’t be so rabidly Zionist and Judeo-centric, radicalized and abused to serve the narrow interests of the Jewish Tribe grown supremacist over the years. But since there is NO balance of powers among the various groups in the US, the US as lone superpower is essentially a War Machine for the Tribe as the lone superpower group in the US. This state-of-affairs is very dangerous. For all the world to tremble before the supremacist interests of a single small ethnic group in America… it can only mean things will be completely out of whack, and indeed they are.
The New War on Russia is really a Jewish War on Russia. Jews use homo proxies and pussy riots proxies — just like ‘white helmets’ are used as proxies in Syria —, but the puppet-masters are of the Tribe.
Long ago, the UK sought to maintain balance of power on the European Continent so that no single nation would be able to consolidate all of Europe against the UK.
Today, something must be done to bring forth some kind of ethnic balance of power in America because Jewish lone-superpower-group domination is greedily whipping into frenzy the awesome Might of America to serve very narrow tribal supremacist interests, albeit under cover of ‘principles’ like ‘human rights’, ‘liberal democracy’, and etc. (These Jews who claim to be for 'liberal democracy' actually prefer Deep State shenanigans to undermine the true will of the people.) Nikki Haley is just another 'servitor of the Empire'. Her ilk whore out in any way and anyhow to climb up the ladder of prestige and privilege.
Anyway, if the US were the lone superpower in the world BUT wasn't dominated by a lone superpower group domestically, there would be some restraint to US power at the global level. Even with US as the most powerful nation, its foreign policy agenda would be counter-balanced among various contending ethnic groups within the US. It’s like Greek Americans side with Greek Cypriots and Turkish Americans side with Turkish Cypriots. But as neither side is dominant, US doesn’t use its power to favor Turks or Greeks. That is balance. And because Irish-Americans gained considerable power, the US respected Irish interests as well as the interests of Britain, long the main ally of the US. But pity the Palestinians. They got no power at all. So, even after so many yrs of Zionist occupation, all we hear from US politicians is “Israel, Israel, Israel” and almost no sympathy for Palestinians.
So, the real problem is Jews have become the lone superpower group in the US that is the lone superpower in the world. This situation is more dangerous than when Anglos were the only superpower group in America. For one thing, since Anglos were the majority of America for a good part of US history, it seemed only right that they would wield the most power. And even when Wasps were no longer the majority, they comprised a huge percentage of the population, and furthermore, many ethnics had become Anglo-Americanized and shared in core values and interests. So, Wasp power did represent many peoples and even groups within America. Also, due to the Christian values of Wasps, there was *some* sense of human interests beyond the merely tribal.
But Jews have never been more than 3% of the US population. So, for them to have lone superpower status within the US throws things out of balance. Also, as the core organizing principle among Jews is ethno-tribalism, their hypocrisy when it comes to universal human rights goes far beyond Christian hypocrisy.
If the US had three superpower groups, even that wouldn’t be so bad for the world. If Wasps, Jews, and Hispanics were three superpower groups, there would be some kind of balance among them. Therefore, American Power couldn't be used solely as an instrument of Jewish interests.
But Jews constitute the ONLY superpower group in the Current US, and that means the awesome power of America is to serve Jews uber alles.
To be sure, white gentiles could become a superpower group if they all pulled together, but white identity is deemed either suspect or generic. Genericism means whites are like a slug with no backbone. As such, whites must lean on OTHER stronger identities to gain a sense of cultural or moral embodiment.
In a hypothetical scenario, suppose the US has Jews as the lone superpower group in America, but American power is only on par with Iran or Brazil. In that case, Jews would dominate the US but the US would not dominate the world. And that would make for some balance in the world.
But when Jews are lone superpower in the US that is the lone superpower in the world, that is a dangerous formula. That is too much power around the world for too small a group. It is Jewish supremacism.
Jews have achieved in America what Napoleon or Hitler sought in Continental Europe. Control over all.
Traditionally, the two powers that did most to maintain balance-of-power on the European Continent were the UK and Russia. Both feared the unification of European power under one nation. Napoleon(France) and Hitler(Germany) unified Europe and waged great wars on the UK and Russia. In both wars, UK and Russia were allies. And it seems rather logical that UK, with a history of suspicion for Continental politics, has been the first European nation to exit the EU. Still, UK is no longer what it used to be. It’s a spent power, a poodle of the US. Russia is still a major power though also greatly diminished.
US and EU united under Jewish hegemony is very dangerous to the world. And we are seeing it.
That, in and of itself, isn’t necessarily bad since majority of Americans are decent people.
It’s the Second problem in combination with first problem that makes the world so toxic.
Among various groups in the US, there is only on superpower group. Jewish Ethnics.
In the past, the lone superpower group within the US was Anglo-American or Wasp.
And then, esp after WWII, the racial/ethnic dynamics became more balanced among Wasps, Catholics, Irish, various other Ethnics, blacks, Jews.
Also, there used to be the generational divide that pit Experience vs Youth. But over time, Youth Culture took over everything, and even old people still listen to youth music and rock. In the 60s, the culture of maturity stood against culture of excitement. But the boomers never really grew up. As such, they co-opted the young of successive generations or caved to infantile demands. Cult of Youth became dominant, even though most things young people enthuse over have been planted in their minds by older people -- boomers and X-ers -- who control the academia and media. When we hear, "Young people demand this", they've made to demand it by older people who planted those ideas and images in naive immature minds. And if boomer in their counterculture heyday rebelled against elders, today’s youths take all their cues from teachers and Pop culture controlled by boomer/ X gen elders. So, there is no longer any balance of power between youth and experience. There is just the Cult of Youth that defines everything. There is no respect for age, and if anything, older people are pressured to cave to demands of young people whose minds have been corrupted by PC and Pop Culture. Look how Hillary sucked up to Lena Dunham.
Wasp power declined precipitously beginning in the 1960s. Ethnic power also faded as various ethnics — Italians, Irish, Polish, etc — just became generic Americans, hardly an identity to rally around. Blacks got stuck in rage politics and self-destruction. Religious identity faded and Catholics grew weak. Evangelicals and Southerners got numerical power but not much brains.
Meanwhile Jewish power rose and rose. In time, Jews became a superpower group in America. Eventually the ONLY ONE. There had been a time when Anglos were the lone superpower group. And then, there was balance among various major groups since end of WWII. But in the end, the only group that was perpetually on the rise were Jews who gained preeminence as the Lone Superpower Group in America.
There has been massive arrivals of non-white immigrants, but most Mexicans and other 'Hispanics' have been lackluster in gaining elite power. As for Asians, they do better in schools and make decent money, but they lack spark and unity among themselves. Whereas all Jews tend to become ONE in the US regardless of national origin(Hungary, Poland, Russia, Germany etc), the various Asians groups don’t see eye to eye on anything. Chinese and Hindus as one people? Fat chance. Also, especially among East Asians, there is too much interracial marriage to maintain a strong sense of identity and interests. The prevailing attitude among Asians is that they must be the 'feminine' partner in relation to whites, Jews, or blacks. Since Asians generally follow and suck up to power, they generally do whatever is necessary to garner favor from Jewish elites.
Muslims haven’t amounted to much either.
So, we have a dangerous situation. US is the only superpower in the world AND the US is ruled by one ethnicity as the lone superpower group. This group is only 2% of the US population but has tremendous control over brain and nerve centers of law, economy, government, judiciary, and etc. If it weren't for the First Amendment, Jewish Power would be even greater as American Jews, like their counterparts in Europe, would have made it illegal to criticize any aspects of Jewish dominance.
If Jews were the lone superpower group in America in a multi-polar world, it wouldn’t be so dangerous. In that scenario, even if Jews dominated the US, the US would not dominate the world that is multi-polar and balanced among various great powers. So, there would be a sense of geo-political equilibrium, and the US, even if Jewish-dominated, would have to respect that balance.
But, as things currently stand, the US is the lone power and controls the world. So, WHO controls the US is has huge repercussions to all the world. If there was balance of powers among various racial/ethnic groups within the US, it wouldn’t be so bad since different groups would balance each other’s interests, agendas, and avarice.
