Freedom, Independence, and Liberty are NOT possible without EXCLUSION

INCLUSION is now the buzzword in PC lingo pushed by Globalists.

But inclusion can work against freedom, liberty, and security. Indeed, freedom and liberty are impossible without security. Does anyone really free in a jungle full of dangerous animals? Does anyone really feel free in high-crime Detroit? Does anyone really feel free in the war zones of Syria or Libya(caused by Zionist-imperialist intervention)? Radical Inclusion leads to breakdown of security(and stability) and that means less freedom and liberty. Coercive Inclusion of US military imperialism into the Middle East and North Africa led to countless deaths and chaos everywhere. And Coercive Inclusion of masses of Africans and Muslims into Europe is leading to crime and mayhem.

Inclusion forces intrusion(even invasion) of other homelands. When EU is forced to be 'inclusive', it means it must surrender to intrusion and invasion by masses of Africans and Muslims. When White Americans are forced to be 'inclusive' of masses of non-white immigrants, it means having to live in a nation where they are reviled and blamed for everything.

A woman who is forced to 'include' every penis can only be rape victim. A woman without the choice to exclude the men she doesn't like is no longer free.

And this goes for victims of stalking as well. Such victims call on the police for safety to keep stalkers away. A woman doesn't feel safe with such types trailing her. This is especially true with famous celebrities who are stalked by crazy fans. In order for such people, women or celebrities, to feel secure(and free and independent), the police is called on warn or even imprison the stalkers. Women and celebs want to EXCLUDE stalkers from their lives.

Freedom and liberty have often been about Exclusion. Exclusion can happen by expelling a people who are deemed dangerous or threatening(or invasive). Or it can be achieved by mass-escape or mass-exile.

In the case of the Vietnamese and Algerians, they finally got together to expel the imperialist French invaders. Natives used guns and bombs to send the French back to France. Vietnamese and Algerians sought national independence via the expulsion of the French. Independence was achieved with the exclusion of the foreign French invaders.

In the case of Moses and Hebrews(if the Biblical legend is to be believed), they self-exiled themselves from the Egyptians. For the Hebrews to be free, they needed to exclude Egyptian tyranny from their lives. Since they couldn't overthrow Egyptians in Egypt, they chose mass-departure from Egypt to found their own homeland. Thus, Egyptian power came to be excluded from the lives of Jews, especially with the help of God who sent the Pillar of Fire and split the sea to devour the Egyptian cavalry(according to myth anyway).

So, Jews found freedom by excluding Egyptian tyranny from their lives. (But in founding their own homeland, they intruded into the lands of other peoples and slaughtered tons of them, again if the Biblical legends are to be believed. In forcing those gentiles in the Promised Land to be 'inclusive' of Jews, there were blood invasions and reprisals. Recent history has similar themes of freedom-by-exclusion and oppression-by-inclusion. The 20th century Exodus is about Jews gaining freedom by excluding the gentile world from their own lives. By departing from gentile lands and creating a Jewish state, Jews would welcome only the Jews and keep out the gentiles. Jews in hostile gentile nations would seek exile and exodus to Modern Israel, thus excluding gentile tyranny from their lives and living freely with other Jews. But this creation of the Jewish homeland required the the intrusive 'inclusion' of Jews upon Palestinians. Palestine was forced to 'include' Jews who soon turned into intruders and invaders who came to lord over the Palestinians. Exclusion meant freedom for Jews, but Inclusion meant tyranny for Palestinians. It's like the Japanese found new opportunities in Manchuria, but it required the coercive 'inclusion-invasion' of Northeast Asia. Later, for the Chinese to be free of Japanese Rule, the Japanese had to be expelled and excluded from China.)

America was founded on themes of exclusion. Colonial elites(Founding Fathers) rebelled against the 'tyranny' by King George and the Brits(even though historians say it wasn't all that bad). Also, white folks worried about Indian raids and red folks scalping white folks and leaving them bald. So, in order for America to be created, the colonials had to declare independence and EXCLUDE British power from the Americas. And in order for white folks to be safe and secure(in order to be free as civilized folks), they had to exclude the 'red savages' and dangerous animals(bears, cougars, wolves, and etc) from their domain.

The very idea of INDEPENDENCE implies exclusion. After all, to be independent means to be free FROM something.

When the Pilgrims came to America, they chose exile in order to exclude British religious tyranny(or what they saw as such) from their lives. When Robert Duvall flees in THX 1138, he is trying to exclude the tyranny of the System from his life. He wants to be free. He wants to be free FROM something. It's like the movie THE GREAT ESCAPE. The prisoners are trying to be free FROM of the German Prison Camp System. They want to exclude the power of German Guards from their lives.

Of course, themes of exclusion and inclusion are often inter-connected, as in the Moses story. Jews seek to exclude Egyptian tyranny from their lives. But in seeking a homeland of their own, they force other peoples in the region to 'include' Jews who come as intruders and invaders.

Also, there is the troubled relation between man and God. In some ways, man wants to be free of God. God has too many laws and injunctions. So, some Jews wanted to dance and party around the Golden Calf. They wanted to follow Edward G. Robinson than Charlton Heston. But God insists on the Jews including His laws in their lives because He figures Jews freed from God's Laws will succumb to their wild egos and start acting nuts like Sarah Silverman and Anthony Wiener. (To be sure, God sometimes want to exclude human affairs from His existence because humans are pesky, ridiculous, and retarded. But just when He wants to say 'get lost, idiots', humans are praying to Him and beseeching Him for help after they mess up. And God figures He will include their prayers in His plan for humanity...)

In a way, one might argue that the theme of INCLUSION in current American politics allows freedom for all of humanity. US is the Promised Land to which all peoples of the world should escape to. All the world is like one giant Egypt, and every people who want to flee are like Jews. Just as Jews sought freedom by excluding Egyptian tyranny from their lives by seeking mass-exile, all these immigrants are trying to exclude from their own lives the tyranny of their own kind by coming to America. So, Chinese wanna flee from China, Indians wanna flee from India, Africans wanna flee from Africa, Mexicans wanna flee from Mexico. Their own people are their worst enemies, and they want to exclude their own race and culture from their own lives and come to America and be included as 'Americans' by presumably superior white folks who run a better political, economic, and social system.

But this is where the analogy with Hebrews break down. Hebrews were not escaping from their own people. They ran from Egyptians. In contrast, Immigrationism says that people should 'escape' from their own race, culture, and land. They should become McCitizens of America.
Yet, there is another contradiction, that of multi-culturalism. Even though all these immigrants say NO to their own race & culture and reject their own homelands in order to join the White World, the white/Jewish 'progressives' who control Western media/academia insist on immigrant-folks maintaining their non-Western 'identities'(as redefined by multi-culti politics). (Better to exploit tensions in the service of 'progressive' politics because non-whites who get along with whites might become 'Republicans'.) So, we have the strange phenomenon of non-white immigrants(and esp their children) rejecting and forgetting their own race, culture, and language(and becoming just generically American in Hollywood and MTV sense) but also taking on 'identity politics' of hostility toward whites. However, this non-white 'identity' is a political construct than something genuine or organic. It is imposed on non-whites by PC politics that didn't originate in their homelands. (For example, no non-Western culture has been traditionally homomaniacal, but multi-cultism would have non-white kids in America believe that worship of homosexuality is part of multi-culturalism. It even fuses Islamic identity with homo decadence.) Non-white 'identity' according to multi-cultism is less about the intrinsic assets of a race, culture, or language than about the politics of hostility toward whites. Indian-Indian identity isn't the same as Indian-American 'identity'(as constructed by PC). Asian-Indians in India are Indian regardless of events and developments in the rest of the world. Even if the entire white world were to vanish overnight, Indians in India would organically and historically be Indian. But 'Indian-American' has no such autonomous or independent meaning. It is premised on PC-ordained Indian-American hostility towards whites as the holders of 'white privilege'(according to venomous PC). Multi-culti identity is about the exploitation of identity politics to corral non-whites against whites. This kind of identity can only exist in opposition to something. It lacks autonomy.
A Japanese in Japan is organically Japanese even if the rest of the world were to vanish. Indeed, Japan was Japanese for many centuries in isolation. But Japanese-American 'identity', as constructed by PC multi-cultism, cannot exist except in the context of hostility against whites.
This is why we have PC-ized Asian-Americans identifying with blacks against whites. These clowns might have had an autonomous identity back in their homeland. But in the US, where they've lost their racial, cultural, and linguistic identities, they rely on multi-culti 'identity' of hating 'white privilege' with the implication that Asians have more in common with Africans than with whites(with whom Asians are closer genetically, in terms of civilizational achievement, and as victims of black violence). It also means Middle Easterners(who are Caucasian if not white and whose histories are more closely tied to the West) have more in common with Mongolian-Americans and Peruvian-Indian-Americans. As white Hispanics count as 'people of color', it also means someone like Marco Rubio can claim to have more in common with a Nigerian-American than with European-Americans. It just gets surreal. And the politics of victimhood identity means that white homos and white women can claim to have more in common with blacks, browns, and yellows than with straight white men. It just gets more and more surreal.

Alt Right must be for Fascist-Democracy

Alt Right must be for fascist-democracy.

A proud people don't want to be ruled by an aristocracy, right or left or whatever. They want to be free.

People want national independence and political freedom.

In the past(and even now), various peoples have been caught between the promise of political freedom without national independence AND promise of national independence without political freedom.

Compare Puerto Rico and Cuba. Puerto Ricans are politically free to say whatever and go wherever. They can even come to America. But they have no national independence as their 'homeland' has been incorporated into the American Commonwealth.
In contrast, Cuba has national independence, but there is no political freedom for the people there. Cuba is an independent prison-state.
This may also be said of South Korea and North Korea. South Korea has political freedom but it is a puppet-whore of the US. North Korea has national independence but it is a prison-state.

