In 'liberal democratic' societies, it's generally the case that most causes, agendas, and movements claim to serve some universal, humanitarian, and all-embracing ideal. Terms like 'justice', 'equality', 'liberty', 'freedom', 'truth', 'tolerance', and so on are bandied about by all sides.
But how can so many different causes claim to be for the same universal ideals and principles?
To understand the true nature of power, we need to check for fingerprints on the steering wheel of any agenda. Who created it and organized it? Who funds it and manages it? Who does the hiring and firing? Most crucial of all, what is the ethnic content and/or class character of these fingerprints?
A Jewish-American organization and an Arab-American organization may preach near-identical-sounding principles, but Jews will direct those 'ideals' toward serving Jews while Arabs will do so for Arabs.
It is the naive, earnest, and inexperienced who focus more on stated principles than on ethnic, cultural, and/or class character of those who head the movement. Of course, many people join the movement out of sincere commitment, but they are invariably the tools, not the tool-users.
Because 'liberal democratic' societies claim to represent bland humanity than specific nationalities, various particularist agendas invoke universal principles to obfuscate what are really narrower agendas. So, a hundred different organizations in America could very well be for 100 different specific interests,but they will chant the same genetic mantras. Rhetorically, they sound remarkably alike, yet inter-relational conflicts owe to the fact of sharply divergent real interests. In cases where various groups come together, the alliance is less the product of agreement on universal principles than agreement of mutual favors(for the time being).
Always dust for fingerprints to notice which individuals of which groups are behind the design, framework, and funding of a movement or cause. Currently, there's convergence of shared interests between Jews and Muslims in the 'Age of Trump'. This has nothing to do with Jews and Muslims respecting each others' common humanity. It has everything to do with Jewish alarm about Trumpism(as an emergent gentile challenge to Jewish supremacist power) and with Muslim/Arab eagerness to gain entry to the West for better material lives. So much of it is tribal and/or mercenary.
But it sounds nobler to celebrate the alliance in terms of 'justice' and 'equality'. It sounds less cynical and cutthroat.
Showing posts with label power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label power. Show all posts
Saturday, March 11, 2017
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
True Power
Real Power is not about the Rule of Law but who is above the law.
But True Power is about who is above the law by the rule of law.
But True Power is about who is above the law by the rule of law.
Sunday, September 18, 2016
Jewish Understanding of Power vs Justified Power
Jews are very smart when it comes to politics and morality.
Politics is important, but even more so is the possession of the moral high ground, especially in the modern West.
Politics is about power, but raw power isn't enough. Power has to be justified.
Since the beginning of history, those with raw power(military class) made an alliance with the clerical class. Thus, the power of might became associated with moral/spiritual righteousness.
Without such 'blessing', power would only be about brutish might, about fear and intimidation.
Such power could last only as long as one had the arms and loyal soldiers. Such power would not be based on real respect, admiration, and etc.
This is why the dynastic power of the First Emperor of China was short-lived. His order was all about fearsome power. He killed the Confucian scholars. His domain ruled by might, fright, and intimidation. Same can be said for Assyrians. They ruled by terror and violence. They were ruthless buggers, just like the later Huns. Huns rampaged and struck fear into the hearts of everyone. But there was no respect among those they conquered.
In contrast, moral power goes beyond the might of arms and terror. Just the power of the word and symbols does the trick. And the power of word is especially effective in the Modern World where one is protected by Rule of Law and especially if one controls the Academia and Media(news and entertainment). The Rule of Law means that the military cannot suddenly move against you even if you insult it with moral condemnation. And control of media means that your righteous Narrative comes to prevail over all.
So, without firing a shot, Jews took over America. In the Russian Revolution, Jews had to take power through power of arms since there wasn't much in the way of Rule of Law in autocratic or weak-parliamentary Russia, especially during Wartime. In the US, as Jews were protected by Anglo-American Rule of Law, they could make aggressive moral claims against Wasps and still be protected by law(that had been established by Anglos). And the military couldn't move against them. Also, as Jews took over media and academia, their vision of history and morality and justice gain dominance.
If white southern conservatives joined the military, Jews joined the academia, media, courts, and etc. And with their power of finance and economics, they were poised to take over the elite institutions. In the US, due to Rule of Law, the military must take orders from those with control over the word. Word orders the Sword.
Jews mastered the Word while white southerners mastered the sword.
In a barbarian world or Leviathan world, the Sword has rule over the Word.
Under Rule of Law, Word has rule over the Sword.
But even Rule of Law wasn't enough for Jewish dominance. After all, Law is supposed to be 'blind'. It is not supposed to play favorites. It is supposed to be equal to all individuals. So, even as Rule of Law protected Jewish freedom and rights, it didn't necessarily favor the Jews. After all, Rule of Law even protects the rights of KKK and Nation of Islam.
For Jews to gain favoritism in the American system, they had to become sacralized while their rivals were demonized.
Jews had to be promoted as a holy people while white gentiles were to be demoted as a wicked people... not least because they had done wrong to the holy Jews. So, the ONLY way whites could gain redemption was by being servile to the holy Jews and making amends for... ever and ever and ever and ever.
So, Jewish success and power depend not only money and might. Such are great assets but don't justify the power. For the power to be justified and blessed, it has to be morally and spiritually sanctified while the power of the rivals must be demonized and accursed.
Consider. The reason why Americans can freely badmouth Saudi power, Chinese power, Iranian power, and Russian power is because they are not sacralized in the Western Narrative. If a rich and powerful man were only seen as rich and powerful, he might be an object of admiration and/or envy, but he wouldn't necessarily be seen as good and righteous.
Because Jews are the most powerful and richest people, they are the natural targets of envy, resentment, suspicion, hostility, distrust, and righteous anger(as the rich and powerful have more means to harm the world). 1% vs the 99%.
So, to protect themselves from criticism and competition, Jews have employed the art of sacralization and vilification. While Rule of Law protects Jewish freedom, rights, and property, it doesn't protect Jews from criticism, rivalry, accusation, and moral condemnation. After all, Rule of Law guarantees freedom of speech for all, even for 'anti-semites' like David Duke.
In order for Jews to silence critics and rivals, they must pervert the 'blind' impartiality of the Rule of Law(as in the EU & Canada) and effectively censor or criminalize anti-Jewish speech(while allowing Jews to criticize, berate, and condemn native whites and other gentiles).
As freedom of speech is still protected by law in the US, Jews rely on the sacralization of their own identity & narrative and on the demonization of their perceived rivals and enemies to maximize their own power.