It’s like various political parties balance each other out in a democracy. One-party system can lead to autocracy and corruption of power. In the current US, we have a one-ethnic-group system despite there being many larger groups in America and despite the lone superpower group being only 2% of the population. There is Red State vs Blue State divide in the US, but the ONE ISSUE on which both sides are completely in agreement about is Israel, Israel, Israel, Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust, and Jews, Jews, Jews. Jews are so holy and wonderful and need to be worshiped and etc.
Suppose Palestinian Americans, Russian-gentile-Americans, and Iranian-Americans also wielded considerable power in the US. Then, US foreign policy wouldn’t be so rabidly Zionist and Judeo-centric, radicalized and abused to serve the narrow interests of the Jewish Tribe grown supremacist over the years. But since there is NO balance of powers among the various groups in the US, the US as lone superpower is essentially a War Machine for the Tribe as the lone superpower group in the US. This state-of-affairs is very dangerous. For all the world to tremble before the supremacist interests of a single small ethnic group in America… it can only mean things will be completely out of whack, and indeed they are.
The New War on Russia is really a Jewish War on Russia. Jews use homo proxies and pussy riots proxies — just like ‘white helmets’ are used as proxies in Syria —, but the puppet-masters are of the Tribe.
Long ago, the UK sought to maintain balance of power on the European Continent so that no single nation would be able to consolidate all of Europe against the UK.
Today, something must be done to bring forth some kind of ethnic balance of power in America because Jewish lone-superpower-group domination is greedily whipping into frenzy the awesome Might of America to serve very narrow tribal supremacist interests, albeit under cover of ‘principles’ like ‘human rights’, ‘liberal democracy’, and etc. (These Jews who claim to be for 'liberal democracy' actually prefer Deep State shenanigans to undermine the true will of the people.) Nikki Haley is just another 'servitor of the Empire'. Her ilk whore out in any way and anyhow to climb up the ladder of prestige and privilege.
Anyway, if the US were the lone superpower in the world BUT wasn't dominated by a lone superpower group domestically, there would be some restraint to US power at the global level. Even with US as the most powerful nation, its foreign policy agenda would be counter-balanced among various contending ethnic groups within the US. It’s like Greek Americans side with Greek Cypriots and Turkish Americans side with Turkish Cypriots. But as neither side is dominant, US doesn’t use its power to favor Turks or Greeks. That is balance. And because Irish-Americans gained considerable power, the US respected Irish interests as well as the interests of Britain, long the main ally of the US. But pity the Palestinians. They got no power at all. So, even after so many yrs of Zionist occupation, all we hear from US politicians is “Israel, Israel, Israel” and almost no sympathy for Palestinians.
So, the real problem is Jews have become the lone superpower group in the US that is the lone superpower in the world. This situation is more dangerous than when Anglos were the only superpower group in America. For one thing, since Anglos were the majority of America for a good part of US history, it seemed only right that they would wield the most power. And even when Wasps were no longer the majority, they comprised a huge percentage of the population, and furthermore, many ethnics had become Anglo-Americanized and shared in core values and interests. So, Wasp power did represent many peoples and even groups within America. Also, due to the Christian values of Wasps, there was *some* sense of human interests beyond the merely tribal.
But Jews have never been more than 3% of the US population. So, for them to have lone superpower status within the US throws things out of balance. Also, as the core organizing principle among Jews is ethno-tribalism, their hypocrisy when it comes to universal human rights goes far beyond Christian hypocrisy.
If the US had three superpower groups, even that wouldn’t be so bad for the world. If Wasps, Jews, and Hispanics were three superpower groups, there would be some kind of balance among them. Therefore, American Power couldn't be used solely as an instrument of Jewish interests.
But Jews constitute the ONLY superpower group in the Current US, and that means the awesome power of America is to serve Jews uber alles.
To be sure, white gentiles could become a superpower group if they all pulled together, but white identity is deemed either suspect or generic. Genericism means whites are like a slug with no backbone. As such, whites must lean on OTHER stronger identities to gain a sense of cultural or moral embodiment.
In a hypothetical scenario, suppose the US has Jews as the lone superpower group in America, but American power is only on par with Iran or Brazil. In that case, Jews would dominate the US but the US would not dominate the world. And that would make for some balance in the world.
But when Jews are lone superpower in the US that is the lone superpower in the world, that is a dangerous formula. That is too much power around the world for too small a group. It is Jewish supremacism.
Jews have achieved in America what Napoleon or Hitler sought in Continental Europe. Control over all.
Traditionally, the two powers that did most to maintain balance-of-power on the European Continent were the UK and Russia. Both feared the unification of European power under one nation. Napoleon(France) and Hitler(Germany) unified Europe and waged great wars on the UK and Russia. In both wars, UK and Russia were allies. And it seems rather logical that UK, with a history of suspicion for Continental politics, has been the first European nation to exit the EU. Still, UK is no longer what it used to be. It’s a spent power, a poodle of the US. Russia is still a major power though also greatly diminished.
US and EU united under Jewish hegemony is very dangerous to the world. And we are seeing it.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Alt-Right must Own the Banner of the ANTI-WAR Movement
Alt Right must adopt the orphaned Anti-War Movement in this crucial moment in history. The world is now being torn asunder by hyper-imperialist globalism of the US as Lone Superpower, which, in turn, is controlled by the Lone Super-group, the Jews.
Alt Right must own the Anti-War Movement. So-called 'progressives' have completely sold their souls to globalism. Whatever anti-globalist and anti-war impulses that they once had during George W. Bush's presidency soon evaporated under Obama, whose brand legitimized American Hegemony in the eyes of Liberals, Leftists, and Decadents. The invasion and destruction of Libya couldn't be so bad if a black guy did it, right, especially since he's for 'gay marriage'? New Cold War with Russia can't be so bad if it's led by Democrats and homosexuals, right?
'Progressives' did NOTHING while Obama went about destroying Libya on trumped-up charges. 'Progressives' also looked the other way while Obama-Hillary administration supported Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar's funneling of arms and aid to Jihadis and Alqaeda remnants in Syria.
With the Anti-War movement all but dead in the West, the Alt Right has the golden opportunity to salvage and own the banner, in effect becoming the enviable Voice of Conscience & Courage against the scourge of Globalism.
Alt Right's message must be:
Nationalism = Peace and sovereignty for every nation
Globalism = War and imperialist hegemony over the world
Armed with this message, the Alt Right can win support not only among European nationalists but among non-whites in nations around the world who've lost patience with the crimes of corrupt Zio-globalism enabled by the US as the Lone Superpower.
Alt Right must soberly(contra Mel Gibson) lay out the case against Zionist-globalists as the main instigators of major wars since end of the Cold War for the purpose of maximizing Israeli interests while subverting and damaging Iran, Syria, and Russia --- in other words, anything deemed advantageous to Jewish Supremacism. It essentially boils down to Jews vs the World. Jews push American hegemony around the world because Jews control America. If the US rules the world, then Jews rule the world since Jews rule the US. And this is why even the 'left' has no interest in anti-war politics. Taking cues from Jews who fund and spin the narrative of the 'left', so-called 'progressives' have come under the impression that Russia is about to conquer the world. According to this paranoid narrative, the good ole US is the ONLY bulwark against Russian hegemony --- Jews sure love to project their own supremacism onto others --- , and therefore, the US and its allies must be in perpetual war-footing against Russia(especially since the Big Bear is opposed to 'gay marriage'). With 'leftist' worldview such as this, is it any wonder that anti-war sentiments are dead among 'progressives'?
Nearly every political organization or persuasion has abandoned the Anti-War position because Jewish Power controls both the 'right' and the 'left' in the West. Since nearly all ideological movements are funded, led, or advised by Jewish-globalist-supremacists, most of them bark dumbly like dogs for more tensions with Russia, Syria, Iran, and any nation currently disliked by Jews. In their rabid virulence, there isn't much difference between John McCain and Rachel Maddow.