When Napoleon's armies invaded other parts of Europe, the peoples were torn between political freedom and national independence. The French occupiers offered political freedom and the concept of rights-of-man. Most people gained more basic freedoms under French rule. But their nations or domains came under the iron heel of the French. They became part of the French Empire.
If the subject people sided with French Occupiers, they could have more political freedom but had to sacrifice national independence. If they sided with the native aristocratic rulers who fought against Napoleon, they might regain national independence but would have less political freedom(as aristocratic privileges would be restored). Consider how the Russian masses must have felt during this era. If Napoleon won the war, serfdom would be ended. Most Russians would have been freer. But they would have had to live under French domination.
On the other hand, if Russian masses supported the aristocrats and expelled the French, they could have national independence but then fewer political freedoms under the repressive Tsarist system.

Fortunately, a people can be politically free and nationally independent. The French Republic showed how this could be achieved. So did the Great Britain until recent history(when UK became a mere puppet of the US). So did the United States for much of its history. And Israel shows that a nation can be nationally independent(fascist) and politically free(democratic). And Japan during the Meiji Restoration managed to both expand political-social freedoms(by scrapping the samurai system) and preserve Japanese national autonomy & independence.

And this is what the Alt Right must promise. Americanism didn't fail because of democracy. It was because the democracy wasn't properly fused with nationality. Israeli Democracy was founded as a Jewish State. So, the thing is for New White Political Orders to be founded on both liberty and ethnos.
All this 'aristocratic' talk on Alt Right is rather ridiculous. So, who's going to be our new aristocrats? Greg Johnson, Jack Donovan, Ramzpaul, and Jazzhand McFeels? No thank you. I have no personal animus against them, but I don't want to live under their aristocratic privilege over me.

A social order must be made of mindful freedom. We love freedom, but freedom can be our worst enemy.
In prison, we are not free. That means we are not free to do great & wonderful things, but it also means we are not free to do horrible & destructive things.
Most of history of civilization was like a prison. Most people were not free. As such, many talented individuals were prevented from doing great things. But then, many stupid individuals were also prevented from doing really dumb things. Modernity let us out of the prison, and this means individuals can do great things... but it also means they can do all sorts of dumb, stupid, and horrible things.

A prison-state prevents people from living fully, but it also prevents people from totally self-destructing and harming others.
A free-state gives people the chance to live fully, but it also permits people to destroy their own culture, heritage, and homeland... which is what is happening to the modern-world-turned-excessive-and-decadent.

To be sure, a people can be physically and socially free but emotionally and psychologically imprisoned. Western Peoples are physically free(more or less), but they are psychologically imprisoned by PC, and that means Jewish Power is the prison warden of their minds.
People must be physically and psychologically free and morally sober & spiritually mindful. Consider ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST. Many of the people in the mental ward are 'voluntaries'. They can leave if they want to, but they stick around because they are mind-slaves of Nurse Ratched. But freedom can be dangerous too if not used properly. Randall McMurphy is a fun guy, but he too poses a danger because he is so reckless and destructive with his freedom. His offering of anarchy solves no problems.

Alt Right must offer a vision of freedom that is mindful and sensible, one that is aligned with nature, culture, health, history, and reason.
The most sickening feature of the Current West is the perverse fusion of Ratchedism and McMurphyism. We have the Style of Slut Porn Pride(cultural anarchy) as the Tool of Political Control wielded by the globalist Ratcheds of the world. If past elites maintained control by banning or suppressing permissive freedoms, today's elites manipulate hedonism and wantonness to keep us like dumb animals addicted to soma and doggy biscuits. Look how Miley Cyrus and Lena Dunham are social tools of the powerful. Institutionalized Anarchy. And Homo Decadence as the New Spirituality(and Morality).

In a way, America was a great curse as well as a blessing. Suppose the New World had never existed. Suppose there was only the Old World. Then, most people would have stayed in their homelands and remained deeply attached to it. Europeans would be in Europe, Asians would be in Asia, Arabs would be in Arabia, Africans would be Africa, and etc.
But the New World did exist, and the great triumph was the rise of United States, a nation forged by betrayal of colonists against their own king and homeland. From this betrayal rose a rich and powerful nation. And it encouraged OTHER peoples to reject their own homelands & heritages and come to America to gain freedoms and riches in a state of blissful amnesia. So, Americanism came to associate wealth, freedom, and progress with rejection/betrayal of one's own race, culture, homeland, ancestors, and etc. Worse, Americanism now affects even Old World nations as each nation tries to become a carbon copy of America with its own 'diversity', 'mass immigration', 'Hollywood culture', and de-racination. Culture used to be about Memory, but Americanism elevated the new cultural ideal of universal amnesia in search of Mammon.

Since Americanism is associated with riches, power, glory, and 'coolness', it serves as the globalist template for all nations, even ancient ones of the Old World with deep historical roots. America spreads the political culture of amnesia as the highest virtue for every nation. Just as anyone can become 'American' just by setting afoot in NY or LA, there is the New Notion that anyone can become 'German' just by setting foot on German soil.

What happens in America will define what happens in all corners of the world since American pop culture, academia, media, military, technology, and finance dominate everything.

Two Kinds of Racial Profiling: Negative and Positive

There seems to be two kinds of racial profiling. There is Negative Racial Profiling for would-be or likely black criminals in the wrong part of town(or even in the inner city where cops are on the look out for potential robbers or drug dealers), though I would think 'white trash' would also be stopped and patted down in affluent areas. In one suburb where my friend and I were driving through in a beat-up car, we were pulled over and investigated though we didn't do anything.

At any rate, another group of blacks are Positively Racial-Profiled for success. The rich liberals(many of them Jewish)in NY, Cambridge, and Chicago obviously spotted Obama as the Will Smith of politics and groomed him and filled his pockets with lots of dough and gave him positive media spin. So, Obama is the biggest beneficiary of positive racial profiling, something he never complains about though it favors his ilk over others who are more qualified and deserving. Interestingly enough, why is Henry Louis Gates friends with Obama? Isn't Gates bitter about recent African immigrants benefiting from affirmative action over American blacks whose ancestry includes slaves?

It's funny, aint it?

Colonel Parker once said FIND ME A WHITE GUY WHO CAN SING AND DANCE LIKE A 'NIGGER', AND I'LL MAKE A MILLION DOLLARS.

In 2008, it was like FIND ME A BLACK GUY WHO CAN HALF PASS FOR WHITE GUY, AND WE'LL MAKE HIM PRESIDENT.

A Compromise on Affirmative Action?

Couldn't we arrive at some kind of compromise? Gentile whites give up some of their precious jobs to blacks & non-white Hispanics ON CONDITION that Jews give up some of their even more precious jobs to non-Jewish whites? After all, Jews are far more outrageously over-represented in prestigious professions than any other group is. Jews make up 2% of the overall population but make up like 40% of Ivy League professors. What percentage of lawyers at top firms are Jewish? What percentage of top operators in the financial industry is Jewish? What percentage of doctors are Jewish, especially those in the most prestigious and high paying fields in medicine? A very high percentage.
Talk about disparate impact!

How is it that Jews, who make up 2% of population, can enjoy so much power and privilege?
I suppose Jews could argue that the are included as whites, but if Hispanics--many of whom are white–-can be categorized separately, why shouldn't the same rule apply to Jews? Many Hispanics in America are actually more white than Jews are. Look at Cuban Americans or Hispanics from places like Argentina or Chile. In contrast, many Jews still have that distinctly Middle Eastern look. So fair is fair. White gentiles give up some of their 'privilege' to blacks and Hispanics(at least non-white ones), AND Jews give up some of their positions to gentile whites.

Maybe we should even have a law that says a group cannot be represented in professions more than double their overall representation. Since Jews are 2% of the population, there should be no more than 4% of Jews in any profession, especially in a prestigious profession.

Besides, why should Jews care? They are always lecturing to us about those noble poor workers. Since being a poor worker is so noble, I say Jews should take those noble jobs than rake in so much money as lawyers, professors, doctors, computer designers, etc.

Ethnology trumps Economics. Material Wealth is not Cultural Wealth.

Mass immigration must be opposed EVEN IF all the newcomers are intelligent, hardworking, and do wonders for the economy.

A nation is, first and foremost, about the shared treasury of race, culture, heritage, history, and territory.
Economy serves the material needs of a nation. It is NOT the heart and soul of a nation. After all, even a poor nation has value and meaning based on its race, culture, and heritage.

West Germany was rich, East Germany was relatively poor. So, economically or materially, one was better than the other. But East Germany was no less racially and culturally rich as West Germany. Both nations, despite ideological and economic differences, were German in the deepest historical and cultural sense.

Same with South Korea and North Korea. South is immeasurably richer than the North, but it is not richer in identity, heritage, and culture. After all, the North, despite its tyranny & poverty, is just as Korean as South Korea. In identity, North is just as rich as the South. Indeed, it may be richer because South is a willing whore of US-dominated globalism that is racial-and-cultural war on all gentile nations.

It's like even a poor Jew is just as Jewish(in the racial and cultural sense) as a rich Jew.

Cultural wealth is different from material wealth.

A poor Jew who maintains his identity, history, and heritage is culturally richer than a rich Jew who, despite wealth and privilege, abandons his identity and heritage to be come crass & vain consumer. Such a Jew may be materially rich, but he is culturally famished and impoverished. (Because white people have been starved of rich nutrients of racial and cultural identity, they serve their hunger for cultural roots by feeding on the racial and cultural identities of others. As cucks forbidden to consume & digest their own racial and cultural identity/heritage, they gorge on AIPAC chicken-feed that makes them cluck for Israel, Israel, and Israel. They are cornfed cucks. Or they become like Rachel Dolezal & Shaun King and feed on the identity of blacks. Such whites over-gorge on other identities since feeding on other identities never feels fully satiating and satisfying. Humans have a natural longing to belong to something, and when they are denied the right to belong to their own kind, they direct their famished attentions to some other identity. It's like Uncle Tom Blacks, denied the chance of black pride, found meaning in shucking and jiving for white massuh.)