With such taboos, it has been nearly impossible for anyone in mainstream channels to criticize or challenge Jewish power. In America, Jewishness = holiness. Badmouthing Jewishness is like sacrilege against God. Our support of Jews must be UNCONDITIONAL no matter what Jews so. If a Jew spits in your face and you hate him for it, you are an 'anti-Semite'.
Such being the case, it has been easy for Jews to destroy anyone just by pointing the finger and shrieking 'anti-Semite' and 'racist'. Of course, Jews have morally paralyzed whites not only by sacralizing the Holocaust but also black slavery. Also, the Narrative says ALL WHITES must carry the burden of 'white guilt' for both Holocaust and Slavery. So, even Swedes and Greeks are thought to be responsible for the Holocaust and even recent Polish immigrants in the US are guilty of black slavery.
But then, this setup works greatly for Jewish power. If Jews only targeted Germans with the Holocaust and only targeted southern whites for slavery, it was be less effective as tool against all white gentiles. It is no wonder that Jews erect Holocaust Memorials even in nations that bear NO HISTORICAL GUILT for it whatsoever.
The Power of Word is most effective when one side is sacralized while the other side(s) is demonized. After all, if Jews and White Christians are equally sacralized, both would feel equally righteous and morally proud. For Jews to have the advantage, they must own sacralization while the other side is smeared with demonization. (Jews now say that the ONLY WAY Christians can be half-way redeemed is by turning over their churches to homomania that is pushed by Jews. So, Christians must adopt cultural decadence to gain an ounce of holiness. It is like telling Alcoholics Anonymous that it must serve whiskey to be good.)
Because Jews are sacralized as the holy people historically victimized by white Christians and the Holocaust, they are to be revered, respected, and worshiped. Because white gentiles have been tagged with 'antisemitism', 'racism', imperialism(never mind Jewish money funded much of Western imperialism), slave trade(never mind Jews played a role in this too and never mind that black Africans had slavery for 10,000 yrs), and etc. they are to be reviled, condemned, and dragged through the mud.
Jews invoke historical justice to promote their Narrative, but it's really about political control over their rivals. After all, Jews are always far more sensitive to the injustice of their enemies and rivals than their allies. We don't see Jews get too tough on Saudi Arabia since it is a defacto ally of Israel. It really comes down to Moral Machiaveillianism.
One of the things Jews FEAR MOST is the loss of moral righteousness. It is that Moral Card that allows Jews to get away with so much foulness without facing criticism. As long as Jews are the holy people and white gentiles are the cursed people, the latter must serve the Jews just like sinful flock is supposed to serve God.
The MAIN REASON for Jewish hysteria about McCarthyism wasn't because things were so bad. Sure, some people got blacklisted but same happened to many during WWII when a whole bunch of suspected Nazi sympathizers were blacklisted or worse. Furthermore, there was the mass-'internment' of the Japanese, something Jewish Liberals didn't protest.
The reason why Jews were so alarmed about McCarthyism and anti-communism is that they knew very well that, despite McCarthyite excesses, there were lots of evidence that a whole bunch of radical and fellow-traveling Jews had aided and abetted Stalin's Empire. Some of these agents went so far as to give Stalin, the killer of millions and occupier of Eastern Europe, the secrets to the atomic bomb. That meant Jews = involvement in Communism... and that opened up a whole new cans of worms about Jewish communist role in the mass killings and destruction in the USSR. In other words, before Nazis did horrible things, European Jews had aided Stalin in doing horrible things that were comparable to Nazi crimes.
Jews would have us believe that McCarthyism was terrifying because... uh... some folk singers and Hollywood writers were blacklisted for a few yrs. (These same Jews were silent about people actually being tortured and shot in Stalin's empire.)
In truth, Jews were terrified of McCarthyism because anti-communism had the power(if used intelligently) to take away Moral Sanctimony from the then-developing Jewish Narrative of Jewish Holiness. Anti-communism could connect Jews with the crimes of communism. As WWII was over and The Cold War pitted US vs USSR, this was bad position for Jews to be in. So, Jews really shat when anti-communism became a huge issue. (If McCarthy had been smarter, he wouldn't have gone after the US military, thereby making Eisenhower turn on him. Going after the military was like Hitler going into Russia. McCarthy got over-ambitious and met his Waterloo.)
Because the anti-communist narrative put Jews on the moral defensive(as participants and agents of murderous tyrannical communism), Jews got extremely hysterical in using all their academic, media, and institutional firepower to reverse the dynamics and put the anti-communists on the moral defensive as 'hysterics', 'paranoids', 'fanatics', 'rabid and virulent', 'anti-civil liberties', and etc.
This is rather amusing since Jewish communists had no use for civil liberties. After all, they were aiding Stalin. And they would eventually cook up PC to silence people with all sorts of accusations. And American Jews fully support EU Laws that silence 'hate speech' that is decided by powers-that-be which is the GLOB.
Ironically, the Jewish Liberal Narrative made anti-communists out to be 'anti-American' while making the Jewish communists and fellow-travelers as American-as-apple-pie for having stood firm in the name of US constitution protecting free speech and right of association. So, the commies were made the 'patriots' while anti-communists were made the 'traitors'. (Using this logic, KKK members who invoke the Constitution to protect their own free speech should be hailed as the greatest patriots.)
Negative association of Jewish Power with Communist Tyranny could have neutralized or at least balanced out the positive association of Jewish Power with the Holocaust. The former would have demonized Jews as the latter would have sacralized Jews. So, Jews would be objects of sympathy but also objects of suspicion and blame. Sure, Jews suffered horribly in WWII, but when they had the power in the USSR they did horrible things too.
That way, Americans could have sympathized with Jews where it was deserving but also could have been judgmental where Jews had done wrong. But because there was only sacralization of Jews while demonization was totally suppressed(by making 'anti-communists' out to be the bad guys while making Jewish radicals and fellow-agents out to be 'patriotic' Americans), there never developed any effective challenge or counterweight to Jewish power that grew and grew.
If there had been the balance of demonization and vilification, we might today look upon Jews the way we look upon Chinese or Russians. We know Chinese suffered horribly under Japanese invasion, and we can sympathize with that. But sacralization of Chinese victimhood during WWII doesn't negate our vilification of them during the Mao era when Chinese acted totally nuts.
Likewise, we can sympathize with Russian suffering and sacrifices during WWII. By some estimates, 25 million Russians(or Soviets) died. But such sacralization doesn't preclude our demonization of Russian craziness under Stalinism. So, we can see the noble side and the wicked side of Russians.
But because Jews have only pushed sacralization of Jews while suppressing any demonization of Jews, we can never accuse or challenge Jewish power.
