Thursday, November 3, 2016

Freedom, Independence, and Liberty are NOT possible without EXCLUSION

INCLUSION is now the buzzword in PC lingo pushed by Globalists.

But inclusion can work against freedom, liberty, and security. Indeed, freedom and liberty are impossible without security. Does anyone really free in a jungle full of dangerous animals? Does anyone really feel free in high-crime Detroit? Does anyone really feel free in the war zones of Syria or Libya(caused by Zionist-imperialist intervention)? Radical Inclusion leads to breakdown of security(and stability) and that means less freedom and liberty. Coercive Inclusion of US military imperialism into the Middle East and North Africa led to countless deaths and chaos everywhere. And Coercive Inclusion of masses of Africans and Muslims into Europe is leading to crime and mayhem.

Inclusion forces intrusion(even invasion) of other homelands. When EU is forced to be 'inclusive', it means it must surrender to intrusion and invasion by masses of Africans and Muslims. When White Americans are forced to be 'inclusive' of masses of non-white immigrants, it means having to live in a nation where they are reviled and blamed for everything.

A woman who is forced to 'include' every penis can only be rape victim. A woman without the choice to exclude the men she doesn't like is no longer free.

And this goes for victims of stalking as well. Such victims call on the police for safety to keep stalkers away. A woman doesn't feel safe with such types trailing her. This is especially true with famous celebrities who are stalked by crazy fans. In order for such people, women or celebrities, to feel secure(and free and independent), the police is called on warn or even imprison the stalkers. Women and celebs want to EXCLUDE stalkers from their lives.

Freedom and liberty have often been about Exclusion. Exclusion can happen by expelling a people who are deemed dangerous or threatening(or invasive). Or it can be achieved by mass-escape or mass-exile.

In the case of the Vietnamese and Algerians, they finally got together to expel the imperialist French invaders. Natives used guns and bombs to send the French back to France. Vietnamese and Algerians sought national independence via the expulsion of the French. Independence was achieved with the exclusion of the foreign French invaders.

In the case of Moses and Hebrews(if the Biblical legend is to be believed), they self-exiled themselves from the Egyptians. For the Hebrews to be free, they needed to exclude Egyptian tyranny from their lives. Since they couldn't overthrow Egyptians in Egypt, they chose mass-departure from Egypt to found their own homeland. Thus, Egyptian power came to be excluded from the lives of Jews, especially with the help of God who sent the Pillar of Fire and split the sea to devour the Egyptian cavalry(according to myth anyway).

So, Jews found freedom by excluding Egyptian tyranny from their lives. (But in founding their own homeland, they intruded into the lands of other peoples and slaughtered tons of them, again if the Biblical legends are to be believed. In forcing those gentiles in the Promised Land to be 'inclusive' of Jews, there were blood invasions and reprisals. Recent history has similar themes of freedom-by-exclusion and oppression-by-inclusion. The 20th century Exodus is about Jews gaining freedom by excluding the gentile world from their own lives. By departing from gentile lands and creating a Jewish state, Jews would welcome only the Jews and keep out the gentiles. Jews in hostile gentile nations would seek exile and exodus to Modern Israel, thus excluding gentile tyranny from their lives and living freely with other Jews. But this creation of the Jewish homeland required the the intrusive 'inclusion' of Jews upon Palestinians. Palestine was forced to 'include' Jews who soon turned into intruders and invaders who came to lord over the Palestinians. Exclusion meant freedom for Jews, but Inclusion meant tyranny for Palestinians. It's like the Japanese found new opportunities in Manchuria, but it required the coercive 'inclusion-invasion' of Northeast Asia. Later, for the Chinese to be free of Japanese Rule, the Japanese had to be expelled and excluded from China.)

America was founded on themes of exclusion. Colonial elites(Founding Fathers) rebelled against the 'tyranny' by King George and the Brits(even though historians say it wasn't all that bad). Also, white folks worried about Indian raids and red folks scalping white folks and leaving them bald. So, in order for America to be created, the colonials had to declare independence and EXCLUDE British power from the Americas. And in order for white folks to be safe and secure(in order to be free as civilized folks), they had to exclude the 'red savages' and dangerous animals(bears, cougars, wolves, and etc) from their domain.

The very idea of INDEPENDENCE implies exclusion. After all, to be independent means to be free FROM something.

When the Pilgrims came to America, they chose exile in order to exclude British religious tyranny(or what they saw as such) from their lives. When Robert Duvall flees in THX 1138, he is trying to exclude the tyranny of the System from his life. He wants to be free. He wants to be free FROM something. It's like the movie THE GREAT ESCAPE. The prisoners are trying to be free FROM of the German Prison Camp System. They want to exclude the power of German Guards from their lives.

Of course, themes of exclusion and inclusion are often inter-connected, as in the Moses story. Jews seek to exclude Egyptian tyranny from their lives. But in seeking a homeland of their own, they force other peoples in the region to 'include' Jews who come as intruders and invaders.