Throughout their history, Jews were sometimes rich, sometimes poor, sometimes powerful, sometimes powerless. But if there was one powerfully connective link throughout those 3,500 yrs, it was the sense of shared identity, history, and heritage.. and the collective dream of returning to the Promised Land, the homeland. Even when Jews were at their material-poorest in the leanest years, their racial-cultural value remained priceless, no less precious than in the fat years.

Now, suppose Finland could become materially richer by having 5 million Hindus or Chinese come and become 'New Finns'. Suppose every one of those newcomers is a law-abiding and hard-working and decent person. Suppose these newcomers do wonders for the economy.

So, is it worth it to allow them in? Only if your idea of nation is purely materialistic and not racial, cultural. or historical. According to soulless materialism, the soil of Finland is chemically no different from soil in Russia, China, and India. According to materialism, Finnishness = GDP numbers and Finn = worker or consumer or voter.

But if your idea of nation is racial, cultural, and historical, the land of the Finns is where your ancestors and heroes are buried. And Finnishness has meaning and value beyond the latest data of economic output. It is about national kinship and shared historical memory.

Of course, Jews know this, which is why they carefully guard the racial, cultural, historical, and territorial integrity of Israel. But Jews seek to weaken gentile nations by economizing their identity, culture, territory, and destiny.

DO AS THE JEWS DO.
DISOBEY WHAT THE JEWS SAY.

Is it part of the American DNA to dominate, transform, and convert the entire world with missionary zeal?

Is it part of the American DNA to dominate, transform, and convert the entire world with missionary zeal?

The Founding Fathers warned against US involvement in overseas affairs. To be sure, Americans were too occupied with settling a vast wilderness to dream of overseas empire.

Still, the political philosophy of America was not about an ‘exceptional’ right to go all over the world and flex its muscles.

In many ways, American political philosophy was ‘isolationist’, not least because US is so vast. It is like a world unto itself. Even without the rest of the world, Americans have a huge world of their own to themselves.

Americans were not keen on getting involved in WWI. And after the war, America drastically cut military spending and downsized the military: One of the reasons why Japan thought it could take on America. And the great majority of Americans didn’t want to get involved in WWII. It was only Japanese attack that roused Americans for entry.

And Americans were confused about Asian policy. Should America save China after WWII? Or just let it fall to communists? Should US involve itself in Korea? Or just move out? Initially, US decided to leave Korea and let the North have the South. But then, it changed its mind.

Also, the Cold War was mostly defensive. While US did prop up allies around the world, it was not the case that Americanism was aggressively knocking on every door. Maybe with Coca Cola and Pop Culture. But politically, US lived in fear of spread of communism, not least because so many Third World nations had been former colonies of Europeans and took inspiration from Soviets, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, and later Castro and Che.

While not all national liberation struggles were communist, many looked to Soviets for inspiration or support. Some turned to China. If Africa and Asia had been European colonies, things were trickier in Latin America, a US backyard along the Monroe Doctrine. Yet, Latin America was a most strange case because it had double layer of Western imperialism: Latin Imperialism over natives and mestizos(and blacks in some parts), and Gringo Imperialism over Latin imperialism over natives and mestizos. This meant native/mestizo resentment toward white Latin elites. But it also meant Latin white resentment at the Yanqui or Gringo.

Some Latin whites collaborated with Yanqui who favored right-wing Latin elites over mestizos and natives who might rise up like the colonized in Africa, Asia, and Middle East. But some Latin whites decided to lead the natives and mestizos against both Latin elites and Yanquis. Pinochet or Che.

Because of post-colonial themes, US didn’t fight the Cold War aggressively but defensively. The question was not turning communist nations into capitalist ones but defending as many nations(esp non-white ones) as possible from turning communist or pro-Soviet.

So, even as the Cold War led to huge American expenditures, its theme was not about American Exceptionalism and spreading the American Way to other nations.

In both Korea and Vietnam, US struggled to prop up its client states against determined enemies who sought to unify the nations. And US failed with Bay of Pigs in Cuba and didn’t try again. And US shat bricks about Marxism spreading like wildfire all over Latin America. And US was upset that India, though not communist, was allied with the USSR.

Periods of American ‘exceptionalist’ jingoist-crusade had been rather limited. It only took off with the end of the Cold War.

The first round of US globalist imperialism was when Americans had finished the settling of the American West and looked elsewhere for spoils. And they saw an easy target in the rotting corpse of Spanish Empire. Taking Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Philippines was a cinch since the Spain was the dying man of Europe. As for the Monroe Doctrine that’s been around, it wasn’t about American messianism in Latin America. America more or less accepted Latin America for what it was after it had gained liberation from Spain under Simon Bolivar. America was content merely to have military superiority and some economic stakes. US had no designs to transform it.

Such missionary zeal was aimed really at Hawaii and Philippines. But they were pushovers and small potatoes, though Filipinos put up some resistance that led to bloodbath.

At any rate, near the turn of the century, US wasn’t looking to conquer the world, control the world, and etc. US took it for granted that European powers would rule much of the world: the Brits and French mostly but there were also Germans, Dutch, and others. US would go for easy picking like Hawaii, Philippines, and Cuba. And it would go for accommodation in China which would be cut like a cake among the various big powers, Japan included.

So, the US wasn’t looking for too much. It had reasons to be content because its own nation, along with Alaska, was so huge. What need to control the world when US itself is a world unto itself?

US messianism really came into being AFTER the Cold War. And to understand this, we need to understand the nature of Jewish Political Psychology(along with that of homos).

When US emerged as the top power after WWI, it could have played for supreme power in the world or at least a model beacon to the world. And to be sure, Wilson did try to propose the American Way to the world. But did Wilson really mean it? No. He was really talking about democratizing parts of Europe. He didn’t much care for the non-whites whom he saw as backward and inferior.

Also, the fact that US soon lost interest in Europe and turned inward goes to show that the American DNA was not infected with messianism and ‘exceptionalist’ world domination. If anything, many Americans began to feel that US involvement in WWI was a big mistake. US cut down its military and lost interest in much of the world. It didn’t care what was happening elsewhere. And Americans had to be dragged into WWII via Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

One could say FDR was the first truly globe-shifting American. He wasn’t content to defeat Germany and Japan in WWII but pressured Europeans to let go of their empires after WWII. He didn’t like Churchill’s jokes about the Hindu darkies. But was FDR being idealistic or was he imbued with global ambition in which America would become the new hegemon along with the USSR, for which he had a soft spot.

Did he want Europeans to drop the empire so US could pick them up? Or did he just want non-white peoples to develop their own nations and have good relations with US whose intentions would NOT be imperialist and exploitative? I dunno. At any rate, it appears FDR wasn’t interested in dominating the world or have US be the sole superpower.

And then, the Cold War mostly had US shitting bricks playing a defensive role. The problem wasn’t only containing communism but preventing the alliance of non-communist non-white nations(rich with natural resources and populations) with the USSR, as happened with India and Egypt(before Sadat switched alliances).

Anyway, the kind of ‘exceptionalism’ that became the globo-neo-imperialism really only took hold after the Cold War. And we have to consider the Jewish Factor in this. Indeed, Jews were the great exceptionalists even during the Cold War.

American Policy during the Cold War was to accommodate the non-white peoples(even supporting them against former European colonizers) so that they would lean toward the US than to the USSR. And US could have done this in the Middle East and North Africa. As US had more to offer in terms of aid, all those nations should have leaned to the US than to the USSR. But why did some key Arab nations turn to USSR? Because of Israel. From the viewpoint of foreign policy, US support of Israel made no sense.

Why sacrifice alliance with key major Arab nations by supporting a small state of Israel that was NO strategic importance to the US? It was because Jews had great power in the US and were in the process of turning the Holocaust into a religion that had to be worshiped. The real McCarthyism of American Politics has been the witch-hunt for anyone who is not 100% committed to Israel and Holocaust as religion.

Jewish interests became an exceptionalist factor in America no matter how irrational they were.

American attitude after WWI goes to show that Americans were generally content to operate within the national model. And Americans might have done the same thing after WWII. It was the Cold War that forced Americans to become involved all over the world. Actually, not just the Cold War but the collapse of the European Colonial Order. IF the only two nations left in the world after WWII were US and USSR, US might have just ignored the commie USSR and went about its way. But the fall of the colonial order meant the possibility of the Third World lurching to the commie side. Unless US stepped into the fray of the Cold War, much of Asia, Africa, and Middle East could turn communist. And then the majority mestizos and natives of Latin America might rise too, either led by Latin leaders or by native/mestizos. And of course, US had to defend Western Europe too.

Anyway, when US saw China fall to the communists in no time, it began to shit. Just how did that happen? Maybe FDR invited Soviets cuz he wanted the commies to win. I dunno. Or maybe he underestimated the full implication of his Asian policy. It’s hard to discern what he really wanted cuz he was a devious man yet not without genuine ideals. Whatever the case, US fought the Cold War in the mode of Damage Control and to stop the bleeding, not to spread American domination all over the world. The main theme was “Don’t join the Soviets” than “Be sure to Join us” or "Be just like us."

But one thing for sure, after the Cold War, there really was no reason for US to get overly involved with the world. It could just trade with other nations, and that was it. Communism was dead. Even Latin American guerrillas pretty much gave it up.

North Vietnam may have won the war, but US won the peace, as Asian nations allied with the US made the real achievement in economy, politics, and health.

Russia ended the communist party and was ready to do business. The fall of the Berlin Wall earlier was epic. Soviets were willing to let its former subject nations go. Amazingly, the Russians went further and dismantled even the USSR itself. Russia gave up huge swaths of territory, especially Kazakstan and even Ukraine, culturally so close to Russia. And with no more Soviet support, Third World Marxist insurgencies were totally dead.

So, why didn’t America do what it did after WWI? Just mind its own business?

When WWII ended, the Cold War loomed. But when the Cold War ended, the global war was really over. There was no more need for more mega-conflicts. Francis Fuku was right on this. Even if the American/Western ideology won the great battle of ideas, most Western Europeans and Americans had no desire to transform the world.