When we see a Russian oligarch or Chinese oligarch, we can say 'Look at that rich Russian a**hole' or 'Look at that rich Chinese a**hole'. But when we see a Jewish oligarch, we aren't allowed to think 'Look at that rich Jewish a**hole.' We must defer to him as a holy Holocaust person. So, all the Jewish money, influence, and connections(and all their bad corrupt deeds) become sanctified and protected. It has a shield around it like the transparent force shield in PHANTOM MENACE.
Anyway, the Lesson of Power is that the Power of Money and Sword isn't enough. Power of money is just greed and cleverness, of wit and cleverness. It may be impressive but doesn't win reverence.
Power of Sword is thug power or barbarian power. It can be impressive or awesome, but it isn't different from the power of a cage fighter, a bull, a lion, a bear, or Big Boss Man. It is power of brawn.
Combine wit and brawn, and you get gangsterism. Gangsters may have some glamour, but their power isn't righteous. It isn't holy. The Corleones are fun to watch, but they have no moral justification.
In contrast, Moral Power means the power to accuse, condemn, and judge others. It means the king-of-the-hill to preach your sermon on the mount. It is the power of MLK myth, the Mandela cult, the Elie Wiesel show.
Granted, the power of word without money and sword doesn't go very far. Dalai Lama is respected as a Man of Word, but China has the guns and money.
But when a people have control of Money, Sword, and the Word(and the idolatry of Hollywood), that is real power.
So, given the nature of Jewish power, the main objective for counter-semites must be to demonize Jewish history the way Jews have demonized white gentile history. Dig up all the dirt things of Jewish evils. Of course, Jews have rigged the system so that when a Jew digs up bad stuff about white history, that is just research and scholarship, but when a white gentile digs up bad stuff about Jewish history, that is 'antisemitism'.
But white gentiles must push at this until the demonization of Jews balances out the sacralization of Jews.
Now, neither demonization nor sacralization should be eternalist or permanentist. In order words, if Jews did some bad things in some time in history, it mustn't reflect on all Jews at all times. But by the same token, if Jews suffered tragically in some time in history, it shouldn't reflect on all Jews at all times. So, Jews shouldn't be condemned for communism forever wherever there are Jews. But neither should Jews invoke Holocaust to protect themselves as holy victims from criticism forever. But this must apply to white gentiles too.
All peoples have their demon-histories and holy-histories. Sometimes, both are tied together. Much of what Japan did in WWII made it a demon nation. But the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a 'sacral' effect at least on the innocents who died there.
Politics is important, but even more so is the possession of the moral high ground, especially in the modern West.
Politics is about power, but raw power isn't enough. Power has to be justified.
Since the beginning of history, those with raw power(military class) made an alliance with the clerical class. Thus, the power of might became associated with moral/spiritual righteousness.
Without such 'blessing', power would only be about brutish might, about fear and intimidation.
Such power could last only as long as one had the arms and loyal soldiers. Such power would not be based on real respect, admiration, and etc.
This is why the dynastic power of the First Emperor of China was short-lived. His order was all about fearsome power. He killed the Confucian scholars. His domain ruled by might, fright, and intimidation. Same can be said for Assyrians. They ruled by terror and violence. They were ruthless buggers, just like the later Huns. Huns rampaged and struck fear into the hearts of everyone. But there was no respect among those they conquered.
In contrast, moral power goes beyond the might of arms and terror. Just the power of the word and symbols does the trick. And the power of word is especially effective in the Modern World where one is protected by Rule of Law and especially if one controls the Academia and Media(news and entertainment). The Rule of Law means that the military cannot suddenly move against you even if you insult it with moral condemnation. And control of media means that your righteous Narrative comes to prevail over all.
So, without firing a shot, Jews took over America. In the Russian Revolution, Jews had to take power through power of arms since there wasn't much in the way of Rule of Law in autocratic or weak-parliamentary Russia, especially during Wartime. In the US, as Jews were protected by Anglo-American Rule of Law, they could make aggressive moral claims against Wasps and still be protected by law(that had been established by Anglos). And the military couldn't move against them. Also, as Jews took over media and academia, their vision of history and morality and justice gain dominance.
If white southern conservatives joined the military, Jews joined the academia, media, courts, and etc. And with their power of finance and economics, they were poised to take over the elite institutions. In the US, due to Rule of Law, the military must take orders from those with control over the word. Word orders the Sword.
Jews mastered the Word while white southerners mastered the sword.
In a barbarian world or Leviathan world, the Sword has rule over the Word.
Under Rule of Law, Word has rule over the Sword.
But even Rule of Law wasn't enough for Jewish dominance. After all, Law is supposed to be 'blind'. It is not supposed to play favorites. It is supposed to be equal to all individuals. So, even as Rule of Law protected Jewish freedom and rights, it didn't necessarily favor the Jews. After all, Rule of Law even protects the rights of KKK and Nation of Islam.
For Jews to gain favoritism in the American system, they had to become sacralized while their rivals were demonized.
Jews had to be promoted as a holy people while white gentiles were to be demoted as a wicked people... not least because they had done wrong to the holy Jews. So, the ONLY way whites could gain redemption was by being servile to the holy Jews and making amends for... ever and ever and ever and ever.
So, Jewish success and power depend not only money and might. Such are great assets but don't justify the power. For the power to be justified and blessed, it has to be morally and spiritually sanctified while the power of the rivals must be demonized and accursed.
Consider. The reason why Americans can freely badmouth Saudi power, Chinese power, Iranian power, and Russian power is because they are not sacralized in the Western Narrative. If a rich and powerful man were only seen as rich and powerful, he might be an object of admiration and/or envy, but he wouldn't necessarily be seen as good and righteous.
Because Jews are the most powerful and richest people, they are the natural targets of envy, resentment, suspicion, hostility, distrust, and righteous anger(as the rich and powerful have more means to harm the world). 1% vs the 99%.
So, to protect themselves from criticism and competition, Jews have employed the art of sacralization and vilification. While Rule of Law protects Jewish freedom, rights, and property, it doesn't protect Jews from criticism, rivalry, accusation, and moral condemnation. After all, Rule of Law guarantees freedom of speech for all, even for 'anti-semites' like David Duke.
In order for Jews to silence critics and rivals, they must pervert the 'blind' impartiality of the Rule of Law(as in the EU & Canada) and effectively censor or criminalize anti-Jewish speech(while allowing Jews to criticize, berate, and condemn native whites and other gentiles).
As freedom of speech is still protected by law in the US, Jews rely on the sacralization of their own identity & narrative and on the demonization of their perceived rivals and enemies to maximize their own power.
With such taboos, it has been nearly impossible for anyone in mainstream channels to criticize or challenge Jewish power. In America, Jewishness = holiness. Badmouthing Jewishness is like sacrilege against God. Our support of Jews must be UNCONDITIONAL no matter what Jews so. If a Jew spits in your face and you hate him for it, you are an 'anti-Semite'.
