Universalism is not about adherence to Universal Principles but about the Power to Force an Agenda Universally

Universalism as a political tool is not about peoples around the world agreeing to what constitutes universal values but about the preeminent power imposing its ideas and interests as 'universals' on all other peoples.

This was true of religion.
Catholics were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned Catholic.
Muslims were universal in the sense that the whole would should be turned Islamic.
It was about Universal Imposition or Universal Coercion than Universal Consensus.

This was also true of ideology.
Communists were universal in the sense that the whole world should be turned communist.

Today, Globalism is a Universal Imposition(the new inquisition) that pressures the entire world to conform to the favored ideas and interests of the Rulers of the US. Since Jews are the ruling elites, Homos are their main proxies & agents, and blacks are sacro-negroes by PC narrative & Pop Culture, the dominant form of Universalism is about Holocaust Worship, Homomania, and Afromania.
After all, if the globalist-universalism is really about 'anti-racist egalitarianism', it should be just as sensitive to the interests of Palestinians as to those of Zionists. But it isn't so. All those politicians in Congress say they support 'universal values', but they totally ignore the tragic history and plight Palestinians caused by Jewish influence on US politics. At the UN, when Iran raised the question of why Palestinians were punished for the crimes of Europeans during WWII, the European delegation all walked out despite their professed commitment to universalism.

So, univeralism as political phenomenon isn't about what the world sincerely, rationally, and morally agrees upon as the shared values that transcend all cultures. It is not about all nations, great and small, submitting to the same principles but really about the Great Power forcing its agenda and biases on the universal scale on all other nations. Using the analogy of nature, it's not about all species of animals agreeing on shared animal-hood but about one dominant species pressuring all other species to 'universally' bow down before it.

Take 'gay rights'. This is promoted as 'universal values'. But who said so? Now, if 'gay rights' means that all peoples should acknowledge, based on scientific evidence, that some people are born homosexual, that it's not homosexuals' fault that they are homo, and that homosexuals should be allowed to pursue professions based on ability, that is a workable and sound principle. It is factual, rational, and humane; it can be held up as a universal principle in the name of reason, tolerance, and meritocracy(as some homos are skilled and talented.)
But what currently goes by the name of 'gay rights' in the West is homomania, a mindless worship of homosexuality as something holy and the cult of homo narcissism & vanity as next to godliness. It is sick, perverse, and degenerate. So, it's not about 'gay rights' but 'gay worship'. It is a fruit-sade, the new crusade. Homomania says even churches should be converted to homo-worship. Sacred texts should be re-written or reinterpreted to spread the 'gayspel' that God, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammad would have been for something like 'gay marriage'.

'Progressives' deride the Inquisition of Old, but they aren't averse to using their vast globalist power to push the Imposition of their sick agenda on all the world. It is often done through bribery of foreign regimes(candies and prizes if they put on 'gay pride' parades), spread of decadent Pop Culture as narcotic & opiate, and promotion of PC that suppresses free speech ironically in the name of 'liberal values'. PC limits the range of inquiry, constricts the Narrative spectrum, and insists on a loaded terminology as dishonest as loaded dice. A term like 'homophobia' favors homomaniac since it implies that those who oppose the homo agenda are clinically sick in the head. And 'racism', as currently defined, is a loaded term since it presumes that anyone who believes in the reality of races is also a racial supremacist.

Anyway, universalism as political force is more about the power to impose one's agenda universally than about the adherence to universal principles applying equally to all nations and cultures.

Globalism is about Minority Supremacism

Jewish globalists would have us believe that injustice is about the majority oppressing the minority. Therefore, justice entails that 'minority rights' be protected above all others. Now, it is true that history has been full of cases of majorities ruling over and even oppressing/exploiting minorities. But the opposite has been just as common; history is filled with many examples of minorities lording over the majorities.

Consider just a few. Hispanic imperialists conquered what came to be known as 'Latin America' and, as minority elites, ruled over the native population. Indeed, the descendants of Conquistador-Americans rule over the native and mestizo(a 'diverse' product of Spanish 'rape' of the indigenous folks) populations to this very day. The history of Latin America has mostly been the story of minority supremacism over the majority.
And how did Hawaii come about? It was by the white minority conquering and presiding over the native Hawaiian majority who had no say in the decision to import massive numbers of Asians to displace the native population. (Whites in America and Europe are now being 'Hawaiianized' by Jewish minority elites who fear the white majority.)
Turkish minority ruled over the majority Christian populations in Greece and Balkans during most of the Ottoman Empire.
Mongol minority ruled over the Chinese majority in Asia and over the Russian majority in Eastern Europe. For a time, they also ruled over the Persian minority in what is now Iran.
In the province of Tibet, Chinese minority, with the backing of Beijing, has domination over the Tibetan majority.
British imperialist-minority-elites held power over the Asian Indian majority, Malayan majority, and African majorities. For a long spell, the Brit imperialist minority also ruled over the native majority in Ireland. Also, they ruled over Boers who outnumbered them in South Africa for a spell following the Boer War.
Japanese minority ruled over Korean majority and Taiwanese majority. And as Japan advanced into China, they ruthlessly ruled over the Chinese majority in areas under their control.
The French colonial minority elites ruled over various Southeast Asian, African, and Arab majorities. It took bitter bloody wars for the majorities to 'liberate' themselves from French imperialist domination in Vietnam and Algeria.
And Zionist minority gained power over the Palestinian majority in the founding of Israel. When Israel was declared, there were more Arabs than Jews in the region. The Jewish minority soon 'corrected' this through massive ethnic cleansing of the native Arab population. (Just as Jews are lying about what is happening in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine these days, they used the power of media to lie about the bloody founding of Israel.)