But what Fuku failed to understand is that civilizations are not only ideological. They can be ethnological. If patriotic Anglo-Americans had firm control of the US after the Cold War, maybe things might have been different. But the so-called End of History also brought about the End of Anglo rule and rise of Jewish rule. And that changed everything.

When WWI ended, Anglo-Americans and other white Americans could just turn inward and be happy as Americans. They could accept the national model.

But Jews have always been uneasy with the gentile national model. It could mean gentile majority against Jewish minority. So, Jews feel safer playing with the globalist model. It weakens the national identity and loyalty within gentile nations. It turns white elites away from white masses(the coming apart) and makes them identify with the World as ‘global citizens’ and the source of masses of new immigrants. Globalism could undermine gentile unity in every nation. This is why Jews hate Viktor Orban in Hungary and the angry patriotic Poles. And of course, they hate Russian’s neo-nationalism that united Putin and other Russian elites with Russian masses. This has thwarted the Jewish takeover of Russia. Russia is friendly to Jews, but that isn’t enough. Jews feel that unless majority gentile power is totally destroyed, they won’t be safe as supremacist overlords. Jews have strange dreams of naked Trumps and Putins coming after them with Nazi armbands and SS dildos to shove up their arses. (Indeed, American Exceptionalism is as much about the American gentile masses surrendering to the world as the world surrendering to American power. Invite/Invade. And American Values are to be decided by Jews and homos rather than by gentile straights who make up the great majority, whose fate is to be rendered into just another minority by mass immigration. American Exceptionalism is not about the world being transformed by the values/culture of the white Christian majority. It is about both the world and white American Christian majority surrendering to the power of Jews, homos, and gangster rappers. If anything, even as American Exceptionalism imbues Americans with special pride and power, it also fills white Americans with guilt, shame, and inferiority for not working hard enough to transform America faster into a multi-culti state like Brazil. This 'exceptionalism' is as much about White America being demographically conquered by the world as about American Power conquering the world via finance, bombs,and trash culture. American Exceptionalism is a crazy game where white Americans are told that they are winning by losing.)

So, after the Cold War, Jews pushed US into a globalist mode. They cooked up this notion of ‘proposition nation’ and ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation that must involve itself with the rest of the world(usually for the sake of Zionist interests, which is why most of US wars have been in the Middle East and North Africa and other Muslim nations than elsewhere). What has happened to the US as the result of Jewish takeover since the end of the Cold War is sickening. So much of US aggression and justification thereof around the world are fantastic, gratuitous, surreal, ludicrous, and etc. Since Jews cannot say they are steering US policy for their own tribal interest, they cook up all sorts of crazy stuff. Jews especially use homos as their proxy. I mean the idea of a ‘new cold war’ with Russia because homos are not allowed to prance around on Red Square. I mean who would have thought such a day would have been possible during the real Cold War? Even Mad Magazine would have passed it over as loony even for humor.

What is so exasperating about Jews is they mask their supremacism with hysteria about ‘white supremacism’. Take the Jewish hostility against Donald Trump. Trump isn’t anti-Jewish or anti-Israel. He is calling for civic nationalism. Too many Americans haven fallen behind, and American workers need something too after globalists and upper crust have been devouring most of the economic pie. Also, too much money has been spent on overseas wars and too many American soldiers have come back wounded or worse. So, let’s intervene less, let’s have good relations with Russia, and let’s offer something for the American Worker and blacks too(who also must compete with immigrants, though, to be sure, maybe some blacks want immigrants to work, pay taxes, and support the government that supports them).

Trump’s ‘America First’ means America should go into national mode and take care of its own citizens first. There is nothing supremacist about it. Also, Trump’s policies would be better for Muslims and Arabs since fewer US wars will lead to fewer destruction of Arab/Muslim nations.

But Trump is seen as Hitler by so many Jews. Of course, Jews know he is NOT Hitler. So, why are Jews so upset? It’s because Trump’s civic nationalism gets in the way of Jewish Hitlerism or Jewish supremacism. Fewer wars in the Middle East means less chance for Zionists to destroy Arab/Muslim nations for the sake of Israel.

And if Americans go into national mode and try to do things that are good for American people as a whole, there might be more scrutiny into Wall Street and other such institutions. Rich Jews would have to be more mindful of doing things that are good for all Americans instead of just themselves. America that thinks nationally than globally will pay more attention to all the social and political ills IN America, and that means the rulimg elites will be made more accountable.

End of mass immigration(at current levels) means American elites, Jews or otherwise, must be more responsive and accountable to American citizens. In contrast, more immigration means they can renege on such duty. How? They can exploit the immigrant labor willing work like slaves from gratitude of having been allowed entry. Also, as the elites praise the immigrants as the ‘true Americans’, native-born majority Americans will have to take the backseat. If native-born Americans complain, the elites can show off their ‘moral credentials’ as the champions of ‘diversity’ and the ‘huddled masses’, especially against ‘ugly’ nativism and ‘xenophobia’. This way, Jewish supremacism is protected.

Also, globalism means the US keeps finding new enemies around the world. Thus, by directing American rage at Russia or Iran or whatever, dumb Americans pay less far less attention to their real problems at home created by their rotten ruling elites.

America in National Mode means most Americans will pay attention to domestic affairs and call out on elite abuse or corruption. But America in global mode means the elites can divert American attention from domestic abuse and corruption to Evil Foreigners. It is surreal that Jews who accuse patriots of ‘xenophobia’ have no qualms about fanning hatred against certain other nations. So, never mind what the Wikileaks say about the massive amount of domestic corruption and collusion. Just remember that Russia and Putin are behind it, and Trump is their ‘puppet’. Jewish supremacist oligarchs are behind Hillary, and they push globalism to expand Jewish ethnic power, but they hire lunatics like Anne Killer of Forward to bitch and whine about how naked Trump is Hitler whose policy of banning Muslim immigration is Holocaust for Mexicans who apparently make good interfaith daughters for Jewish lesbians.

The world is a dangerous place because of Jewish Dominationism. It is the only Dominationism left standing even though Jews keep projecting it onto other groups, especially Russians and Iranians(though at times at Chinese too).

Dominationism used to define much of the world until the end of WWII, though vestiges lasted until the end of the Cold War.

Several nations, mostly European, once sought domination over the world. They didn’t necessarily want to rule the whole world but they either wanted to be #1 or one of the very great powers. The British were into dominationism, especially after they eclipsed the Spanish in naval domination. The French were full of dominationism, especially under Napoleon who sought to control all of Europe and even invaded Russia.

Dominationism is about more than being dominant in one’s own nation or domain. It is a ambition to gain disproportionate control over a domain much larger than one’s homeland. Romans were dominationist.
Japanese ruling over Japan was not dominationist, but Japanese designs on rest of Asia was dominationist.
In contrast, even though the Chinese practiced middle kingdom arrogance and regional dominance, they weren’t truly dominationist because they were content with control over their core domain.

In contrast, Spain was dominationist and so was Portugal. They tried to become the dominant powers in the world through navigation, trade, and colonization. But Brits and French overtook them, and they too went into dominationist mode. And they fought many wars, often with one another. And then later, Germans caught the same bug. They too wanted to build a huge navy and grab imperial loot. And Russia began to conquer and dominate non-Russian lands in Central Asia and Eastern Europe and even Scandinavia. These contentions led to Napoleonic Wars and finally World War I. And Japan caught the dominantionist bug in Asia, first taking small pieces but then targeting China and Southeast Asia.

No nation that would be a ‘great power’ was content with its own nation and borders. It had to control other territories, other nations, other kingdoms, other regions, the seas and skies. Japan wasn’t content with Japan. Germany wasn’t content with Germany. Italy wasn’t content with Italy. It too wanted to be great, a neo-roman empire with African territories. Brits and French ruled over vast empires. Germans and Japanese, both latecomers, wanted their piece of the pie. Japan invaded China, Germany invaded Russia in WWII. In WWI, the great powers and would-be-great-powers beat the crap out of each other. The Ottomans, a once great power, clung to its fading empire by latching onto the Germans.

WWI dealt a huge blow to dominationism, but it didn’t die. France and Brits lost a lot of people and the war was costly, but they managed to hold onto their empires and still qualify as great powers. Japan expanded its position in Asia. Italy got to feeling big about itself, and Mussolini came to power. Germany and Russia seemed like the two big losers, but communism armed Russia with new expansionism, and Germany turned to the most extreme form of dominationism with the rise of Nazism.

Back then, there were several dominationist contenders: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Russia. The Turks were out as they wisely made peace with the loss of the Ottoman Empire, and they went about minding national issues.

But it wasn’t long before WWII cured all those nations of dominationism. Both winners and losers lost taste for it. Germany got defeated horribly, many times worse than in WWI. Japan got demolished. France was humiliated in defeat at hands of Germans and had to be saved by detested Brits and Americans. Italy was exposed as a paper tiger. Russia prevailed and even took over Eastern Europe, but the war was so costly and destructive that Russians were mostly involved with rebuilding. And its military was designed more for defense than offense contrary to US fears that USSR might swallow all of Europe. And the prospect of nuclear war tempered both US and USSR.

Europeans decided that the sane thing is to live with one another instead of seeking domination over one another. So many horrible wars had been fought among Europeans over domination, empire, territory, revenge, and hatred. Some of these wars were near-genocidal, like the Thirty Years War. But just as Catholics and Protestants had earlier decided to just respect one another and stop butchering one another, modern European peoples finally decided to bury the hatchet after WWII. No more hard feelings and vengeance. It’s like, at some point, Christendom and the Muslim world had also decided to just leave each other alone and stop bashing one another. (The Zionist destruction of the Muslim World, broken borders, and mass migration of Muslims/Africans into Europe may lead to new 'clashes of civilizations' in the West: National Whites vs Cuck Whites vs Jews vs Muslims vs Africans.)

