Alt Right must be for Fascist-Democracy

Alt Right must be for fascist-democracy.

A proud people don't want to be ruled by an aristocracy, right or left or whatever. They want to be free.

People want national independence and political freedom.

In the past(and even now), various peoples have been caught between the promise of political freedom without national independence AND promise of national independence without political freedom.

Compare Puerto Rico and Cuba. Puerto Ricans are politically free to say whatever and go wherever. They can even come to America. But they have no national independence as their 'homeland' has been incorporated into the American Commonwealth.
In contrast, Cuba has national independence, but there is no political freedom for the people there. Cuba is an independent prison-state.
This may also be said of South Korea and North Korea. South Korea has political freedom but it is a puppet-whore of the US. North Korea has national independence but it is a prison-state.

When Napoleon's armies invaded other parts of Europe, the peoples were torn between political freedom and national independence. The French occupiers offered political freedom and the concept of rights-of-man. Most people gained more basic freedoms under French rule. But their nations or domains came under the iron heel of the French. They became part of the French Empire.
If the subject people sided with French Occupiers, they could have more political freedom but had to sacrifice national independence. If they sided with the native aristocratic rulers who fought against Napoleon, they might regain national independence but would have less political freedom(as aristocratic privileges would be restored). Consider how the Russian masses must have felt during this era. If Napoleon won the war, serfdom would be ended. Most Russians would have been freer. But they would have had to live under French domination.
On the other hand, if Russian masses supported the aristocrats and expelled the French, they could have national independence but then fewer political freedoms under the repressive Tsarist system.

Fortunately, a people can be politically free and nationally independent. The French Republic showed how this could be achieved. So did the Great Britain until recent history(when UK became a mere puppet of the US). So did the United States for much of its history. And Israel shows that a nation can be nationally independent(fascist) and politically free(democratic). And Japan during the Meiji Restoration managed to both expand political-social freedoms(by scrapping the samurai system) and preserve Japanese national autonomy & independence.

And this is what the Alt Right must promise. Americanism didn't fail because of democracy. It was because the democracy wasn't properly fused with nationality. Israeli Democracy was founded as a Jewish State. So, the thing is for New White Political Orders to be founded on both liberty and ethnos.
All this 'aristocratic' talk on Alt Right is rather ridiculous. So, who's going to be our new aristocrats? Greg Johnson, Jack Donovan, Ramzpaul, and Jazzhand McFeels? No thank you. I have no personal animus against them, but I don't want to live under their aristocratic privilege over me.

A social order must be made of mindful freedom. We love freedom, but freedom can be our worst enemy.
In prison, we are not free. That means we are not free to do great & wonderful things, but it also means we are not free to do horrible & destructive things.
Most of history of civilization was like a prison. Most people were not free. As such, many talented individuals were prevented from doing great things. But then, many stupid individuals were also prevented from doing really dumb things. Modernity let us out of the prison, and this means individuals can do great things... but it also means they can do all sorts of dumb, stupid, and horrible things.

A prison-state prevents people from living fully, but it also prevents people from totally self-destructing and harming others.
A free-state gives people the chance to live fully, but it also permits people to destroy their own culture, heritage, and homeland... which is what is happening to the modern-world-turned-excessive-and-decadent.

To be sure, a people can be physically and socially free but emotionally and psychologically imprisoned. Western Peoples are physically free(more or less), but they are psychologically imprisoned by PC, and that means Jewish Power is the prison warden of their minds.
People must be physically and psychologically free and morally sober & spiritually mindful. Consider ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST. Many of the people in the mental ward are 'voluntaries'. They can leave if they want to, but they stick around because they are mind-slaves of Nurse Ratched. But freedom can be dangerous too if not used properly. Randall McMurphy is a fun guy, but he too poses a danger because he is so reckless and destructive with his freedom. His offering of anarchy solves no problems.