A year ago, Trump expressed some remarkable anti-war sentiments during the campaign, thereby throwing politics-as-usual off balance by aligning the Right with peace(whereas there wasn't a war that Hillary didn't like), but alas, it appears Trump has cravenly kowtowed under Zio-con pressure.
So, the Anti-War banner now belongs to any side that will pick it up, raise high, and wave in its march for global balance, truth, and justice. Since no side is willing to take up the banner, a golden opportunity has falle on Alt Right's lap.
In the globalist melee, the ball of conscience has been fumbled by all sides. No one dares to pick it up since every side is owned by Jews who want more Wars for Israel. But the Alt Right, the ONLY substantive movement that is independent of Jewish domination, can pick it up and run with it for a Moral Touchdown.
Alt Right must own the Anti-War Movement. So-called 'progressives' have completely sold their souls to globalism. Whatever anti-globalist and anti-war impulses that they once had during George W. Bush's presidency soon evaporated under Obama, whose brand legitimized American Hegemony in the eyes of Liberals, Leftists, and Decadents. The invasion and destruction of Libya couldn't be so bad if a black guy did it, right, especially since he's for 'gay marriage'? New Cold War with Russia can't be so bad if it's led by Democrats and homosexuals, right?
'Progressives' did NOTHING while Obama went about destroying Libya on trumped-up charges. 'Progressives' also looked the other way while Obama-Hillary administration supported Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar's funneling of arms and aid to Jihadis and Alqaeda remnants in Syria.
With the Anti-War movement all but dead in the West, the Alt Right has the golden opportunity to salvage and own the banner, in effect becoming the enviable Voice of Conscience & Courage against the scourge of Globalism.
Alt Right's message must be:
Nationalism = Peace and sovereignty for every nation
Globalism = War and imperialist hegemony over the world
Armed with this message, the Alt Right can win support not only among European nationalists but among non-whites in nations around the world who've lost patience with the crimes of corrupt Zio-globalism enabled by the US as the Lone Superpower.
Alt Right must soberly(contra Mel Gibson) lay out the case against Zionist-globalists as the main instigators of major wars since end of the Cold War for the purpose of maximizing Israeli interests while subverting and damaging Iran, Syria, and Russia --- in other words, anything deemed advantageous to Jewish Supremacism. It essentially boils down to Jews vs the World. Jews push American hegemony around the world because Jews control America. If the US rules the world, then Jews rule the world since Jews rule the US. And this is why even the 'left' has no interest in anti-war politics. Taking cues from Jews who fund and spin the narrative of the 'left', so-called 'progressives' have come under the impression that Russia is about to conquer the world. According to this paranoid narrative, the good ole US is the ONLY bulwark against Russian hegemony --- Jews sure love to project their own supremacism onto others --- , and therefore, the US and its allies must be in perpetual war-footing against Russia(especially since the Big Bear is opposed to 'gay marriage'). With 'leftist' worldview such as this, is it any wonder that anti-war sentiments are dead among 'progressives'?
Nearly every political organization or persuasion has abandoned the Anti-War position because Jewish Power controls both the 'right' and the 'left' in the West. Since nearly all ideological movements are funded, led, or advised by Jewish-globalist-supremacists, most of them bark dumbly like dogs for more tensions with Russia, Syria, Iran, and any nation currently disliked by Jews. In their rabid virulence, there isn't much difference between John McCain and Rachel Maddow.
A year ago, Trump expressed some remarkable anti-war sentiments during the campaign, thereby throwing politics-as-usual off balance by aligning the Right with peace(whereas there wasn't a war that Hillary didn't like), but alas, it appears Trump has cravenly kowtowed under Zio-con pressure.
So, the Anti-War banner now belongs to any side that will pick it up, raise high, and wave in its march for global balance, truth, and justice. Since no side is willing to take up the banner, a golden opportunity has falle on Alt Right's lap.
In the globalist melee, the ball of conscience has been fumbled by all sides. No one dares to pick it up since every side is owned by Jews who want more Wars for Israel. But the Alt Right, the ONLY substantive movement that is independent of Jewish domination, can pick it up and run with it for a Moral Touchdown.
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Individual Differences are Real. What about Group Differences?
Progs have no problem with the reality of individual differences but have a big trouble with the concept of group differences. They admit some individuals are smarter than others, but they are reluctant to believe a group can be smarter than another group.
So, if someone says Mike Tyson and Justin Bieber are different in many respects as individuals, even Progs would agree. Tyson and Bieber are different individuals and different as individuals.
Now, suppose some mad scientist clones Mike Tyson and makes a thousand copies of him. Suppose this scientist also clones Justin Bieber into a thousand copies..
Didn't we go from validity of individual differences to validity of group differences?
Surely, the clone-tribe of Tysons are different as a group from the clone-tribe of Biebers.
Of course, people of a race are not clones of one another. There are too many genetic variations. Still, they are kind of like rough-clones of an 'extended family' because they share the DNA that evolved in isolation to make them distinct from other groups.
So, if we grab a bunch of average whites and a bunch of average blacks, whites will have more in common with one another than with blacks, and blacks will have more in common with one another than with whites. Even though there may be more genetic differences between a white giant and a whited dwarf than between an average white man and an average black man, most people don't have extreme-traits --- like Down's Syndrome or some rare genetic condition --- and belong to the racial mean. Among people of this mean, they have more in common with members of their own race(or subspecies) than with members of another race.
Anyway, the Tyson-Bieber Experiment proves that group differences can exist. Just multiply the traits of an individual to form a larger group. Such a group will surely differ from another group with different DNA basis.
So, if someone says Mike Tyson and Justin Bieber are different in many respects as individuals, even Progs would agree. Tyson and Bieber are different individuals and different as individuals.
Now, suppose some mad scientist clones Mike Tyson and makes a thousand copies of him. Suppose this scientist also clones Justin Bieber into a thousand copies..
Didn't we go from validity of individual differences to validity of group differences?
Surely, the clone-tribe of Tysons are different as a group from the clone-tribe of Biebers.
Of course, people of a race are not clones of one another. There are too many genetic variations. Still, they are kind of like rough-clones of an 'extended family' because they share the DNA that evolved in isolation to make them distinct from other groups.
So, if we grab a bunch of average whites and a bunch of average blacks, whites will have more in common with one another than with blacks, and blacks will have more in common with one another than with whites. Even though there may be more genetic differences between a white giant and a whited dwarf than between an average white man and an average black man, most people don't have extreme-traits --- like Down's Syndrome or some rare genetic condition --- and belong to the racial mean. Among people of this mean, they have more in common with members of their own race(or subspecies) than with members of another race.
Anyway, the Tyson-Bieber Experiment proves that group differences can exist. Just multiply the traits of an individual to form a larger group. Such a group will surely differ from another group with different DNA basis.
Monday, April 3, 2017
PC or Political Correctness needs to be classified & treated as a Disease
PC should really be treated as a disease.
What is a disease? It is something that makes an organism sick, defenseless, and weak.
There is organic disease caused by bacterial or viral infections. And there is disease resulting from physical injuries like falling down or being thrown off a horse(even leading to paralysis).
But, as Richard Dawkins theorized, ideas also work like viruses or bacteria. Ideas have a kind of iDNA.
Some have a way of colonizing, infecting, subverting, and reprogramming minds and senses.
Some ideas and images are beneficial to the organism and promote healthy outlook, constructive habits, and well-being. Their impact is like nutrition, exercise, beneficial micro-organisms(like lactobacilli), vitamins, and oxygen-rich red blood cells.
Some ideas and images are harmful and lead to dissipation, confusion, agitation, deterioration. Their effects are not unlike rabies from a bite of diseased animal or diabetes from excessive intake of sugary calories.
Ideas can infect minds like viruses and bacteria infect cells. Ideas can lead to Idea-disease or Ideasease. Punk Rock culture had a toxic and degenerative effect on the British Working Class.
PC is a kind of idea-disease. To understand the danger of PC, we need to consider the immune system, be it biological or socio-political.