Europeans were able to overcome dominationism because of the horrifying lessons of the war. Also, as Jerry Muller wrote in Foreign Affairs, it was because the borderlines and population transfers after WWII produced homogeneous nation-states. With each nation being made up mostly of its own kinfolk, there was less need for tension and conflict. (In contrast, Soviet Occupation of Eastern Bloc nations led to East German rebellions, Polish riots, Hungarian uprising, and Czech uprisings; and the diverse crazy quilt of Yugoslavia led to the wars in the 90s.) The miracle of post WWII was that Europeans discovered they could live with one another in mutual peace and forgiveness as long as each people relinquished dominationism.
Europeans began to care more about goodness than greatness, cooperation than domination.
Even in the Soviet-occupied Eastern Bloc, there was relative peace since Soviets allowed each Warsaw Pact nation to mind its own affairs within its borders. It was empire by indirect rule. For so very long, Europeans had thought such peace was impossible. Each nation once had so many narratives and legends of their great heroes fighting the evil nasty bad guys of other kingdoms or nations. Each side felt so justified, even to the point of bloodlust toward other peoples.

And Europeans once harbored such feelings toward Jews. The Jewish Question was asked over and over whether Christian folks can live with Jews. But after WWII, Europeans decided Jews are okay too. Everyone could get along as long as they all relinquished dominationism. After all, dominationism had led to so many wars over the centuries that sometimes led to near-genocidal wars. So many people got ‘genocided’ in WWII. Not only Jews in holocaust but millions of dead Poles, Germans, Russians, etc. Who needed more of this? Even though WWII was more destructive than WWI, there was less bad blood after it ended than following the previous war. Paradoxically, the total-shit-facing of just about every nation taught it a most valuable lesson. Supremacism and chauvinism lead to mayhem and disaster for all. Therefore, much of the hatred that once seemed ineradicable among nations and ethnic groups melted away. Also, France and UK soon lost their empires and returned home. They made peace with the outcome, even though there were some hard-fought wars, especially in Vietnam and Algeria. Europeans learned to get along and do business with non-whites without dominationist empires.

And in the East, Japan lost its entire empire, renounced war, and decided to be a good nation and trading partner with the world. No more banzai imperial rising sun crap.

Americans could have been filled with dominationism as they were the undisputed great power after WWII, not least because its homeland was untouched by destruction. But America didn’t go into dominationist mode. Though it totally crushed Japan, it generously aided its rebuilding and even felt a bit sorry for having dropped the two big ones. And instead of gloating as the dominant power, it came up with Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe and was ultimately magnanimous with Germany that soon rebuilt itself into the main economy of Europe.

And in the Cold War, US mostly played a defensive role to contain communism and spread of ‘world liberation movements’ allied with Soviets(who themselves didn’t know what to make of these movements). Even in Vietnam, US wasn’t trying to take north Vietnam but only trying to save the South from communism up north.

And US took weak measures against Castro’s Cuba. Maybe American elites felt some degree of guilt of having treated Cuba like a sleazy whore for too long. They could see that Castro and revolutionaries were inspired and popular whereas the most prominent Cuban exiles were gangsters, oligarchs, playboys, sharks, or stooges of the CIA.

Anyway, the 80s showed that Wasps, Russians, and Chinese were not into dominationism either. China under Deng wanted to change and just develop economically. Russians had enough of the Cold War. They wanted peace and were even willing to give up Eastern Bloc on promise that US would not seek dominationism by exploiting Russian weakness. And Reagan, upon sensing good will in Gorbachev, was eager to end the Cold War as soon as possible. With the end of the Cold War, it could really have been the end of dominationism all over the world.

But, there was one group that was not willing to give it up. The Jews.

This is rather odd. While it’s true that Jews did have problems with Europeans and Christians for a long time — just like French, Germans, Russians, Poles, Brits, Turks, Greeks, and etc had problems with one another, sometimes leading to horrible wars and retaliations — , Europeans and Christians really buried the hatchet with Jews after WWII, especially in Western Europe(though things got a bit hostile in Eastern Europe once Zionist Israel allied with the US). As the Germans, French, Brits, Italians, and etc were all getting along with another — and despite the Iron Curtain, the relations between Western Europeans and Eastern Europeans were cordial on a personal/social basis — , Jews could have joined in like everyone else. After WWII and Holocaust, most Europeans lost the stomach for antisemitism, especially the overt kind, and new generation of kids were raised to tolerate and accept Jews, even love Jews. It was much the same in the US. So, Jews and whites could have gotten along famously after WWII. There was no more need for bad blood.

But Jews felt otherwise. Why?

Did Jews have dominationism on their minds from the outset? Or did they become addicted to power as they came into vast wealth, power, and influence? It seems much of Jewish vitriol against Trump and Putin has nothing to do with prospect of New Nazism. There is zero chance of gentiles rounding up Jews and doing horrible things. What Jews fear is the loss of their supremacist status, their dominationist control over others. At one time, immediately following WWII, it is possible that Jews mainly had survival and well-being on their minds. But as they rapidly gained in power, privilege, and influence, they got accustomed to an existence that has value and meaning ONLY IF Jews are at the very top and bossing everyone around, even to the point of telling them not to use the word ‘bossy’.

Consider Putin and Jews. There are lots of rich Jews in Russia. Putin goes out of his way to accommodate the Jewish community. But that isn’t enough for Jews because Russian nationalism stands in the way of Jewish supremacist domination of the kind that defined Russia in the 90s. Jews prefer a Russia where most Russians are defeated & humiliated while Jews rule supreme than a Russia where things are good for both Jews and Russians.

And there is nothing in Trump’s platform that would do any harm to Jews. There are no anti-Jewish laws or anything of the kind. The only difference would be that a new civic nationalism would require Jews to be mindful of what is good for ALL Americans. Jews simply cannot abide by this. It’s either their way or.. it’s the Holocaust!! Anything other than Jewish dominationism and Jewish supremacism is the ‘Holocaust’ as Jews see it.

And this mindset is so deeply embedded in the sicko American political landscape(shaped by Jewish power) that we get strange statements about Israel and Palestinians. So, if anyone makes the slightest suggestion that Palestinians be given some consideration in the West Bank, we have shrill hysteria(from both Democrats and Republicans, even from Trump) that this is ‘throwing Israel under the bus’, it is ‘new holocaust’, and etc. I mean Zionists have total domination over Palestinians who still live under Occupation. Yet, even a modest proposal for some justice for Palestinians is seen as ‘new holocaust’ on the horizon for Jews. The most supremacist people bitch incessantly about how they are about to be destroyed by antisemitic supremacism when most critics of Zionism are only calling for a fair resolution to the West Bank crisis.

Jewish supremacists sound so much like the Nazis. Nazis sought supremacist control over other peoples, but they constantly bitched about how the poor poor Germans were being oppressed and done wrong by other peoples. In a way, even Nazi German complaint had more validity than the current Jewish hysteria. After all, Germans were treated badly in Sudetenland; and Stalin’s fate for Baltic Germans were pretty grim. But Jews are doing fine in America, EU, and Israel, even in Russia. Jewsare well-protected even in Iran. If some Jews are periodically attacked in EU, it’s because of massive immigration of Muslims(with full support of Jewish globalists). And if there is some Palestinian violence against Israelis, well, the Occupation is still going on, and Israelis keep building more settlements.

Holocaust Cult has blinded Jews to the idea that they themselves could become evil and supremacist. They are so used to seeing themselves as victims of Nazi racial supremacism that they are blind to their own abuse of power and overly sensitive to any criticism of Jewish power.

And spectacular Jewish success in so many fields have accustomed Jews to the mindset that they are entitled to lead super-privileged lives with complete obedience from the gentile population. Jews have become so spoiled in the US and EU — where Holocaust Cult is a religion — that they expect the same kind of treatment all over the world and get awful angry when they don’t get it. So, they use the might of US and NATO to smash any gentile nation they don’t like, mostly in Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe as Russia is in the crosshairs.

The tragedy of WWII led to one great moral triumph for most peoples: the abandonment of dominationism and willingness to respect other nations and get along in peace and mutual respect. Just a decade after WWII, it was amazing how the Europeans were getting along and cooperating. One might think the greatest war in history never happened. They were willing to bury the hatchet,and this goodwill was extended to Jews as well.

But Jews, due to Holocaust neurosis, radical personality, new-found arrogance of great success, or whatever, decided to work in bad faith and serve their own dominationism. And American Jews dragged Anglo-cucks into this madness, and we have whores like Hillary and John McCain barking at Russia and arming Jihadis in Syria to take down secular modernizer Assad.
We have a useless ‘new cold war’ that makes no sense apart from Jewish ethno-supremacism. We have these horrible wars in the Middle East and North Africa that were concocted by Zionist-globalists. And with the massive migration of ‘refugees’ and migrants from Africa and Muslim world to Europe, national borders are in tatters.

The great achievement of end of WWII was the clear demarcation of national borders and the creation of stable national populations. But Jews have this crazy idea that the gentile national model means new rise of Nazism, and so, Jews support open borders and diversity so that gentiles will be forever in conflict with other gentiles.

And so, the world is going to pot once again. The golden opportunity was lost.
And who knows? If things get so horribly bad in Europe, maybe there will be the rise of new extreme antisemitism once again.

The Nature of White/Jewish Relationship. A White Guy and a Jewish Guy Hanging on a Cliff

Whites and Jews have a strange relationship. At some point, something's gotta give.

Imagine two people hanging on a cliff. One person attempts by every trick in the book to make the other person fall, but the latter does everything he can muster to ensure that the other guy(who is trying to make him fall) makes it safely to the top.

Something's gotta give in this crazy equation.
But then, Jews operate this scenario effectively because they are not totally anti-white. (After all, if Jews were committed to destroying all white lives, every white would be forced to unite with other beleaguered whites and fight Jewish Power.) Jews generously reward white collaborators -- the best and the brightest of the white gentiles -- like the Clintons, Bidens, and Bushes who get their thirty pieces of silver(and more) by serving globalism.

So, maybe the Jewish/White relationship is more like three people on the cliff. The Jew, the white collaborator, and the ordinary white guy. The Jew tries to make the ordinary white guy fall, and the white collaborator helps the Jew, of course with the tacit understanding that the collaborator will be carried along to the top for his cucky services against his racial brethren, the ordinary white guy.