Such being the case, it has been easy for Jews to destroy anyone just by pointing the finger and shrieking 'anti-Semite' and 'racist'. Of course, Jews have morally paralyzed whites not only by sacralizing the Holocaust but also black slavery. Also, the Narrative says ALL WHITES must carry the burden of 'white guilt' for both Holocaust and Slavery. So, even Swedes and Greeks are thought to be responsible for the Holocaust and even recent Polish immigrants in the US are guilty of black slavery.
But then, this setup works greatly for Jewish power. If Jews only targeted Germans with the Holocaust and only targeted southern whites for slavery, it was be less effective as tool against all white gentiles. It is no wonder that Jews erect Holocaust Memorials even in nations that bear NO HISTORICAL GUILT for it whatsoever.
The Power of Word is most effective when one side is sacralized while the other side(s) is demonized. After all, if Jews and White Christians are equally sacralized, both would feel equally righteous and morally proud. For Jews to have the advantage, they must own sacralization while the other side is smeared with demonization. (Jews now say that the ONLY WAY Christians can be half-way redeemed is by turning over their churches to homomania that is pushed by Jews. So, Christians must adopt cultural decadence to gain an ounce of holiness. It is like telling Alcoholics Anonymous that it must serve whiskey to be good.)
Because Jews are sacralized as the holy people historically victimized by white Christians and the Holocaust, they are to be revered, respected, and worshiped. Because white gentiles have been tagged with 'antisemitism', 'racism', imperialism(never mind Jewish money funded much of Western imperialism), slave trade(never mind Jews played a role in this too and never mind that black Africans had slavery for 10,000 yrs), and etc. they are to be reviled, condemned, and dragged through the mud.
Jews invoke historical justice to promote their Narrative, but it's really about political control over their rivals. After all, Jews are always far more sensitive to the injustice of their enemies and rivals than their allies. We don't see Jews get too tough on Saudi Arabia since it is a defacto ally of Israel. It really comes down to Moral Machiaveillianism.
One of the things Jews FEAR MOST is the loss of moral righteousness. It is that Moral Card that allows Jews to get away with so much foulness without facing criticism. As long as Jews are the holy people and white gentiles are the cursed people, the latter must serve the Jews just like sinful flock is supposed to serve God.
The MAIN REASON for Jewish hysteria about McCarthyism wasn't because things were so bad. Sure, some people got blacklisted but same happened to many during WWII when a whole bunch of suspected Nazi sympathizers were blacklisted or worse. Furthermore, there was the mass-'internment' of the Japanese, something Jewish Liberals didn't protest.
The reason why Jews were so alarmed about McCarthyism and anti-communism is that they knew very well that, despite McCarthyite excesses, there were lots of evidence that a whole bunch of radical and fellow-traveling Jews had aided and abetted Stalin's Empire. Some of these agents went so far as to give Stalin, the killer of millions and occupier of Eastern Europe, the secrets to the atomic bomb. That meant Jews = involvement in Communism... and that opened up a whole new cans of worms about Jewish communist role in the mass killings and destruction in the USSR. In other words, before Nazis did horrible things, European Jews had aided Stalin in doing horrible things that were comparable to Nazi crimes.
Jews would have us believe that McCarthyism was terrifying because... uh... some folk singers and Hollywood writers were blacklisted for a few yrs. (These same Jews were silent about people actually being tortured and shot in Stalin's empire.)
In truth, Jews were terrified of McCarthyism because anti-communism had the power(if used intelligently) to take away Moral Sanctimony from the then-developing Jewish Narrative of Jewish Holiness. Anti-communism could connect Jews with the crimes of communism. As WWII was over and The Cold War pitted US vs USSR, this was bad position for Jews to be in. So, Jews really shat when anti-communism became a huge issue. (If McCarthy had been smarter, he wouldn't have gone after the US military, thereby making Eisenhower turn on him. Going after the military was like Hitler going into Russia. McCarthy got over-ambitious and met his Waterloo.)
Because the anti-communist narrative put Jews on the moral defensive(as participants and agents of murderous tyrannical communism), Jews got extremely hysterical in using all their academic, media, and institutional firepower to reverse the dynamics and put the anti-communists on the moral defensive as 'hysterics', 'paranoids', 'fanatics', 'rabid and virulent', 'anti-civil liberties', and etc.
This is rather amusing since Jewish communists had no use for civil liberties. After all, they were aiding Stalin. And they would eventually cook up PC to silence people with all sorts of accusations. And American Jews fully support EU Laws that silence 'hate speech' that is decided by powers-that-be which is the GLOB.
Ironically, the Jewish Liberal Narrative made anti-communists out to be 'anti-American' while making the Jewish communists and fellow-travelers as American-as-apple-pie for having stood firm in the name of US constitution protecting free speech and right of association. So, the commies were made the 'patriots' while anti-communists were made the 'traitors'. (Using this logic, KKK members who invoke the Constitution to protect their own free speech should be hailed as the greatest patriots.)
Negative association of Jewish Power with Communist Tyranny could have neutralized or at least balanced out the positive association of Jewish Power with the Holocaust. The former would have demonized Jews as the latter would have sacralized Jews. So, Jews would be objects of sympathy but also objects of suspicion and blame. Sure, Jews suffered horribly in WWII, but when they had the power in the USSR they did horrible things too.
That way, Americans could have sympathized with Jews where it was deserving but also could have been judgmental where Jews had done wrong. But because there was only sacralization of Jews while demonization was totally suppressed(by making 'anti-communists' out to be the bad guys while making Jewish radicals and fellow-agents out to be 'patriotic' Americans), there never developed any effective challenge or counterweight to Jewish power that grew and grew.
If there had been the balance of demonization and vilification, we might today look upon Jews the way we look upon Chinese or Russians. We know Chinese suffered horribly under Japanese invasion, and we can sympathize with that. But sacralization of Chinese victimhood during WWII doesn't negate our vilification of them during the Mao era when Chinese acted totally nuts.
Likewise, we can sympathize with Russian suffering and sacrifices during WWII. By some estimates, 25 million Russians(or Soviets) died. But such sacralization doesn't preclude our demonization of Russian craziness under Stalinism. So, we can see the noble side and the wicked side of Russians.
But because Jews have only pushed sacralization of Jews while suppressing any demonization of Jews, we can never accuse or challenge Jewish power.
When we see a Russian oligarch or Chinese oligarch, we can say 'Look at that rich Russian a**hole' or 'Look at that rich Chinese a**hole'. But when we see a Jewish oligarch, we aren't allowed to think 'Look at that rich Jewish a**hole.' We must defer to him as a holy Holocaust person. So, all the Jewish money, influence, and connections(and all their bad corrupt deeds) become sanctified and protected. It has a shield around it like the transparent force shield in PHANTOM MENACE.