A healthy organism relies on a strong immune system. Every individual body is organo-nativist-and-defensivist. It is under constant bombardment from countless germs in air, moisture, and objects. The body’s immune system must constantly maintain itself against invasive-foreign elements. It tries to filter in only the things that are essential to the body. A healthy body accepts food to be digested and absorbed by the body. It also benefits from some beneficial ‘germs’, like lactobacillus. But it must constantly be on guard to keep out useless and especially hazardous materials. Harmful germs and parasitic agents are useful only to the extent that they strengthen organismic immune system against them. People in germ-free environments will end up up immune systems grown lax and weak. So, the body’s constant struggle against germs has a way of invigorating and recharging the immune system, thus keeping the body vigilant and hardy.
But when there is TOO MUCH invasion of germs and hazardous elements, the exhausted and/or overwhelmed immune system can’t sustain itself and collapses.
More dangerous yet, a virus may sneak in and play fifth-column from within the cells, insidiously subverting the immune system from the inside. That’s how HIV works. It enters cells and wreaks havoc on their internal mechanism, thus rendering their immune capacity moot.
PC is like HIV. It messes up the white race’s immune system from the inside.
PC makes white folks suffer from RIDS, or Racial Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
PC memes infect white folks' neurons with paralysis of ‘white guilt’ and images of ‘white evil’. Thus 'converted' or 're-programmed', even when white folks sense danger(and the need to respond accordingly), their corrupted internal mechanism tells them NO. PC-infected whites feel they have no right to defend their own kind.
Young PC types in colleges are not rational beings, and they didn't arrive at their worldview rationally. Rather, right from the cradle, their minds were inculcated with PC. Thus infected, they feel that their race has no right to defend itself or preserve itself. They see the white race as a rapacious parasite that deserves to be leeched on by other races who'd been historically sucked dry by the white race.
So, as a race or ethnic community, white folks infected with PC have been rendered defenseless. PC-programming allows white virulence & aggression only in attacks on its own kind.
Even so, despite their antipathy to their own kind, every single organism seeks out safety and comfort. So, even as white PC brats are committed to their racial demise, they nevertheless strive for success as individuals. Devious PC offers this opportunity to white collaborators as a hook. The pledge to abandon group-survival and collective-power buys them certain privileges as atomized individuals.
Invasive systems often play this game on their prey. Since wholesale conquest may be too daunting a task, the invasive force seeks out collaborator-agents(with the uncanny ability to loosen themselves from the whole) to turn against their own kind for rewards of individual gain. Certain germs have the same effect on the body. They make some parts of the body cooperate against the rest of the body. This is also true of how human organs work. The tongue can become a fatal collaborator against the body. Its sweet-tooth addiction can make the tongue take leave of its senses and 'collaborate' with the Junk Food Industry that encourages it to consume more junk that tastes wonderful to the tongue but does the rest of the body wrong. SJW-s who spout PC to gain individual success are slurping-in-tongues. They do will say and do anything to gain sweet things for themselves at the expense of their own race. Of course, they can rationalize their betrayal on universal grounds --- they live for all of humanity than for the tribalism of race --- , but such mindless utopianism isn't grounded in the limitations of reality. It is as stupid as parents who neglect their own children to pursue the impossible dream of caring for all children. Of course, utopian-universalism is, more often than not, just a crutch for doing nothing at all. When one's task is conceived in such grandiose and herculean manner, one never knows where to start, so he doesn't. Instead, one can just pursue individual interests while pontificating about how he hasn't the time for his kind since he is concerned with the entirety of the 'human race'. It's like a general who refuses to fight a single battle since he's too occupied with the entirety of the war.
We mustn't treat PC-infected youth as rational agents. They are mentally infected and diseased. All healthy organisms seek to survive and be strong. As humans are social organisms, it makes no sense for a group of humans to invite harm & danger to its own kind. Swedes are not acting rational or natural by inviting more Invasion of Diversity. Nature is about organisms using sense and reason to save themselves, grow strong, and survive. It is not about organisms inviting self-destruction. Organisms act to harm themselves ONLY IF they are diseased.
Health = More Strength and Better Survival.
Disease = More Weakness and More Harm.
PC whites are idea-diseased or ideaseased. They are like Red Guards in China whose minds were infected with Maoism. When dealing with the diseased, we need to focus on the disease, not on the patient. It is the disease that renders the patient weak. Weakened state lowers the immune system, and then more foreign elements attack and infect the body. Thus, HIV had a domino effect on the body. Initially, the body falls prey to HIV and is made weaker. And then, more infections by other viruses and bacteria make the body increasingly weaker until the body cannot even defend itself from the weakest pathogens.
The pathogenic effect of mass immigration-migration-invasion into the West works in a similar manner. PC has been the ideological-HIV that weakened the Western immune system's effectiveness against invasion. PC weakened white-pride and white-defensive-resolve by associating such ideas & passions with negative emotions tainted with 'racism'. Thus, the West was helpless to stem the initial waves of invasion. But with each successive wave of invasion, the Western body is made weaker as its resources & energies must be allocated toward taking care of these invasive foreign bodies. Each successive stage of weakening means another round of invasion, even by ragtag mobs. Just like the weakest & smallest creatures can gorge on a beached whale or fallen elephant, the most hapless bunch of nobodies can invade a civilization whose defensive systems have corroded and decayed to the point of no return.
Naturally, there have been signs of healthy reaction from certain elements of the West. There are righteously enraged patriots in Sweden and other nations. They are like white blood cells activated to destroy germs and foreign elements. However, the West is under treatment by the globo-Jewish quack-doctor who keeps injecting the White Body with sedatives & chemicals to weaken its defenses. Thus, white blood cells must contend with both the infection(by foreign bodies) and the injection(by Jewish versions of Dr. Mengele).
Organisms have control over certain foreign bodies but may come under control of others. When we eat, the food-as-foreign-body is controlled by our bodies. Our bodies process the food, take what we need, and excrete the rest. We use and 'control' the food, not the other way around.
But when germs-as-foreign-bodies infect us, they control us. They mess with us and try to take over us.
Anyway, any organism that acts against its own interest must be diagnosed as sick and diseased. A deer that runs into a pack of wolves is surely not well in the head.
To the extent that PC is making Swedes invite self-harm and self-ruin, Swedes are idea-diseased. Their minds are filled with ideas and images that lead them over the cliff.
Furthermore, a diseased-mind can become schizophrenic and be given to hallucinations. Sweden is under such a delusion. Its hallucinations of delusions-of-grandeur as a 'moral superpower' has rendered it blind to obvious facts of what's really happening in Sweden and around the world. It has turned batshit crazy, indeed into the Crazy Cat Lady of the World. But then, in the Current West under the chemi-control of the globo-Jewish doctor --- Jew-run academia serves as mental institutions and the Jew-run news/entertainment media serve as dope-pushers --- , so many gentiles now hallucinate that homos = rainbow, man's anus = sex organ, and sexuality = 50 genders.
When we respond to SJW’s as if they themselves are the problem, we are giving them too much credit. It’d be like blaming Red Guards or Hitler Youth for their own virulence(as if they'd rationally and individually arrived at their 'convictions') when, in fact, their minds were infected with radical idea-germs inculcated into them by the all-powerful-system. Though the US is not a totalitarian power, most of its institutions and industries have fallen into the hands of Jewish globalists whose agenda is drive by a 'radical will'. If anything, the conceit of the US being a 'liberal democracy' makes PC delusions all the more insidious because the PC-infected can believe themselves to have come to their conclusions by way of free will and individual choice when, more often than not, the decisions/delusions were made for them by the controllers of the academia and media. At least in Stalin's USSR and Hitler's Nazi Germany, everyone knew there was no such thing as 'free speech'. In contrast, the globo-Jewish West trick the PC-infected with the notion of 'free speech but no hate speech'. The PC West tricks people into believing they have the freedom they really don't.