Until the Trump campaign, even the ordinary white guy(duped by Conservatism Inc) was trying to help the Jewish guy make it to the top despite being bitten, gouged in the eyes, boxed in the ears, and pounded on the fingers by the Jew and the white collaborator.

But Trump offered the ordinary white guy an alternative rope along another side of the cliff, and so, the Jew and the collaborator are fuming over Trump's defiant deviance from the globalist script. But how long will the Trump rope hold?

The white collaborator is promised the joys of globo-super-privilege for his role in destroying the ordinary white guy whose only expectation in life was security and well-being as an American citizen.
Perversely enough, the Jew and the white collaborator attack the ordinary white guy as a symbol of of 'white privilege'(and even 'white supremacism') when, in fact, all of 'white privilege' in the Age of Globalism accrues only to Jews and their craven gentile collaborators(among the whites, mulattoes, browns, and yellows).

Why are Jews filled with such anti-white vitriol?

An organism is driven by fear & anxiety and seeks to secure its survival... or better yet, its dominance.

Jews are the dominant organism in the Global System and American hierarchy.

The Jewish Organism understands that other ethno-organisms or ethnorganisms tend to envy, resent, and target the organism that has the most power and privilege. It is the political logic of the King of the Hill. Those at the bottom of the hill go after those on top of the hill. The Jewish Organism or Zio-Organism(or Ziorganism) is the King of the Hill and visible as such to any honest & clear-eyed person.

So, the Ziorganism, as the King of the Hill, uses various tactics to shield itself from attacks by other ethnorganisms.

By spraying the narco-toxin of moral outrage over 'white privilege' and 'white supremacism', Jews seek to paralyze or divert the anti-Ziorganic feelings of gentile ethnorganisms.

The narco-toxin that vilifies 'white privilege' has a paralyzing effect on the White Ethnorganism. Injected and infected with 'white guilt', the White Ethnorganism loses the prideful will and determination to challenge the Dominant Power of the Ziorganism. Thus, the Ziorganism maintains supremacy over the White Ethnorganism that remains in servile mode before its Jewish Master Organism. Morality is a tool of power among organisms, and it is the powerful that tweaks the politics of morality to suit its own interests.

At any rate, this narco-toxin is also effective in controlling the potentially anti-Jewish rage of non-white ethnorganisms. Ziorganism is nervous about Afrorganism, Islamorganism, Latinorganism, Mongorganism, and etc. because they, as 'people of color', aren't contaminated with 'white guilt' and 'Holocaust Guilt'. If anything, Jewish Media/Academia Narrative have instilled non-whites with moral pride as victims of Western Imperialism and White Racism. Thus, non-whites have the pride of victim-hood. Since they see themselves as noble victims, they naturally feel hostile to the ruling power of the West. Since Ziorganism rules the West, Jews are the natural target of non-white ethnorganisms.

This is why the narco-toxin of the moral outrage about 'white privilege' and 'white supremacism' is useful to Jews. By screaming 'Nazi' and 'KKK' 24/7, the Ziorganism creates the illusion among non-white ethnorganisms that 'white people' still have and control everything. Thus, non-white hostility is diverted away from Jewish elites and directed toward whites(in America and even abroad in Russia, even though Russian whites have been among the greatest victims of Jewish venom either in the form of radical communism, finance capitalism, or Zio-Globalist warmongering).

Jews promote anti-white hatred for a reason. It is not about morality or justice. It is really the survival strategy of the Zio-Organism to maintain its dominance over other ethno-organisms.

White People Must Seek White Liberation from Jewish Enslavement

White people are the least free people in America because they are beholden to another people.
White people may have higher incomes on average than certain other groups, but they are not free.

Blacks are freer than whites because they are not beholden to Jews. Blacks don't give a crap about Jews. Blacks are all about black identity and interests. They are all about black power and black lives. They put their identity and interests before others.

Browns are freer than whites because they are not beholden to Jews. Browns don't give a crap about Jews. Browns are all about brown identity and interests. They are all about brown power and brown lives. They put their identity and interests before others.

Muslims are freer than whites because they are not beholden to Jews. Muslims don't give a crap about Jews. Muslims are all about Muslim identity and interests. They are all about Muslim power and Muslim lives. They put their identity and interests before others.

Hindus are freer than whites because they are not beholden to Jews. Hindus don't give a crap about Jews. Hindus are all about Hindu identity and interests. They are all about Hindu power and Hindu lives. They put their identity and interests before others.

They are free because they don't prioritize ANOTHER people before their own. They are free to be themselves, defend themselves, represent themselves, and serve themselves. Even if they make less money than whites, they are freer because they are not beholden to the supremacist egotism of another race. They serve their own people, not another people.

But whites put another people before their own. Whites put Jews before themselves. Whites serve Jews before their own. Whites even worship Jews. Whites crave Jewish approval and fear-and-tremble at Jewish disapproval.
White Conservatives hope that IF they serve Jews in this manner, Jews will favor whites and work with whites. White Conservatives hope that IF whites put Jewish interests above their own, Jews will reciprocate by putting white interests just below Jewish interests: Jews will be masters, but whites will be the most favored group right below Jews.

But this has been a pipe dream. When whites put Jews above themselves, Jews demanded that whites put even blacks, browns, Muslims, Homos, and Hindus above white identity and interests. For Jews, it is not enough that whites serve Jews. Jews demand that whites must serve OTHER minorities as well... until whites themselves become a minority from the huge demographic shift. Only by turning whites into a gentile minority contending with other gentile minorities will Jewish supremacism be ensured. Jews at the top will get to play divide-and-rule among goyim.

So, whites began to lose out when they put Jewish interests above their own. Whites lost their freedom when they made Jews masters over them. A free man puts himself before others. A free people put themselves before other peoples. After all, a master is free and puts his interests above that of his slaves. A slave, in contrast, must always put his master's interests above his own.

Whites are slaves of Jews because they put Jewish interests above white interests.
This is why Jews fear Trump's role as Spartacus or Lawrence of Arabia. It is a slave rebellion. Whites who support Trump are saying "We want to put white interests above Jewish interests." Jews fume, "How dare they!" Jews accuse Trump supporters of 'white supremacism', but Trump supporters are only struggling for White Liberation from Jewish tyranny.
After all, what have whites reaped from serving Jews and putting Jewish interests before their own? Jews stole massive fortunes through Wall Street, waged Wars for Israel in which countless gentiles died, opened the immigration floodgates to swamp whites demographically, used PC to inculcate whites with self-loathing and paralyzing guilt, promoted interracism that encourages white women to reject white men and use their wombs to create black babies, and etc.

Whites need to be like blacks, browns, Muslims, Hindus, and Jews. Those other groups are all free because they don't put another people before their own. Whites are not free because they put another people, the Jews, above their own. Worse, Jewish masters ordered whites to put even the interests of blacks, browns, Hindus, and Muslims above those of whites(not because Jews feel affection for non-whites but because non-whites are useful as weapons against white majority power; after all, in the Middle East, Jews use white Christian soldiers to bomb and kill countless Muslims). Jews aren't content with whites being slaves of Jews. Jews insist that whites must be servile to ALL peoples. Just listen to the vile hatred of Jew Tim Wise.

Why do Jews hate Russia? In the 90s, Jewish oligarchs plundered most of the Russian economy and gained control of most institutions. They forced Russians to put Jewish power and interests above those of Russians. Russians were turned into slaves of Jews. But Putin rolled back some of this Jewish supremacist power and put Russian interests before Jewish interests. Russia was thus liberated from Jewish tyranny(if not entirely).
Liberation for Russians is seen as 'tyranny' to Jews. The idea of Russians putting Russian identity and interests above those of Jews is anathema to the Zio-globalists. This is why Jews hate, hate, and hate Trump's idea that the US should be friends with Russia. They fear that the Russian will-to-freedom might spread to the US. Jews see gentile freedom as a 'virus'. The idea that white American gentiles should favor their own identity and interests above those of Jews(just like Jews favor their own identity and interests above all else) is intolerable to Jews. Jews have a Yahweh Complex that makes them feel, "Thou shalt have no interest before ours."

No people are free unless they put their identity and interests above those of others. When a people put another people's interests above their own, they become like Hindus under British Imperialism or Algerians under French imperialism.
Whites are now under Jewish globo-imperialism.
Hindus eventually pushed out the British and put their own interests first and foremost in India. And Algerians did the same in their own homeland.

White America will be free ONLY WHEN white people think and act like Jews, blacks, Hindus, & Muslims and say loud and clear, WE ARE WHITE AND WE PUT WHITE IDENTITY AND INTERESTS BEFORE ALL OTHERS. After all, most non-white groups feel that way, think that way, and act that way.

According to Jews, white freedom = 'white supremacism'.
Jews feel this way because they expect whites to put Jewish interests above their own. Only when white slaves serve Jewish supremacism are they tolerable to nasty and vicious Jewish globalists.

Well, we say F*** YOU to SOROS and his ilk and their whores and cucks.

Jews are the most patriotic and nationalist people... but for their own kind of course

In one way, Jews are the most patriotic people in America... except not to America but to Israel and Jewish Diaspora Empire, or Diaspire.
Jewish Globalists are different from white globalists. White globalists really want to surrender their identity, sovereignty, & heritage and just join the globo-club of cosmo-privilege. In contrast, Jewish elites use globalism to strengthen and consolidate Jewish Power and Control over the world. For Jews, globalism(like liberalism) is a tool for what are essentially ethnic identity and interests. After all, white globalists don't demand that all Americans praise and worship White America, but Jewish Globalists require all gentiles to attend AIPAC Nuremberkowicz Rallies and hail Israel and Jewish People sky high.