Anyway, the Lesson of Power is that the Power of Money and Sword isn't enough. Power of money is just greed and cleverness, of wit and cleverness. It may be impressive but doesn't win reverence.
Power of Sword is thug power or barbarian power. It can be impressive or awesome, but it isn't different from the power of a cage fighter, a bull, a lion, a bear, or Big Boss Man. It is power of brawn.
Combine wit and brawn, and you get gangsterism. Gangsters may have some glamour, but their power isn't righteous. It isn't holy. The Corleones are fun to watch, but they have no moral justification.
In contrast, Moral Power means the power to accuse, condemn, and judge others. It means the king-of-the-hill to preach your sermon on the mount. It is the power of MLK myth, the Mandela cult, the Elie Wiesel show.
Granted, the power of word without money and sword doesn't go very far. Dalai Lama is respected as a Man of Word, but China has the guns and money.
But when a people have control of Money, Sword, and the Word(and the idolatry of Hollywood), that is real power.
So, given the nature of Jewish power, the main objective for counter-semites must be to demonize Jewish history the way Jews have demonized white gentile history. Dig up all the dirt things of Jewish evils. Of course, Jews have rigged the system so that when a Jew digs up bad stuff about white history, that is just research and scholarship, but when a white gentile digs up bad stuff about Jewish history, that is 'antisemitism'.
But white gentiles must push at this until the demonization of Jews balances out the sacralization of Jews.
Now, neither demonization nor sacralization should be eternalist or permanentist. In order words, if Jews did some bad things in some time in history, it mustn't reflect on all Jews at all times. But by the same token, if Jews suffered tragically in some time in history, it shouldn't reflect on all Jews at all times. So, Jews shouldn't be condemned for communism forever wherever there are Jews. But neither should Jews invoke Holocaust to protect themselves as holy victims from criticism forever. But this must apply to white gentiles too.
All peoples have their demon-histories and holy-histories. Sometimes, both are tied together. Much of what Japan did in WWII made it a demon nation. But the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a 'sacral' effect at least on the innocents who died there.
The Power that owns the Left is truly awesome power.
The Power that owns the Left is truly awesome power.
It is because most of opposition politics have come from the Left.
People of leftist disposition are naturally inclined to be restless, agitated, abrasive, and confrontational. They like to bitch, thrown tantrums, and be defiant. Even in a perfect world, the leftist mindset would find something to complain about. The problem is more internal than external. The leftist mindset loves to fuss about how something is wrong and how others must be blamed.
Consider Betty Friedan. She had a nice middle class life, but she compared it to the Holocaust. Leftists blame the world, but the real agitation is within their hearts. It's like what Mao said in Stone's movie: "The real war is in us. History is a symptom of our disease."
Rightists can be violent and disruptive, but it's not in their nature. When things seem normal and stable, most rightists just stay home and tend the garden. They don't enjoy marching in streets, tossing molotov cocktails, holding up signs, and dreaming of utopia. They may dream of personal kingdom of God, but they accept the world as it is UNLESS things get really bad. Then, even the rightists take to the streets, as happened in interwar Europe and as is happening in current Europe(due to massive migration) and the US(where support for Trump shows there is growing anxiety among conservatives). The left is ahead in making and/or anticipating trouble; the right is late in recognizing and/or reacting to trouble.
Because rightists tend to be calmer and allergic to agitation and trouble-making, the power need not fear them much. A rightist is like Norman Fell's character of the landlord in THE GRADUATE who tells Benjamin Braddock that he won't have any agitation; he wants order and peace.
The Power fears the Left because it is often agitated, hysterical, excited, angry, bitter, violent, aggressive, demanding, righteous, utopian, deranged. (The Power also fears blacks because they are crazy and riot and loot for the hell of it.) The Power, when it was Waspy, used to fear restless and relentless Jews. But now the Power is held by Jews.
When Wasps held the Power, the leftist Jewish opposition was feverish and driven.
Today, when Jews hold the Power, it is the Power that is most feverish and driven.
The Power doesn't have to worry too much about the Right. Right tends to be either timid, reserved, restrained, orderly, stoic, and too normal for much trouble-making.
Even when Rightists are pissed, they usually stay home, hunker down, and gripe alone.
But the Left is much more likely to hit the streets. Also, the left is much more likely to be engaged with arts, media, and academia and shape public opinion and inspire young to make trouble. The Right tends to be philistine and anti-intellectual.
So, the Power has much to fear from the Left.
It is a great boon to the Power to win over the Left and have it on its side. If the Left feels that its side is in power, it is less likely to go nuts and make trouble. And the Power had less to worry about since the Left would support the Power.
Of course, this causes a problem. The Power is never about equality. The PTB--powers that be--are always going to be richer, more privileged, and more powerful than the rest. Leftism is anti-hierarchy, so it isn't easy to square the Left with the Power, especially capitalist power that leads to the creation of oligarchy and super-wealth(and imperialist expansion).
The classic left bitches about the 1% vs the 99%.
The Power tries to make the 1% even richer and more powerful.
The 1% has much to fear from the Left.
After WWII, the 1% had less to fear about the Left. Anti-communism made Americans suspicious of radicalism and Soviet Union and Red China.
Also, the post-war boom led to rise of vast middle class. It wasn't a time of 1% vs 99% but a time when the vast middle had it pretty good. There was more wealth distribution throughout the economy. US labor was strong. US was the leader in manufacturing, and even highschool graduates could have decent jobs and raise a family in a world where family values still mattered.
But US entered into the globalist era. With massive outsourcing of working class jobs and massive insourcing of immigrants in service and high-tech jobs, many Americans are feeling the squeeze in the middle and below.
The 1% is richer than ever. It is also more Jewish than ever. Jews are 2% of the US population but 43% of the top 1%.
Jewish leftists loved to attack the Wasp Power. But Jewish progs today don't want to be overly harsh on the Power since it is held by their tribal brethren who, btw, shower them with money and favors.
But, given the increasing rift between the rich and everyone else, there should be more reason than ever for the Left to speak truth to the Power.
But the 'left' is now more supportive of the Power than ever before. Why?
Now. there was some leftist fury during the Bush era, especially with the Iraq War that turned into quagmire.
But during the Clinton and Obama era, there was mostly silence.
Clinton forged a new alliance between 1% free trade globalism and the Left. Via Clintonism, those who were on the Left could find promising careers funded by the rich, especially in NGO's. Also, it was the boomer Libs who became the richest people in the 80s and 90s.