Alt Right must offer a vision of freedom that is mindful and sensible, one that is aligned with nature, culture, health, history, and reason.
The most sickening feature of the Current West is the perverse fusion of Ratchedism and McMurphyism. We have the Style of Slut Porn Pride(cultural anarchy) as the Tool of Political Control wielded by the globalist Ratcheds of the world. If past elites maintained control by banning or suppressing permissive freedoms, today's elites manipulate hedonism and wantonness to keep us like dumb animals addicted to soma and doggy biscuits. Look how Miley Cyrus and Lena Dunham are social tools of the powerful. Institutionalized Anarchy. And Homo Decadence as the New Spirituality(and Morality).

In a way, America was a great curse as well as a blessing. Suppose the New World had never existed. Suppose there was only the Old World. Then, most people would have stayed in their homelands and remained deeply attached to it. Europeans would be in Europe, Asians would be in Asia, Arabs would be in Arabia, Africans would be Africa, and etc.
But the New World did exist, and the great triumph was the rise of United States, a nation forged by betrayal of colonists against their own king and homeland. From this betrayal rose a rich and powerful nation. And it encouraged OTHER peoples to reject their own homelands & heritages and come to America to gain freedoms and riches in a state of blissful amnesia. So, Americanism came to associate wealth, freedom, and progress with rejection/betrayal of one's own race, culture, homeland, ancestors, and etc. Worse, Americanism now affects even Old World nations as each nation tries to become a carbon copy of America with its own 'diversity', 'mass immigration', 'Hollywood culture', and de-racination. Culture used to be about Memory, but Americanism elevated the new cultural ideal of universal amnesia in search of Mammon.

Since Americanism is associated with riches, power, glory, and 'coolness', it serves as the globalist template for all nations, even ancient ones of the Old World with deep historical roots. America spreads the political culture of amnesia as the highest virtue for every nation. Just as anyone can become 'American' just by setting afoot in NY or LA, there is the New Notion that anyone can become 'German' just by setting foot on German soil.

What happens in America will define what happens in all corners of the world since American pop culture, academia, media, military, technology, and finance dominate everything.

Is the West really ruled by Liberal Democracy... or by the Fascist-Democracy of Zionist-Globalists?

It's been said Liberal Democracy has ruled the West.

If so, why does US take orders from Israel, a fascist-democracy?

Israel is democratic ethno-state. American Jews support Israel via AIPAC & Zionist-controlled media that favors Shabbos Goyim shills like Bush family, John McCain, Hillary, and etc.

Oddly enough, a 'liberal Democracy' takes orders from a fascist-democracy. Americans are ruled by ethnocentric Jews. In principle, the US may be a 'liberal democracy' but, in practice, takes orders from ethno-conscious rule of Jewish racialists.

If US, as a liberal democracy, takes orders from Jews & Israel who are committed to ethno-democracy, then fascism(that of Jews who are nationalist in Israel and globalist in goy nations) must be the most powerful force in the world. After all, the most powerful 'liberal democracy' submits to the will of a 'fascist-democracy'. If fascist-democratic Israel dictates orders to liberal-democratic US, then it means Jewish fascism is the reigning champion of World Power.

If liberal democracy is indeed dominant(as Western pundits always remind us), then Liberal Jews should insist on Israel dumping its fascist-democracy and becoming like the cucked EU. But the US as a 'liberal democracy' obeys Israel as a 'fascist-democracy', and Jews everywhere(US, UK, France, etc) want to keep it that way.

A fascist-democracy has elections & rule of law, but its core constitution is explicitly & thematically rooted in identity-heritage-territory. Israel is such a nation. A racial-cultural-national democracy.

Israel is a fascist-democracy like Turkey. US Jews push liberal democracy on whites but embrace ethno-democracy for themselves.

If US Jews are truly committed to the ideal of liberal democracy, they should apply the same pressure on Israel that they do on Poland and Hungary. But there is no Jewish pressure on Israel to accept refugees(or to give back Golan Heights back to Syria). Jewish 'liberals' pressure the smallest European nation to abandon its racial-national-territorial integrity and open up its legs to take in tons of Muslim and African invaders. But Jews, even 'liberal' ones in the West, fully support Israel's 'right to exist' as a racial-cultural-historical-territorial entity. When white gentile nations practice what Israel does, the Jewish-run press condemns them as 'fascist' and 'far right'. But when Jews do it, Jews expect(and demand) every US congressmen to pledge even more aid to Israel and uphold Israel's right to exist as a 'Jewish State'.