In a way, the Jewish way makes sense from their own perspective. Jews didn't come to America as humble immigrants to assimilate with the white gentile majority. Indeed, what set Jews apart from other peoples through the ages has been their powerful Will to cling to identity & history and resist total assimilation.
Jews chose accommodation over assimilation. They had to seek accommodation with gentile surroundings to do business and work up the social ladder. But they despised gentiles as dumb, naive, earnest, brutish, and less civilized. Jewish attitude toward gentiles can be found in Polack Jokes. Jews hated gentiles who noticed & exposed Jewish power-lust. But Jews also despised gentiles-who-trusted-Jews as dupes and useful idiots.

So, even though many Jews did come to America as poor folks, their ultimate Will to Power was to rule over white masses. They had an imperialist mindset. Their attitude towards white gentiles was akin to British attitudes towards Asian Indians, Spanish attitude towards native Meso-Americans, Japanese imperialist attitude towards Manchurians, Prussian elites attitude towards Poles(in Polish areas under Prussian occupation), and Anglo-Afrikaner attitude towards the black majority in South Africa. Afrikaner nationalism couldn't represent black South African nationalism since the two mindsets and narratives were so very different.
Likewise, despite white gentile fantasies of 'Judeo-Christian' America, Jews never saw themselves as part of any 'Christian' civilization. They equated Christianity mainly with the antisemitic resistance to the Jewish Will to Power seeking domination over gentiles. But since Jews didn't gain dominance by power of gunboats and bombs(except in Israel) but through power of money and media, their imperialism has been invisible. Jews are the Invisible Imperialists.

Even though Jews are indeed globalist, they are also deeply nationalist and patriotic. The problem is that their patriotism isn't the patriotism of gentiles. Why should Jews be patriotic to white Christian/gentile America? If patriotism means love of one's own people and culture, then Jews should be all about Jewish identity and power. Since Jews don't have the power of numbers in gentile-majority nations, they cannot use Jewish nationalism to defeat and dominate over white gentiles. They can use blatant nationalism to their advantage ONLY IN Israel where they are the solid majority.
But in non-Jewish nations, promoting nationalism would be counter-productive since gentiles will get the idea that their own nationalism is a good thing(and such nationalism will resist the hostile power of the Jews with different identity and interests). So, Jews in the West attack and suppress nationalism while surreptitiously serving their own Jewish nationalism behind the rubric of globalism. Esoteric nationalism or eso-nationalism.

Jewish attitude in the US is similar to British policy across their once mighty empire. Brits feared the rise of Asian Indian nationalism, so it was suppressed, and Asian Indians were encouraged to identify with the glory and might of the British globo-empire and the Queen, the AIPAC of its day. Don't serve your Hindu identity and nationhood; instead, serve the empire(that brings light of civilization to all peoples) and the Queen.

Even so, the Brits were very proud to be British, and this show of nationalism got their subject peoples to wondering.. "If nationalism is good for the Brits, why is it bad for us?" So, the British empire began to fall apart when various peoples became nationalistic in their own manner.
Jews fear gentile nationalism for the same reason. Jewish globalist empire will be shaken if various peoples feel more national pride and work toward national sovereignty to free themselves from the likes of George Soros, Google Jews, and Bloomberg.

Just like Hindus wondered, "If nationalism is good for Anglos, why is it bad for us?", we need to ask, "If nationalism is good for Zionists and Jews, why is it bad for us?" And from that question, white folks may finally wake up from the Great Hoodwinking by the globo-Jewish-supremacists.

So-called 'Progressives' and 'Liberals' Really Hate Trump because he has exposed their addiction to greed, narcissism, and privilege.

Democrats portray Trump as some extreme right-wing bigot but really feel threatened by the impression that Trump is for the Common Man left behind by the globalist system that favors the globalist urban gentry. Progs want to believe that they are for the little guy, but their candidate is a globalist shill who serves the likes of Wall Street and Warfare State. Hillary pretends to care about 'refugees', but they exist only because of Zionist-led wars in the Middle East that destroyed entire nations and displaced millions of people. Prog urban gentry soar in wealth and privilege over the little guys, but through the mass importation of littler guys(immigrants), they excoriate the little guys who oppose their own demographic displacement as 'racist' while flattering themselves as compassionate champions of the 'huddled masses' as the salt of the earth. Of course, the 'New Americans',as scab labor, fatten the wallets of the elite urban class.

Trump, in appealing to those who'd been left behind, has merged nationalism with populism.It's been a potent message to American Workers reduced to the penury status of interchangeable commodities in the globo-marketplace. Such conditions were what they Left used to bemoan, but it is now behind Hillary the corporate shill. How embarrassing it must be for Progs to be outed as utterly hollow and phony by, of all people, crass Trump and 'rednecks'.

Progs really hate Trump because he has co-opted key 'leftist' issues. The fact that he of all people has taken them up and won the backing of the American Working Class has exposed the Liberal Class as clinging to their privilege at all cost. And through the power of the Jewish-run media, they maintain the illusion that they are 'radicals' opposed to Hate. Of course, they conveniently turn a blind eye to all the lives destroyed by Obama & Hillary's wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. Or Hillary's coup in Honduras. In the end, it all comes down to power and privilege. And the narcissistic conceit that one is 'more evolved' because one buys coffee at Starbucks.

True Power

Real Power is not about the Rule of Law but who is above the law.
But True Power is about who is above the law by the rule of law.

White Folks Must Resist PALESTINIANIZATION

White Folks must resist Palestinianization. Just as Jewish Imperialists carried out Palestinian Genocide, they are now working on White Genocide. Jewish globo-imperialists attempted White Genocide in Russia in the 1990s, and millions of Russians died while Jews grabbed all the loot. Putin took back some of the loot, and that is why Jews hate him. Jewish globalists see the world as their oyster and want to have it all. We are cattle that exist to serve them.

White people must not be Palestinianized. Consider the plight of Palestinians. A defeated, exiled, and occupied people. But no one cares about them because Jewish elites control the media and narrative. Through AIPAC, Jewish elites have turned all US politicians into vile supporters of Palestinian Genocide.
We know Jewish elites have the same plan for the white gentile race as a whole.

Jewish Globo-Imperialists use Western power to destroy the Middle East, and then they pressure white nations to take in all the refugees uprooted by Wars for Israel(while Israel waits to pounce on and grab emptied Arab territories). Jewish globalists pretend to be humanitarians, but they are the power behind the Wars in the Middle East. And they are the ones who are pressuring white nations to take in endless numbers of Muslim refugees and African migrants.

And in order to weaken white resistance to their grand plan, Jewish perverts have promoted homomania and tranny agenda. That way, white males will be raised to be girly pansies or eunuchs without the virile will to fight for their land, defend their women, and control their own destiny. While Jewish globalists promote black masculinity in rap and sports, they promote wussy cuckold behavior among white boys. If Jewish elites can help it, every white womb will carry a black baby while castrated white boys cheer on their own sexual defeat.

This is the Palestinianization of the white race.

The white race owes a great apology to the Palestinians. Even though Palestinians never did any wrong to the West, white people aided Jewish Zionists in the utter destruction of Palestine: The Palestinian Genocide.
And this was especially egregious since Palestinians were forced to pay the price for the crimes of Nazi Germany. Germans carried out the Holocaust, but for some reason, Palestinians had to carry the moral burden; they were made the scapegoat.
Zionists destroyed Palestine, and the white West gave full blessing to the destruction of an innocent people.

It is time for white people to apologize for having aided and abetted the Palestinian Genocide. Currently, since what was done to Palestinians is being done to the West, white people need to join with Palestinians to resist and fight the common foe: Jewish Globalists.

It is time to denounce Palestinian Genocide and White Genocide, both spearheaded by Zionist-Globalists or the Zio-Glob.

RESIST PALESTINIANIZATION.

For too long, white people believed that powerful and rich Jews would gratefully reciprocate if white people supported the Jewish-Zionist destruction of Palestinians and the Middle East.
But we now know that Jewish globalists have zero feeling for anyone but their own kind.
They feel no conscience about the destruction of Palestine.
They feel no gratitude to whites for having aided the Zionist project.
Jews only seek to further destroy the Middle East so that Muslims will be expelled to the West while Israelis get ready to grab huge swaths of Syria and Iraq.
And Jewish globalists use the Tide of Color in the West to undermine white power and bring about White Genocide.

Say NO to Palestinianization.

It is time for white folks to realize that they'd sided with the wrong people all along.
When the Zionists were hatching a plan to destroy Palestine, white folks should have stood with Palestinians against Jewish imperialists. But instead, white folks helped the Jewish imperialists destroy Palestine and laughed at the plight of Palestinians.

But now, white folks are realizing that Jews intend to palestinianize the white race as well. Jews are plotting White Genocide and carrying it out in EU and US. They use shabbos goyim like Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton. Say NO to Palestinianization.

SAY NO!!!

Jews hate Russia because Russians said NO to the palestinianization of the Russian people. White folks in the West must wake up and save themselves the same way.

HOW THE LEFT WENT FROM A MAJORITY IDEOLOGY TO A MINORITY IDEOLOGY. HOW IT MAY BECOME AN MAJORITY IDEOLOGY ONCE AGAIN.

The Left began as a majority ideology.

In the French Revolution, there was the Nationalist Idea that the leaders should represent the People, the majority masses.

France was ruled by the King and aristocratic minority that held much of the wealth, power, and privileges. Also, the French kings and aristocrats felt closer to fellow royalty and noblemen of OTHER kingdoms than with their own downtrodden people. (It's rather like smaller version of the globalist elites who rub shoulders & attend same fancy schools but sneer at their own hoi polloi and even try to destroy the power of the masses by importing tons of immigrants and accusing the native masses of 'racism' for resisting the invasion.)

The original Left was about nationalism and rise of people power. It was about new breed of leaders representing the Will of the People, the great majority.

America was crucial in how the new politics would play out.

It became the richest and most powerful nation on earth, and for most of its history, it was led by white elites for the good of the white masses. Although all elites constitute minorities(by class if not race), elites who share race & culture with the masses feel a sense of unity, a common bond. White gentile elites were a minority-by-class but of the majority-by-race. White elites and white masses had race and culture in common if not much else. And this mattered.