Also, in a nation that worships Diversity and Holocaust, the fact that there are so many rich Jews made it rather uncouth to be overly critical of the rich. After all, it might be 'antisemitic'. Also, celebrity culture features so many rich black rappers, homo fashion designers, liberal Hollywood stars, the likes of Oprah, and etc. Their fans love the fact that their 'heroes' and idols are so rich. So, super-wealth was made 'cool'. Much of 'leftism' today is swooning over the fact that Jay-Z and Taylor Swift are worth gazillions. Who complains if their sports hero signs a $100 million contract? Who bitched about Tiger Woods raking in millions with all those endorsements? And who said anything about Clinton making $100 million from speeches?
Also, the Proglobalists increasingly changed leftism from economic to cultural, demographic, and lifestyle issues. 'Radical politics' had less and less to do with class and economics. It had more to do with celebrating homomania. The celebration of privileged and well-connected homos doesn't hurt the super-rich at all, especially when so many homos cater to the vain rich. It is celebration of the fact that Tim Cook wants a dick up his bunghole.
It had more to do with style. So, celebrating black athletes and rappers became part of 'leftism'. Slut culture and porny behavior(promoted by consumer-capitalism) became 'leftist'.
With so many young people immersed in hedonism and self-indulgence as their main political agenda, they were never going to pose a threat to the Power. No wonder Hillary invited Lena Dunham to give a speech at DNC. What rich person of The Power would fear such a creature whose idea of 'progress' is getting tattoos, hooking up, and acting like a materialistic pig?
And of course massive immigration. Immigrants can be a tax burden on the rich. But they also provide cheap labor. And they serve as buffer between the urban gentry and criminal blacks. Also, as many immigrants happen to be Mexican or Asian, they tend to have docile with Asiatic genes. Mexicans are mostly happy to pick lettuce and say 'Si, senor' and yellow folks are mostly dogs and drones who serve their new masters. Even as most yellows are now proggy, they merely follow the 'leftism' as devised and dictated by the Power. If the Power says 'leftism' is about homo-rainbows, that is what yelloids go with. They have zero originality and zero intellectual agency, at least outside Asia.
So, with the Power in control of the 'left'(as lifestyle and vanity), there is no challenge to their status and privilege. Hillary, the darling of Wall Street and War Machine, is seen as the 'leftist' candidate. (Merkel is supposed to be 'conservative' but shmoozes with Hillary and her ilk. Go figure.)
There was some challenge from Bernie Sanders voters, but Sanders gave up real socialism long ago. He is a phony who appeals to upper-middle-class kids who want free college tuition. His supporters are trust-fund kids, not working class folks and their kids.
As for the challenge from Trump supporters, maybe it will lead to something in the long run. But the Right isn't good at the culture of dissent, opposition, trouble-making, and etc. The Right is, by nature, used to favoring order, harmony, conformity, and unity. They don't thrive in the role of opposition and rebellion.
But things may get so bad that the Right may become the new kind of left.
Indeed, the trick of fascism was it was a rightist movement that took the style and energy from the leftist model.
It is because most of opposition politics have come from the Left.
People of leftist disposition are naturally inclined to be restless, agitated, abrasive, and confrontational. They like to bitch, thrown tantrums, and be defiant. Even in a perfect world, the leftist mindset would find something to complain about. The problem is more internal than external. The leftist mindset loves to fuss about how something is wrong and how others must be blamed.
Consider Betty Friedan. She had a nice middle class life, but she compared it to the Holocaust. Leftists blame the world, but the real agitation is within their hearts. It's like what Mao said in Stone's movie: "The real war is in us. History is a symptom of our disease."
Rightists can be violent and disruptive, but it's not in their nature. When things seem normal and stable, most rightists just stay home and tend the garden. They don't enjoy marching in streets, tossing molotov cocktails, holding up signs, and dreaming of utopia. They may dream of personal kingdom of God, but they accept the world as it is UNLESS things get really bad. Then, even the rightists take to the streets, as happened in interwar Europe and as is happening in current Europe(due to massive migration) and the US(where support for Trump shows there is growing anxiety among conservatives). The left is ahead in making and/or anticipating trouble; the right is late in recognizing and/or reacting to trouble.
Because rightists tend to be calmer and allergic to agitation and trouble-making, the power need not fear them much. A rightist is like Norman Fell's character of the landlord in THE GRADUATE who tells Benjamin Braddock that he won't have any agitation; he wants order and peace.
The Power fears the Left because it is often agitated, hysterical, excited, angry, bitter, violent, aggressive, demanding, righteous, utopian, deranged. (The Power also fears blacks because they are crazy and riot and loot for the hell of it.) The Power, when it was Waspy, used to fear restless and relentless Jews. But now the Power is held by Jews.
When Wasps held the Power, the leftist Jewish opposition was feverish and driven.
Today, when Jews hold the Power, it is the Power that is most feverish and driven.
The Power doesn't have to worry too much about the Right. Right tends to be either timid, reserved, restrained, orderly, stoic, and too normal for much trouble-making.
Even when Rightists are pissed, they usually stay home, hunker down, and gripe alone.
But the Left is much more likely to hit the streets. Also, the left is much more likely to be engaged with arts, media, and academia and shape public opinion and inspire young to make trouble. The Right tends to be philistine and anti-intellectual.
So, the Power has much to fear from the Left.
It is a great boon to the Power to win over the Left and have it on its side. If the Left feels that its side is in power, it is less likely to go nuts and make trouble. And the Power had less to worry about since the Left would support the Power.
Of course, this causes a problem. The Power is never about equality. The PTB--powers that be--are always going to be richer, more privileged, and more powerful than the rest. Leftism is anti-hierarchy, so it isn't easy to square the Left with the Power, especially capitalist power that leads to the creation of oligarchy and super-wealth(and imperialist expansion).
The classic left bitches about the 1% vs the 99%.
The Power tries to make the 1% even richer and more powerful.
The 1% has much to fear from the Left.
After WWII, the 1% had less to fear about the Left. Anti-communism made Americans suspicious of radicalism and Soviet Union and Red China.
Also, the post-war boom led to rise of vast middle class. It wasn't a time of 1% vs 99% but a time when the vast middle had it pretty good. There was more wealth distribution throughout the economy. US labor was strong. US was the leader in manufacturing, and even highschool graduates could have decent jobs and raise a family in a world where family values still mattered.
But US entered into the globalist era. With massive outsourcing of working class jobs and massive insourcing of immigrants in service and high-tech jobs, many Americans are feeling the squeeze in the middle and below.
The 1% is richer than ever. It is also more Jewish than ever. Jews are 2% of the US population but 43% of the top 1%.