Anyway, it’d make no sense to treat a sick patient as if he is rationally willing the disease to be there when, in fact, he’s been taken over by the disease. Once infected, he has no control over the disease that has a logic of its own. It’s like someone with malaria is sick regardless of what he thinks or feels. It'd make no sense to treat a diseased person as if his condition is a matter of creed or conviction. (Likewise, when dealing with problems of addiction, it's important to understand that the addiction has control over the person, not the other way around. An addict is what he is not because he has wrong ideas but because the totality of his mind and body, his soul, has become slave to the addiction. Even though rational understanding of the problem is helpful to the addict, it isn't enough for him to break free. It's like someone suffering from flu or malaria cannot overcome the illness with medical knowledge about it. Whether sick or addicted, the starting point of the treatment must be the realization or admittance that the mind-and-body has been taken over by a force that is beyond the power of reason and morality.) If someone has rabies, it doesn’t matter what he thinks or feels as an individual. The fact is the rabies virus has control over him, and it is the virus that must be the focus of medical attention. As with any disease, some people can be saved, some cannot. Also, we need to give it time and expect no quick fixes. Just as a disease goes through phases and cycles, PC has its own symptoms and processes: its infection state, incubation state, fever stage, delirium stage, etc. Some eventually emerge from it and regain mental health. Others become chronic cases and become college professors or journalists... or slacker antifa types or crazy cat ladies.
A PC-deranged person has to be treated as a patient with an infection that may be cured(for good) or controlled(like Herpes that never goes away) than as a rational thinker with free will or individuality. Though there's no quick fix, helpful advice may allow more mental oxygen and iron into his intellectual bloodstream and hasten the healing process. (In some cases, PC passes away naturally. It's like growing up. Some people seem difficult in teen yrs and destined for trouble but land on their feet as soon as they mature.) A sick patient with a flu or malaria can't do anything about it --- he can only wait for the disease to play itself out and exit the body --- , but there are still precautions and procedures he can undertake to make the sickness subside faster. For example, he should be resting and eating healthy than partying and drinking. Likewise, we can goad the PC-infected to take certain steps to bolster their white blood cells and reactivate their immune system that will help them realize how demented & deranged PC really is. Still, it will take time. (To be sure, there may be instant cures, like dropping them into Haiti for a week, but I don’t think too many PC types will go there.)
SJW’s, who all sound and talk alike, are zombies infected with same virus. If indeed they are free-thinking agents, why do they drone the same mantras like mental clones? They all exhibit the same ‘symptoms’. It’s like people with rabies or leprosy all end up the same way. SJW’s all have the same psycho-symptoms or psymptoms.
When the priests treat Regan in THE EXORCIST, they focus on the Demon inside her, not on the girl. Once the evil spirit has taken possession of her, she no longer has agency. (AMERICAN PASTORAL is even more frightening on the matter of ‘possession’.) Regan is really helpless even when she acts wild and crazy. It is the spirit-possessing-her that is really driving her.
Certain ideas and images have this power to take over someone's soul. Same is true of certain foods. Most foods are not addictive. Whoever heard of broccoli or spinach addiction? But sugar can be additive. And certain drugs, like nicotine or cocaine, can be very addictive. It gains control over the person…. like opium in China and meth among certain white demographics. People with strong moral fiber and critical mindset are less prone to fall under the influence, but some people are either weak of mind/spirit or have personalities prone to virulence & extremism. As for children, they can easily fall for anything… which is why PC keeps targeting kids at younger ages. “Is you baby racist? You must make him worship at the altar of the Mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse or the Tranny Drag-queen from the earliest age possible.” (If no amount of social engineering can turn a homo into non-homo or tranny into non-tranny, why does PC believe that normal-sexual people can be pried out of their 'hetero-normativity'?)
If some people become diseased with ideas, others become diseased with images and sounds. Intellectual types often fall for radical ideas that may turn out to be harmful.
The hoi polloi often fall for addictive images and sounds of pop culture. These are without ideas — though increasingly fused with PC into ‘cool’ memes — , but they can be just as powerful, indeed even more powerful. Bad ideas can close the mind, but they must nevertheless must be activated by the mind, requiring some effort and modicum of critical activity. In contrast, hedonistic images and sounds of Pop Culture can turn young ones into cultural meth-heads. In the Age of Paglia, we've seen how Slut-feminists can be just as crazy, even crazier, than the earlier Stalinist ones.
What is a disease? It is something that makes an organism sick, defenseless, and weak.
There is organic disease caused by bacterial or viral infections. And there is disease resulting from physical injuries like falling down or being thrown off a horse(even leading to paralysis).
But, as Richard Dawkins theorized, ideas also work like viruses or bacteria. Ideas have a kind of iDNA.
Some have a way of colonizing, infecting, subverting, and reprogramming minds and senses.
Some ideas and images are beneficial to the organism and promote healthy outlook, constructive habits, and well-being. Their impact is like nutrition, exercise, beneficial micro-organisms(like lactobacilli), vitamins, and oxygen-rich red blood cells.
Some ideas and images are harmful and lead to dissipation, confusion, agitation, deterioration. Their effects are not unlike rabies from a bite of diseased animal or diabetes from excessive intake of sugary calories.
Ideas can infect minds like viruses and bacteria infect cells. Ideas can lead to Idea-disease or Ideasease. Punk Rock culture had a toxic and degenerative effect on the British Working Class.
PC is a kind of idea-disease. To understand the danger of PC, we need to consider the immune system, be it biological or socio-political.
A healthy organism relies on a strong immune system. Every individual body is organo-nativist-and-defensivist. It is under constant bombardment from countless germs in air, moisture, and objects. The body’s immune system must constantly maintain itself against invasive-foreign elements. It tries to filter in only the things that are essential to the body. A healthy body accepts food to be digested and absorbed by the body. It also benefits from some beneficial ‘germs’, like lactobacillus. But it must constantly be on guard to keep out useless and especially hazardous materials. Harmful germs and parasitic agents are useful only to the extent that they strengthen organismic immune system against them. People in germ-free environments will end up up immune systems grown lax and weak. So, the body’s constant struggle against germs has a way of invigorating and recharging the immune system, thus keeping the body vigilant and hardy.
But when there is TOO MUCH invasion of germs and hazardous elements, the exhausted and/or overwhelmed immune system can’t sustain itself and collapses.
More dangerous yet, a virus may sneak in and play fifth-column from within the cells, insidiously subverting the immune system from the inside. That’s how HIV works. It enters cells and wreaks havoc on their internal mechanism, thus rendering their immune capacity moot.
PC is like HIV. It messes up the white race’s immune system from the inside.
PC makes white folks suffer from RIDS, or Racial Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
PC memes infect white folks' neurons with paralysis of ‘white guilt’ and images of ‘white evil’. Thus 'converted' or 're-programmed', even when white folks sense danger(and the need to respond accordingly), their corrupted internal mechanism tells them NO. PC-infected whites feel they have no right to defend their own kind.
Young PC types in colleges are not rational beings, and they didn't arrive at their worldview rationally. Rather, right from the cradle, their minds were inculcated with PC. Thus infected, they feel that their race has no right to defend itself or preserve itself. They see the white race as a rapacious parasite that deserves to be leeched on by other races who'd been historically sucked dry by the white race.
So, as a race or ethnic community, white folks infected with PC have been rendered defenseless. PC-programming allows white virulence & aggression only in attacks on its own kind.
Even so, despite their antipathy to their own kind, every single organism seeks out safety and comfort. So, even as white PC brats are committed to their racial demise, they nevertheless strive for success as individuals. Devious PC offers this opportunity to white collaborators as a hook. The pledge to abandon group-survival and collective-power buys them certain privileges as atomized individuals.