Also, there is the troubled relation between man and God. In some ways, man wants to be free of God. God has too many laws and injunctions. So, some Jews wanted to dance and party around the Golden Calf. They wanted to follow Edward G. Robinson than Charlton Heston. But God insists on the Jews including His laws in their lives because He figures Jews freed from God's Laws will succumb to their wild egos and start acting nuts like Sarah Silverman and Anthony Wiener. (To be sure, God sometimes want to exclude human affairs from His existence because humans are pesky, ridiculous, and retarded. But just when He wants to say 'get lost, idiots', humans are praying to Him and beseeching Him for help after they mess up. And God figures He will include their prayers in His plan for humanity...)

In a way, one might argue that the theme of INCLUSION in current American politics allows freedom for all of humanity. US is the Promised Land to which all peoples of the world should escape to. All the world is like one giant Egypt, and every people who want to flee are like Jews. Just as Jews sought freedom by excluding Egyptian tyranny from their lives by seeking mass-exile, all these immigrants are trying to exclude from their own lives the tyranny of their own kind by coming to America. So, Chinese wanna flee from China, Indians wanna flee from India, Africans wanna flee from Africa, Mexicans wanna flee from Mexico. Their own people are their worst enemies, and they want to exclude their own race and culture from their own lives and come to America and be included as 'Americans' by presumably superior white folks who run a better political, economic, and social system.

But this is where the analogy with Hebrews break down. Hebrews were not escaping from their own people. They ran from Egyptians. In contrast, Immigrationism says that people should 'escape' from their own race, culture, and land. They should become McCitizens of America.
Yet, there is another contradiction, that of multi-culturalism. Even though all these immigrants say NO to their own race & culture and reject their own homelands in order to join the White World, the white/Jewish 'progressives' who control Western media/academia insist on immigrant-folks maintaining their non-Western 'identities'(as redefined by multi-culti politics). (Better to exploit tensions in the service of 'progressive' politics because non-whites who get along with whites might become 'Republicans'.) So, we have the strange phenomenon of non-white immigrants(and esp their children) rejecting and forgetting their own race, culture, and language(and becoming just generically American in Hollywood and MTV sense) but also taking on 'identity politics' of hostility toward whites. However, this non-white 'identity' is a political construct than something genuine or organic. It is imposed on non-whites by PC politics that didn't originate in their homelands. (For example, no non-Western culture has been traditionally homomaniacal, but multi-cultism would have non-white kids in America believe that worship of homosexuality is part of multi-culturalism. It even fuses Islamic identity with homo decadence.) Non-white 'identity' according to multi-cultism is less about the intrinsic assets of a race, culture, or language than about the politics of hostility toward whites. Indian-Indian identity isn't the same as Indian-American 'identity'(as constructed by PC). Asian-Indians in India are Indian regardless of events and developments in the rest of the world. Even if the entire white world were to vanish overnight, Indians in India would organically and historically be Indian. But 'Indian-American' has no such autonomous or independent meaning. It is premised on PC-ordained Indian-American hostility towards whites as the holders of 'white privilege'(according to venomous PC). Multi-culti identity is about the exploitation of identity politics to corral non-whites against whites. This kind of identity can only exist in opposition to something. It lacks autonomy.
A Japanese in Japan is organically Japanese even if the rest of the world were to vanish. Indeed, Japan was Japanese for many centuries in isolation. But Japanese-American 'identity', as constructed by PC multi-cultism, cannot exist except in the context of hostility against whites.
This is why we have PC-ized Asian-Americans identifying with blacks against whites. These clowns might have had an autonomous identity back in their homeland. But in the US, where they've lost their racial, cultural, and linguistic identities, they rely on multi-culti 'identity' of hating 'white privilege' with the implication that Asians have more in common with Africans than with whites(with whom Asians are closer genetically, in terms of civilizational achievement, and as victims of black violence). It also means Middle Easterners(who are Caucasian if not white and whose histories are more closely tied to the West) have more in common with Mongolian-Americans and Peruvian-Indian-Americans. As white Hispanics count as 'people of color', it also means someone like Marco Rubio can claim to have more in common with a Nigerian-American than with European-Americans. It just gets surreal. And the politics of victimhood identity means that white homos and white women can claim to have more in common with blacks, browns, and yellows than with straight white men. It just gets more and more surreal.

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Alt Right must be for Fascist-Democracy

Alt Right must be for fascist-democracy.

A proud people don't want to be ruled by an aristocracy, right or left or whatever. They want to be free.

People want national independence and political freedom.

In the past(and even now), various peoples have been caught between the promise of political freedom without national independence AND promise of national independence without political freedom.

Compare Puerto Rico and Cuba. Puerto Ricans are politically free to say whatever and go wherever. They can even come to America. But they have no national independence as their 'homeland' has been incorporated into the American Commonwealth.
In contrast, Cuba has national independence, but there is no political freedom for the people there. Cuba is an independent prison-state.
This may also be said of South Korea and North Korea. South Korea has political freedom but it is a puppet-whore of the US. North Korea has national independence but it is a prison-state.