Jewish leftists loved to attack the Wasp Power. But Jewish progs today don't want to be overly harsh on the Power since it is held by their tribal brethren who, btw, shower them with money and favors.
But, given the increasing rift between the rich and everyone else, there should be more reason than ever for the Left to speak truth to the Power.
But the 'left' is now more supportive of the Power than ever before. Why?
Now. there was some leftist fury during the Bush era, especially with the Iraq War that turned into quagmire.
But during the Clinton and Obama era, there was mostly silence.
Clinton forged a new alliance between 1% free trade globalism and the Left. Via Clintonism, those who were on the Left could find promising careers funded by the rich, especially in NGO's. Also, it was the boomer Libs who became the richest people in the 80s and 90s.
Also, in a nation that worships Diversity and Holocaust, the fact that there are so many rich Jews made it rather uncouth to be overly critical of the rich. After all, it might be 'antisemitic'. Also, celebrity culture features so many rich black rappers, homo fashion designers, liberal Hollywood stars, the likes of Oprah, and etc. Their fans love the fact that their 'heroes' and idols are so rich. So, super-wealth was made 'cool'. Much of 'leftism' today is swooning over the fact that Jay-Z and Taylor Swift are worth gazillions. Who complains if their sports hero signs a $100 million contract? Who bitched about Tiger Woods raking in millions with all those endorsements? And who said anything about Clinton making $100 million from speeches?
Also, the Proglobalists increasingly changed leftism from economic to cultural, demographic, and lifestyle issues. 'Radical politics' had less and less to do with class and economics. It had more to do with celebrating homomania. The celebration of privileged and well-connected homos doesn't hurt the super-rich at all, especially when so many homos cater to the vain rich. It is celebration of the fact that Tim Cook wants a dick up his bunghole.
It had more to do with style. So, celebrating black athletes and rappers became part of 'leftism'. Slut culture and porny behavior(promoted by consumer-capitalism) became 'leftist'.
With so many young people immersed in hedonism and self-indulgence as their main political agenda, they were never going to pose a threat to the Power. No wonder Hillary invited Lena Dunham to give a speech at DNC. What rich person of The Power would fear such a creature whose idea of 'progress' is getting tattoos, hooking up, and acting like a materialistic pig?
And of course massive immigration. Immigrants can be a tax burden on the rich. But they also provide cheap labor. And they serve as buffer between the urban gentry and criminal blacks. Also, as many immigrants happen to be Mexican or Asian, they tend to have docile with Asiatic genes. Mexicans are mostly happy to pick lettuce and say 'Si, senor' and yellow folks are mostly dogs and drones who serve their new masters. Even as most yellows are now proggy, they merely follow the 'leftism' as devised and dictated by the Power. If the Power says 'leftism' is about homo-rainbows, that is what yelloids go with. They have zero originality and zero intellectual agency, at least outside Asia.
So, with the Power in control of the 'left'(as lifestyle and vanity), there is no challenge to their status and privilege. Hillary, the darling of Wall Street and War Machine, is seen as the 'leftist' candidate. (Merkel is supposed to be 'conservative' but shmoozes with Hillary and her ilk. Go figure.)
There was some challenge from Bernie Sanders voters, but Sanders gave up real socialism long ago. He is a phony who appeals to upper-middle-class kids who want free college tuition. His supporters are trust-fund kids, not working class folks and their kids.
As for the challenge from Trump supporters, maybe it will lead to something in the long run. But the Right isn't good at the culture of dissent, opposition, trouble-making, and etc. The Right is, by nature, used to favoring order, harmony, conformity, and unity. They don't thrive in the role of opposition and rebellion.
But things may get so bad that the Right may become the new kind of left.
Indeed, the trick of fascism was it was a rightist movement that took the style and energy from the leftist model.
Sunday, August 28, 2016
Power Outside Politics. Learn from Jews.
Looking to politics for ultimate power misses the point.
Jews are 2% of the population, and there has never been a Jewish president. But Jews rule this country because they work as a team in controlling the key industries and institutions of America.
Whites need to learn from Jews. Act in unity for identity. Identify or create a common enemy against which white people can come together. Gain power and create networks OUTSIDE politics. Once that has been accomplished, the political gains will naturally follow.
It's like training in the off-season prepares for the performance during the season. The game itself is only the culmination of all the practice away from the playing field.
Black failure hasn't been primarily political. It has been economic, moral, and social. They abused freedom to revert to savage African nature. Blacks have succeeded politically in places like Detroit and Baltimore. But, their political success only led to social failure because blacks are weak in morals, virtues, skills, and knowledge. Outside politics, they succeed in failure.
Jews are 2% of the population, and there has never been a Jewish president. But Jews rule this country because they work as a team in controlling the key industries and institutions of America.
Whites need to learn from Jews. Act in unity for identity. Identify or create a common enemy against which white people can come together. Gain power and create networks OUTSIDE politics. Once that has been accomplished, the political gains will naturally follow.
It's like training in the off-season prepares for the performance during the season. The game itself is only the culmination of all the practice away from the playing field.
Black failure hasn't been primarily political. It has been economic, moral, and social. They abused freedom to revert to savage African nature. Blacks have succeeded politically in places like Detroit and Baltimore. But, their political success only led to social failure because blacks are weak in morals, virtues, skills, and knowledge. Outside politics, they succeed in failure.
Friday, August 26, 2016
The Two Ways of Power. Courageous or Craven
There are two ways of power.
Power by honesty, courage, truth, and integrity in challenging the ruling power and formulating a new order on firm grounds.
Or...
Power by sucking up whomever has the most money, leverage, and connections.
GOP cuckservatives and Democratic cuckerals are mere toy servants of power. It is the power of the craven. GOP cuckservatives invoke 'principles' to mask their opportunism. (After all, if they really into 'universal values', why do they favor Jews over Palestinians in the Middle East conflict?) Democratic cuckerals like Hillary will pay-to-play and play-to-pay to get what's hers. There is zero consistency in her world-view. She claims to care about Muslims, but no one did more to destroy the Muslim world in the past 8 yrs than she did.
Alt Right has chance of starting a movement that is built on honesty, courage, truth, and integrity.
This is possible... but it can't happen until Alt Right distances itself from 14/88 types who have no honesty and no integrity. They have courage in violating taboos about the Holocaust, but a courageous falsehood is still a falsehood.
True courage is having the fortitude to favor facts and truths even when they upset one's own comforting narrative and worldview.
14/88 morons find comfort in HEIL HITLER and cannot handle the truth of history that says Nazism was, in the end, a total disaster, the main culprit of which was Hitler. They are just blind stupid SJW's of the far right.