Invasive systems often play this game on their prey. Since wholesale conquest may be too daunting a task, the invasive force seeks out collaborator-agents(with the uncanny ability to loosen themselves from the whole) to turn against their own kind for rewards of individual gain. Certain germs have the same effect on the body. They make some parts of the body cooperate against the rest of the body. This is also true of how human organs work. The tongue can become a fatal collaborator against the body. Its sweet-tooth addiction can make the tongue take leave of its senses and 'collaborate' with the Junk Food Industry that encourages it to consume more junk that tastes wonderful to the tongue but does the rest of the body wrong. SJW-s who spout PC to gain individual success are slurping-in-tongues. They do will say and do anything to gain sweet things for themselves at the expense of their own race. Of course, they can rationalize their betrayal on universal grounds --- they live for all of humanity than for the tribalism of race --- , but such mindless utopianism isn't grounded in the limitations of reality. It is as stupid as parents who neglect their own children to pursue the impossible dream of caring for all children. Of course, utopian-universalism is, more often than not, just a crutch for doing nothing at all. When one's task is conceived in such grandiose and herculean manner, one never knows where to start, so he doesn't. Instead, one can just pursue individual interests while pontificating about how he hasn't the time for his kind since he is concerned with the entirety of the 'human race'. It's like a general who refuses to fight a single battle since he's too occupied with the entirety of the war.
We mustn't treat PC-infected youth as rational agents. They are mentally infected and diseased. All healthy organisms seek to survive and be strong. As humans are social organisms, it makes no sense for a group of humans to invite harm & danger to its own kind. Swedes are not acting rational or natural by inviting more Invasion of Diversity. Nature is about organisms using sense and reason to save themselves, grow strong, and survive. It is not about organisms inviting self-destruction. Organisms act to harm themselves ONLY IF they are diseased.
Health = More Strength and Better Survival.
Disease = More Weakness and More Harm.
PC whites are idea-diseased or ideaseased. They are like Red Guards in China whose minds were infected with Maoism. When dealing with the diseased, we need to focus on the disease, not on the patient. It is the disease that renders the patient weak. Weakened state lowers the immune system, and then more foreign elements attack and infect the body. Thus, HIV had a domino effect on the body. Initially, the body falls prey to HIV and is made weaker. And then, more infections by other viruses and bacteria make the body increasingly weaker until the body cannot even defend itself from the weakest pathogens.
The pathogenic effect of mass immigration-migration-invasion into the West works in a similar manner. PC has been the ideological-HIV that weakened the Western immune system's effectiveness against invasion. PC weakened white-pride and white-defensive-resolve by associating such ideas & passions with negative emotions tainted with 'racism'. Thus, the West was helpless to stem the initial waves of invasion. But with each successive wave of invasion, the Western body is made weaker as its resources & energies must be allocated toward taking care of these invasive foreign bodies. Each successive stage of weakening means another round of invasion, even by ragtag mobs. Just like the weakest & smallest creatures can gorge on a beached whale or fallen elephant, the most hapless bunch of nobodies can invade a civilization whose defensive systems have corroded and decayed to the point of no return.
Naturally, there have been signs of healthy reaction from certain elements of the West. There are righteously enraged patriots in Sweden and other nations. They are like white blood cells activated to destroy germs and foreign elements. However, the West is under treatment by the globo-Jewish quack-doctor who keeps injecting the White Body with sedatives & chemicals to weaken its defenses. Thus, white blood cells must contend with both the infection(by foreign bodies) and the injection(by Jewish versions of Dr. Mengele).
Organisms have control over certain foreign bodies but may come under control of others. When we eat, the food-as-foreign-body is controlled by our bodies. Our bodies process the food, take what we need, and excrete the rest. We use and 'control' the food, not the other way around.
But when germs-as-foreign-bodies infect us, they control us. They mess with us and try to take over us.
Anyway, any organism that acts against its own interest must be diagnosed as sick and diseased. A deer that runs into a pack of wolves is surely not well in the head.
To the extent that PC is making Swedes invite self-harm and self-ruin, Swedes are idea-diseased. Their minds are filled with ideas and images that lead them over the cliff.
Furthermore, a diseased-mind can become schizophrenic and be given to hallucinations. Sweden is under such a delusion. Its hallucinations of delusions-of-grandeur as a 'moral superpower' has rendered it blind to obvious facts of what's really happening in Sweden and around the world. It has turned batshit crazy, indeed into the Crazy Cat Lady of the World. But then, in the Current West under the chemi-control of the globo-Jewish doctor --- Jew-run academia serves as mental institutions and the Jew-run news/entertainment media serve as dope-pushers --- , so many gentiles now hallucinate that homos = rainbow, man's anus = sex organ, and sexuality = 50 genders.
When we respond to SJW’s as if they themselves are the problem, we are giving them too much credit. It’d be like blaming Red Guards or Hitler Youth for their own virulence(as if they'd rationally and individually arrived at their 'convictions') when, in fact, their minds were infected with radical idea-germs inculcated into them by the all-powerful-system. Though the US is not a totalitarian power, most of its institutions and industries have fallen into the hands of Jewish globalists whose agenda is drive by a 'radical will'. If anything, the conceit of the US being a 'liberal democracy' makes PC delusions all the more insidious because the PC-infected can believe themselves to have come to their conclusions by way of free will and individual choice when, more often than not, the decisions/delusions were made for them by the controllers of the academia and media. At least in Stalin's USSR and Hitler's Nazi Germany, everyone knew there was no such thing as 'free speech'. In contrast, the globo-Jewish West trick the PC-infected with the notion of 'free speech but no hate speech'. The PC West tricks people into believing they have the freedom they really don't.
Anyway, it’d make no sense to treat a sick patient as if he is rationally willing the disease to be there when, in fact, he’s been taken over by the disease. Once infected, he has no control over the disease that has a logic of its own. It’s like someone with malaria is sick regardless of what he thinks or feels. It'd make no sense to treat a diseased person as if his condition is a matter of creed or conviction. (Likewise, when dealing with problems of addiction, it's important to understand that the addiction has control over the person, not the other way around. An addict is what he is not because he has wrong ideas but because the totality of his mind and body, his soul, has become slave to the addiction. Even though rational understanding of the problem is helpful to the addict, it isn't enough for him to break free. It's like someone suffering from flu or malaria cannot overcome the illness with medical knowledge about it. Whether sick or addicted, the starting point of the treatment must be the realization or admittance that the mind-and-body has been taken over by a force that is beyond the power of reason and morality.) If someone has rabies, it doesn’t matter what he thinks or feels as an individual. The fact is the rabies virus has control over him, and it is the virus that must be the focus of medical attention. As with any disease, some people can be saved, some cannot. Also, we need to give it time and expect no quick fixes. Just as a disease goes through phases and cycles, PC has its own symptoms and processes: its infection state, incubation state, fever stage, delirium stage, etc. Some eventually emerge from it and regain mental health. Others become chronic cases and become college professors or journalists... or slacker antifa types or crazy cat ladies.
A PC-deranged person has to be treated as a patient with an infection that may be cured(for good) or controlled(like Herpes that never goes away) than as a rational thinker with free will or individuality. Though there's no quick fix, helpful advice may allow more mental oxygen and iron into his intellectual bloodstream and hasten the healing process. (In some cases, PC passes away naturally. It's like growing up. Some people seem difficult in teen yrs and destined for trouble but land on their feet as soon as they mature.) A sick patient with a flu or malaria can't do anything about it --- he can only wait for the disease to play itself out and exit the body --- , but there are still precautions and procedures he can undertake to make the sickness subside faster. For example, he should be resting and eating healthy than partying and drinking. Likewise, we can goad the PC-infected to take certain steps to bolster their white blood cells and reactivate their immune system that will help them realize how demented & deranged PC really is. Still, it will take time. (To be sure, there may be instant cures, like dropping them into Haiti for a week, but I don’t think too many PC types will go there.)
SJW’s, who all sound and talk alike, are zombies infected with same virus. If indeed they are free-thinking agents, why do they drone the same mantras like mental clones? They all exhibit the same ‘symptoms’. It’s like people with rabies or leprosy all end up the same way. SJW’s all have the same psycho-symptoms or psymptoms.
When the priests treat Regan in THE EXORCIST, they focus on the Demon inside her, not on the girl. Once the evil spirit has taken possession of her, she no longer has agency. (AMERICAN PASTORAL is even more frightening on the matter of ‘possession’.) Regan is really helpless even when she acts wild and crazy. It is the spirit-possessing-her that is really driving her.