Well, by rules of logical consistency, if a certain policy is 'fascist' in Hungary or Poland, it must be 'fascist' in Israel as well. (Of course, Jews control the media and academia, thereby the Narrative and Political Logic. If Jews do what others do, it never reflects badly on Jews even if others are condemned for doing it. If Jews were to exterminate Palestinians like Nazis did with Jews, it would not be called a 'holocaust' by current Political Logic since Jews are judged differently from rest of mankind. Jews are above conventional morality. Also, if others were to do what Jews do, they could well be condemned for their 'extreme' and 'far right' tendencies. Israeli Jews can be nationalist, but if any white nation emulates such outlook, they will be condemned while, perversely enough, simultaneously being pressured to praise Israel's like-minded policy. Gentiles must say, "We condemn our own identity, territory, & history" while admiring Jews for upholding their identity, territory, & history. What a crazy world. It's the pretzel logic of Jews.)

Anyway, since American Jews and Israeli Jews are agreed on the need for Jewish identity, Jewish consciousness, and Jewish nationhood, they must be fascists. Since they rule America and the West, gentiles are not living under liberal democracy but under Jewish fascist democracy(because American liberal-democracy must defer to Jewish fascist-democracy).
Now, Jewish fascist-democracy is fine as long as Jews practice it for themselves in their own nation. But it is wrong, even evil, when Jews practice fascism over non-Jews. Each nation should have a fascist-democracy of its own. Hungary for Hungarians, Poland for Poles, just like Israel for Jews. But Jews not only want domination in Israel but in gentile nations. Jews know that fascist-democracy is a great formula for national unity, and so, they love it for Jewish Power and Israel. But they hate it for gentile nations because it implies Polish unity against Jewish control or Hungarian unity against the venal likes of George Soros. So, Jews push 'liberal democracy' on goyim while maintaining fascist-democracy for themselves.

Jewish War on Russia isn't about liberalism vs autocracy. It is Jewish ethno-centrism vs Russia nationalism. Jews are seething with hateful venom because Putin partly reversed what was done to Russia in the 90s: Jews raped & plundered the country and turned it into their whore. But Putin came along and wrested back some of the plunder and political control, and Jewish finance-imperialists hate him for that.

Jews fear that what Putin did for Russia may spread to other white nations. This is why Jews hate Trump. Even though Trump, like Putin, isn't anti-Jewish, his themes of Americanism vs globalism infuriates Jews since Jews use anti-nationalist globalism to weaken every gentile nation. (Of course, Jews support fascism and nationalism in Israel. Jews also subvert and empty Syria -- via refugee crisis -- to make room for Palestinians yet to be expelled from West Bank that shall ultimately be claimed entirely by Jews. Because nationalism and fascism are particularist, they are fine as long as they are confined within national borders. The problem is when it violates other national borders. Mixing particularism and universalism is like mixing oil and water. So-called globalist-liberal-democracy creates chaos and evil because its universalism is perverted by a particularist tribe that controls and manipulates the New World Order. So-called universal globalist-imperialism is really defined and controlled by particularist-fascist-Zionists who reserve a separate set of rules for themselves. Tragically, Jewish nationalist-fascism of Zionism is violating other borders. Jews control the US and use American money and military might to smash all Arab/Muslim nations hated by Israel. But Jews are so sneaky. Even though their wars have created the refugee crisis, they pretend to be 'humanitarians' by aiding the refugees get to the West.)

White Nationalists have most problem with globalist Jews, but their political ideal is closest to Israel, a fascist-ethno-democracy beloved by Jews.

Jews have hard fascist-democracy for themselves but push flaccid liberal-democracy on whites. Whites want fascist-democracy too in their own homelands.