And of course, the aristocrats were minority rulers over the majority.
It was the great French Revolution that overthrew the useless king & the snobby aristocrats, thereby paving the way for Nationalism whereupon the elites of a nation were expected to represent and serve the masses, the native majority.
French Revolution was about the triumph of native mass/majority power. Why did it fail? Because the French went into imperialist mode and soon became minority-rulers over non-French people, creating much resentment.

Likewise, National Socialism in Germany worked when it was about German leaders representing and serving the German volk. It failed when it went into imperialist mode and led to German minority colonization over Polish and Russian majorities in non-German lands.
Imperialism is unstable because: Imperialism = Minority Supremacism.

Jewish elites are now the minority-supremacist rulers of the West.
In Israel where they are now the majority, Jews believe in majority dominance.
But as the minority elites in white gentile nations, Jews work to undermine and weaken the power of white majorities lest they challenge and confront total Jewish domination. It was because Russia is mostly Russian that the majority were able to come together to uphold Russian nationalism against Jewish globalism. (It's no wonder Jews hate, hate, and hate Putin and Russians.) Jews also hide behind the minority-elite-supremacism of homomania, their globalist partner and proxy.

Jews pompously pontificate about 'minority rights', but globalism is a form of neo-imperialism that furthers minority supremacism and domination over native majority populations. Jewish neo-imperialist globalist elites in Hungary want to flood that nation with Africans and Muslims(as 'New Europeans', like 'gay marriage' is supposedly the 'new normal') so that native Hungarian majority will be demoralized, cucked, and defeated forever.

This is not a time to worry about 'minority rights'. It is a time to worry about Majority Rights that are under assault by Minority Might or Minority Supremacism.

The West is now under the Power of Jewish Globalists who use homomania(to destroy white moral culture) and Negrophilia(to drive a wedge between white men--who are castrated and cucked--and white women--who are turned onto jungle fever to reject white men in favor of black men).

Cops and Palestinians are pariahs to most powerful people

No one cares about Palestinians.

It’s like no one cares about cops.

If any Republican president said things that led to the killing of innocents, he would have been lambasted by the media and the Democratic Party.

Obama and Soros stoked the BLM rage, and it led to killing of cops.

Media and GOP didn’t hold Obama accountable and instead just led him get away and pompously pontificate about ‘history’ to weasel himself out of responsibility.

Even the Conservative Establishment won’t blame and denounce Obama on the killing of cops when his rhetoric and politicking on the matter clearly led to the deaths.

Even Trump dared not make the connection between Obama and black murder of cops.

Cops(if killed by black rage fueled by Obama the historic president) don’t matter just like Palestinians don’t matter as they look forward yet more decades of Occupation and humiliation(and even mass killing).

Obama is a cop-killer. He didn’t pull the trigger but he encouraged the lunacy of BLM. It is all the more sick since it was the Prog push for gentrification that led to more tensions & clashes between cops and blacks.

The Tribalism of Socio-Political Compassion. Dogs and Dog Food. Which one are you?

Compassion may sound anti-tribal, but one's compassion for a selective group means a blind eye and cold-heart(even hatred) toward its perceived enemies, rivals, or victims.

It is our compassion for dogs that make us blind to the animals killed and fed to dogs. To own and love a dog means you must take care of it & feed it, and that means other animals must be killed to be used as food. Our concern for dogs disregards the millions of animals that are destroyed to make dog food.

White gentiles feel compassion for Zionists, and this has blinded them to the struggles of Palestinians, the enemies and victims of the Jews. We see Jews as wonderful dogs and see Palestinians as dog food(for the Zionist dogs), a people who must be sacrificed to make the Jews happy.

So, if you think compassion will facilitate rising above tribalism, think again. It may help you rise above your own tribalism, but in making you root for a 'special' group over other groups, it morphs into a deferred tribalism.

In the West, the elite 'compassion for Jews, homos, and blacks means that other groups are disregarded. Jews, homos, and blacks are the darling dogs, and the rest of us are seen as dog food. We exist only to serve and feed those who've been made the special objects of 'universal' compassion by the power of Political Correctness.

Try not to be dog food to other races. You and your people deserve better. Don't be Palestinianized.