Tell a 14/88 idiot that he is wrong about Hitler, and he throws tantrums just like an SJW idiot on college campus. He is easily 'triggered' by challenge to his narrative. He wants his own 'safe space' from real history and real world. Let him hunker in his bunker with a portrait of Hitler as a frog.
Alt Right has better things to do... if it wants to do them.
Power by honesty, courage, truth, and integrity in challenging the ruling power and formulating a new order on firm grounds.
Or...
Power by sucking up whomever has the most money, leverage, and connections.
GOP cuckservatives and Democratic cuckerals are mere toy servants of power. It is the power of the craven. GOP cuckservatives invoke 'principles' to mask their opportunism. (After all, if they really into 'universal values', why do they favor Jews over Palestinians in the Middle East conflict?) Democratic cuckerals like Hillary will pay-to-play and play-to-pay to get what's hers. There is zero consistency in her world-view. She claims to care about Muslims, but no one did more to destroy the Muslim world in the past 8 yrs than she did.
Alt Right has chance of starting a movement that is built on honesty, courage, truth, and integrity.
This is possible... but it can't happen until Alt Right distances itself from 14/88 types who have no honesty and no integrity. They have courage in violating taboos about the Holocaust, but a courageous falsehood is still a falsehood.
True courage is having the fortitude to favor facts and truths even when they upset one's own comforting narrative and worldview.
14/88 morons find comfort in HEIL HITLER and cannot handle the truth of history that says Nazism was, in the end, a total disaster, the main culprit of which was Hitler. They are just blind stupid SJW's of the far right.
Tell a 14/88 idiot that he is wrong about Hitler, and he throws tantrums just like an SJW idiot on college campus. He is easily 'triggered' by challenge to his narrative. He wants his own 'safe space' from real history and real world. Let him hunker in his bunker with a portrait of Hitler as a frog.
Alt Right has better things to do... if it wants to do them.
Thursday, August 25, 2016
Alt Right must focus on telling the truth than seeking political power.
Alt Right doesn't have the money, organization, and connections to gain political power. Not yet. So, it shouldn't even try. Instead, it should devote itself to becoming the most honest, potent, principled, and fearless critic of power. In our age of PC, Alt Right has a golden opportunity to take on this role.
Alt Right should also criticize the so-called 'powerless', e.g. blacks burning down cities and 'white trash' ruining their lives with meth. While the powerful hold great sway over the world, the 'powerless' in great numbers constitute a great power that can even bring down civilizations. Look at Detroit that was destroyed by all those 'powerless' blacks.
Speaking truth to power constitutes a kind of power, perhaps the most important kind of power. By exposing and de-legitimizing the corrupt globalist powers-that-be, Alt Right can prove its worth even to its enemies who, under PC medication, lacks the agency and courage to call it like it is.
Honesty and truth are power for those below. Alt Right has no money but has something that is priceless: the honest truth.
Alt Right must be the Woodward and Bernstein of the 21st century. Truth brought down Nixon, the 'most powerful man in the world'.
Alt Right is the only voice willing to play the role of the boy who dared to say the obvious: 'Emperor has no clothes'.
Cuckservatives of the GOP seemed impregnable as 'custodians of the right', but their empty rhetoric, however lavishly funded, couldn't save them from the barrage of the Alt Right that had truth on its side.
Conservatism Inc. collapsed as dramatically as the Soviet Union.
Likewise, as rich and powerful as the Jewish Globalists and the PC 'progressivism' may be, they too are empires built on sand. A few well-placed truths could do to them what a few well-placed explosives do to a bridge.
The globalists are so vulnerable because they only have lies to tell. Sure, they are expensive lies that, for the time being, have a lot of people fooled. But lies cannot withstand the power of simple truth forever. A time will come when their power will collapse most unexpectedly.
The media will have to own Hillary since they protected and promoted her. Their ties to her, like their ties to Obama, have made them less reliable and trustworthy. They've chosen to rot with Hillary.
Alt Right should also criticize the so-called 'powerless', e.g. blacks burning down cities and 'white trash' ruining their lives with meth. While the powerful hold great sway over the world, the 'powerless' in great numbers constitute a great power that can even bring down civilizations. Look at Detroit that was destroyed by all those 'powerless' blacks.
Speaking truth to power constitutes a kind of power, perhaps the most important kind of power. By exposing and de-legitimizing the corrupt globalist powers-that-be, Alt Right can prove its worth even to its enemies who, under PC medication, lacks the agency and courage to call it like it is.
Honesty and truth are power for those below. Alt Right has no money but has something that is priceless: the honest truth.
Alt Right must be the Woodward and Bernstein of the 21st century. Truth brought down Nixon, the 'most powerful man in the world'.
Alt Right is the only voice willing to play the role of the boy who dared to say the obvious: 'Emperor has no clothes'.
Cuckservatives of the GOP seemed impregnable as 'custodians of the right', but their empty rhetoric, however lavishly funded, couldn't save them from the barrage of the Alt Right that had truth on its side.
Conservatism Inc. collapsed as dramatically as the Soviet Union.
Likewise, as rich and powerful as the Jewish Globalists and the PC 'progressivism' may be, they too are empires built on sand. A few well-placed truths could do to them what a few well-placed explosives do to a bridge.
The globalists are so vulnerable because they only have lies to tell. Sure, they are expensive lies that, for the time being, have a lot of people fooled. But lies cannot withstand the power of simple truth forever. A time will come when their power will collapse most unexpectedly.
The media will have to own Hillary since they protected and promoted her. Their ties to her, like their ties to Obama, have made them less reliable and trustworthy. They've chosen to rot with Hillary.
Criticism of Power is the First Step to Power
Criticism of power is a form of power.
Noam Chomsky has great influence over many because he critiqued the nexus of power.
Jews initially rose in power as critics of Wasp Power. Jews are now the 'new wasps', and only Alt Right is willing to discuss this power honestly. And yes, wittingly or unwittingly, most gentile politicians are cuckservatives or cuckerals.
Alt Right, due to its lack of PC, can be the most honest and potent critique of Power.
But being anti-PC is a double-edged sword. It opens up free debate but also attracts the 14/88 cranks(who exercise their own brand of PC) and have nothing to contribute but yelling "Heil Hitler" and attacking ANY Alt Right who has no use for Der Fuhrer.
Indeed, Alt Right would be in a much better position right now if it had made a clean break with 14/88. It is so easy to smear the Alt Right by associating it with Daily Stormer.
There is nothing Jews love more than conflating Alt Right with Nazis and loonies like Sinead McCarthy the flat-earther.
Alt Right likes theatrics and the circus-antics, and there is a time and place for that. But, in the long run, who mattered more? Critics like Chomsky and Sontag or clowns like Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin?
To be sure, Camille Paglia has shown one can be both.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)