When Napoleon's armies invaded other parts of Europe, the peoples were torn between political freedom and national independence. The French occupiers offered political freedom and the concept of rights-of-man. Most people gained more basic freedoms under French rule. But their nations or domains came under the iron heel of the French. They became part of the French Empire.
If the subject people sided with French Occupiers, they could have more political freedom but had to sacrifice national independence. If they sided with the native aristocratic rulers who fought against Napoleon, they might regain national independence but would have less political freedom(as aristocratic privileges would be restored). Consider how the Russian masses must have felt during this era. If Napoleon won the war, serfdom would be ended. Most Russians would have been freer. But they would have had to live under French domination.
On the other hand, if Russian masses supported the aristocrats and expelled the French, they could have national independence but then fewer political freedoms under the repressive Tsarist system.

Fortunately, a people can be politically free and nationally independent. The French Republic showed how this could be achieved. So did the Great Britain until recent history(when UK became a mere puppet of the US). So did the United States for much of its history. And Israel shows that a nation can be nationally independent(fascist) and politically free(democratic). And Japan during the Meiji Restoration managed to both expand political-social freedoms(by scrapping the samurai system) and preserve Japanese national autonomy & independence.

And this is what the Alt Right must promise. Americanism didn't fail because of democracy. It was because the democracy wasn't properly fused with nationality. Israeli Democracy was founded as a Jewish State. So, the thing is for New White Political Orders to be founded on both liberty and ethnos.
All this 'aristocratic' talk on Alt Right is rather ridiculous. So, who's going to be our new aristocrats? Greg Johnson, Jack Donovan, Ramzpaul, and Jazzhand McFeels? No thank you. I have no personal animus against them, but I don't want to live under their aristocratic privilege over me.

A social order must be made of mindful freedom. We love freedom, but freedom can be our worst enemy.
In prison, we are not free. That means we are not free to do great & wonderful things, but it also means we are not free to do horrible & destructive things.
Most of history of civilization was like a prison. Most people were not free. As such, many talented individuals were prevented from doing great things. But then, many stupid individuals were also prevented from doing really dumb things. Modernity let us out of the prison, and this means individuals can do great things... but it also means they can do all sorts of dumb, stupid, and horrible things.

A prison-state prevents people from living fully, but it also prevents people from totally self-destructing and harming others.
A free-state gives people the chance to live fully, but it also permits people to destroy their own culture, heritage, and homeland... which is what is happening to the modern-world-turned-excessive-and-decadent.

To be sure, a people can be physically and socially free but emotionally and psychologically imprisoned. Western Peoples are physically free(more or less), but they are psychologically imprisoned by PC, and that means Jewish Power is the prison warden of their minds.
People must be physically and psychologically free and morally sober & spiritually mindful. Consider ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST. Many of the people in the mental ward are 'voluntaries'. They can leave if they want to, but they stick around because they are mind-slaves of Nurse Ratched. But freedom can be dangerous too if not used properly. Randall McMurphy is a fun guy, but he too poses a danger because he is so reckless and destructive with his freedom. His offering of anarchy solves no problems.

Alt Right must offer a vision of freedom that is mindful and sensible, one that is aligned with nature, culture, health, history, and reason.
The most sickening feature of the Current West is the perverse fusion of Ratchedism and McMurphyism. We have the Style of Slut Porn Pride(cultural anarchy) as the Tool of Political Control wielded by the globalist Ratcheds of the world. If past elites maintained control by banning or suppressing permissive freedoms, today's elites manipulate hedonism and wantonness to keep us like dumb animals addicted to soma and doggy biscuits. Look how Miley Cyrus and Lena Dunham are social tools of the powerful. Institutionalized Anarchy. And Homo Decadence as the New Spirituality(and Morality).

In a way, America was a great curse as well as a blessing. Suppose the New World had never existed. Suppose there was only the Old World. Then, most people would have stayed in their homelands and remained deeply attached to it. Europeans would be in Europe, Asians would be in Asia, Arabs would be in Arabia, Africans would be Africa, and etc.
But the New World did exist, and the great triumph was the rise of United States, a nation forged by betrayal of colonists against their own king and homeland. From this betrayal rose a rich and powerful nation. And it encouraged OTHER peoples to reject their own homelands & heritages and come to America to gain freedoms and riches in a state of blissful amnesia. So, Americanism came to associate wealth, freedom, and progress with rejection/betrayal of one's own race, culture, homeland, ancestors, and etc. Worse, Americanism now affects even Old World nations as each nation tries to become a carbon copy of America with its own 'diversity', 'mass immigration', 'Hollywood culture', and de-racination. Culture used to be about Memory, but Americanism elevated the new cultural ideal of universal amnesia in search of Mammon.

Since Americanism is associated with riches, power, glory, and 'coolness', it serves as the globalist template for all nations, even ancient ones of the Old World with deep historical roots. America spreads the political culture of amnesia as the highest virtue for every nation. Just as anyone can become 'American' just by setting afoot in NY or LA, there is the New Notion that anyone can become 'German' just by setting foot on German soil.

What happens in America will define what happens in all corners of the world since American pop culture, academia, media, military, technology, and finance dominate everything.