Certain ideas and images have this power to take over someone's soul. Same is true of certain foods. Most foods are not addictive. Whoever heard of broccoli or spinach addiction? But sugar can be additive. And certain drugs, like nicotine or cocaine, can be very addictive. It gains control over the person…. like opium in China and meth among certain white demographics. People with strong moral fiber and critical mindset are less prone to fall under the influence, but some people are either weak of mind/spirit or have personalities prone to virulence & extremism. As for children, they can easily fall for anything… which is why PC keeps targeting kids at younger ages. “Is you baby racist? You must make him worship at the altar of the Mountain-sized Negro who loves a little white mouse or the Tranny Drag-queen from the earliest age possible.” (If no amount of social engineering can turn a homo into non-homo or tranny into non-tranny, why does PC believe that normal-sexual people can be pried out of their 'hetero-normativity'?)
If some people become diseased with ideas, others become diseased with images and sounds. Intellectual types often fall for radical ideas that may turn out to be harmful.
The hoi polloi often fall for addictive images and sounds of pop culture. These are without ideas — though increasingly fused with PC into ‘cool’ memes — , but they can be just as powerful, indeed even more powerful. Bad ideas can close the mind, but they must nevertheless must be activated by the mind, requiring some effort and modicum of critical activity. In contrast, hedonistic images and sounds of Pop Culture can turn young ones into cultural meth-heads. In the Age of Paglia, we've seen how Slut-feminists can be just as crazy, even crazier, than the earlier Stalinist ones.
Saturday, April 1, 2017
Human Organisms that are no longer Defensivist are Defenseless and fated for Destruction
Some animals that evolved in blissful isolation over a long spell are incapable of registering the danger posed by invasive species. They've been pampered into complacency in their environmental bubble. So, when new species arrive and wreak havoc, the native species don't know how to react. They aren't used to dealing with this kind of danger. Worse, they even fail to identify the threat as a threat. As a result, many members of the native species get destroyed or devoured, and the entire species may face extinction. In some cases, however, there are members of the native species that learn to perceive the danger and respond accordingly to ensure their own survival. So, unlike the clueless ones that were easily conquered or summarily devoured, they learn to flee from danger or fight back and strike back.
Scandinavian nations are vulnerable to this kind of invasion because they haven't known invasions, especially non-white invasions, for a long long time. Their only idea of 'evil aggression' involves historical narratives of others whites doing bad stuff: Nazi Germans especially and maybe the Russians. They have no idea of how dire and destructive the massive arrivals of non-whites could turn out to be, especially since most of their impression of the non-white world comes from Hollywood, PC, Pop Culture, and Christian do-goody stuff. So, when masses of foreigners arrive, these 'welcoming' whites are clueless and act like native species of Galapagos islands or Hawaii when met with the arrival of cats and rats. It doesn't register that these invasive human-organisms pose a grave threat to Sweden as a people, culture, and territory.
Because they'd been safely distanced from the non-white world for as long as they can remember, their defensivist instincts have been deactivated(at least against non-whites who are seen as poor, weak, and helpless... and in need of compassion). With weakened defensivist instincts, they're virtually defenseless against the horrors that keep piling on. They are like the Eternals at the end of ZARDOZ. Some are of them are so so 'bored' that they will even risk demise and extinction for change of scenery. (According to the EU narrative, the only invasive forces in history have been white imperialist nations. So, whites have conquered, exploited, and destroyed. Non-whites have only been conquered, and they've only suffered nobly. So, if such people are allowed into EU, they are not invaders but pitiable 'refugees' and 'migrants' seeking a better life and compassion from redemptive whites, the 'good' ones who must always berate and beat down the 'bad' ones, the 'Nazis'. In this, the EU has a schizo attitude toward the US. In some ways, America is seen as the new Nazi-like imperialist power that destroys other nations. However, the US cannot be condemned outright since it's ruled by Jews who are untouchable due to Holocaust Narrative. Also, EU depends on the US for security, finance, and trade. So, the only course of action for the EU is to indirectly demonstrate its moral superiority over the US by taking in 'refugees' created by America's neo-imperialism. By acting as the 'moral superpower' of the world, the EU will show Americans who is the really 'good guy'. Of course, it's all very amusing since NO ONE gives a crap about Sweden or EU as a moral giant. Anyway, according to PC, those Europeans who put up a defensive resistance against non-white invasion are condemned as 'aggressive', whereas non-white invaders are portrayed as bringers of 'peace' and 'tolerance'. This suggests that moral dynamics of aggression/defense is determined less by who-does-what than by who-is-what, i.e. who-is-'good-guy'-and-who-is-'bad-guy'. So, even though whites invaded American Indian lands, Manifest Destiny portrayed whites as the spreaders of 'peace' and Indians as the aggressors of 'violence'. Likewise, even though the US invaded Iraq and Libya, the globalist propaganda made the US out to be the spreader of 'human rights' & 'peace' while making Iraq & Libya as 'rogue' nations sworn to invasion and violence. We were told NATO had to invade Libya as a defensive measure against Gaddafi's acts of aggression in his own nation.)
The current situation among the human organisms of Sweden(and other parts of Europe) is worse than a case of native animals being attacked by invasive animals.
When the native species are attacked by invasive ones, many of the former remain clueless and be hunted down(and thus weeded out of the gene pool). However, others may come to realize what's up and develop resistances and even means of counterattack.
Suppose there's a bunch of wombats minding their own business, and all is well in wombat-world. But suppose raccoons arrive in big numbers and eat wombat food and even attack wombats. Since wombat had been without enemies for as long as they can remember, they fail to recognize raccoons as enemies or danger. Indeed, the very notion of alien-species-posing-a-threat has become alien to the wombat way of thinking.
So, a whole bunch of wombats get attacked without proper defenses and realization of what's really happening. But suppose some wombats have latent defensive instincts that are activated by the crisis, and they begin to fight back and resist.
At least among animals, the defenseless members will not interfere with defensivist ones that react, fight, and survive. Defenseless ones will be victimized and weeded out of the gene pool, whereas the defensivist ones will resist, fight back, survive, and pass down their genes(thereby creating a hardier race of wombats). So, there is at least a chance of defensivist ones surviving and carrying on a species.
But among humans, the defenseless ones could prevent the defensivist ones from practicing their survivalist instinct. So, instead of just the defenseless ones meeting their doom, even the defensivist ones are compelled to go over the cliff with their idiot brethren.
Such is now happening in Sweden. Some Swedes are like clueless wombats. They are like deer in the headlight and don't know what's coming straight at them. They'd been so accustomed to comfort & complacency and so instilled with holy notions of the Other(non-whites) that they have difficulty registering what is really happening in Sweden. (And some have grown so bored and apathetic with their civilization that they see its demise as welcome relief.)
But, there are other Swedes who have awoken and possess the will to resist and fight back. They see the danger and want to do the right thing.
But unlike defensivist wombats who are free to fight and resist(without interference from the defenseless wombats), defensivist Swedes are constrained by defenseless Swedes who control the institutions. At least among animals, the defensivist ones are not hamstrung by defenseless ones. They can fight hard and tough. But among Swedes, the defenseless bunch tie the hands of the defensivist bunch so that NO Swede may put up a resistance. As the West is under Jewish-American globalist control, the defenseless ones have been given political, ideological, and economic power over the defensivist ones.
But there is worse. There is the problem of the Deification of the Other. While, in most cases, human tribes have generally feared and distrusted outsiders and strangers, they've also been prone to spiritual imagination and exoticism. Thus, positive fantasies may be projected onto outsiders as holy men, saviors, liberators, and etc. (This can happen within the same race. Many European intellectuals mistakenly perceived Napoleon as a liberator and Renaissance Man, that is until French military invasion made a horror of their towns and villages. Ukrainians mis-perceived German Wehrmacht as a liberating force against the Soviet Union. Germans turned out to be even worse.) Consider the story of 'Latin America'. When Conquistadors arrived, some natives greeted & welcomed the invaders as gods prophesied in their folklore and mythology. So, even though Spanish really came to conquer, plunder, exploit, and dominate the foolish natives thought they were visited by god-angel-races who arrived to liberate or redeem them.