When America, the richest and most powerful nation, was ruled by white elites, it stood for the ideal of majority power around the world. After all, white elites made sure that American Power would best serve the white masses. This was true of FDR's New Deal(which would be called 'racist' today).

Indeed, the anti-imperialist struggles after WWII were premised on the notion that the majority natives should expel the minority imperialist elites from other nations and be led by their own elites of shared race and culture. So, Asian-Indians kicked out the Brits. And the Viets kicked out the French.

But in time, the US came to be ruled by the 'alien' Jewish minority elites who felt no sense of unity or identity with the white gentile masses. Jews were not only minority-by-class but minority-by-ethnicity.

Since Jewish minority power felt threatened by white gentile majority power, Jews re-engineered leftism to be more about minority privileges than about majority needs or the Will of the People. So, Jews not only promoted their own power but the interests of blacks, homos, and immigrants. Jews got burned by National Socialism, Communism(which eventually favored gentile majority against Jewish elites), and resurgent Russian majority nationalism since Putin era. So, Jews hate the idea of majority power(except in Israel where Jews are the majority).

But in the future, as the West becomes majority non-white, leftism might once again become a majority ideology. If white gentiles unite with non-white gentile majority, the 'new left' could be about gentile majority masses struggling against Jewish & homo minority elites.

Is the West really ruled by Liberal Democracy... or by the Fascist-Democracy of Zionist-Globalists?

It's been said Liberal Democracy has ruled the West.

If so, why does US take orders from Israel, a fascist-democracy?

Israel is democratic ethno-state. American Jews support Israel via AIPAC & Zionist-controlled media that favors Shabbos Goyim shills like Bush family, John McCain, Hillary, and etc.

Oddly enough, a 'liberal Democracy' takes orders from a fascist-democracy. Americans are ruled by ethnocentric Jews. In principle, the US may be a 'liberal democracy' but, in practice, takes orders from ethno-conscious rule of Jewish racialists.

If US, as a liberal democracy, takes orders from Jews & Israel who are committed to ethno-democracy, then fascism(that of Jews who are nationalist in Israel and globalist in goy nations) must be the most powerful force in the world. After all, the most powerful 'liberal democracy' submits to the will of a 'fascist-democracy'. If fascist-democratic Israel dictates orders to liberal-democratic US, then it means Jewish fascism is the reigning champion of World Power.

If liberal democracy is indeed dominant(as Western pundits always remind us), then Liberal Jews should insist on Israel dumping its fascist-democracy and becoming like the cucked EU. But the US as a 'liberal democracy' obeys Israel as a 'fascist-democracy', and Jews everywhere(US, UK, France, etc) want to keep it that way.

A fascist-democracy has elections & rule of law, but its core constitution is explicitly & thematically rooted in identity-heritage-territory. Israel is such a nation. A racial-cultural-national democracy.

Israel is a fascist-democracy like Turkey. US Jews push liberal democracy on whites but embrace ethno-democracy for themselves.

If US Jews are truly committed to the ideal of liberal democracy, they should apply the same pressure on Israel that they do on Poland and Hungary. But there is no Jewish pressure on Israel to accept refugees(or to give back Golan Heights back to Syria). Jewish 'liberals' pressure the smallest European nation to abandon its racial-national-territorial integrity and open up its legs to take in tons of Muslim and African invaders. But Jews, even 'liberal' ones in the West, fully support Israel's 'right to exist' as a racial-cultural-historical-territorial entity. When white gentile nations practice what Israel does, the Jewish-run press condemns them as 'fascist' and 'far right'. But when Jews do it, Jews expect(and demand) every US congressmen to pledge even more aid to Israel and uphold Israel's right to exist as a 'Jewish State'.

Well, by rules of logical consistency, if a certain policy is 'fascist' in Hungary or Poland, it must be 'fascist' in Israel as well. (Of course, Jews control the media and academia, thereby the Narrative and Political Logic. If Jews do what others do, it never reflects badly on Jews even if others are condemned for doing it. If Jews were to exterminate Palestinians like Nazis did with Jews, it would not be called a 'holocaust' by current Political Logic since Jews are judged differently from rest of mankind. Jews are above conventional morality. Also, if others were to do what Jews do, they could well be condemned for their 'extreme' and 'far right' tendencies. Israeli Jews can be nationalist, but if any white nation emulates such outlook, they will be condemned while, perversely enough, simultaneously being pressured to praise Israel's like-minded policy. Gentiles must say, "We condemn our own identity, territory, & history" while admiring Jews for upholding their identity, territory, & history. What a crazy world. It's the pretzel logic of Jews.)

Anyway, since American Jews and Israeli Jews are agreed on the need for Jewish identity, Jewish consciousness, and Jewish nationhood, they must be fascists. Since they rule America and the West, gentiles are not living under liberal democracy but under Jewish fascist democracy(because American liberal-democracy must defer to Jewish fascist-democracy).
Now, Jewish fascist-democracy is fine as long as Jews practice it for themselves in their own nation. But it is wrong, even evil, when Jews practice fascism over non-Jews. Each nation should have a fascist-democracy of its own. Hungary for Hungarians, Poland for Poles, just like Israel for Jews. But Jews not only want domination in Israel but in gentile nations. Jews know that fascist-democracy is a great formula for national unity, and so, they love it for Jewish Power and Israel. But they hate it for gentile nations because it implies Polish unity against Jewish control or Hungarian unity against the venal likes of George Soros. So, Jews push 'liberal democracy' on goyim while maintaining fascist-democracy for themselves.

Jewish War on Russia isn't about liberalism vs autocracy. It is Jewish ethno-centrism vs Russia nationalism. Jews are seething with hateful venom because Putin partly reversed what was done to Russia in the 90s: Jews raped & plundered the country and turned it into their whore. But Putin came along and wrested back some of the plunder and political control, and Jewish finance-imperialists hate him for that.

Jews fear that what Putin did for Russia may spread to other white nations. This is why Jews hate Trump. Even though Trump, like Putin, isn't anti-Jewish, his themes of Americanism vs globalism infuriates Jews since Jews use anti-nationalist globalism to weaken every gentile nation. (Of course, Jews support fascism and nationalism in Israel. Jews also subvert and empty Syria -- via refugee crisis -- to make room for Palestinians yet to be expelled from West Bank that shall ultimately be claimed entirely by Jews. Because nationalism and fascism are particularist, they are fine as long as they are confined within national borders. The problem is when it violates other national borders. Mixing particularism and universalism is like mixing oil and water. So-called globalist-liberal-democracy creates chaos and evil because its universalism is perverted by a particularist tribe that controls and manipulates the New World Order. So-called universal globalist-imperialism is really defined and controlled by particularist-fascist-Zionists who reserve a separate set of rules for themselves. Tragically, Jewish nationalist-fascism of Zionism is violating other borders. Jews control the US and use American money and military might to smash all Arab/Muslim nations hated by Israel. But Jews are so sneaky. Even though their wars have created the refugee crisis, they pretend to be 'humanitarians' by aiding the refugees get to the West.)

White Nationalists have most problem with globalist Jews, but their political ideal is closest to Israel, a fascist-ethno-democracy beloved by Jews.

Jews have hard fascist-democracy for themselves but push flaccid liberal-democracy on whites. Whites want fascist-democracy too in their own homelands.

Why is Finland doing better in education than Sweden?

Why Finland and not Sweden?

Is it due to genography? Sweden is safely situated and hasn’t been invaded for a long time. Even during WWII, it had little to worry about. It made a lot of money and it made even lot more money during the Cold War. So, Swedes seem to get carried away with leftist utopian dreams.

Finns might have ended up like the Swedes, but their geography put them right next to massive Russia. Finland had been conquered by Russia during Tsarist times, and the USSR attacked Finland during WWII, and Finns fought a bitter war and even lost some territory. And even after the peace, Finns had to be live with the knowledge that the USSR was right next door breathing down its neck. Indeed, it’s interesting that Finland was the ONLY European nation during the Cold War that was geographically attached to the Soviet Union but was NOT communist.

So, Finn geopolitics probably made them less naive about leftist fantasies of socialist utopia. With mighty Russian bear at its door, Finland probably maintained a sense of ‘conservative’ nationalism if only out of fear. If a nation is overly conservative, it can hold them back.
And if a nation is overly Liberal, it can foster all sorts of silly unrealistic utopian fantasies about what can be done to improve society.

But Finland seems to have been influenced by both Social-Democracy and awakened to nationalism(if only out of fear of big Russia). So, maybe Finns are politically and socially more realistic about humanity, ideas, and the world. There’s a balance that’s lacking in places like Sweden and Denmark.

Btw, since Liberals tell us that it’s so great for all those Mexicans to flood into America, are any of them saying that millions of poor Russians should flock to Finland to make the place more vibrant and diverse?

Politics is about Alliances as about Ideology

Politics is about alliances as about ‘ideology’.

If the elites form an alliance with homos to attack nationalists, it’s deemed wonderful.
But if the nationalists try to form an alliance with homos to halt multi-culti immigration, that is denounced as deplorable.

So, homo or anti-homo is less relevant than the nature of the alliance with the homo.

After all, the Lib elites would hardly endorse the kind of homo-fascist alliance that had existed during the days of the Nazi SA.

The issue of Islamism also depends on alliances. If globalist elites can use Muslim immigrants against European nationalism, that is deemed good. But if Christian Conservatives join with Muslims to oppose ‘gay marriage’, that is deemed bad, bad, and bad.

Look at the issue of China. It was a communist nation, but its alliance with the US against the USSR was seen as good. It wasn’t because Americans endorsed Maoism per se but endorsed using Maoism against the Soviet bear.

But then in the Ukraine, the likes of Victoria Nuland will even forge ties with Neo-Nazi types while branding Putin as the ‘new Hitler’. And the US, which suffered 9/11, is now allied with Alqaeda Jihadis in Syria to undermine Assad who is backed by Russia, nation that Jewish globalists hate most because it resists total Jewish takeover.