Today, a similar kind of neo-mythological outlook has become pervasive among white gentiles. The PC Deification of the Other as saintly, vibrant, wonderful, baptismal, and etc. had led to naive & clueless whites embracing mass non-white invasion as a kind of visitation of angels sent by the god of history bearing gifts of growth, prosperity, love, redemption, healing, color, and hope. It's like the arrival of the 3 million Wise Men.
Not only are too many whites stuck in defenseless mode but they are prone to worship the very thing that threatens their very existence as a civilization. It's not unlike childlike white folks in the US worshiping the Magic Negro as represented by the mountain-sized black guy who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE.
At the end of ZARDOZ, the foolish Eternals mistake the Exterminators as the Deliverers when the Exterminators just came to murder, plunder, and wreak vengeance.
Instead of seeing the Other, the non-white invaders, for what they are, white folks project onto them all their hopes and dreams, like so many voters did with Obama of the vague faith of hope.
Scandinavian nations are vulnerable to this kind of invasion because they haven't known invasions, especially non-white invasions, for a long long time. Their only idea of 'evil aggression' involves historical narratives of others whites doing bad stuff: Nazi Germans especially and maybe the Russians. They have no idea of how dire and destructive the massive arrivals of non-whites could turn out to be, especially since most of their impression of the non-white world comes from Hollywood, PC, Pop Culture, and Christian do-goody stuff. So, when masses of foreigners arrive, these 'welcoming' whites are clueless and act like native species of Galapagos islands or Hawaii when met with the arrival of cats and rats. It doesn't register that these invasive human-organisms pose a grave threat to Sweden as a people, culture, and territory.
Because they'd been safely distanced from the non-white world for as long as they can remember, their defensivist instincts have been deactivated(at least against non-whites who are seen as poor, weak, and helpless... and in need of compassion). With weakened defensivist instincts, they're virtually defenseless against the horrors that keep piling on. They are like the Eternals at the end of ZARDOZ. Some are of them are so so 'bored' that they will even risk demise and extinction for change of scenery. (According to the EU narrative, the only invasive forces in history have been white imperialist nations. So, whites have conquered, exploited, and destroyed. Non-whites have only been conquered, and they've only suffered nobly. So, if such people are allowed into EU, they are not invaders but pitiable 'refugees' and 'migrants' seeking a better life and compassion from redemptive whites, the 'good' ones who must always berate and beat down the 'bad' ones, the 'Nazis'. In this, the EU has a schizo attitude toward the US. In some ways, America is seen as the new Nazi-like imperialist power that destroys other nations. However, the US cannot be condemned outright since it's ruled by Jews who are untouchable due to Holocaust Narrative. Also, EU depends on the US for security, finance, and trade. So, the only course of action for the EU is to indirectly demonstrate its moral superiority over the US by taking in 'refugees' created by America's neo-imperialism. By acting as the 'moral superpower' of the world, the EU will show Americans who is the really 'good guy'. Of course, it's all very amusing since NO ONE gives a crap about Sweden or EU as a moral giant. Anyway, according to PC, those Europeans who put up a defensive resistance against non-white invasion are condemned as 'aggressive', whereas non-white invaders are portrayed as bringers of 'peace' and 'tolerance'. This suggests that moral dynamics of aggression/defense is determined less by who-does-what than by who-is-what, i.e. who-is-'good-guy'-and-who-is-'bad-guy'. So, even though whites invaded American Indian lands, Manifest Destiny portrayed whites as the spreaders of 'peace' and Indians as the aggressors of 'violence'. Likewise, even though the US invaded Iraq and Libya, the globalist propaganda made the US out to be the spreader of 'human rights' & 'peace' while making Iraq & Libya as 'rogue' nations sworn to invasion and violence. We were told NATO had to invade Libya as a defensive measure against Gaddafi's acts of aggression in his own nation.)
The current situation among the human organisms of Sweden(and other parts of Europe) is worse than a case of native animals being attacked by invasive animals.
When the native species are attacked by invasive ones, many of the former remain clueless and be hunted down(and thus weeded out of the gene pool). However, others may come to realize what's up and develop resistances and even means of counterattack.
Suppose there's a bunch of wombats minding their own business, and all is well in wombat-world. But suppose raccoons arrive in big numbers and eat wombat food and even attack wombats. Since wombat had been without enemies for as long as they can remember, they fail to recognize raccoons as enemies or danger. Indeed, the very notion of alien-species-posing-a-threat has become alien to the wombat way of thinking.
So, a whole bunch of wombats get attacked without proper defenses and realization of what's really happening. But suppose some wombats have latent defensive instincts that are activated by the crisis, and they begin to fight back and resist.
At least among animals, the defenseless members will not interfere with defensivist ones that react, fight, and survive. Defenseless ones will be victimized and weeded out of the gene pool, whereas the defensivist ones will resist, fight back, survive, and pass down their genes(thereby creating a hardier race of wombats). So, there is at least a chance of defensivist ones surviving and carrying on a species.
But among humans, the defenseless ones could prevent the defensivist ones from practicing their survivalist instinct. So, instead of just the defenseless ones meeting their doom, even the defensivist ones are compelled to go over the cliff with their idiot brethren.
Such is now happening in Sweden. Some Swedes are like clueless wombats. They are like deer in the headlight and don't know what's coming straight at them. They'd been so accustomed to comfort & complacency and so instilled with holy notions of the Other(non-whites) that they have difficulty registering what is really happening in Sweden. (And some have grown so bored and apathetic with their civilization that they see its demise as welcome relief.)
But, there are other Swedes who have awoken and possess the will to resist and fight back. They see the danger and want to do the right thing.
But unlike defensivist wombats who are free to fight and resist(without interference from the defenseless wombats), defensivist Swedes are constrained by defenseless Swedes who control the institutions. At least among animals, the defensivist ones are not hamstrung by defenseless ones. They can fight hard and tough. But among Swedes, the defenseless bunch tie the hands of the defensivist bunch so that NO Swede may put up a resistance. As the West is under Jewish-American globalist control, the defenseless ones have been given political, ideological, and economic power over the defensivist ones.
But there is worse. There is the problem of the Deification of the Other. While, in most cases, human tribes have generally feared and distrusted outsiders and strangers, they've also been prone to spiritual imagination and exoticism. Thus, positive fantasies may be projected onto outsiders as holy men, saviors, liberators, and etc. (This can happen within the same race. Many European intellectuals mistakenly perceived Napoleon as a liberator and Renaissance Man, that is until French military invasion made a horror of their towns and villages. Ukrainians mis-perceived German Wehrmacht as a liberating force against the Soviet Union. Germans turned out to be even worse.) Consider the story of 'Latin America'. When Conquistadors arrived, some natives greeted & welcomed the invaders as gods prophesied in their folklore and mythology. So, even though Spanish really came to conquer, plunder, exploit, and dominate the foolish natives thought they were visited by god-angel-races who arrived to liberate or redeem them.
Today, a similar kind of neo-mythological outlook has become pervasive among white gentiles. The PC Deification of the Other as saintly, vibrant, wonderful, baptismal, and etc. had led to naive & clueless whites embracing mass non-white invasion as a kind of visitation of angels sent by the god of history bearing gifts of growth, prosperity, love, redemption, healing, color, and hope. It's like the arrival of the 3 million Wise Men.
Not only are too many whites stuck in defenseless mode but they are prone to worship the very thing that threatens their very existence as a civilization. It's not unlike childlike white folks in the US worshiping the Magic Negro as represented by the mountain-sized black guy who loves a little white mouse in GREEN MILE.
At the end of ZARDOZ, the foolish Eternals mistake the Exterminators as the Deliverers when the Exterminators just came to murder, plunder, and wreak vengeance.
Instead of seeing the Other, the non-white invaders, for what they are, white folks project onto them all their hopes and dreams, like so many voters did with Obama of the vague faith of hope.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)